NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 — review. GPU Benchmark & Specs
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 graphics card (also called GPU) comes in 796 in the performance rating. It is a good result. The graphics card NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 runs with the minimal clock speed 500 MHz. It is featured by the acceleration option and able to run up to . The manufacturer has equipped NVIDIA with GB of 768 MB memory, clock speed 1400 MHz and bandwidth 67.2 GB/s.
The power consumption of the graphics card is 134 Watt, and the fabrication process is only 90 nm. Below you will find the main data on the compatibility, sizes, technologies and gaming performance test results. Also you can read and leave the comments.
Let’s take a closer look at the most important specifications of the graphics card. To have a good idea what a graphics card is the best, we recommend to use comparison service.
3.7
Out of 3
Hitesti score
Popular graphics cards
Most viewed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 600
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel HD Graphics 530
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 520
Buy here:
AliExpress
General info
The basic set of information will help you find out the graphics card NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 release date and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of the release and the average current price. This data also includes the architecture employed by the producer, and the chip’s codename.
| Place in performance rating: | 894 | |||
| Value for money (0-100): | 4.05 | |||
| Architecture: | Tesla | |||
| Code name: | G80 | |||
| Type: | Workstation | |||
| Release date: | 5 March 2007 (14 years ago) | |||
| Launch price (MSRP): | $1,999 | |||
| Price now: | $145 (0. 1x MSRP) |
|||
| Value for money: | 0.11 | |||
| GPU code name: | G80 | |||
| Market segment: | Workstation | |||
Technical specs
This is the important information that defines the graphics card’s capacity. The simpler the device production process, the better. The core’s power frequency is responsible for its speed (direct correlation) while the elaboration of signals is performed by the transistors (the more transistors, the faster the computations are carried out).
| Pipelines: | 96 | |||
| Core clock speed: | 500 MHz | |||
| Transistor count: | 681 million | |||
| Manufacturing process technology: | 90 nm | |||
| Power consumption (TDP): | 134 Watt | |||
| Texture fill rate: | 24. 00 |
|||
| Floating-point performance: | 230.4 gflops | |||
| Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 96 | |||
| Number of transistors: | 681 million | |||
| Thermal design power (TDP): | 134 Watt | |||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Today there are numerous form factors for PC cases, so it is extremely important to know the length of the graphics card and the types of its connection. This will help facilitate the upgrade process.
| Interface: | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |||
| Length: | 229 mm | |||
| Supplementary power connectors: | 1x 6-pin | |||
Memory
The internal main memory is used for storing data while conducting computations.
Contemporary games and professional graphic apps have high requirements for the memory’s volume and capacity. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and fast the graphics card is. Type of memory, the capacity and bandwidth for NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600.
| Memory type: | GDDR3 | |||
| Maximum RAM amount: | 768 MB | |||
| Memory bus width: | 384 Bit | |||
| Memory clock speed: | 1400 MHz | |||
| Memory bandwidth: | 67.2 GB/s | |||
Video outputs and ports
As a rule, all contemporary graphics cards feature several connection types and additional ports.
Knowing these peculiarities is crucial for avoiding problems with connecting the graphics card to the monitor or other peripheral devices.
| Display Connectors: | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |||
API support
All API-supported NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 are listed below.
| DirectX: | 11.1 (10_0) | |||
| OpenGL: | 3.3 | |||
Overall gaming performance
All tests have been based on FPS counter. Let’s have a look on what place NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 has been taken in the gaming performance test (calculation has been made in accordance with the game developer recommendations about system requirements; it can differ from the real world situations).
Select games to view
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.
0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10.
25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates. |
May Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates. |
|
| 30 | Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 25fps or more |
| 40 | Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more |
| 60 | Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more |
| May Run Fluently – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to show fluent frame rates. | |
| ? | Uncertain – The testing of this graphics cards on this game showed unexpected results. A slower card might be able to produce higher and more consistent frame rates when running the same benchmark scene. |
| Uncertain – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. No reliable data interpolation can be made based on the performance of similar cards of the same category. | |
| The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To obtain individual results, move your cursor over the value. | |
AMD equivalent
AMD FirePro 2270
Compare
Benchmark
Benchmarks help determine the performance in standard tests for NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600. We have listed the world’s most famous benchmarks so that you could obtain accurate results in each (see the description). Graphics card preliminary testing is especially important in the presence of high loads so that the user could see to what extent the graphic processing unit copes with computations and data elaboration.
Overall benchmark performance
ATI Radeon HD 5570
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
PassMark is a great benchmark that gets updated regularly and shows relevant information on the graphics card’s performance.
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
NVIDIA Quadro 410
NVIDIA GeForce 810M
3.
7
Out of 3
Hitesti score
Share on social network:
In order to leave a review you need to log in
Reviews of NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Compare NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
AMD Radeon R9 M380
AMD Radeon R5 M230
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 X2
AMD Radeon Pro Duo
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
AMD Caicos
AMD Hainan
AMD Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
EOL Windows driver support for legacy products
NVIDIA SUPPORT
EOL Windows driver support for legacy products
Beginning with the Release 378, the NVIDIA professional drivers no longer support the following NVIDIA Quadro products below.
The NVIDIA support team will continue to address critical driver issues for these products in Release 375 through March 1, 2018. However, future driver enhancements and optimizations in driver releases after Release 375 will not support these products.
|
Quadro |
Quadro Blade/Embedded |
Quadro Notebook |
|
Quadro Plex 7000 |
Quadro 4000M |
Quadro 5010M |
|
Quadro 7000 |
Quadro 3000M |
Quadro 5000M |
|
Quadro 6000 |
Quadro 100M |
Quadro 4000M |
|
Quadro 5000 |
Quadro 500M |
Quadro 3000M |
|
Quadro 4000 |
Quadro 2000M |
|
|
Quadro 2000 |
Quadro 1000M |
|
|
Quadro 2000 D |
||
|
Quadro 600 |
||
|
Quadro 400 |
After Release 340, any subsequent Windows driver release starting with Release 343 will cease to support the products listed in this section below.
