Nvidia quadro 640: GeForce GT 640 (OEM) | Specifications

10 января, 2021

GeForce GT 640 (OEM) | Specifications

Note: The below specifications represent this GPU as incorporated into NVIDIA’s reference graphics card design. Graphics card specifications may vary by Add-in-card manufacturer. Please refer to the Add-in-card manufacturers’ website for actual shipping specifications.

GPU Engine Specs:

Graphics card version GT 640
128-bit DDR3		 GT 640
192-bit DDR3		 GT 640
128-bitGDDR5
CUDA Cores 384 144 384
Graphics Clock (MHz) 797 720 950
Processor Clock (MHz) 797 1440 950
Texture Fill Rate (billion/sec) 25. 5 17 30.4

Memory Specs:

Memory Clock (MHz) 891 891 2500
Standard Memory Config 1 or 2GB DDR3 1.5 or 3GB DDR3 1 or 2GB GDDR5
Memory Interface Width 128-bit 192-bit 128-bit
Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec) 28.5 43 80

Feature Support:

OpenGL 4. 2 4.2 4.2
Bus Support PCI Express 3.0 PCI Express 2.0 PCI Express 3.0
Certified for Windows 7 Yes Yes Yes
Supported Technologies DirectX 11, CUDA, PhysX, 3DVision DirectX 11, CUDA, PhysX, SLI, 3DVision DirectX 11, CUDA, PhysX, 3DVision

Display Support:

Maximum Digital Resolution 3840×2160 3840×2160 2560×1600
Maximum VGA Resolution 2048×1536 2048×1536 2048×1536
HDCP Yes Yes Yes
HDMI Yes Yes Yes
Standard Display Connectors VGA, HDMI, DVI-D VGA, HDMI, DVI-I VGA, HDMI, DP
Audio Input for HDMI Internal Internal Internal

Standard Graphics Card Dimensions:

Length 5. 7 inches 5.7 inches 5.7 inches
Height 2.731 inches 4.38 inches 4.38 inches
Width Single slot Single slot Single slot

Thermal and Power Specs:

Maximum GPU Temperature (in C) 102 102 102
Maximum Graphics Card Power (W) 50 75 75

3D Vision Ready:

Yes3D Blu-Ray

Yes3D Gaming

Yes3D Photos

Nvidia Quadro 600 vs Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB: What is the difference?

19points

Nvidia Quadro 600

28points

Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

Comparison winner

vs

54 facts in comparison

Nvidia Quadro 600

Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

Why is Nvidia Quadro 600 better than Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB?

  • 25W lower TDP?
    40Wvs65W
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs?
    1vs0

Why is Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB better than Nvidia Quadro 600?

  • 406MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    1046MHzvs640MHz
  • 0. 45 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    0.69 TFLOPSvs0.25 TFLOPS
  • 4.66 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    7.22 GPixel/svs2.56 GPixel/s
  • 450MHz faster memory clock speed?
    1250MHzvs800MHz
  • 3400MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    5000MHzvs1600MHz
  • 18.6 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    28.8 GTexels/svs10.2 GTexels/s
  • 2x more VRAM?
    2GBvs1GB
  • 15.7GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    28.5GB/svs12.8GB/s

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Nvidia Quadro 600

vs

Nvidia Quadro K600

Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

Nvidia Quadro 600

vs

Nvidia Quadro 2000

Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

vs

AMD Radeon 530

Nvidia Quadro 600

vs

Nvidia Quadro 4000

Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

vs

AMD Radeon RX 470

Nvidia Quadro 600

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660

Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Nvidia Quadro 600

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

vs

AMD Radeon HD 6670

Nvidia Quadro 600

vs

MSI Radeon RX 570 Gaming 8GB

Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

vs

ATI Radeon HD 5570

Nvidia Quadro 600

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTS 450

Nvidia Quadro 600

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

vs

AMD Radeon R5

Nvidia Quadro 600

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

vs

Asus TUF GeForce GTX 1650 Super Gaming OC

Nvidia Quadro 600

vs

Nvidia Quadro K2000

Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

vs

Nvidia GeForce GT 620

Price comparison

User reviews

Performance

1. GPU clock speed

640MHz

1046MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia Quadro 600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB)

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

2.56 GPixel/s

7.22 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

0.25 TFLOPS

0.69 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

10.2 GTexels/s

28.8 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6. GPU memory speed

800MHz

1250MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

1600MHz

5000MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

12.8GB/s

28.5GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

128bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖Nvidia Quadro 600

✖Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔Nvidia Quadro 600

✔Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia Quadro 600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB)

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖Nvidia Quadro 600

✖Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔Nvidia Quadro 600

✔Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Nvidia Quadro 600

✖Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✖Nvidia Quadro 600

✔Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia Quadro 600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia Quadro 600)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Zotac GeForce GT 640 2GB)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro 600


Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

Buy on Amazon


vs

NVIDIA Quadro 600

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 25% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 640 MHz
  • 2.5x more texture fill rate: 25.5 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s
  • 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
  • 2.5x better floating-point performance: 612.1 gflops vs 245.76 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.932 vs 5.617
  • Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 254.345 vs 185.752
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.14 vs 0.444
  • Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.613 vs 8.848
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1502 vs 899
  • Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 2167 vs 1255
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 2037
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1502 vs 899
  • Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 2167 vs 1255
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 2037



















Launch date 24 April 2012 vs 13 December 2010
Core clock speed 797 MHz vs 640 MHz
Texture fill rate 25. 5 GTexel / s vs 10.24 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 96
Floating-point performance 612.1 gflops vs 245.76 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.932 vs 5.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 254.345 vs 185.752
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.14 vs 0.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.613 vs 8.848
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1502 vs 899
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 2167 vs 1255
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3334 vs 2037
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1502 vs 899
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 2167 vs 1255
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3334 vs 2037

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600

  • Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.137 vs 15.32



Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 16.137 vs 15.32

Compare benchmarks


GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 600












CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2


CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

254. 345

185.752

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2


CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

13.613


CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

16. 137

GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2

















Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM NVIDIA Quadro 600
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.932 5.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 254.345 185.752
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.14 0.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.613 8.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 15.32 16.137
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1502 899
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 2167 1255
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3334 2037
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1502 899
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 2167 1255
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3334 2037
PassMark — G3D Mark

548
PassMark — G2D Mark

229
Geekbench — OpenCL

1849

Compare specifications (specs)




























NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM NVIDIA Quadro 600
Architecture Kepler Fermi
Code name GK107 GF108
Launch date 24 April 2012 13 December 2010
Place in performance rating 1295 1349
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)

$179
Price now

$299
Value for money (0-100)

2. 80
Core clock speed 797 MHz 640 MHz
Floating-point performance 612.1 gflops 245.76 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 96
Texture fill rate 25.5 GTexel / s 10.24 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 40 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 585 million
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 145 mm 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None None
DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM


Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Buy on Amazon


vs

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 25% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 797 MHz
  • Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 31. 78 GTexel / s vs 25.5 GTexel / s
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
  • Around 66% better floating-point performance: 1,017 gflops vs 612.1 gflops
  • Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1782 MHz
  • 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 9.932
  • 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 vs 254.345
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 1.14
  • 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 vs 13.613
  • 9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 vs 15.32
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 1502
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2167
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3334
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 1502
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2167
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3334



















Launch date 18 August 2015 vs 24 April 2012
Core clock speed 993 MHz vs 797 MHz
Texture fill rate 31.78 GTexel / s vs 25.5 GTexel / s
Pipelines 512 vs 384
Floating-point performance 1,017 gflops vs 612.1 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 1782 MHz
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 38.33 vs 9.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 721.18 vs 254.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.056 vs 1.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 42.938 vs 13.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 137.786 vs 15.32
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4196 vs 1502
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 2167
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3334
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4196 vs 1502
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 2167
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3334

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

  • 1024x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB


Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB

Compare benchmarks


GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM












CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2


CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

721.18

254.345

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

42.938

13.613

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1
GPU 2

137.786


GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2


GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1
GPU 2














Name NVIDIA Quadro M1000M NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
PassMark — G3D Mark 2944
PassMark — G2D Mark 333
Geekbench — OpenCL 8849
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 38.33 9.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 721.18 254.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.056 1.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 42.938 13.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 137.786 15.32
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4196 1502
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3716 2167
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3334
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4196 1502
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3716 2167
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3334
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 1002

Compare specifications (specs)

























NVIDIA Quadro M1000M NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM107 GK107
Launch date 18 August 2015 24 April 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $200. 89
Place in performance rating 680 1295
Price now $203.37
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 16.10
Boost clock speed 1072 MHz
Core clock speed 993 MHz 797 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,017 gflops 612. 1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 512 384
Texture fill rate 31.78 GTexel / s 25.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 1,270 million
Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Port 1. 2
Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length

145 mm
DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 5.0
Vulkan
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB / 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 80 GB / s 28. 51 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 1782 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus

Nvidia GeForce GT 640 vs Nvidia Quadro P400

Nvidia GeForce GT 640 vs Nvidia Quadro P400

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GT 640 on one side and Nvidia Quadro P400 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 384 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0,9 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 256 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,3 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card

Nvidia GeForce GT 640

Nvidia Quadro P400
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
Release date

