Intel i7 socket 1155 list: Lga1155 Socket CPU — Pangoly

10 января, 2021

Socket LGA 1155 – CPU list, Xeon, specs and recommendations

Home » Intel CPUs




Published by: Modified by: Category: Intel CPUs



The LGA 1155 socket is a CPU socket designed by Intel Corporation for their second-generation Core i3, i5, and i7 processors based on the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture. The socket supports dual-channel DDR3 memory and is used on motherboards based on the Intel 6-series chipset. Later, it was also used with third-generation Core processors based on the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture. In this article, we will explore the features and differences between these two microarchitectures and their impact on performance. In this article, we will explore the features and differences between these two microarchitectures, list the processors compatible with the LGA 1155 socket, and recommend the best choice for upgrading or replacing.

Architectures and features of LGA 1155

Socket LGA 1155 on a motherboard

Socket was a popular choice for users looking to build a system based on the Sandy Bridge or Ivy Bridge microarchitecture. SandyB was the first to introduce the Ring Bus system architecture and integrated graphics, while Ivy Bridge improved performance and power efficiency with a refined architecture and a new graphics architecture.

Sandy Bridge

SandyBridge was released in 2011 and was the successor to the Nehalem microarchitecture. It was the first to feature Intel’s new “Ring Bus” system architecture, which improved performance by allowing the processor cores to communicate with each other more efficiently. It also introduced Intel’s Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) instruction set, which improved performance for floating-point intensive applications.

Microarchitecture featured Intel’s 32-nanometer process technology and integrated graphics on the processor die, which was a significant improvement over previous generations. It also introduced the Turbo Boost feature, which allowed the processor to dynamically increase its clock speed when additional performance was required.

Ivy Bridge

Ivy Bridge was released in 2012 and was the successor to the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture. It was based on the same 22-nanometer process technology as the previous generation, but featured a refined architecture that improved performance and power efficiency. It also introduced Intel’s Tri-Gate transistor technology, which allowed for better control of the flow of electricity within the processor.

One of the significant improvements in Ivy Bridge was the integrated graphics, which had twice the performance of the Sandy Bridge graphics. It also featured a new instruction set called Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions (AES-NI), which improved performance for encryption and decryption tasks. Ivy Bridge also introduced support for PCI Express 3.0, which doubled the bandwidth of the previous generation.

Differences between Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge

The most significant difference between Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge is the manufacturing process. Ivy Bridge uses a 22-nanometer process technology, which allows for more transistors to be packed into a smaller space, improving performance and power efficiency. It also introduces support for PCI Express 3.0, which offers twice the bandwidth of PCI Express 2.0.

Ivy Bridge also introduces a new graphics architecture, which offers better performance and efficiency than the Sandy Bridge graphics. Additionally, Ivy Bridge features new instruction sets, such as AVX2 and FMA3, which offer improved performance for mathematical and scientific applications.

Full list of processors for LGA 1155 socket and specs

How to determine Sandy Bridge or Ivy Bridge?

For Core series models, you can determine the architecture by the model number:

Sandy Bridge – the number starts with 2: Core i3 2100, Core i5 2300, etc.

Ivy Bridge – the number starts with 3: Core i3 3210, Core i5 3330, etc.

Below is a table with the main characteristics of all existing processors for the 1155 socket (excluding server Xeons, for which we have created a separate table below).

CPU Name Frequency Core Threads Cache memory Process TDP Graphics Launch Date
Intel Core i7-3770K 3.50 GHz 4 8 8 MB 22nm 77W Intel HD Graphics 4000 2012
Intel Core i3-3250 3.50 GHz 2 4 3 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2013
Intel Core i3-2130 3.40 GHz 2 4 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2000 2011
Intel Core i5-3570K 3.40 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 77W Intel HD Graphics 4000 2012
Intel Core i3-3240 3. 40 GHz 2 4 3 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Core i5-3570 3.40 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 77W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Core i7-3770 3.40 GHz 4 8 8 MB 22nm 77W Intel HD Graphics 4000 2012
Intel Core i3-3245 3.40 GHz 2 4 3 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 4000 2013
Intel Core i3-2120 3.30 GHz 2 4 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2000 2011
Intel Core i3-2125 3.30 GHz 2 4 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 3000 2011
Intel Core i5-3550 3.30 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 77W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Core i3-3225 3. 30 GHz 2 4 3 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 4000 2012
Intel Core i3-3220 3.30 GHz 2 4 3 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Pentium G2140 3.30 GHz 2 2 3 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 2rd 2013
Intel Core i5-3470 3.20 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 77W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Pentium G2130 3.20 GHz 2 2 3 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 2rd 2013
Intel Core i3-3210 3.20 GHz 2 4 3 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2013
Intel Core i3-2100 3.10 GHz 2 4 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2000 2011
Intel Core i3-2102 3. 10 GHz 2 4 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2000 2011
Intel Pentium G870 3.10 GHz 2 2 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2012
Intel Core i3-2105 3.10 GHz 2 4 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 3000 2011
Intel Core i5-3450 3.10 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 77W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Core i7-3770S 3.10 GHz 4 8 8 MB 22nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 4000 2012
Intel Pentium G2120 3.10 GHz 2 2 3 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 2rd 2012
Intel Core i5-3570S 3.10 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Core i5-3350P 3. 10 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 69W 2012
Intel Core i5-3340 3.10 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 77W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2013
Intel Pentium G860 3.00 GHz 2 2 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2011
Intel Core i5-3330 3.00 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 77W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Core i5-3550S 3.00 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Core i3-3250T 3.00 GHz 2 4 3 MB 22nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2013
Intel Pentium G2030 3.00 GHz 2 2 3 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 2rd 2013
Intel Pentium G850 2. 90 GHz 2 2 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2011
Intel Core i5-3475S 2.90 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 4000 2012
Intel Core i5-3470T 2.90 GHz 2 4 3 MB 22nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Core i3-3240T 2.90 GHz 2 4 3 MB 22nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Core i5-3470S 2.90 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Pentium G645 2.90 GHz 2 2 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2012
Intel Pentium G2020 2.90 GHz 2 2 3 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 2rd 2013
Intel Pentium G640 2. 80 GHz 2 2 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2012
Intel Pentium G840 2.80 GHz 2 2 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2011
Intel Core i5-3450S 2.80 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Core i3-3220T 2.80 GHz 2 4 3 MB 22nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Pentium G2010 2.80 GHz 2 2 3 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 2rd 2013
Intel Core i5-3340S 2.80 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2013
Intel Celeron G1630 2.80 GHz 2 2 2 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 2rd 2013
Intel Core i5-2390T 2. 70 GHz 2 4 3 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2000 2011
Intel Pentium G630 2.70 GHz 2 2 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2011
Intel Pentium G632 2.70 GHz 2 2 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2011
Intel Core i5-3330S 2.70 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Celeron G555 2.70 GHz 2 2 2 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2012
Intel Celeron G1620 2.70 GHz 2 2 2 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 2rd 2013
Intel Pentium G2120T 2.70 GHz 2 2 3 MB 22nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2rd 2013
Intel Celeron G550 2. 60 GHz 2 2 2 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2012
Intel Core i3-2120T 2.60 GHz 2 4 3 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2000 2011
Intel Pentium G620 2.60 GHz 2 2 3 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2011
Intel Pentium G2100T 2.60 GHz 2 2 3 MB 22nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 3rd 2012
Intel Pentium G860T 2.60 GHz 2 2 3 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2012
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz 2 2 2 MB 22nm 55W Intel HD Graphics 2rd 2013
Intel Pentium G2030T 2.60 GHz 2 2 3 MB 22nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2rd 2013
Intel Celeron G540 2. 50 GHz 2 2 2 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2011
Intel Core i3-2100T 2.50 GHz 2 4 3 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2000 2011
Intel Core i5-2405S 2.50 GHz 4 4 6 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 3000 2011
Intel Core i7-3770T 2.50 GHz 4 8 8 MB 22nm 45W Intel HD Graphics 4000 2012
Intel Pentium G645T 2.50 GHz 2 2 3 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2012
Intel Pentium G2020T 2.50 GHz 2 2 3 MB 22nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2rd 2013
Intel Celeron G530 2.40 GHz 2 2 2 MB 32nm 65W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2011
Intel Pentium G640T 2. 40 GHz 2 2 3 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2012
Intel Celeron G1620T 2.40 GHz 2 2 2 MB 22nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2rd 2013
Intel Pentium G630T 2.30 GHz 2 2 3 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2011
Intel Core i5-3570T 2.30 GHz 4 4 6 MB 22nm 45W Intel HD Graphics 2500 2012
Intel Celeron G1610T 2.30 GHz 2 2 2 MB 22nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2rd 2013
Intel Celeron G550T 2.20 GHz 2 2 2 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2012
Intel Pentium G620T 2.20 GHz 2 2 3 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2011
Intel Celeron G540T 2. 10 GHz 2 2 2 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2012
Intel Celeron G530T 2.00 GHz 2 2 2 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2011
Intel Celeron G470 2.00 GHz 1 2 1.5 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2013
Intel Celeron G465 1.90 GHz 1 2 1.5 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2012
Intel Celeron G460 1.80 GHz 1 2 1.5 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2011
Intel Celeron G440 1.60 GHz 1 1 1 MB 32nm 35W Intel HD Graphics 2nd 2011