The Release 340 drivers will continue to support these products until April 1, 2016, and the NVIDIA support team will continue to address driver issues for these products in driver branches up to and including Release 340. However, future driver enhancements and optimizations in driver releases after Release 340 will not support these products.
|
Quadro, Quadro FX/CX, and NVS Workstation Products |
||
|
Quadro FX |
NVS |
Quadro/Quadro CX/Quadro VX |
|
Quadro FX 5800 |
NVIDIA NVS 300 |
Quadro 400 |
|
Quadro FX 5500 |
Quadro NVS 295 |
Quadro CX |
|
Quadro FX 4800 |
Quadro NVS 420 |
Quadro VX |
|
Quadro FX 4700 |
Quadro NVS 450 |
Quadro VX 200 |
|
Quadro FX 4600 |
Quadro NVS |
|
|
Quadro FX 4500 |
Quadro NVS 210S |
|
|
Quadro FX 4500 X2 |
Quadro NVS 280 |
|
|
Quadro FX 4000 SDI |
Quadro NVS 280 SD |
|
|
Quadro FX 4000 |
Quadro NVS 285 |
|
|
Quadro FX 3800 |
Quadro NVS 290 |
|
|
Quadro FX 3700 |
Quadro NVS 440 |
|
|
Quadro FX 3500 |
Quadro NVS 50 PCI |
|
|
Quadro FX 3450 SDI |
Quadro NVS 55 |
|
|
Quadro FX 3400 |
||
|
Quadro FX 3000 |
||
|
Quadro FX 2000 |
||
|
Quadro FX 1800 |
||
|
Quadro FX 1700 |
||
|
Quadro FX 1500 |
||
|
Quadro FX 1400 |
||
|
Quadro FX 1300 |
||
|
Quadro FX 1100 |
||
|
Quadro FX 1000 |
||
|
Quadro FX 880 |
||
|
Quadro FX 700 |
||
|
Quadro FX 600 |
||
|
Quadro FX 580 |
||
|
Quadro FX 570 |
||
|
Quadro FX 560 |
||
|
Quadro FX 550 |
||
|
Quadro FX 540 |
||
|
Quadro FX 500 |
||
|
Quadro FX 380 |
||
|
Quadro FX 380LP |
||
|
Quadro FX 370 |
||
|
Quadro FX 370LP |
||
|
Quadro FX 350 |
||
|
Quadro FX 340 |
||
|
Quadro FX 330 PCI-E |
||
|
Tesla C, Quadro Plex Products |
|
|
Tesla C |
Quadro Plex |
|
Tesla C1060 |
Quadro Plex 2200 D2 |
|
Quadro Plex 2200 S4 |
|
|
Quadro FX and NVS Notebook Products |
|
|
Quadro FX Notebook |
NVS Notebook |
|
Quadro FX 3800M |
NVIDIA NVS 5100M |
|
Quadro FX 3700M |
NVIDIA NVS 3100M |
|
Quadro FX 3600M |
NVIDIA NVS 2100M |
|
Quadro FX 2800M |
Quadro NVS 510M |
|
Quadro FX 2700M |
Quadro NVS 320M |
|
Quadro FX 2500M |
Quadro NVS 160M |
|
Quadro FX 3600M |
Quadro NVS 150M Quadro NVS 140M |
|
Quadro FX 1800M |
Quadro NVS 135M |
|
Quadro FX 1700M |
Quadro NVS 130M |
|
Quadro FX 1600M |
Quadro NVS 120M |
|
Quadro FX 1500M |
Quadro NVS 110M |
|
Quadro FX 880M |
|
|
Quadro FX 770M |
|
|
Quadro FX 570M |
|
|
Quadro FX 560M |
|
|
Quadro FX 540M |
|
|
Quadro FX 380M |
|
|
Quadro FX 370M |
|
|
Quadro FX 360M |
|
|
Quadro FX 350M |
|
GeForce 7/8/9 Series Notebook Products |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce 7 Series |
GeForce 8 Series |
GeForce 9 Series |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce Go 7950 GTX |
GeForce 8800M GTX |
GeForce 9800M GTX |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce Go 7900 GT |
GeForce 8800M GTS |
GeForce 9800M GT |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce Go 7900 GS |
GeForce 8700M GT |
GeForce 9800M GTS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce Go 7800 GTX |
GeForce 8600M GT |
GeForce 9800M GS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce Go 7800 |
GeForce 8600M GS |
GeForce 9700M GTS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce Go 7700 |
GeForce 8400M GT |
GeForce 9700M GT |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce Go 7600 GT |
GeForce 8400M GS |
GeForce 9650M GT |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce Go 7600 |
GeForce 8400M G |
GeForce 9650M GS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce Go 7400 |
GeForce 9600M GT |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce Go 7300 |
GeForce 9600M GS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce Go 7200 |
GeForce 9500M GS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce 9500M G |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce 9300M GS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce 9300M G |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GeForce 9200M GS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Critical security updates will be available on Fermi series GPUs through January 2019.|
GeForce 100/200/300 Series Notebook Products |
||
|
GeForce 100 Series |
GeForce 200 Series |
GeForce 300 Series |
|
GeForce GTS 160M |
GeForce GTX 285M |
GeForce GTS 360M |
|
GeForce GTS 150M |
GeForce GTX 280M |
GeForce GTS 350M |
|
GeForce GT 130M |
GeForce GTX 260M |
GeForce GT 335M |
|
GeForce GT 120M |
GeForce GTS 260M |
GeForce GT 330M |
|
ION LE |
||
|
ION |
||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOTE: this list is specific to Windows drivers.