Q2 2012

Q1 2017
Model number

GK107-300-A2

Quadro P400
GPU name

GK107

GP107
Architecture

Kepler

Pascal
Generation

GeForce 600

Quadro Px000
Lithography

28 nm

14 nm
Transistors

1. 270.000.000

3.300.000.000
Bus interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock

902 MHz

1,23 GHz
GPU boost clock

902 MHz

1,25 GHz
Memory frequency

891 MHz

1.002 MHz
Effective memory speed

1,8 GB/s

4 GB/s
Memory size

2 GB

2 GB
Memory type

DDR3

GDDR5
Memory bus

128 Bit

64 Bit
Memory bandwidth

28,5 GB/s

32,1 GB/s
TDP

65 W

30 W
Suggested PSU 250W ATX Power Supply 200W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology

—

SLI
Outputs

1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x DisplayPort

3x mini-DisplayPort
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)

2

2
Shading units (cuda cores)

384

256
TMUs

32

16
ROPs

16

16
Cache memory

256 KB

512 KB
Pixel fillrate

7,2 GP/s

20,0 GP/s
Texture fillrate

28,9 GT/s

20,0 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)

692,7 GFLOPS

641 GFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)

28,9 GFLOPS

20,0 GFLOPS
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce GT 640

692,7
Nvidia Quadro P400

641

The difference is 8%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

Nvidia GeForce GT 640MNvidia GeForce GT 640M LENvidia GeForce GT 645Nvidia GeForce GT 645M

Nvidia Quadro P4000

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce GT 640 AMD equivalentNvidia Quadro P400 AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

GeForce GT 640 vs Quadro 4000 Graphics cards Comparison

In this comparison between GeForce GT 640 and Quadro 4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today’s games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards’ performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don’t overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 640 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GT 640

Check Price

Quadro 4000

Check Price

Main Specs

  GeForce GT 640 Quadro 4000
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 142 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
 

Check Price

Check Price
  • Quadro 4000 has 118% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640.
  • GeForce GT 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 4000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
  • GeForce GT 640 and Quadro 4000 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce GT 640 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 4000 — with Fermi.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GT 640 is 427 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
  • GeForce GT 640 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000 — by 40 nm process technology.
  • Quadro 4000 is 96 mm longer, than GeForce GT 640.
  • Memory clock speed of Quadro 4000 is 1026 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 2−3 6−7
ultra / 1080p 1−2 4−5
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 14−16 16−18
medium / 1080p 5−6 8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p 7−8 12−14
ultra / 1080p 5−6 10−11
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 20−22 24−27
medium / 1080p 7−8 12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p 50−55 45−50
high / 1080p 35−40 45−50
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p 110−120 130−140
medium / 768p 90−95 110−120
ultra / 1080p 45−50 50−55
QHD / 1440p 24−27 27−30
4K / 2160p 18−20 27−30
high / 768p 65−70 80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p 70−75 55−60
ultra / 1080p 21−24 18−20
medium / 1080p 45−50 45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 640 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p 70−75 80−85
medium / 768p 50−55 60−65
ultra / 1080p 27−30 30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p 3−4 8−9
ultra / 1080p 3−4 7−8
4K / 2160p 2−3 3−4
low / 720p 14−16 18−20
medium / 1080p 4−5 9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p 10−12 14−16
ultra / 1080p 5−6 10−11
QHD / 1440p 2−3 −
low / 720p 50−55 60−65
medium / 1080p 16−18 21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Fortnite is 28% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p 6−7 12−14
ultra / 1080p − 10−12
QHD / 1440p 4−5 1−2
4K / 2160p 2−3 −
low / 720p 21−24 24−27
medium / 1080p 9−10 14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p 45−50 50−55
medium / 768p − 45−50
high / 1080p 7−8 12−14
ultra / 1080p 3−4 6−7
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
medium / 720p 40−45 −
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p 2−3 5−6
ultra / 1080p 0−1 3−4
4K / 2160p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 8−9 12−14
medium / 1080p 4−5 6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p 80−85 95−100
high / 1080p − 90−95
ultra / 1080p 70−75 80−85
medium / 1080p − 90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Minecraft is 16% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p − 16−18
ultra / 1080p 12−14 14−16
low / 720p 27−30 30−35
medium / 1080p 14−16 18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce GT 640.
high / 1080p 6−7 −
ultra / 1080p 4−5 7−8
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 7−8 12−14
medium / 1080p − 10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p 14−16 24−27
medium / 768p 10−11 16−18
high / 1080p 5−6 9−10
ultra / 1080p 4−5 6−7
4K / 2160p 0−1 6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than GeForce GT 640.
low / 768p 70−75 85−90
medium / 768p 35−40 45−50
ultra / 1080p 16−18 18−20
high / 768p 30−35 35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than GeForce GT 640.