List Xeon processors supporting LGA 1155

Processor Model Cores / Threads Max Frequency Cache TDP Process PCI Express
Intel Xeon E3-1281 v3 4 / 8 4. 10 GHz 8 MB 82W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1286 v3 4 / 8 4.10 GHz 8 MB 84W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 4 / 8 4.00 GHz 8 MB 82W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1285 v3 4 / 8 4.00 GHz 8 MB 84W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1271 v3 4 / 8 4.00 GHz 8 MB 80W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1286L v3 4 / 8 4.00 GHz 8 MB 65W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1276 v3 4 / 8 4.00 GHz 8 MB 84W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 4 / 8 3.90 GHz 8 MB 80W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 4 / 8 3.90 GHz 8 MB 84W 22 nm 3. 0
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v3 4 / 8 3.90 GHz 8 MB 65W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1275L v3 4 / 8 3.90 GHz 8 MB 45W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 4 / 8 3.90 GHz 8 MB 80W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3 4 / 8 3.90 GHz 8 MB 84W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 4 / 8 3.80 GHz 8 MB 80W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3 4 / 8 3.80 GHz 8 MB 84W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 4 / 8 3.80 GHz 8 MB 80W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 4 / 8 3.80 GHz 6 MB 65W 14 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4 4 / 8 3. 80 GHz 6 MB 95W 14 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 4 / 8 3.70 GHz 8 MB 80W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 4 / 8 3.70 GHz 8 MB 45W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1226 v3 4 / 4 3.70 GHz 8 MB 84W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 4 / 4 3.60 GHz 8 MB 84W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 4 / 4 3.50 GHz 8 MB 80W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v4 4 / 8 3.30 GHz 6 MB 35W 14 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3 4 / 8 3.00 GHz 8 MB 25W 22 nm 3.0
Intel Xeon E3-1230L v3 4 / 8 2.80 GHz 8 MB 25W 22 nm 3. 0
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3 2 / 4 1.50 GHz 4 MB 13W 22 nm 3.0

Which processors are the best to choose for LGA 1155 socket?

The most powerful processors that support LGA 1155 socket are Core i7 3770K and Core i7 2700K. Their approximate cost is $100 and above. There is also a good processor, the i5 2500K (about $60-80), but it only has 4 threads. If you are currently reading this article, you are probably looking to upgrade or restore your computer on a tight budget, in which case you can go for the Core i7 2600K (around $40) or the Xeon E3 1230v2, Xeon 1240v2, and Xeon 1270 v2 (these Xeons do not support overclocking, but can compete with Core i7 3770). If you have a motherboard that supports overclocking, then you can consider the Xeon E3 1230, 1240, and 1270. Xeon processors can be purchased from $10 and up.

For example, here is the cost on Amazon – Xeon E3 127.

Below is a table with specifications and examples of regular LGA 1155 processors:

Processor Model Cores/Threads Clock Speed Turbo Boost L3 Cache Process Graphics Price (USD)
Core i7 2700K 4/8 3. 5 GHz 3.9 GHz 8 MB 32 nm HD 3000

~100

Check price
Core i7 3770K 4/8 3.5 GHz 3.9 GHz 8 MB 22 nm HD 4000

~120

Check price
Core i7 2600K 4/8 3.4 GHz 3.8 GHz 8 MB 32 nm HD 3000

~40-150

Check price
Core i5 2500K 4/4 3.3 GHz 3.7 GHz 6 MB 32 nm HD 3000

~60-80

Check price

Here’s the table with the characteristics of Xeon E3 1230, 1240, and 1270, as well as Xeon E3 1230v2, 1240v2, and 1270v2 processors:

Processor Model Cores/Threads Clock Speed Turbo Boost L3 Cache Process Graphics Price (USD)
Xeon E3 1230 4/8 3. 2 GHz 3.6 GHz 8 MB 32 nm Intel HD 3000

~10-40

Check price
Xeon E3 1240 4/8 3.3 GHz 3.7 GHz 8 MB 32 nm Intel HD 3000

~10-40

Check price
Xeon E3 1270 4/8 3.4 GHz 3.8 GHz 8 MB 32 nm Intel HD 3000

~10-40

Check price
Xeon E3 1230v2 4/8 3.3 GHz 3.7 GHz 8 MB 22 nm Intel HD 4000

~60-80

Check price
Xeon E3 1240v2 4/8 3.4 GHz 3.8 GHz 8 MB 22 nm Intel HD 4000

~80-100

Check price
Xeon E3 1270v2 4/8 3.5 GHz 3.9 GHz 8 MB 22 nm Intel HD P4000

~120-150

Check price

*We cannot provide exact links to the products as the processors are outdated and limited in stock, but we have provided the average fair prices.