For Unix information, click here: Support timeframes for Unix legacy GPU releases
Is this answer helpful?
Live Chat
Chat online with one of our support agents
CHAT NOW
ASK US A QUESTION
Contact Support for assistance
Ask a Question
New NVIDIA Quadro FX Series Workstation Graphics Cards Deliver HPC for Less
By David Cohn
| The entry-level NVIDIA Quadro FX 370. |
Over the past year, NVIDIA has once again refreshed its entire lineup of workstation-class graphics accelerators — the Quadro FX series. Previously we looked at the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and FX 5600 boards (see June and July 2007 DE, respectively). Now that the rest of the family has also been updated, it’s time to give you all the details on the entire product line.
Like the ultra high-end Quadro FX 4600 and FX 5600, all of the new graphics accelerators feature NVIDIA’s unified architecture, which dynamically allocates geometry, shading, and pixel processing as well as compute power.
Previous generations of graphics cards had separate banks of vertex and pixel shaders that could only be used for accelerating vertex calculations and texturing, respectively. This often resulted in portions of the graphics processing unit (GPU) sitting idle while others were maxed out, because games often use models with low numbers of polygons with lots of textures while CAD models often have large numbers of polygons with few or no textures. The new unified architecture dynamically allocates the GPU’s power between vertex and pixel shading, improving performance for all types of users.
| The entry-level 3D NVIDIA Quadro FX 570. |
| The ultra high-end NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600was reviewed previously. |
|
Themid-range NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700. |
|
The new high-end NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700. |
In addition to sharing the same core unified architecture and drivers, the new boards are now Shader Model 4.0 compliant and come with the increased frame buffer capacity needed to make them fully Microsoft Vista ready. The Quadro FX 370, 570, 1700, and 3700 are all based on a 65-nanometer (nm) manufacturing process whereas the FX 4600 and 5600 are 90nm boards. The 370, 570, 1700, and 3700 also support PCI Express version 2.0, which doubles the bus standard’s bandwidth, meaning the X16 graphics slot can transfer 16GBps bidirectionally (8GBps in each direction).
The latest boards also support the new NVIDIA Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA) GPU-computing software architecture. Some types of computing tasks have parts that are better suited for CPU computing while other parts are better suited for being run on the GPU. CUDA provides a standard C language interface so that programmers can synchronize hybrid programs running on both CPUs and GPUs.
The New Quadro FX Family
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 ($129 MSRP/$115 average street price) is the company’s new low-end entry-level 3D card. Priced $70 less than its predecessor, the board comes with 256MB of DDR2 video memory, twice that of the board it replaces. The 64-bit memory interface yields a memory bandwidth of 6.4GBps. The FX 370 delivers 66 million triangles per second and 2.88 billion texels per second and provides two DVI-I connectors, one of which even supports dual link, enabling the board to support ultra-high resolution displays at 2560 x 1600 at normal refresh rates, a first for an entry-level board. Yet the half-length board uses a single PCIe X16 slot and consumes just 35 watts.
Up a step is the new NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 ($199 MSRP/ $182 street), which outperforms the older FX 550 and FX 560 boards yet costs $80 and $100 less, respectively. Like the new FX 370, the FX 570 comes with 256MB of DDR2 memory, but uses a 128-bit memory interface.
This results in a memory bandwidth of 12.8GBps, enabling the board to pump out 137 million triangles per second and a fill rate of 3.68 texels per second. Both of the board’s DVI-I connectors support dual link.
For the mid-range, NVIDIA improves upon the FX 1500 with the introduction of the Quadro FX 1700 ($699 MSRP/$585 street). Likely to become the most popular board in the new Quadro FX lineup, the FX 1700 comes with 512MB of DDR2 memory, again double the amount previously found at this price point. Unlike its predecessor, the FX 1700 uses a 128-bit memory interface, yielding a memory bandwidth of just 12.8GBps, the same as the FX 570. But when coupled with the new GPU, the FX 1700 clearly outperforms its predecessor, delivering 191 million triangles per second and a fill rate of 7.36 billion texels per second. In addition to two dual link DVI-I connectors, the Quadro FX 1700 also provides HD component video.
At the high-end, NVIDIA refreshes its product line with the introduction of the newest member of the family, the Quadro FX 3700 ($1,599 MSRP/$899 street).
This board comes with 512MB of GDDR3 memory (double that on the older FX 3500) and uses a 256-bit memory interface to deliver a memory bandwidth of 51.2GBps. The new GPU provides 112 parallel processors, enabling it to deliver 250 million triangles per second and a fill rate of 28 billion texels per second. In addition to its two dual link DVI-I connectors, the board also supports stereoscopic 3D output as well as NVIDIA’s Scalable Link Interface (SLI). SLI technology enables two NVIDIA Quadro FX graphics boards to work in tandem to increase the graphics performance of a single workstation. The FX 3700 requires just a single PCIe X16 slot, but since it consumes 78 watts it does require an auxiliary connection to the system power supply.
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 ($1,999 MSRP/$1,399 street) is technically not a new board. This ultra high-end graphics accelerator was introduced just over a year ago, and was reviewed in the June 2007 issue of DE. But since it is a member of the new Quadro family, we’ll cover it again briefly here.
The FX 4600 comes with 768MB of GDDR3 memory and a 384-bit memory interface. Its memory bandwidth is rated at 67.2GBps and the board delivers 250 billion triangles per second and 24 billion texels per second. Like the FX 3700, both of its DVI-I connectors support dual link and the board offers a stereo 3D graphics connector and SLI support. NVIDIA also offers optional G-Sync and SDI option cards for the FX 4600, providing frame lock and broadcast quality video capabilities, respectively. Because it consumes 134 watts of power, the board requires an auxiliary power connection, and with its large cooling fan and plastic cowl protruding more than an inch from the board, it is impossible to use the adjacent expansion slot.