Full Specs

  GeForce GT 640 Quadro 4000
Architecture Kepler Fermi
Code name GK107 GF100
Type Desktop Workstation
Release date 5 June 2012 2 November 2010
Pipelines 384 256
Core clock speed 902 MHz 475 MHz
Transistor count 1,270 million 3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Texture fill rate 28. 86 15.20
Floating-point performance 692.7 gflops 486.4 gflops
Length 145 mm 241 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz 2808 MHz
Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB/s 89.86 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.1
Vulkan 1.1.126 N/A
CUDA 3.0 2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 24 Mh/s 44 Mh/s
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce GT 640 vs FireStream 9250
  • GeForce GT 640 vs Radeon RX Vega 3
  • Quadro 4000 vs FireStream 9250
  • Quadro 4000 vs Radeon RX Vega 3
  • GeForce GT 640 vs Radeon HD 7870M
  • GeForce GT 640 vs UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU
  • Quadro 4000 vs Radeon HD 7870M
  • Quadro 4000 vs UHD Graphics G7 Lakefield GT2 64 EU

0025 1046MHz vs 625MHz

  • 0. 32 TFLOPS above FLOPS?
    0.8 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 3.37 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    8.37 GPixel/s vs 5 GPixel/s
  • 13W below TDP?
    49W vs 62W
  • 602MHz faster memory speed?
    1252MHz vs 650MHz
  • 2408MHz higher effective clock speed?
    5008MHz vs 2600MHz
  • 192 more stream processors?
    384 vs 192
  • 100million more transistors?
    1270M vs 1170M

    • Why is Nvidia Quadro 2000 better than Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5?

    • 3.3 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
      20 GTexels/s vs 16.7 GTexels/s
    • 64bit wider memory bus?
      128bit vs 64bit
    • 16 more texture units (TMUs)?
      32 vs 16
    • 8 more ROPs?
      16 vs 8
    • 649 better PassMark (G3D)?
      1293 vs 644
    • 2 more DisplayPort outputs?
      2 vs 0
    • Has DPFP?

    What are the most popular comparisons?

    Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GT 430

    Nvidia Quadro 2000

    vs

    Nvidia Quadro K2000

    Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5

    vs

    Asus GeForce GTX 650

    Nvidia Quadro 2000

    vs

    Nvidia Quadro 4000

    Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5

    vs

    MSI GeForce GT 710 2GB

    Nvidia Quadro 2000

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

    Nvidia GeForce GT 5 640003

    vs

    AMD Radeon HD 7750

    Nvidia Quadro 2000

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5

    vs

    EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Nvidia Quadro 2000

    vs

    Nvidia Quadro 600

    Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5

    vs

    EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked

    Nvidia Quadro 2000

    vs

    Quadro 004 Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GT 640 OEM 192-bit DDR3 3GB

    Nvidia Quadro 2000

    vs

    Nvidia Quadro P4000

    Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 TI

    NVIDIA QUADRO 2000

    VS

    NVIDIA Q2000D

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 GDDR5

    VS

    AMD Radeon RX 460

    NVIDIA QUADRO 20000

    VS

    NVIDIA QUADRO M4000

    NVIDIA QUADRO 2000

    VS

    NVIDIA QUADRO M5000

    Classes

    Reviews

    GHP

    9000 higher clock frequency.

    2.turbo GPU

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia Quadro 2000)

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it may jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel rate

    8.37 GPixel/s

    5 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4.flops

    0.8 TFLOPS

    0.48 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

    5. texture size

    16.7 GTexels/s

    20 GTexels/s

    The number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    1252MHz

    650MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7. shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    5008MHz

    2600MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2. max memory bandwidth

    40GB/s

    41.6GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4. memory bus width

    128bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5.GDDR memory versions

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improves performance.

    6. Supports memory debug code

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5

    ✖Nvidia Quadro 2000

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5

    ✔Nvidia Quadro 2000

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5. GPU temperature at boot

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia Quadro 2000)

    Lower boot temperature — this means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5

    ✖Nvidia Quadro 2000

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7.Supports 3D

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5

    ✔Nvidia Quadro 2000

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5

    ✖Nvidia Quadro 2000

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5

    ✖Nvidia Quadro 2000

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia Quadro 2000)

    More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    3rd HDMI version

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GT 640 GDDR5)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia Quadro 2000)

    New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5.DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

    Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

    Price Match

    Cancel

    Which graphics cards are better?

    Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

    Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
    Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

    NVIDIA Quadro K2000

    versus

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

    Advantages

    Reasons to choose NVIDIA Quadro K2000

    • Reveal video card, the difference in the production dates of 8 MONTH (S)
    • The kernel frequency is about 6% more: 954 MHA VS 9002
    • 6% faster texturing speed: 30.53 GTexel / s vs 28.86 GTexel / s
    • 6% faster floating point performance: 732.7 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
    • Approximately 27% less power consumption: 51 Watt vs 65 Watt
    • 2. 2x faster memory frequency: 4000 MHz vs 1782 MHz
    • Approximately 31% more performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 1562 vs 1189
    • About 31% more performance in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 379 vs 289
    • About 34% more performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 4071 vs 3045
    • s) about 25% more: 14.327 vs 11.448
    • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 28% more: 265.424 vs 206.777
    • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 37% more: 1.078 vs 0.789
    • About 3% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) benchmark: 15.009 vs 14.637
    • About 80% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) benchmark: 37.514 vs 20.86
    • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 15% more: 2446 vs 2134
    • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) about 15% more: 2446 vs 2134
      • 9

      Issue date 1 March 2013 vs 5 June 2012
      Core frequency 954 MHz vs 902 MHz
      Texturing Speed ​​ 30. 53 GTexel/s vs 28.86 GTexel/s
      Floating point performance 732.7 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
      Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt vs 65 Watt
      Memory frequency 4000 MHz vs 1782 MHz
      PassMark — G3D Mark 1562 vs 1189
      PassMark — G2D Mark 379 vs 289
      Geekbench — OpenCL 4071 vs 3045
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.327 vs 11.448
      CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 265.424 vs 206.777
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.078 vs 0.789
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.009 vs 14.637
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 37.514 vs 20.86
      GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2446 vs 2134
      GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2446 vs 2134

      Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

      • About 46% more performance in GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 2375 vs 1631
      • About 6% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 (Frames — T-Rex) benchmark (Frames) more: 3328 vs 1974
      • GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) performance about 46% more: 2375 vs 1631
      • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) about 69% more: 3328 vs 1974
      GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 2375 vs 1631
      GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3328 vs 1974
      GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 2375 vs 1631
      GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3328 vs 1974

      Benchmark comparison

      GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
      GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

      PassMark — G3D Mark
      GPU 1
      GPU 2
      PassMark — G2D Mark
      GPU 1
      GPU 2
      Geekbench — OpenCL
      GPU 1
      GPU 2
      CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
      GPU 1
      GPU 2
      14.327
      11.448
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
      GPU 1
      GPU 2
      265.424
      206.777
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)
      GPU 1
      GPU 2
      CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)
      GPU 1
      GPU 2
      15.009
      14.637
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
      GPU 1
      GPU 2
      37.514
      GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
      GPU 1
      GPU 2
      GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)
      GPU 1
      GPU 2
      GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
      GPU 1
      GPU 2
      GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
      GPU 1
      GPU 2
      GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)
      GPU 1
      GPU 2
      GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps)
      GPU 1
      GPU 2
      Name NVIDIA Quadro K2000 NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
      PassMark — G3D Mark 1562 1189
      PassMark — G2D Mark 379 289
      Geekbench — OpenCL 4071 3045
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14. 327 11.448
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 265.424 206.777
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.078 0.789
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.009 14.637
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 37.514 20.86
      GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2446 2134
      GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 1631 2375
      GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 1974 3328
      GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2446 2134
      GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 1631 2375
      GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 1974 3328
      3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 0 1565

      Feature comparison

      NVIDIA Quadro K2000 NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
      Architecture Kepler Kepler
      Codename GK107 GK107
      Issue date March 1, 2013 5 June 2012
      Price at first issue date $599 $99
      Place in the ranking 1097 1081
      Price now $164. 99 $59.99
      Type Workstation Desktop
      Price/performance ratio (0-100) 11.74 25.25
      Core frequency 954MHz 902 MHz
      Floating point performance 732.7 gflops 692.7 gflops
      Process 28nm 28nm
      Number of shaders 384 384
      Texturing Speed ​​ 30. 53 GTexel/s 28.86 GTexel/s
      Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 65 Watt
      Number of transistors 1,270 million 1,270 million
      Video connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
      Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
      Length 202 mm 145mm
      Additional power connectors None None
      DirectX 12. 0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
      OpenGL 4.6 4.6
      Vulcan
      Maximum memory size 2GB 2GB
      Memory bandwidth 64GB/s 28.51 GB/s
      Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
      Memory frequency 4000MHz 1782 MHz
      Memory type GDDR5 DDR3

      Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev.

      2 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000G

      Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000G by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
      Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

      NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

      versus

      NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000G

      Benefits

      Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev.