Denis B.

Author and developer of the website

For many years, I have been following the PC and component market, building computers, and constantly improving my expertise in this field. With my website, I aim to share my knowledge and provide helpful guides and advice for those interested in building and upgrading their own computers.


0








5 Best LGA 1155 CPUs (2022 Review)

Your CPU is the most important part of your PC. Whether you use your PC for gaming, programming, or other purposes, the overall performance of your PC and its suitability for your demands hinge largely on your CPU. This explains why you must invest in a top-notch CPU if you’re looking for flawless performance from your PC.

Best LGA 1155 CPUs: Our Top 5 Picks

If your motherboard bears an LGA 1155 socket, then it goes without saying that you must shop for a matching CPU. LGA 1155 CPUs abound on the market, but not all are worth your money. In fact, making the right choice can be a huge challenge if you don’t have the right information.

Thankfully, we have made the selection easier for you. Our research team spent several hours scouring the market for LGA 1155 CPUs and comparing them in a bid to figure out the best.

And here are our top contenders:

1. Intel Core i7-3770 Quad-Core Processor

Check Price on Amazon.com

 

Specifications

  • Core Name: Ivy Bridge
  • No of Cores: Quad-Core
  • Operating Frequency: 3.4 GHz
  • Max Turbo Frequency: 3.9 GHz
  • Max Memory Bandwidth: 25.6GB
  • DMI: 5 GT/s
  • L2 Cache: 4 x 256KB
  • L3 Cache: 8MB
  • Manufacturing Tech: 22nm
  • 64-Bit Support: Yes
  • Hyper-Threading Support: Yes
  • Virtualization Technology Support: Yes
  • Integrated Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 4000
  • Graphics Base Frequency: 650 MHz
  • Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency: 1. 15 GHz
  • Thermal Design Power: 77W
  • Cooling Device: Heatsink and fan included
  • Warranty: 3-year limited warranty on parts/labor

Our Review

The Intel Core i7-3770 Processor packs an impressive line of specs sure to provide you with the best performance and operating speeds. Its 22nm 3-D Tri-Gate processor delivers an exceptional combination of power efficiency and performance.

To maintain energy and operate intelligently, this processor features a new generation Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0. Normally, the Intel Turbo Boost automatically increases the processor’s operating frequency allowing for smoother performance when running demanding tasks. In this processor, the feature performs even better, allowing for a more impressive automatic speed increase by boosting the processor core speed above the base operating frequency to allow demanding applications to run effortlessly.

Another impressive upgrade here is the Hyper-Threading Technology, which delivers thread-level parallelism which boosts the processing throughput and improves performance on current and future multi-threaded software.

For efficiency and speed, the Intel Core i7-3770 Processor comes with 3.4 GHz processing frequency, which does pretty well with demanding software. Coupled with its 4 (Quad-Core) processing core, the processor offers smooth performance for regular users and heavy users alike.

Moving on, you get to level 2 and level 3 Intel Smart Cache which allows for faster memory sharing among different execution cores. Unlike the L1 (level 1) cache built onto the microprocessor itself. The L2 and L3 are built on a separate chip, which increases the efficiency and speed at which each of the cores accesses data. The L2 measures 4 x 256KB while the L3 has a larger memory size of 8MB

What’s more, the Intel Core i7-3770 Processor packs impressive visual features that deliver an outstanding visual experience. Fast media processing on this unit is brought by Intel Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) and Intel Quick Sync Video.

For discrete 3D graphics performance, the processor comes with built-in Intel HD Graphics with DirectX 11 support. Other graphics features include the Intel Clear Video Technology which enhances image quality, video playback, and color fidelity. It also comes with InTRU 3D technology which supports 3D Blu-ray playback in 1080p resolution.

Pros

  • Heatsink and fan included.
  • Low power consumption.
  • Hyper-threading support.

Cons

  • Graphics features could be improved.

2. Intel Core i7-2600 Processor

Check Price on Amazon.com

 

Specifications

  • CPU Socket Type: LGA 1155
  • Core Name: Sandy Bridge
  • No of Cores: Quad-Core
  • Operating Frequency: 3. 4 GHz
  • Max Turbo Frequency: 3.8 GHz
  • L3 Cache: 8MB
  • Manufacturing Tech: 32nm
  • 64-Bit Support: Yes
  • Hyper-Threading Support: Yes
  • Virtualization Technology Support: Yes
  • Integrated Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 2000
  • Graphics Base Frequency: 850 MHz
  • Thermal Design Power: 95W
  • Warranty: 3-year limited warranty on parts/labor

Our Review

Featuring a 32nm manufacturing tech, the Intel Core i7-2600 Processor provides high-performance allowing for better power efficiency and increased operating speeds. This is one of the few processors from Intel designed specifically for digital video making, so it comes with many graphic enhancements to meet almost every need. For speed, it packs a 3.4 GHz operating frequency which is just enough for even the most demanding tasks. You’d still get to boost its operating speed to 3.8 GHz, which is the turbo max speed.

For memory processing and delivery, the quad-core processor comes with three cache components. The first has a memory size of 256 KB, the second is larger and accepts up to 1 MB, and the third features an 8 MB memory capacity.

There are many other impressive enhancements on this Intel Core i7-2600 Processor which you won’t find in older processors. Some of these features including a DMI speed of 5.0 GT/s, AES New Instruction, Flex Memory Access, Hyper-Threading, and Fast Memory Access.

There are impressive graphic upgrades here that allow for a seamless visual experience. For a start, the processor comes with a graphics max dynamic frequency of 1. 35 GHz, and a graphics base frequency of 850 MHz. To allow for multitasking and smooth performance, Intel includes several useful graphic enhancements including HD Graphics, Turbo Boost, Quick Sync Video, Integrated Graphics, Intel FDI, Clear Video HD, Intel FDI, HD Graphics, and Intru 3D technology.

Overall, the Intel Core i7-2600 Processor does very well due to an abundance of features. With this processor, you will enjoy clear and steady graphics for a bunch of tasks including playing games. In addition to all that, the processor consumes less power for low system cost. On your PC, it would only consume 95W, which is pretty impressive considering the specs it packs.

Pros

  • Decent CPU performance.
  • Virtualization technology support.
  • Hyper-threading capability.

Cons

  • Features 32nm manufacturing tech.