NVIDIA’s Quadro FX 5600 ($2,999 MSRP/$2,573 street) occupies the extreme top end of the product line and, like the FX 4600, Desktop Engineering reviewed this board when it was first introduced nearly a year ago (“Even More Graphics Power,” DE, Aug 2007).
Targeted at the interactive display of large, complex models often found in automotive and aerospace design, oil and gas exploration, and scientific visualization, this board doubles the performance of its predecessor. The Quadro FX 5600 comes with 1.5GB of GDDR3 memory and uses a 384-bit memory interface to yield a memory bandwidth of 76.8GBps to deliver 300 million triangles per second and a fill rate of 19.2 billion texels per second.
Like the FX 4600, the Quadro FX 5600 provides two dual link enabled DVI-I connectors, SLI capability, stereo 3D support and the available G-Sync and SDI option cards. And like the FX 4600, the FX 5600 is so wide that it prevents the use of the adjacent expansion slot. But the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 is a full-length board, and its maximum power consumption of 171 watts necessitates the use of not one, but two auxiliary connections to the system power supply.
The ultra high-end NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 outperforms its predecessorby 2X. |
Benchmarking the Boards
As in the past, we tested five of the six boards using the same HP xw6600 workstation equipped with a pair of 3.0GHz Quad-Core Xeon E5450 processors, so all of our results are directly comparable. Desktop Engineering reviewed this system in the April 2008 issue (“Big Power in a Small Package”).
But this is a different system than the HP xw4200 we used in previous years. We switched for two reasons: graphics performance has improved so dramatically that the older system was no longer fast enough to take advantage of the graphics performance and because the xw4200 lacks PCIe 2.0 support. In addition, the HP xw6600 was a close match to the system NVIDIA used to produce the benchmark results shown on its website.
The PCIe 2.0 specification is backward and forward compatible with PCIe v1.x, so newer graphics boards will work in older systems and vice versa. But of course, when installed in an older system (like our original HP xw4200 benchmark platform), the newer boards are limited to the bandwidth of the original PCIe v1.
x spec. Similarly, older graphics boards installed in a PCIe 2.0 capable system won’t be able to take advantage of the extra bandwidth.
To help readers compare the benefits of PCIe v2.0, we went back and tested the older NVIDIA boards in the new HP xw6600, using version 10 of the SPEC viewperf benchmark (spec.org). Since we no longer had the FX 3500, FX 4600, or FX 5500 on hand, we were unable to retest those boards. For that reason, our benchmark results chart (see previous page) also includes the results published on the NVIDIA website. We did not see any significant benefit of PCIe 2.0 in our benchmark tests.
What both NVIDIA’s numbers and our own independent tests showed however, is that the new NVIDIA boards clearly outperform the company’s previous generation of graphics accelerators in each product range and, in most cases, the new board in one product range outperformed the older board in the next higher product range. For example, the Quadro FX 570 outperformed the older FX 1500, the FX 1700 outperformed the older FX 3500, and so on.
All of the new NVIDIA Quadro FX boards are fully certified with most CAD and DCC (digital content creation) applications and all of the boards in the Quadro FX line, including earlier boards, use the same unified video driver. Drivers are available for most 32- and 64-bit operating systems, including Vista, XP, and Linux.
Many of NVIDIA’s older Quadro FX boards remain available, but with the new boards outperforming the older boards at similar or sometimes even lesser price points, we recommend going with the newer products. With these six boards to choose from, there’s definitely a NVIDIA Quadro FX graphics accelerator for every CAD user.
More Info:
NVIDIA Corporation
Santa Clara, CA
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
> Price: $129 (suggested retail), $115 (average street)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
> Price: $199 (suggested retail), $182 (average street)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
> Price: $699 (suggested retail), $585 (average street)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
> Price: $1599 (suggested retail), $899 (average street)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
> Price: $1995 (suggested retail), $1399 (average street)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
> Price: $2999 (suggested retail), $2576 (average street)
Contributing Editor David Cohn is a computer consultant and technical writer based in Bellingham, WA, and has been benchmarking PCs since 1984.
He’s an applications engineer with The PPI Group, and the author of more than a dozen books. Please send comments about this article to [email protected]. You can also contact David at [email protected].
Oops! We ran into some problems. | PakGamers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
The requested page could not be found.
we have disabled traderscore and are working on a fix. There was a bug with the plugin
- No one is chatting at the moment.
-
iampasha:
Major Aly said:
But since such comments of mine have a track record of being back-fired, @iampasha urhta hua ayega comment karne jab Sony Pony simultanenous release announce karay ga release date ke nazdeek ke PC par bhi same day arahi hai
Click to expand.
..
Reactions:
Necrokiller
Link
-
Necrokiller:
If Ragnarok’s port is anything like God of War’s, it’ll be the definitive version to play the game
Link
-
Necrokiller:
You mean the port that Alex called «simply sensational»?
Link
-
CerebralTiger:
Be wary of streaming stutters.
Original GoW was only developed with PS4 in mind, and it exhibited stutters during background loading at higher than PS4 settings
Link
-
Necrokiller:
Ultrawide being the cherry on top
Link
-
Necrokiller:
Aur PS5 ka faida hi nahi jab Reflex+DLSS version aana hai PC pe.
Link
-
Necrokiller:
PS4 pe khelne ki ghalati dobara nahi hogi
Link
-
Radical:
Filhaal to PC gamers ko aik saal tak intezar kerna parta hay
Link
-
Radical:
Bhai jis din PS games release ho gaye PC pe, on same day.
Usi din se hum bhi PC gamers honge.Link
-
CerebralTiger:
*raises hand for GoW Ragnarok no jump button at launch»
Reactions:
Major Aly
Link
-
CerebralTiger:
EternalBlizzard said:
faizali ko ghaas to dalo yar
Click to expand.