      2

      • Newer graphics card, release date difference 9 year(s) 10 month(s)
      • 2.6x faster core clock: 1046 MHz vs 400 MHz
      • 5.2x faster texturing speed: 16.74 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
      • A newer production process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 28 nm vs 130 nm
      • 4 times the maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
      • 5.9 times the memory frequency: 5008 MHz vs 850 MHz
      Release date 29 May 2013 vs 22 July 2003
      Core frequency 1046 MHz vs 400 MHz
      Texturing Speed ​​ 16.74 GTexel/s vs 3.2 GTexel/s
      Process 28 nm vs 130 nm
      Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 256 MB
      Memory frequency 5008 MHz vs 850 MHz

      Benchmark comparison

      GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
      GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000G

      Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000G
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.475
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 173.537
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.032
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 8.717
      CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 10. 454
      GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2309
      GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3354
      GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3220
      GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2309
      GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3354
      GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3220

      Feature comparison

      NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000G
      Architecture Kepler 2.0 Rankine
      Codename GK208 NV35
      Issue date 29 May 2013 July 22, 2003
      Price at first issue date $89
      Place in the ranking 1194 not rated
      Type Desktop Workstation
      Core frequency 1046MHz 400MHz
      Floating point performance 803. 3 gflops
      Process 28nm 130 nm
      Number of shaders 384
      Texturing Speed ​​ 16.74 GTexel/s 3.2 GTexel/s
      Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt
      Number of transistors 135 million
      Video connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA 2x DVI, 1x S-Video
      Interface PCIe 2. 0 x8 AGP 8x
      Length 145mm
      Additional power connectors None 1x Molex
      DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 9.0a
      OpenGL 4.6 1.5 (2.1)
      Maximum memory size 1GB 256MB
      Memory bandwidth 40.06GB/s 27.2 GB/s
      Memory bus width 64 Bit 256 Bit
      Memory frequency 5008MHz 850 MHz
      Memory type GDDR5 DDR

      Video card PNY QUADRO 600 640MHZ PCI-E 2.

      0 1024MB in Ufa: 62-TOVARA: Free delivery, Discount-14% [Cross]

      Partnership program Wizard

      Ufalog

      Catalog 9000 footwear

      Clothing and footwear

      Building materials

      Building materials

      Textiles and leather

      Textiles and leather 9Ol000

      Furniture and interior

      Industry

      Industry

      Agriculture

      Agriculture

      All categories

      95W incl. VL), Active, 111.76 mm H x 266.7 L, Dual Slot, Full Height, Retail

      MORE DETAILSMore prices and similar items

      Professional graphics card Quadro 600 Q600 1U PCI-E DDR3 for 3D modeling and gears, low draw baffle, video card

      DETAILSMore prices and similar items

      Video card Palit PCI-E PA-GT1030 2GD4 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2048Mb 64 DDR4 11503

      HDMIxCP low profile1 HDMIx10003

      More than prices and similar goods

      HP Video card (PCI-E/ QUADRO NVS 315/ 1024MB GDDR3/ DMS-59/ 64BIT) OEM E1U66AA 9000 Supermicro Inc. Nvidia Quadro RTX4000, 8GB GDDR6, PCI-E 3.0 x16, 3x DP 1.4, 1x USB-C, single width (GPU-NVQRTX4000-EU)

      DETAILSMore prices and similar items

      PNY -E/NVIDIA

      more than prices and similar goods

      16 193

      19045

      Video card PCI-E PNY T400 (VCNT400BLK-1) 2GB GDDR6 64BIT 14NM 1.04 TFLOPS 3*MDP

      out of 3

      nVidia Quadro rtx4000, p4000, m4000, p620, nvs510 and other professional video cards