3. Intel Core i5-3570 Ivy Bridge Quad-Core Processor

Check Price on Amazon. com

 

Specifications

  • CPU Socket Type: LGA 1155
  • Core Name: Ivy Bridge
  • No of Cores: Quad-Core
  • Operating Frequency: 3.4 GHz
  • Max Turbo Boost Frequency: 3.8 GHz
  • DMI: 5 GT/s
  • L2 Cache: 4 x 256KB
  • L3 Cache: 6MB
  • Manufacturing Tech: 22nm
  • 64–Bit Support: Yes
  • Hyper–Threading Support: No
  • Memory Types: DDR3 1600
  • Virtualization Technology Support: Yes
  • Integrated Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 2500
  • Graphics Base Frequency: 650 MHz
  • Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency: 1. 15 GHz
  • Multimedia Instruction: SSE4.1/4.2, AVX
  • Thermal Design Power: 77W
  • Cooling Device: Heatsink and fan included
  • Warranty: 3-year limited warranty on parts/labor

Our Review

The Intel Core i5-3570 is your best shot if you’re looking for a processor with high performance and expanded capabilities. With an operating frequency of 3.4 GHz, this processor delivers the smoothest experience even when multitasking. Its max turbo boost frequency of 3.8 GHz allows for much better performance when running demanding tasks. Its 22nm tech allows it to do more when it comes to power efficiency, performance, and optimization. While this processor lacks the Intel Hyper-Threading Technology, it does perform well with what it comes with.

To process memory, the processor offers two cache components. The first accepts up to 4 x 256 KB while the second accepts up to 6MB.  More on memory, the Intel Core i5-3570 packs a max memory size of 32 GB which allows for memory types including DDR3 1333/1600. It supports two memory channels with its second maximum memory clocking at 25.6 GB/s. This allows data to be stored by the processor as a semiconductor memory. The quad-processor does not support ECC memory but you should be able to make do with what it offers.

This processor offers a bunch of graphic improvements which makes for the best visual experience.  Its features Intel” HD Graphic 2500 and offer a graphics base frequency of 650 MHz with the graphics max dynamic frequency clocking at 1.15 GHz. More graphics enhancements include Intel Quick Sync Video, Intel Clear Video HD Technology, Intel Flexible Display Interface (Intel FDI), Intel Intru 3D Technology, and support for up to 3 displays.

Intel does well to include several security enhancements in this unit. It features security and reliability specifications like Anti-Theft Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Intel Trusted Execution Technology and Secure Key.

Lastly, this processor consumes less power with a thermal design power consumption of 77 W when operating at base frequency.

Pros

  • Virtualization technology support.
  • Impressive graphic specs.
  • Low power consumption.

Cons

  • No hyper-threading support.

4. Intel Core i3-3250 Ivy Bridge Dual-Core Processor

Check Price on Amazon.com

 

Specifications

  • CPU Socket Type: LGA 1155
  • Core Name: Ivy Bridge
  • No of Cores: Dual-Core
  • Operating Frequency: 3.5 GHz
  • DMI: 5 GT/s
  • L3 Cache: 3MB
  • Manufacturing Tech: 22nm
  • 64–Bit Support: Yes
  • Hyper–Threading Support: Yes
  • Virtualization Technology Support: Yes
  • Integrated Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 2500
  • Graphics Base Frequency: 650 MHz
  • Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency: 1. 05 GHz
  • Multimedia Instruction: SSE4.1/4.2, AVX
  • Thermal Design Power: 55W
  • Cooling Device: Heatsink and fan included
  • Warranty: 3-year limited warranty on parts/labor

Our Review

The Intel Core i3-3250 Ivy Bridge Dual-Core 3.5 GHz LGA 1155 is designed specifically to handle basic tasks so you will not find high-end features like Turbo Boost and Intel vPro Platform Eligibility in this unit.

Nevertheless, it does pack some impressive specs like a clock speed of 3.5 GHz and Intel Hyper-Threading Technology. This will handle basic tasks without lag, ensure smooth performance for some demanding tasks, and use less power with a thermal design power of 55 W when operating at base frequency.

Its feature lineup includes a cache memory size of 3 MB. While this is very small, it is just enough for most of your basic tasks. The dual-core processor also features a bus speed of 5 GT/s.

The memory specifications are pretty much the same so you should still expect a nice performance. The max memory size specification is 32GB and it also supports a max of 2 memory channels.

Its graphics specs are probably the most impressive. Here, you will find processor graphic features like Intel HD Graphics 2500, a graphics base frequency of 650 MHz, graphics max dynamic frequency of 1.05 MHz, Intel Quick Sync Video, Intel Intru 3D Technology, Intel FDI (Flexible Display Interface), and Intel Clear Video HD Technology.

The Intel Core i3-3250 Processor doesn’t come with as many security and reliable specs as the i5 and i7 cores. Its lack Secure Key, Intel Trusted Execution Technology, and Intel AES New Instructions features. For security and reliability, you only get Execute Disable Bit and Anti-Theft Technology.

Pros

  • Perfect for basic tasks.
  • Impressive graphic features.
  • Low power consumption.

Cons

  • Few security features.

5. Intel Core i5-3470 Ivy Bridge Quad-Core Processor

Check Price on Amazon.com

 

Specifications

  • CPU Socket Type: LGA 1155
  • Core Name: Ivy Bridge
  • No of Cores: Quad-Core
  • No of Threads: 4
  • Operating Frequency: 3.2 GHz
  • Max Turbo Frequency: 3.6 GHz
  • L2 Cache: 4 x 256KB
  • L3 Cache: 6MB
  • Manufacturing Tech: 22nm
  • 64–Bit Support: Yes
  • Hyper–Threading Support: No
  • Virtualization Technology Support: Yes
  • Integrated Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 2500
  • Graphics Base Frequency: 650 MHz
  • Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency: 1. 1 GHz
  • Thermal Design Power: 77W
  • Cooling Device: Heatsink and fan included
  • Warranty: 3-year limited warranty on parts/labor

Our Review

If you’re looking for an LGA 1155 CPU for everyday tasks, then the Intel Core i5-3470 Processor would make for the best buy. Though it doesn’t match up to Intel Core i7 processors, it offers some impressive features that should allow for optimal performance and endurance. Overall, it is an efficient processor with a reasonable price tag.

The Intel Core i5-3470 comes with a clocking speed of 3.2 GHz which is good enough for everyday tasks. You will enjoy a smoother experience while multitasking due to the Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0, which allows for a frequency of 3.60 GHz. Another performance-boosting feature is its cache memory size of 6 MB. This allows for fast memory processing and delivery.

As with most Intel processors, the Intel Core i5-3470 offers an impressive line of graphic enhancements that should boost your visual experience. The graphics lineup is very much identical to the ones above. It features Intel Graphic 2500, Intel Quick Sync Video, Intel Intru 3D Technology, Intel Flexible Display Interface, and Intel Clear Video HD Technology. It also offers a graphic base frequency of 350 MHz and graphic max dynamic frequency 1.10 GHz.

When it comes to security and reliability features, Intel does not disappoint. The Intel Core i5-3470 packs several features in this area including Intel AES New Instructions, Secure Key, Intel Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit, and Anti-Theft Technology.

Finally, considering its specifications, the Intel Core i5-3470 doesn’t draw that much power during use. It only consumes about 77 W when used at base frequency.

Pros

  • Decent performance.
  • Top-notch graphics.
  • Low thermal power consumption.

Cons

  • No hyper-threading support.