..Blizzy ne jis klo ghaas daalni thi ussay tou daali nahi, humara kya kasoor
Reactions:
EternalBlizzard
Link
-
Major Aly:
But since such comments of mine have a track record of being back-fired, @iampasha urhta hua ayega comment karne jab Sony Pony simultanenous release announce karay ga release date ke nazdeek ke PC par bhi same day arahi hai
Reactions:
CerebralTiger
Link
-
Major Aly:
Not PC guys
Reactions:
CerebralTiger
Link
-
Radical:
GOW kon khelay ga launch pe ?
Link
-
Radical:
Link
-
EternalBlizzard:
faizali ko ghaas to dalo yar
Reactions:
CerebralTiger
Link
-
Necrokiller:
Same universe where people have no problem finding matches in Splatoon 3
Link
-
CerebralTiger:
In an imaginary universe
Link
-
Necrokiller:
More players than Splatoon 3
Reactions:
CerebralTiger
Link
-
CerebralTiger:
RIP Infinite.
Farewell Bonnie Ross Link
-
Necrokiller:
Free to play to Infinite bhi hai
Link
-
Necrokiller:
Game Pass pe to phir bhi aani hai
Link
-
CerebralTiger:
Free tooo play hai OW2
Link
-
Necrokiller:
Ab to Game Pass pe jab aani hogi aajaegi OW2, don’t care
Link
-
F
faiziali1996:Helo
Link
▷ Finde das richtige Acer Aspire ES1-732 Notebook
Acer Aspire ES1-732 Notebooks
Displaygröße
- bis 12″
- 13″ (beliebt)
- 14″
- 15″ (beliebt)
- 16″
- ab 17″
Akkulaufzeit
- mind.
4 Stunden - mind. 6 Stunden
- mind. 8 Stunden
- mind. 12 Stunden
- mind. 16 Stunden
- mind. 20 Stunden
Gewicht
- bis 1,0 kg
- bis 1,5 kg
- bis 2,0 kg
- bis 2,5 kg (beliebt)
- bis 3,0 kg
- bis 3,5 kg
- bis 4,0 kg
1. Festplatte
- mind. 128 GB
- mind. 256 GB
- mind. 500 GB
- mind. 750 GB
- mind. 1 TB
1. Festplatte (Typ)
- HDD
- SSD
- Hybrid
2. Festplatte
- mind. 128 GB
- mind. 256 GB
- mind. 500 GB
- mind. 750 GB
- mind. 1 TB
2. Festplatte (Typ)
- HDD
- SSD
- Hybrid
2-in-1 Convertible
- 360 Grad Scharnier
- Detachable
Display-Typ
- Matt
- Glänzend
- Touch
- 3D
Display-Auflösung
- mind. HD
- mind. Full HD
- mind. Full HD (WQHD)
- mind. 4K
Bildwiederholrate
- mind. 120 Hz
- mind.
144 Hz - mind. 240 Hz
- mind. 300 Hz
Arbeitsspeicher (RAM)
- mind. 4 GB
- mind. 8 GB
- mind. 16 GB
- mind. 32 GB
Betriebssystem
- Microsoft Windows 11
- Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
- Microsoft Windows 10
- Microsoft Windows 10 Pro
- Apple macOS
- ohne Betriebssystem
- Google Chrome OS
- DOS
- Linux
Extras
- USB-C
- USB 3.1
- USB 3.0
- Fingerabdruckleser
- Beleuchtete Tastatur
- umschaltbare Grafikkarte
- 4G LTE / 3G UMTS
- Thunderbolt
- DisplayPort
- HDMI
- Speicherkartenleser
- Dock im Lieferumfang
Prozessor-Kategorie
- Gaming- und Highend-Prozessoren
- Mittelklasse Prozessoren
- Einsteiger Prozessoren
Prozessor
Grafikkarten-Kategorie
- Gaming- und Highend-Grafikkarten
- Mittelklasse-Grafikkarten
- Einsteiger-Grafikkarten
Grafikkarte
Laufwerk
- ohne Laufwerk
- mit Laufwerk
Hilfe bei der Auswahl?
Interaktive Kaufberatung jetzt starten10
BeliebtheitPreis aufsteigendPreis absteigendDeal-ErsparnisAktualitätHersteller A-ZGewicht aufsteigendAkkulaufzeit absteigendFestplatte absteigendDisplaygröße aufsteigend
- 02.10.22 02:35Zuletzt niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen in unserem Preisvergleich: 929,00 €
-
- 17,3″ glänzend (1600 x 900)
- 256 GB SSD
- 8 GB
- 3,5 Std.
- 2,8 kg
- CPU Intel Pentium N4200 / 1,1 GHz / Quad-Core
- Grafik Intel HD Graphics 505
- System Microsoft Windows 10 Home (64 Bit)
- Extra DVD±RW (±R DL) (DVD-Brenner)
-
-
SUPER DEAL: BIS -300€ BEI HP
JETZT BEI HP: NUR MIT DIESEN CODES BIS 31.
10.22 SPARENHP ANGEBOTE ZEIGEN
-
FLASH SALE + EXKLUSIVE DEALS
15% RABATT AUF ALLES IM ACER SHOP — NUR BIS MONTAG 12UHR
ZU DEN ACER DEALS
-
NOTEBOOK SALE BEI LENOVO
NOTEBOOKS REDUZIERT — NUR SOLANGE VORRAT REICHT
ZUR LENOVO AKTION
-
-
Deal: 15% Rabatt im Acer Store — nur bis 03.10.2022 — ACER FLASH SALE WOCHENENDE
- 16,1″ IPS, matt (1920 x 1080)
- 1 TB SSD
- 16 GB
- 11,5 Std.