      nVidia Quadro rtx4000 (8GB GDDR5 256-bit 416 GBps / 2304 WDA) — 1025$ / 2304 WDA
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_rtx4000_Datasheet.pdf
      nVidia Quadro p4000 (8GB GDDR5 256-bit 243 GBps / 1792CUDA / 105W / 2017) — $800
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_p4000_Datasheet.pdf
      nVidia Quadro p2200 (5GB GDDR5 160-bit 200 GBps / 1280 CUDA / 75W / 2019) — $600
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_p2200_Datasheet. pdf
      nVidia Quadro p2000 (5GB GDDR5 160-bit 140 GBps / 1024 CUDA / 75W / 2017) — $450
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_p2000_Datasheet.pdf
      nVidia Quadro m4000 (8GB GDDR5 256-bit 192 GBps / 1664 CUDA / 120W / 2016) — $400
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_m4000_Datasheet.pdf
      nVidia Quadro t1000 (4GB GDDR6 128-bit 160 GBps / 896CUDA / 50W / 2021) — 400$
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_t1000_Datasheet.pdf
      nVidia Quadro t600 (4GB GDDR6 128-bit 160 GBps / 640 CUDA / 40W / 2021) — $300
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_t600_Datasheet.pdf
      nVidia Quadro p1000 (4GB GDDR5 128-bit 82 GBps / 640 CUDA / 47W / 2017) — $250
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_p1000_Datasheet.pdf
      nVidia Quadro p620 (2GB GDDR5 128-bit 80 GBps / 512 CUDA / 40W / 2018) — $220
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_p620_Datasheet.pdf
      nVidia Quadro m2000 (4GB GDDR5 128-bit 106 GBps / 768 CUDA / 75W / 2016) — $200
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_m2000_Datasheet.pdf
      nVidia Quadro p400 (2GB GDDR5 64-bit 32 GBps / 256 CUDA / 30W / 2017) — $120
      www. brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_p400_Datasheet.pdf
      nVidia Quadro NVS 510 (2GB DDR3 128-bit 28.5 GBps/ 192CUDA / 35W / 2012) — 80$
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_nvs510_Datasheet.pdf
      nVidia Quadro NVS 450 (512MB GDDR3 64-bit 11.2 GBps / 16 CUDA / 35W / 2008) — $30
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_nvs450_Datasheet.pdf
      nVidia Quadro NVS 440 (256MB / 2009 / Dual DMS-59) — $25
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_nvs440_Datasheet.pdf
      PCI-E nVidia Quadro NVS 310 (512MB 64-bit 14 GBps / 19.5W / 2012 / 2x Display Port) — $30
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_nvs310_Datasheet.pdf
      PCI-E nVidia Quadro NVS 300 (512MB DDR3 64-bit 12.6 GBps / 17.5W / DMS-59) — 15$
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_nvs300_Datasheet.pdf
      PCI-E nVidia Quadro NVS 290 (256MB GDDR3 64-bit 6.4 GBps / 21W / DMS-59) — $10
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Quadro_nvs290_Datasheet.pdf
      nVidia Quadro 3D Workstation Professional Graphics Solutions
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Pro_Graphics_Line_Cards_2013.pdf
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Pro_Graphics_Line_Cards_2014. pdf
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Pro_Graphics_Line_Cards_2015.pdf
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Pro_Graphics_Line_Cards_2016.pdf
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Pro_Graphics_Line_Cards_2017.pdf
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Pro_Graphics_Line_Cards_2018.pdf
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Pro_Graphics_Line_Cards_2019.pdf
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Pro_Graphics_Line_Cards_2020.pdf
      www.brandexim.com/pdf/nVidia/Pro_Graphics_Line_Cards_2021.pdf
      Modern graphics cards www.nvidia.com/en-us/design-visualization/desktop-graphics/
      Attention! For graphics cards with DMS-59 output, you need to purchase
      additional adapter DMS-59 to Dual DVI-I — 5$
      The nVidia Quadro line of graphics cards is designed for professional 3D applications for design, construction, modeling, animation, visualization, video and image editing, art design, such as:
      Adobe After Effects
      Adobe Media Encoder
      Adobe Premiere Pro
      Adobe Photoshop
      Adobe Illustrator
      Allegorithmic Substance Designer
      Allegorithmic Substance Painter
      Altair HyperWorks
      ANSYS Workbench, ANSYS AIM and HFSS
      ANSYS Mechanical Fluent
      Autodesk 3ds Max
      Autodesk AutoCAD
      Autodesk Inventor
      Autodesk Maya
      Autodesk MoldFlow
      Autodesk Revit
      Autodesk Showcase
      Autodesk VRED
      Avid Media Composer
      CEI EnSight
      COMSOL
      Dassault Systmes 3DEXCITE DELTAGEN / DELTAVIEW
      Dassault Systmes CATIA V5-6 and 3DEXPERIENCE
      Dassault Systmes CATIA Live Rendering
      Dassault Systmes SIMULIA Abaqus
      Dassault Systmes SIMULIA CST STUDIO
      Dassault Systmes SOLIDWORKS
      Dassault Systmes SOLIDWORKS Visualize
      ESI Group IC. IDO
      EXA PowerViz
      Grass Valley Edius
      LS-PrePost
      Lumiscaphe P3D Design
      MathWorks MATLAB
      Magix Vegas Pro
      Maxon CINEMA 4D
      MSC Nastran, Patran, Apex, ADAMS
      NewTek Lightwave
      PTC Creo
      Side Effects Houdini
      Siemens CD-adapco STAR-CCM+
      Siemens NX
      Siemens NX + Ray Traced Studio (Iray)
      Siemens PLM Solid Edge
      Siemens SimCenter, NX CAE, FEMAP, NX Nastran
      Ascon KOMPAS-3D
      TopSystems T-FLEX CAD
      Please do not confuse these video cards with the nVidia GeForce gaming line.
      All characteristics in the documentation at the links.
      ————————————————— ————————————————— —
      The price includes VAT. Video cards used, except for items marked New! 9

      Contacts:
      • +373 69 200305

      invite the seller

      Sent

      , disconnect advertising

      NVIDIA 3000m

      NVIDIA Quadro 3000M — 27 secret facts, review, specifications, reviews.