Related

  • 5 Best LGA 1155 CPUs (2022 Review)
  • 5 Best LGA 1151 CPUs (2022 Review)
  • 7 Best External Hard Drives for Desktop PCs (2022 Review)

Core i5 and i7 processors in LGA1155 design

Finally, the long-awaited moment has come when you can get acquainted with the performance of Intel processors for the new LGA1155 platform! True, just like last year, it fell exactly on holidays, but that’s okay — after recovering from the rest, the more interesting it is to go to the store 🙂 By the way, not only the date makes today’s event related to the announcement of processors based on the Clarkdale core a year ago. The fact is that the story with LGA1156 is essentially repeating itself — the announcement of new processors is stretched over several stages. Today we will learn all the details about the quad-core models of the Sandy Bridge architecture, but more affordable dual-core models will have to wait for almost a month and a half. «People’s» Pentiums do not even fall into the first quarter.

But still, one and a half — not four, Pentium will appear much more than one, prices for them are expected to be more humane than for a single processor (well, one and a half) of this family under LGA1156, and Celeron are visible on the horizon: in a word, in the company took into account the experience of the «stretched start» LGA1156 and most likely will not make such mistakes. Thus, starting from the second or third quarter of this year, LGA1155 will finally allow to abolish the healed LGA775 construct, and by the end of the year will also do away with LGA1156. But for some time these three platforms will exist in parallel, which, coupled with the surviving LGA1366 (and it will definitely live until the end of the year), will only increase the confusion on the market. However, these are the harsh realities of the modern market and we can hardly change them in any way. It remains only to carefully study everything and always make the right choice 🙂

There will be no theoretical part today. The fact is that we already had materials on this topic, and more detailed studies of microarchitecture are just around the corner. In general, we will not beat the bread from the theorists 🙂 Also, for now, we will leave behind the scenes the issue of performance and functionality of the graphics core — this is also a separate and serious topic, which we will return to for a detailed study in the near future. At the moment, the main thing is to study the performance of the processor part itself and compare it with competing products from both Intel and AMD. To what we propose and go.

Test bench configuration

Cache L1, I/ D, KB

9 0022

Processor Core i5-2300 Core i5-2400 Core i5-2500/2500K Core i7-2600/2600K
Core name Sandy Bridge Sandy Bridge Sandy Bridge Sandy Bridge
Technology 32 nm 32 nm 32 nm 32 nm
Core frequency (std/max), GHz 2. 8/3.1 3.1/3.4 3.3/3.7 3.4/3.8
Starting multiplier 28 31 33 34
Turbo Boost pattern 012 4-3-2-1 32/32 32/32 32/32 32/32
L2 cache, KB 4×256 9 0013

4×256 4×256 4×256
L3 Cache, MiB 6 6 6 8
RAM 2×DDR3- 1333 2×DDR3-1333 2×DDR3-1333 2×DDR3 -1333
GMA HD Graphics Core 2000 2000 2000/3000 2000/3000
Graphics core frequency (max), MHz 1100 1100 1100 1350
Socket LGA1155 LGA1155 LGA1155 LGA1155
TDP 95W 95W 95W 95W
Price $275(12) $236(24) $229(43)/N/A(2) $340(32)/N/A(4)
Wholesale price at time of announcement $177 $184 $205/$216 $294/ $317

In the family of processors under LGA1156, two processors of the Core i7 line and only one Core i5 first appeared, but now the ratio is reversed — one to three. The explanation is simple: the older Core i7-800s are still on the market and have adequate performance, so don’t bother them too much. But the Core i5 is too motley company, which includes fast, but devoid of graphics processors of the 700th series and equipped with graphics, but rather weak (due to only two cores) Core i5-600. It is this imbalance that Intel decided to eliminate in the first place. Note that now Core i5 is is always four cores, and the «old» two-core/four-thread variant is only present in the cheaper Core i3 family. But these processors will be released a little later, since now the Core i3-500 is not so bad.

What does the performance comparison show? If earlier the Core i5-700 and Core i7-800 differed only in the presence / absence of Hyper-Threading support and frequencies, now the differences have become a little deeper: the i5 also has less cache memory. Moreover, the line is built in an interesting way — the step of the starting clock frequencies is uneven, but here at the maximum frequency in the boost mode “everything is right”: a hundred in the index is equal to 300 MHz of the clock frequency. A very serious difference, since both Intel and AMD have already accustomed us to the fact that neighboring processors in the line differ only by one multiplier. It is still difficult to say whether the concept will continue in the future or whether the company will go to tighten the ranks, so we will postpone this issue for the future. In our opinion, «do not part» is very useful — there are already too many processors on the market, in which it is too easy to get confused. But there may be some progress — otherwise the Core i5-2300 looks a bit strange, whose price is only slightly lower than that of the 2400, but the clock frequency lag is greater than the difference between the older models. Unless in one-two-threaded applications, it is reduced, but there are fewer and fewer of them. Moreover, the presence of background processes “votes” in favor of multithreading, which sometimes require not so few computing resources (and some of these background applications have also become multithreaded).

But with the Turbo Boost mode itself somehow … More was expected. And the maximum increase has decreased to 400 MHz (do not forget that one «new» step is equal to 3/4 of the old one), and the dependence on the number of working cores has not gone away, although there were rumors that now it is possible to increase the frequency of all cores to the maximum. The only significant change is that now processors have the right to overclock «to the last»: the boost mode is allowed to the TDP level (it used to be turned off at a lower limit), and if necessary, for a short time — even higher. Thus, a certain increase in performance under heavy load should be observed. Which one, let’s check.

The main thing for overclockers is that Turbo Boost in the new incarnation also supports such a feature as «Limited Unlocked Core» — the ability to set multipliers to «Max Turbo +4». That is, in other words, according to the Intel documentation, a completely ordinary Core i7-2500 will be able to operate at a frequency of 3. 9 GHz when all cores are loaded, and when only one is loaded, it will even reach a frequency of 4.1 GHz! The reality turned out to be even more interesting — the Gigabyte board, on which we tested the new family, of course, limited the multipliers, but … But for the 2600, for example, the maximum value (namely 42) could be set for any number of active cores, i.e., with a flick of the wrist, a 3.4 GHz processor turns into a 4.2 GHz model. And we have strong suspicions that other boards based on the P67 chipset (with the possible exception of those made by Intel itself) will behave in the same way.