- 1,8 kg
- CPU Intel Core i7-11370H / 3 GHz / Quad-Core
- Grafik Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96 EUs
- System Microsoft Windows 11 Home (64 Bit)
999,00 €849,15 €149,85 € (15 %) günstigerAcer Store, inkl. Versand,
Händlerangabe: Zuletzt niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen in unserem Preisvergleich: 899,00 €
1 — 10 von 10
Weitere Serien aus Modellreihe Acer Aspire
Weitere Acer Modellreihen
- Acer Spin
- Acer Chromebook
- Acer Predator
- Acer ConceptD
- Acer TravelMate
- Acer Extensa
Acer Aspire ES1-732 Notebooks sind in diesen Kategorien
-
Notebooks mit 17 Zoll Display
-
Notebooks mit Windows 10
-
Notebooks mit SSD
Du möchtest Hilfe bei der Auswahl?
- Notebook Konfigurator starten
- Interaktive Kaufberatung starten
Video card Quadro FX 4600 [in 1 benchmark]
NVIDIA
Quadro FX 4600
- PCIe 1.0 x16 interface
- Core frequency 500 MHz
- Video memory size 768 MB
- Memory type GDDR3
- Memory frequency 1400 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Description
NVIDIA started Quadro FX 4600 sales on March 5, 2007 at a suggested price of 1.
9$99. This is a desktop video card based on Tesla architecture and 90 nm manufacturing process, primarily aimed at designers. It has 768 MB of GDDR3 memory at 1.4 GHz, and coupled with a 384-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 67.20 Gb / s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a two-slot PCIe 1.0 x16 card. The length of the reference version is 229 mm. An additional 1x 6-pin power cable is required for connection, and the power consumption is 134W.
It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of
1.48%
from the leader, which is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.
QuadroFX
4600
or
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
General information 9999 (A100 SXM4)
Value for money
To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of video cards and their cost, taking into account the cost of other cards.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Features
Quadro FX 4600’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak of Quadro FX 4600’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Compatibility and dimensions
Information on Quadro FX 4600 compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply).
| memory capacity | 67.20 GB/s | of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
video exit
21
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro FX 4600.
As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
| Video connectors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests. 
57
| PassMark G3D Mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark G2D Mark |
|
|||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 T-Rex |
|
|
| Name | Meaning |
|---|---|
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 437 |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 202 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 3230 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 3230.000 Fps |
Features
| Architecture | Tesla |
| Codename | G80 |
| Production date | March 5, 2007 |
| Price at first issue date | $1,999 |
| Place in the ranking | 921 |
| Price now | $143. 51 |
| Type | Workstation |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 5.45 |
| Core frequency | 500MHz |
| Floating point performance | 230.4 gflops |
| Process | 90 nm |
| Number of shaders | 96 |
| Texturing speed | 12 GTexel/s |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 134 Watt |
| Number of transistors | 681 million |
| Video connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Interface | PCIe 2. 0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm |
| Additional power connectors | 1x 6-pin |
| DirectX | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 |
| Maximum memory size | 768MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit |
| Memory frequency | 1400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 |
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 Overview.
Benchmarks and features
The NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 graphics card (GPU) is ranked 796 in our performance ranking. Manufacturer: NVIDIA. NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 runs at a minimum clock speed of 500 MHz. The graphics chip is equipped with an acceleration system and can operate in turbo mode or during overclocking. The RAM size is 768 MB GB with a clock speed of 1400 MHz and a bandwidth of 67.2 GB/s.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 power consumption is 134 Watts and the workflow is only 90 nm. Below you will find key compatibility, sizing, technology, and gaming performance test results. You can also leave comments if you have any questions.
Let’s take a closer look at the most important characteristics of the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600. To get an idea of which video card is better, we recommend using the comparison service.
3.7
From 3
Hitesti Grade
Popular video cards
Most viewed
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 600
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel HD Graphics 530
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 520
Buy here:
AliExpress
General information
The base set of information will help you find out the release date of the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 graphics card and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of release and the average current cost.
This data also includes the architecture used by the manufacturer and the video processor code name.
| Performance rating position: | 894 | |||
| Value for money: | 4.05 | |||
| Architecture: | Tesla | |||
| Code name: | G80 | |||
| Type: | Workstation | |||
| Release date: | March 5, 2007 (14 years ago) | |||
| Starting price: | $1,999 | |||
| Current price: | $145 (0.1x MSRP) | |||
| Value for money: | 0.11 | |||
| GPU Code Name: | G80 | |||
| Market segment: | Workstation | |||
Specifications
This is important information that determines all the power characteristics of the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 video card.
The smaller the chip manufacturing process, the better (in modern realities). The clock frequency of the core is responsible for its speed (direct correlation), while signal processing is carried out by transistors (the more transistors, the faster the calculations are performed, for example, in cryptocurrency mining).
| Conveyors: | 96 | |||
| Core Clock: | 500MHz | |||
| Number of transistors: | 681 million | |||
| Process: | 90nm | |||
| Power consumption (TDP): | 134 Watt | |||
| Number of texels processed in 1 second: | 24.00 | |||
| Floating point: | 230.4 gflops | |||
| Pipelines / CUDA cores: | 96 | |||
| Number of transistors: | 681 million | |||
| Estimated heat output: | 134 Watt | |||
Dimensions, connectors and compatibility
There are many form factors of PC cases and laptop sizes today, so it is extremely important to know the length of the video card and its connection types (except for laptop versions).