      Top specifications and features

      • Passmark score
      • 3DMark Vantage Performance test score
      • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark score
      • GPU base clock
      • RAM

      Passmark test score

      NVIDIA Quadro 3000M:
      1003
      Best score:
      29325

      Performance

      NVIDIA Quadro 3000M:
      1522
      Best score:

      Memory

      NVIDIA Quadro 3000M:
      172
      Best score:

      General Information

      NVIDIA Quadro 3000M:
      523
      Best score:

      NVIDIA Quadro 3000M features:
      156
      Best score:

      Description

      NVIDIA Quadro 3000M graphics card based on Fermi architecture has 1950 million transistors, tech. 40 nm process. The frequency of the graphics core is 450 MHz. In terms of memory, 2 GB is installed here. DDR5, 625MHz frequency and 80Gb/s maximum bandwidth. The texture size is 18 GTexels/s. FLOPS is 433.7.

      In tests, the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M video card performed as follows — according to the Passmark benchmark, the model scored 1003 points. At the same time, the maximum number of points for today is 260261 points.
      Directx version — 12. OpenGL version — 4.6. Regarding cooling, here the heat dissipation requirement is 75 watts.
      In our tests, the video card scores 10607 points.

      Why NVIDIA Quadro 3000M is better than others

      Has no merit

      • Passmark 1003 score. This parameter is lower than 49%
      • 3DMark Vantage Performance score 7782 . This parameter is lower than 27%
      • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score 1508 . This setting is lower than 35%
      • GPU base clock speed 450 MHz. This parameter is lower than 77%
      • RAM 2 GB. This parameter is lower than 54%
      • 80 GB/s memory bandwidth. This parameter is lower than that of 54%
      • Effective memory speed 625 MHz. This parameter is lower than 60%
      • GPU memory frequency 625 MHz. This parameter is lower than that of 69%

      NVIDIA Quadro 3000M Overview

      Performance

      Memory

      general information

      Functions

      Tests in benchmarks

      NVIDIA Quadro 3000M Review: Highlights


      GPU base clock

      The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.

      450MHz

      max 2457

      Average: 938 MHz

      2457MHz


      GPU memory frequency

      This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth

      625MHz

      max 16000

      Average: 1326. 6 MHz

      16000MHz


      FLOPS

      A measure of the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.

      433.7TFLOPS

      max 1142.32

      Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

      1142.32TFLOPS


      Texture size

      A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
      Show all

      18 GTexels/s

      max 756.8

      Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

      756.8 GTexels/s


      Architecture name

      Fermi


      GPU Name

      GF104


      Shared memory

      No


      Memory bandwidth

      This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.

      80GB/s

      max 2656

      Average: 198.3 GB/s

      2656GB/s


      Effective memory speed

      The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
      Show all

      625MHz

      max 19500

      Average: 6984.5 MHz

      19500MHz


      RAM

      2GB

      max 128

      Average: 4.6 GB

      128GB


      GDDR Memory Versions

      Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
      Show all

      5

      Average: 4. 5

      6


      Memory bus width

      A wide memory bus indicates that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
      Show all

      256bit

      max 8192

      Average: 290.1bit

      8192bit


      Release date

      2011-02-22 00:00:00

      Mean value:


      Thermal Dissipation (TDP)

      The Thermal Dissipation Requirements (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
      Show all

      75W

      Average: 140.4W

      2W


      Process technology

      The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

      40 nm

      Average: 47.5 nm

      4 nm


      Number of transistors

      1950 million

      max 80000

      Average: 5043 million

      80000 million


      Purpose

      Mobile Workstations


      DirectX

      Used in demanding games, providing enhanced graphics

      12

      max 12.2

      Average: 11.1

      12.2


      OpenCL version

      Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
      Show all

      1.1

      max 4.6

      Average: 1. 7

      4.6


      opengl version

      Later versions provide better game graphics

      4.6

      max 4.6

      Average: 4

      4.6


      Shader model version

      5.1

      max 6.6

      Average: 5.5

      6.6


      CUDA Version

      2.1


      Passmark test score

      1003

      max 29325

      Average: 7628.6

      29325


      3DMark 11 performance benchmark score GPU

      1508

      max 57937

      Average: 18799.9

      57937


      3DMark Vantage Performance score

      7782

      max 97887

      Average: 37830. 6

      97887


      Octane Render test score OctaneBench

      13

      max 125

      Average: 47.1

      125

      FAQ

      How much RAM does NVIDIA Quadro 3000M have

      NVIDIA Quadro 3000M has 2 GB.

      What version of RAM does NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

      NVIDIA Quadro 3000M support GDDR5.

      What is the architecture of NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

      Fermi.

      Watts of NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

      75 watts.

      How NVIDIA Quadro 3000M performs in benchmarks

      In the Passmark benchmark, the video card scored 1003 points.

      NVIDIA Quadro 3000M FLOPS

      433.7 TFLOPs.

      Which version of DirectX does the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M support?

      DirectX 12.

      Does the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M support CUDA?

      2.1.

      When was the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M released?

      2011-02-22 00:00:00.