P67 boards also support «Fully Unlocked Core», which allows using a multiplier up to 57 in any mode. However, this requires a K-series processor. Note that they are of interest not only to overclockers (and maybe not so much to them: as shown above, you can add 700-800 MHz on conventional processors): the K-series uses the HD 3000 series video core, but in conventional models — only only HD 2000, in which half of the execution modules are disabled. Thus, these processors will also be extremely useful for fans of integrated graphics, who will use them on motherboards based on the H67 chipset. But on the P67, it will not work to use the built-in video core (since there is no FDI link in it), but it will be possible to fully «retreat» during overclocking, as mentioned above. Moreover, when overclocking not only cores, but also memory: despite the fact that the officially supported maximum mode is DDR3-1333, this is true only for H67. On the P67, higher multipliers are also available, which gives memory frequencies up to 2133 MHz. And the TDP level on these boards can be adjusted manually, increasing it during overclocking or, conversely, reducing it to save energy (which was previously available only for extreme processors). In general, when developing processors and chipsets for LGA1155, Intel took into account all past experience, putting things in order in their comparative positioning 🙂 9 Core i5-680 Core i5-760 Core i7-880 Core i7-975 Extreme Core i7-980X Extreme Core name Clarkdale Lynnfield Lynnfield Bloomfield Gulftown Technology 32/45 nm 45 nm 45 nm 45 nm 32 nm Core frequency (std/max), GHz 33/3. 6 Starting multiplication factor 27 21 23 25 25

90 022

Turbo Boost diagram 2-1 4-4-1-1 5-4-2-2 2-1-1-1 2-1-1-1-1-1 Cores/Threads 2/4 4/4 4/8 4/8 6/12 L1 cache, I/D, KB 32/32 32/32 32 /32 32/32 32/32 L2 cache, KB 2×256 4×256 4×2 56 4×256 6×256 Cache L3, MiB 4 8 8 8 12 UnCore frequency, GHz 2.4 2.13 2.4 2.66 2.66 2×DDR3-1333 2×DDR3-1333 2×DDR3 -1333 3×DDR3-1066 3×DDR3-1066 Graphics core frequency, MHz 733 —

9001 2 — — — Socket LGA1156 LGA1156 LGA1156 LGA1366 LGA1366 TDP 73W 95W 95W 130W 1 30 W Price N/A(2) N/A(4) N/A(1) N/A(2) N/A(1)

As expected when testing a new family of processors, there will be more competitors than test subjects. Especially competitors produced in the same factories. The company of Intel processors we selected at first glance looks too colorful, but the selection logic is simple — the table (from left to right) shows:

  1. The fastest processor for LGA1156 equipped with a graphics core (it costs, by the way, like the Core i7-2600)
  2. The fastest Core i5 of the previous generation (has the same starting frequency as the new Core i5-2300, price — as Core i5-2500)
  3. The fastest Core i7 for LGA1156
  4. The fastest quad-core x86 processor
  5. In general, the fastest x86 processor 🙂

The last two models, of course, we need mainly out of curiosity — any LGA1155 processor announced today is not ashamed to lose to them 🙂 However, there are serious suspicions that the «extreme» i7-9 will loseThe Core i7-2600 won’t be able to achieve 75 Extreme (no matter how hard it tries), but a comparison with the i7-980X in a wide range of applications is of considerable interest.

900 12 Thuban

90 012 2×DDR3-1333

Processor Phenom II X4 970 Phenom II X6 1090T
Core name Deneb
Technology 45 nm 45 nm
Frequency cores (std/max), GHz 3.5 3.2/3.6
Starting multiplier 17.5 16
Turbo CORE operation scheme — 3-3-3 -0-0-0
Number of cores/threads 4/4 6/6
L1 cache, I/D, KB 64/64 64/64
L2 cache, KB 4×512 6×512
L3 cache, MiB 6 6
UnCore frequency, GHz 2.0 2.0
RAM 2×DDR3-1333
Graphics core frequency, MHz — —
socket 12 125 W
Price N/A(0) N/A(0)

Now let’s move on to AMD. It is obvious that when the heavy equipment of the “blue” enters the battlefield, only guerrilla warfare and ambush actions remain “green”. In any case, this situation will last until the Superwaffe, codenamed «Bulldozer», rolls out of the laboratories, but there is quite a lot of time left until that moment. Today we will not touch the «Green partisans», in the form of hordes of various Athlon IIs, but we will consider a couple of «tank ambushes». The first will be Phenom II X4 9 already familiar to our readers.70 is the fastest guaranteed quad-core processor on the market (Core i7-2600 only reaches 3.5 GHz in boost mode, and others are not capable of that either). As the second — Phenom II X6 1090T. The launch of this line last spring allowed the company to return to the $200-$300 market segment again, as the processors very successfully occupied a niche between the older Core i5 and younger Core i7 — let’s see if they manage to maintain their positions taking into account the renewal of the product range Intel. To be fair, both the X4 and X6 families are expecting replenishment in the near future (more precisely, 1100T appeared at the end of last year, and 975 — now), but since we are talking about only a slight increase in the clock frequency, it is obvious that the presence of slightly more productive ones than the ones used will not change the qualitative picture.

Motherboard RAM
LGA1155 Gigabyte P67A-UD5 (P67) Kingston KVR1333D3N9K3/6G (2×1333; 9-9-9-24)
LGA1156 Gigabyte P55A-UD6 (P55) Kingston KVR1333D3N9K3/6G (2×1333; 9-9-9-24)
LGA1366 Intel DX58SO (X58) Kingston KVR1333D3N9K3/ 6G (3×1333; 9-9-9-24)
AM3 Gigabyte 890FXA-UD7 (AMD 890FX) Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (2×1333; 7-7-7-20-1T, Unganged Mode)

Testing

Performance testing methodology (list of software used and testing conditions) is described in detail in a separate article. For ease of perception, the results on the diagrams are presented in percentages (the result of AMD Athlon II X4 620 is taken as 100% in each of the tests). Detailed results in absolute terms are available as a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel format.

3D visualization

The very first group of programs — and the first discoveries. As we already know, these tasks do not require a large number of computational threads, so the speed with which these same threads (in the amount of two or three) are «run» through the processor comes first. That is, in other words, this is exactly the area where architecture optimizations can have the best effect. And they did — already the Core i5-2300 (the youngest and cheapest) overtook all the processors that we tested earlier. Including extreme Core i7-975, which no one has been able to beat in this test so far. The remaining representatives of the new architecture, for obvious reasons, are even faster, so there is simply no one to compete with them.

3D rendering

It seems to us that Sandy Bridge will have the last word in these tasks when the new AVX vector instruction set is supported in programs. So far, this is “pure” mathematics, and very well parallelized, so the more computation threads, the better: the force breaks straw. However, the high efficiency of each computation thread affects here as well. In particular, the new Core i5 is faster than the old ones with the same number of cores and at a comparable clock frequency by 10 percent (looking at the diagram, do not forget that the i5-760 in boost mode runs at a frequency of 2.93 GHz, while the i5-2300 is only 2.9 GHz). But the transition to a thinner process technology allows the new processors to run at higher frequencies, so they can compete with both the old Core i7 and the six-core Phenom II X6. And with the latter — even despite their higher frequency;) However, there are no miracles in the world, so six-core Core i7 are out of reach, but they are much more expensive. Therefore, the second place of the Core i7-2600 is actually not a defeat, but a brilliant victory.

Scientific and engineering computing

Another basically low-flow group with a few multi-thread interspersed that distinguishes it from the first. But not much — the first two places were taken by processors under LGA1155 (the first was shared by as many as two, which once again shows that Hyper-Threading technology is still far from «free»), and the «penny» Core i5-2300 lost only to «multi-ruble» extreme processors of previous families.