This will help make the upgrade process easier, as Not all cases can accommodate modern video cards.
| Interface: | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |||
| Length: | 229 mm | |||
| Additional power: | 1x 6-pin | |||
Memory (Frequency and Overclocking)
Internal memory is used to store data during calculations. Modern games and professional graphics applications place high demands on the amount and speed of memory. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and faster the video card. Memory type, size and bandwidth for NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 + overclocking in turbo mode.
| Memory type: | GDDR3 | |||
| Maximum RAM amount: | 768MB | |||
| Memory bus width: | 384 Bit | |||
| Memory frequency: | 1400 MHz | |||
| Memory bandwidth: | 67. 2 GB/s |
|||
Support for ports and displays
As a rule, all modern video cards have several types of connections and additional ports, for example HDMI and DVI . Knowing these features is very important in order to avoid problems connecting a video card to a monitor or other peripherals.
| Display connections: | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |||
API Support
All NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 supported APIs are listed below. This is a minor factor that does not greatly affect the overall performance.
| DirectX: | 11.1 (10_0) | |||
| OpenGL: | 3.3 | |||
Overall gaming performance
All tests are based on FPS. Let’s see how the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 scores in the gaming performance test (the calculation was made in accordance with the game developer’s recommendations for system requirements; it may differ from the real situation).
Select games
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Survival 2Middle-earth:8 Shadow of WarFIFA EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind Divid edMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10.
25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Border 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysi s — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5 GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Death Stranding (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
F1 2020 (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Gears Tactics (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
Doom Eternal (2020)
low
1280×720
med.
1920×1080
high
1920×1080
ultra
1920×1080
QHD
2560×1440
4K
3840×2160
| Description | |
| 5 | Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. |
| May Stutter — The performance of this video card with this game has not been studied enough yet. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to stutter and display low frame rates. | |
| 30 | Fluent — Based on all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 25 fps or more |
| 40 | Fluent — According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more |
| 60 | Fluent — Based on all known benchmarks with the specified graphic settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more |
May Run Fluently — The performance of this video card with this game has not yet been studied enough. Based on interpolated information from graphics cards of a similar performance level, the game is likely to show smooth frame rates. |
|
| ? | Uncertain — testing this video card in this game showed unexpected results. A slower card could deliver higher and more consistent frame rates while running the same reference scene. |
| Uncertain — The performance of this video card in this game has not yet been studied enough. It is not possible to reliably interpolate data based on the performance of similar cards in the same category. | |
| The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To get individual results, hover over a value. | |
AMD equivalent
AMD FirePro 2270
Compare
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 in benchmark results
Benchmarks help determine the performance of standard NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 benchmarks.
We’ve compiled a list of the world’s best-known benchmarks so you can get accurate results for each one (see description). Pre-testing the graphics card is especially important when there are high loads, so that the user can see how the graphics processor copes with calculations and data processing.
Overall performance in benchmarks
ATI Radeon HD 5570
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
NVIDIA QuadroFX 4600
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
Passmark is an excellent benchmark that is updated regularly and shows relevant graphics card performance information.
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
NVIDIA QuadroFX 4600
NVIDIA Quadro 410
NVIDIA GeForce 810M
3.7
From 3
Hitesti Grade
Share on social networks:
You need to log in to write a review
Review NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Compare NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
AMD Radeon R9 M380
AMD Radeon R5 M230
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 X2
AMD Radeon Pro Duo
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
AMD Caicos
AMD Hainan
AMD Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 comparison which is better?
Home / Video card / Nvidia GeForce GT 230 VS NVIDIA QUADRO 4600
NVIDIA GEFORCE GT 230
Devicelist
9000% 29% 29% 9000% 9000% 9000% characteristics of NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you.
Find out which one to choose in 2022.
Benefits NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
Comparison winner
|
Value for money |
|
58.2% 56.1% (2671.4%) better than vs 2.1% |
|
Release price |
|
$43.99 at -19$55.01 (-97.8%) better than vs 1999 $ |
|
Core frequency |
|
650 MHz 150 MHz (30%) better than vs 500 MHz |
|
Process |
|
55 nm At -35 nm (-38.9%) better than vs 90 nm |
|
Power Demand (TDP) |
|
75 W -59 W (-44%) better than vs 134 W |
|
Memory frequency |
|
1800 MHz At 400 MHz (28. vs 1400 MHz |
6%) better than Benefits NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
|
Number of shaders |
|
96 48 (100%) better than vs 48 |
|
Maximum memory |
|
0.768 GB 0.268 GB (53.6%) better than vs 0.5 GB |
|
Memory bus width |
|
384 bit 128 bit (50%) better than vs 256 bit |
|
Memory bandwidth |
|
67.2 9.6 (16.7%) better than vs 57.6 |
| General information | |
|
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. |
|
| 58.2%
56.1% (2671.4%) better than |
2.1% |
|
Architecture |
|
| Tesla | Tesla |
|
Codename |
|
| G94B | G80 |
|
Type |
|
| Desktop | For workstations |
|
Release price |
|
| $43.99
-1955.01 $ (-97.8%) better than |
1999 $ |
|
Number of shaders |
|
| 48 | 96
48 (100%) better than |
|
Core clock |
|
| 650MHz
150 MHz (30%) better than |
500 MHz |
|
Number of transistors |
|
| 505 million | 681 million |
|
Process |
|
| 55 nm
-35 nm (-38. |
90 nm |
|
Interface |
|
| PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
|
Power Demand (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
| 75 W
-59 W (-44%) better than |
134 W |
|
Length |
|
| n/a | 229 mm |
|
Additional power connectors |
|
| no | 1x 6-pin |
|
Video connectors |
|
| No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
|
DirectX |
|
| 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
|
Floating point performance |
|
| 156 gflops | 230. 4 gflops |
The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. 
9%) better than |
Memory |
|
| GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
|
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, |
|
| 0.5 GB | 0.768 GB
0.268 GB (53.6%) better than |
|
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better the performance in demanding games. |
|
| 256 bit | 384 bit
128 bit (50%) better than |
|
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data. |
|
| 1800MHz
At 400 MHz (28. |
1400 MHz |
|
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use. |
|
| 57.6 | 67.2
9.6 (16.7%) better than |
6%) better than Retro review of a rare video card from 2007
This material was written by a site visitor and has been rewarded.