Graphic editors

As we have already written more than once, the applications included in this group have very different preferences: Adobe Photoshop «loves» a lot of calculation threads, while the three «amateur» programs do not need them (and even interfere at times). Well, since there are three of them for one, it is not surprising that the dual-core (but high-frequency) Core i5-600 showed very good summary results earlier. Only extremals gave out more, where there are a lot of cores, and the frequencies are also rather big. «Family 2000» suits these programs even better, and in Photoshop its results are very good — here you have new leaders. In particular, the Core i7-2600 shocked, which almost caught up with the much more expensive six-core Core i7-9 in the Adobe software package.70, and in the three remaining applications it simply has no competitors. The Core i5-2400 in them also showed a similar performance to the Core i5-680 (previously leading), but outperformed it in Photoshop by almost a factor of one and a half, which allowed this inexpensive model to take its place among the former leaders in terms of the totality of results. The Core i5-2500 is understandably faster than them and only behind the Core i7-2600. In general, only the youngest Core i5-2300 did not shake the imagination. Although if you remember that its wholesale price is only $ 177, and it “didn’t shock” against the background of processors for a whole hundred (or even all four — if you remember how much the Core i7-880 costs, to which the “baby” from the new line somewhat closer than to the equal frequency Core i5-760) more expensive dollars, this is also just a wonderful result.

Archivers

7-Zip is able to use as many cores as it finds, all three subtests strongly «like» a large amount of cache memory, and the latter seems to be only interested in it — in general, it’s not surprising that here are the new Core i5 did not perform as well as in the previous groups: only four threads and a cache reduced to 6 MB make themselves felt. But «not perfect» does not mean bad — they easily bypassed all AMD processors and managed to reach about the level of the old Core i7, which cost about a hundred more. But the new Core i7-2600 has Hyper-Threading support and 8 MB cache, so its only competitor is the extreme Core i7-980X (even 975 is slower).

Compiling

Visual Studio turned out to be not the most loyal application to new processors, apparently due to the fact that the compilation task was already one of the best optimized ones. However, the Core i5-2300 slightly outperformed the Core i5-760: taking into account the smaller cache memory capacity (which is of considerable importance in this test) of the new product, this deserves a positive assessment. The increase (albeit small) is actually of strategic importance — as we remember, earlier in this program the Phenom II X6 were very good, located above the Core i5 and with older models reaching the younger Core i7. And now? And now with compilation quad-core (and «honest» — without any Hyper-Threading) Core i5-2400 copes with exactly the same speed as six-core Phenom II X6 1055T (albeit the youngest in the family, but more expensive)! And the next model with the 1075T index is not far behind, only one point ahead of the Core i5-2500. The older models, as we can see, are still faster than even the new Core i5 and they can already be compared with the old Intel processor at the $294 bar, but the new one for the same money has galloped far ahead, and is only behind six-core processors of the Intel itself. Moreover, it cannot be said that it is very noticeable — some 10% separates it from the current extreme Core i7-980X.

Java

But SPECjvm was a bit of a surprise, since we’re used to citing this test as a good example of multi-core optimization. However, apparently, its capabilities extend to an area with eight to ten streams, but no more. While processors with a different number of cores competed, but based on similar architectures, this gave an obvious priority to more multi-threaded models, but as soon as we started comparing models with different efficiency per thread … In general, Core i7-980X is still the fastest, but the advantage over the Core i7-2600 has become purely formal. Well, the Core i5-2400 somehow «didn’t notice» that the Core i7-880 supports twice as many computational threads and has a close clock speed, and almost caught up with it 🙂 The 970 was faster than any Core i5, and the Phenom II X6 1090T outperformed any Core i7-800. Now Phenom II X4 970 is slower than all Core i5 for LGA1155, and Phenom II X6 1090T is behind the Core i5 -2500. And it’s not surprising that with the new Core i7 for LGA1155, AMD’s six-core processors can no longer compete in terms of performance.

Internet browsers

Previously, this group of applications was the most loyal to the Phenom II X4, since even the model with the 965 index bypassed all Intel processors. Now, as we can see, even the Core i5-2300 can repeat the results of the past tops, the Core i5-2400 outperforms the Phenom II X4 965 and only slightly falls short of 970, while the 2500 and 2600 are simply the fastest on the market. Without any reservations 🙂 However, as we have said more than once, from a practical point of view, it makes no sense to attach great importance to the results of these tests on top processors, but from a research point of view, we mark with a tick that, perhaps, the last group has disappeared, where AMD processors held the lead.

Audio Encoding

Another group of applications that can benefit greatly from the introduction of AVX over time, but so far operates only with «old» code. In addition, as has been said more than once, the testing conditions favor processors that are capable of simultaneously executing a large number of computation threads to the greatest extent. Therefore, at first glance, the new Core i5 is not so good here. But if you look closely, it becomes obvious that this is the level of the «old» Core i7 or Phenom II X6, i.e. more expensive CPUs. In any case, earlier, not a single quad-core crystal scored 150 points here, and now three are gaining more at once. The Core i7-2600, as one would expect, takes an honorable second place, trailing only the six-core (and twelve-thread) Core i7-980X.

Video encoding

Similar to the previous picture. Only now the gap between 2600 and 980X has become larger, but it can be done — after all, devices of completely different price classes. The main thing is that new devices are able to defeat not only direct competitors, but also processors that are one step higher.

Games

Even this group of applications has run out of stagnation. After which we started to run into a far from the slowest video card — for example, in Stalker and Resident Evil 5, all new processors showed the same results 🙂 Which, it should be noted, turned out to be much higher than all the old ones. In general, the question of finding the best gaming processor, perhaps, should be considered resolved in all cases where you can spend more than $ 150 on a purchase — such is the Core i5-2300. Or, if finances are not so pitiful, then the Core i5-2400, which costs quite a bit more, but “keeps” at the level of former extreme sportsmen. Top-end video cards or multi-GPUs remain “behind the scenes”, but here, as it seems to us, the question of the price of the processor is not decisive. Moreover, even the Core i7-2600 is not too expensive. And you can also overclock it by 400-800 MHz if you wish … Or pay just a little extra for 2600K and overclock it even more. Or save a hundred and do the same procedure with the Core i5-2500K 🙂 In general, the only choice will be for those who need a fast processor for games for $ 100 or who, on principle, want to take something very expensive.

Total

There was a time when the older Phenom II X4 models were sold at a price of about $300, but the introduction of the Core i5-750 «driven» all AMD processors into the «under $200» price niche. The company was able to get out of it only by releasing the Phenom II X6. Now, it looks like history is repeating itself: already six-core Phenom IIs should be sold at prices not exceeding $200 — to the delight of some fans, but to the dismay of shareholders. (After all, it is obvious that quad-core processors manufactured according to the 32 nm process technology are cheaper in production than six-core ones at 45 nm, despite the presence of a video core in the first ones.) So it will be interesting to see how the «green» get out of this situation — before the release of Bulldozer- there is still quite a lot of time left.

Another family of processors was not so lucky. Yes, in fact, the Core i5-600 can be sent to the dustbin of history in full force. While it was necessary to make a choice: “four cores or integrated graphics?”, There was something to talk about. However, now the choice is clear — four cores (faster than the old ones) and integrated graphics (faster than the old ones) at the same time . The new Core i5s are definitely better than the old ones. It looks a little strange, perhaps, the current pricing policy: the 2400 differs from the 2300 by as much as 300 MHz and only $ 7, and from the 2500 by only 200 MHz and as much as $ 20, but this is quite explainable by the premium for steepness. Moreover, maybe after the release of the new i3 (which will finally write off all the processors on the Clarkdale core), the “ladder” will be redone into 155-177-204, which will be more logical.

If the new i5s are so good, what about the Core i7-2600? An excellent processor, the absolute triumph of which was spoiled only by the extreme Core i7-980X. But even then only in the overall standings — it’s easy to see that in half of the test groups, even this expensive device can now compete only with the new Core i5, significantly pulling ahead only in a few cases. Yes, this is still a difficult share of six-core desktop environments: a very small percentage of software can make good use of their potential. It seems to us that Intel very correctly decided that the time for multi-core processors on the desktop has already come, but «a lot» still means «four». For thrill-seekers, you can do more, but only if they are willing to pay for it 🙂 And pay regularly — previously the same 980X competed only with the same extreme models, and now it doesn’t always win even with budget ones. And the previous extreme lost everywhere to the usual Core i7-2600. Top, but regular . In general, the standard practice for Intel is that the new family of processors is unconditionally better than the old one, and the older models in it are no worse than the old extreme ones. Moreover, what is gratifying, even fans of overclocking and other optimizations now do not have to prepare another thousand dollars: there are not so expensive Core i5-2500K and i7-2600K. And even more versatile than their predecessors in the K-series, as they are interesting not only with fully unlocked multipliers, but also with a more powerful graphics core.

Summing up, is the release of new processors successful? Yes, count. Even despite the changed design, which will once again force upgrade enthusiasts to change motherboards: the new processors are good enough that even the owners of systems with LGA1366 have a temptation to do this procedure (if only because changing some i7-920 to i7-970 will be more expensive and less interesting than getting i7-2600K on a new board) or LGA1156. Not to mention those who are still holding on to the LGA775 — it’s time to finally retire any Core 2 Duo, and Core 2 Quad too. Well, those who buy complete computers receive just a small gift from the company — for the same money as in December last year, they can buy about 20 percent more processor power 🙂

We thank the Russian representative office of the company Gigabyte
for their help in completing the test benches.

Processors 1155 list in Syzran: 500-items: free shipping, 56% discount [link]

Affiliate programHelp Goods

Clothing and footwear

Clothing and footwear

Building materials

Building materials

Textiles and leather

Textile and leather

Health and beauty

Health and beauty

Children’s goods

Children’s goods

Electrical engineering

Electrical engineering

Food and beverages 900 03

Food and drink

Home and garden

Home and garden

Industry

Industry

Water, gas and heat

Water, gas and heat

Trade and warehouse

Trade and warehouse

All categories

Input Favorite

Processor Intel Core i5-3550 i5 3550 3.3GHz Quad Core Processor 6MB 77W LGA 1155 Socket:

POD ROBER

I5-3475S i5 3475s SR0PP 2.9GHz quad-core four thread processor 65W LGA 1155 socket:

DETAILS

processor intel Pentium G645 3Mb, 2C\2T, GPU) OEM (without cooler) Manufacturer: Intel,

DETAILS

Processor Intel Core i7 2600S 2. 8GHz Quad Core Processor 8MB 65W LGA 1155 Processor

9 0740 DETAILS

I7-2700K i7 2700K SR0DG 3.5GHz quad-core processor 8M 95W LGA 1155 Socket: LGA1155, Frequency

DETAILS

Processor Intel Xeon E3 1260L E3 1260L 2.4GHz Quad Core Eight Thread 45W CPU 907 89 processor LGA 1155

DETAILS

-64%

1,796

4999

Processor Intel Core i5 2500 (3.3Ghz, 1155 , 6Mb, 4C/4T, GPU) OEM (without cooler ) Type: CPU ,

IN STORE

-52%

836

1749

CPU Intel Core i3-3220 ( LGA 1155 ) Type: Processor , Size: Length 10.000 Width 7.000 Height

B STORE

-15%

3 661

4299

Processor Intel Xeon E3-1270, 4 cores, 8 threads, 3.40Ghz, 80w, LGA 1155 OEM (no cooler) Type:

SHOP

-19%

1,628

1999

Processor Intel i5 2500, 95w, 4 cores, 4 threads, 3. 30Ghz, Sandy Bridge, LGA 1155 OEM (no cooler)

STORE

Processors 1155

-51%

3,454

6999

Processor Intel Core i7 2600 (3.4Ghz, 1155 , 8Mb, 4C/8T, GPU) OEM (no cooler) Type: Processor ,

IN STORE 9 0003

-66%

483

1400

Processor Intel Pentium G2030 (3.0Ghz, 1155 , 3Mb, 2C/2T, GPU) OEM (without cooler) Type: Processor , 900 03 TO STORE

-15%

3 491

4099

Processor Intel i5 3570K, 4 cores, 4 threads, 3.40Ghz, 77w, LGA 1155 OEM (without cooler) Type: Processor ,

IN STORE

Processor Intel Core i7-2600K 3.4 GHz LGA1155 Manufacturer: Intel, Socket: LGA1155, Line ka

DETAILS

Processor intel Celeron G1630 (2.8 Ghz, 1155 , 2Mb, 2C/2T, GPU) OEM (without cooler) Manufacturer:

DETAILS

Processor Intel Xeon E3-1280 LGA1155 Manufacturer: Intel, Socket: L GA1155, Line processors :

DETAILS

Processor Intel Pentium G630 (2. 7GHZ, 3M Cache, 65W, LGA 1155 ) Manufacturer: Intel, Socket:

907 40 DETAILS

Processor Intel Core i5-2380P Sandy Bridge LGA1155, 4 x 3100 MHz Manufacturer: Intel, Socket:

DETAILS

Processor Intel Core i7-3770 3400MHz LGA1155 Manufacturer: Intel, Socket: LGA1155, Line

DETAILS

Processor Intel Core i5-2400 socket 1155 4 cores 4 threads 3.1GHz 85W Manufacturer: Intel Line

DETAILS

Processor Intel Core i5-23 00 i5 2300 2.8GHz quad-core processor CPU 6M 95W LGA 1155 BOX (with cooler)

DETAILS

Processor Intel Pentum G2030 socket 1155 2 cores 55W Manufacturer: Intel, Line 90 789 processors :

DETAILS

28 990

Processor Intel Core i5 3550S LGA 1155 OEM merchantCountBpg2: 0, cashback: 6, LT_cluster1: 1

Processor Intel Core i3 2130 LGA 1155 Intel Intel, Socket: LGA1155, Line

DETAILS

Processor Intel Core i7 2600K Socket 1155 cores 8 threads 3.