Good day to all, dear visitors of the site Overclockers.ru. We are talking about a legendary video card that made a splash in 2006. This is the 8800GTX, namely the Quadro FX5600, its analogue, but more durable and with twice the memory capacity. I will also quickly compare this card with integrated graphics from Intel in 2013 in 10 games.
So in 2006, the 8800GTX revolutionized the IT space, surpassing even the Radeon 9700pro at the time. This video card had many innovations, but the main know-how was in its fundamentally new architecture, on the basis of which cards are produced to this day — a unified shader architecture, in which there is no division into pixel and vertex pipelines.
The era of directx 10 began with this video card. The increase in performance compared to its predecessor in the face of 7800GTX was more than 1.5 times.
recommendations
Not without tar. Either because of the huge size of the chip, or because of the new technology of lead-free solder, the 8800 series cards failed very often, as the chip eventually lost contact with the substrate due to temperature changes. This was temporarily treated by warming up the chip, or completely replacing it. A similar problem appeared later on the gtx480/580/780, but on a smaller scale.
At that time, in 2006-2007, the window glass separated me from the 8800gtx. All I could do was admire it for a long time in stores, because the price tag was such that I could only dream of it. Even the 8800gts 320 was not much more accessible to me. At that time, he only had an Asus Geforce 6800LE 128MB video card, which he was glad about.
But a lot of time has passed since then, but vivid memories remain.
In this regard, I began to look after the 8800GTX in used sectors, but I had no luck for a long time. In my city, if they appeared, they were either faulty or after warming up. But now, at last, there is an opportunity to purchase the desired, and even better than expected, namely, an even rarer modification of 8800gtx. Meet the Nvidia Quadro FX5600.
In terms of characteristics, the main difference from 8800GTX is twice the amount of video memory, 1536 MB vs. 768. Slightly higher than the frequency of the graphic chip, but the memory frequency is lowered. So, in terms of gaming performance, plus or minus, they should match.
Other differences are external. The top quads of that generation are made more reliable than their gaming counterparts, perhaps not even subject to moldboard. In this model, the quad differed significantly, both in the printed circuit board and in the design as a whole. The board is much longer than 8800gtx, the length of the textolite is simply deadly and is 312mm, this is the longest card that I had, and before that I also had 2x chip 3870,4870,5970,6990.
The cooling is more massive, there is also a backplate, and a metal stiffening frame along the card. Holding it in your hands, you feel the quality and strength, the time machine would go 12 years ago with it.
Now a lot has changed and if you look at the flagship Quadro RTX and its gaming counterpart, you can see the following: the card is clad in metal. Looks very stylish and fundamental.
And here is the «brick» of the Quadro RTX 6000:
Again, the usual turbine in the singular, and the backplate is completely absent, as if the design was cheaper, relative to the game counterpart. The design of the Quadro RTX 6000 reminded me of the GTX 680 from 2012, but the price for it is about 6 times higher than for the 2080Ti!
Let’s get back to the heroine of the review — Quadro FX 5600. Unlike the 8800GTX, the card also has a list of functions for professional applications. For example, higher levels of anti-aliasing in the list of 3D editors, faster real-time rendering in them, more advanced functionality of the nView desktop manager, and much, much more.
But I will not go into these details, now I’m only interested in gaming performance. Let me just briefly compare the Quadro FX 5600 with a much more, albeit modern, but still gaming video card — the Radeon R9Nano in imitation of a number of professional applications, namely the current Quadro FX 5600 benchmark Viewperf 10 2007.
As you can see, the NVidia Quadro FX5600 outperforms even AMD’s top 2015 in 7 out of 8 tests, which justifies its name «Quadro», even after such an impressive time that one cannot but rejoice!
Just think! In 2007 it cost 5 times more than 8800gtx — $3000 and that’s in the USA without cheating! The card did not see a blade for the entire time of operation, according to the seller, and I believed this, since I did not find external signs of warming up during a thorough examination. I got the card completely naked, without a box and other things.
So, let’s move on to gaming tests and compare the Quadro FX 5600 with the integrated video card in my CPU — Intel iris pro 5200.
The system parameters are as follows:
Motherboard — Msi b85 pc mate
Memory — 12gb ddr3 1333, 2 sticks of 2 gigs and 2 of 4.
System — Win10 pro 1903
Drivers for Intel and NVidia installed the latest available.
Recording video of the gameplay from the Nvidia video card was made using the Mirillis action program, the decoding load fell on the built-in from intel, which worked in parallel using Intel Quick Sync Video technology. Recording with Intel was similar, but helped her Radeon r9 Nano with its AMD APP technology. The drop in performance for both participants was approximately the same and not categorical.
Test in 10 games. The layout is something like this:
Moreover, the integrated video core uses RAM, which is the same as the processor, and not graphics. In addition, the memory is only 1333 MHz in dual-channel mode, which gives only 128 bits and only a gigabyte is allocated for graphic purposes!
How far progress has progressed from 2006 to 2013, after all, only 7 years have passed, and such a monstrous video card loses in power to the video core built into the processor! It is hard to believe that in 2025, the video cores integrated into the processors of that time will not only overtake, but at least equal in performance to the 2018 RTX2080ti.
Thank you for your attention and I hope that this article will be interesting, since I myself asked myself a similar question comparing with my iGPU, the flagship from 2006, when I didn’t have an 8800 on hand, but I didn’t find an answer on the Internet.
More complete video version of this comparison.
Comparison with gtx1060 6Gb in 6 games:
This content has been written by a website visitor and has been rewarded.
PNY Quadro FX 4600 580Mhz PCI-E 768Mb 1800Mhz 384 bit 2xDVI TV price, specifications, video review, reviews
General characteristics
*
| Passive cooling | No |
Max.
|