Overclocking and Test Setup — AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Review: Non-X Marks the Spot — Tom’s Hardware
Why you can trust Tom’s Hardware
Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
Overclocking and Test Setup
AMD’s Ryzen 3000 processors have drastically improved single-threaded performance, but you’ll lose that benefit if you manually overclock. That’s largely because the chips can’t be manually overclocked on all cores to reach the same frequency as the single-core boost frequency. In fact, we often find the all-core overclock ceiling to be 200 to 300 MHz lower than the rated boost speeds, which is likely due to the AMD’s new binning strategy that finds the Ryzen 3000 chips with a mix of both faster and slower cores.
We’ve tested several of the Ryzen 3000 processors in manually-overclocked configurations, and the results are predictable: You gain some extra threaded performance over automatic overclocking with PBO, but lose too much performance in lightly-threaded apps to make it worthwhile. In other words, outside of a few edge cases, like systems that will only do heavily-threaded work, manual overclocking simply isn’t worth your time — or the egregious power consumption it requires for relatively small performance gains.
As we’ve seen, AMD’s PBO algorithms provide a speedup that improves threaded performance while preserving the single-core boost frequency. The feature also keeps the Ryzen processor in its power-to-performance sweet spot, which means that it doesn’t require much additional power consumption or cooling. Unfortunately, PBO gains are slight (don’t expect miracles), but it is worthwhile if you have adequate cooling. As we’ve found in the past, AMD’s stock coolers tend to extract most of the full benefit.
AMD’s Precision Boost Overdrive (PBO) is an adaptive overclocking approach that allows the processor to communicate with the platform to modulate performance based on the motherboard’s power delivery subsystem and thermal dissipation capabilities. The processor monitors Package Power Tracking (PPT), which is total socket power, and the Thermal Design Current (TDC) variable, which is the motherboard’s maximum available sustained current. Electrical Design Current (EDC) also indicates the maximum current possible from the VRMs during peak/transient conditions.
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (AMD Ryzen 5) at Newegg for $104.99
Swipe to scroll horizontally
65W CPU Limits | PPT | EDC | TDC |
AMD IPM | 88W | 60A | 90A |
MSI X570 Godlike | 1000W | 490A | 630A |
AMD enables two options for PBO: IPM is AMD’s default PBO setting, which is activated if you leave the PBO setting to ‘Auto’ in the Godlike’s UEFI (our testing board). But you can select ‘Enabled’ to activate a profile that’s dictated by the maximum limits of the motherboard’s power delivery subsystem. These limits vary by motherboard and are defined by the vendor. We chose the latter to unlock the full potential of PBO. This setting kicks the socket’s maximum power delivery up to 1000W to offer the best of increased multi-core boost clocks while retaining the high single-core boost clocks. You won’t need anything near that much power delivery, but we don’t want to leave any performance on the table.
AMD says you can also further tune the chip with an Auto OC (AOC) feature. AMD designed the new feature to give you some control over the maximum attainable boost clocks by allowing you to add up to an extra 200MHz to the maximum boost clock, but it isn’t guaranteed that the processor will reach those speeds at all times, or under all conditions.
Unfortunately, we’ve found that the PBO+AOC feature often comes at the expense of performance in single-threaded workloads even though it is billed as retaining, and even heightening, single-core boost clocks. In most cases, the feature has no observable impact.
Security Mitigations
The new AMD-optimized Windows scheduler is only present in Windows 10 1903 and promises to expose gains in several types of applications. As such, we updated our test image to the latest version of Windows 10 available (18362.207). All of our test results come from the aforementioned operating system and include all publicly available security mitigations and the latest motherboard firmware revisions. Intel is currently impacted by Spectre, Spectre v4, Meltdown, Foreshadow, Spectre v3a, Lazy FPU, Spoiler, and MDS, while AMD is only impacted by Spectre and Spectre v4. AMD has added hardware-based mitigations for both variants of Spectre, which should reduce the performance impact, but the requisite patches for both companies have performance penalties, which are reflected here in our testing.
Phoronix Benchmark
We added in several new tests from Phornix’s open-source benchmark suite. While this suite is heavily focused on Linux test environments, the benchmark utility does have several powerful testing options for Windows systems, along with Apple OS X, GNU Hurd, Solaris, and BSD operating systems. The test also outputs deviation metrics that help ensure accuracy in our test results.We’ve integrated key tests, like GIMP productivity, web browser benchmarks, SVT-AV1 encoding, NAMD, and the build-llvm compile test.
MSI MEG X570 Godlike
We’re using MSI’s MEG X570 Godlike as our test platform for the second- and third-gen AMD processors. The pricey Godlike board retails for around $800, but has the 14+4+1-phase power delivery subsystem to support aggressive overclocking.
The MEG X570 Godlike comes with a few nifty accessories like a 10Gb “Super LAN” Ethernet card and a PCIe Gen 4 Xpander-Z M.2 expansion card. That lets you add two more M.2 drives to complement the three M.2 PCIe Gen 4 M.2 ports on the board. You also get four PCIe 4.0 x16 slots, an RGB Mystic Light Infinity II mirror over the IO shroud, and a tiny OLED screen, alongside the two-digit LCD display for error codes.
Comparison Products
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i5-9600K
Intel Core i7-9700K
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Test System & Configuration | |
Hardware | AMD Socket AM4 (X570)Ryzen 7 3800X, Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 5 3600X, Ryzen 5 3600, Ryzen 7 2700XMSI MEG X570 Godlike<2x 8GB G. Skill Flare DDR4-3200Ryzen 3000 — DDR4-3200, DDR4-3600Second-gen Ryzen — DDR4-2933, DDR4-3466Intel LGA 1151 (Z390)Intel Core i7-9700K, Core i5-9600K, Core i5-9400FMSI MEG Z390 Godlike2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2667 & DDR4-3466AMD Socket AM4 (X470)AMD Ryzen 5 1600XMSI X470 Gaming M7 AC2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2933All SystemsNvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 2TB Intel DC4510 SSDEVGA Supernova 1600 T2, 1600WWindows 10 Pro (1903 — All Updates) |
Cooling | Corsair h215iCustom Loop, EKWB Supremacy EVO waterblock, Dual-720mm radiatorsAMD Wraith Prism, Wraith Stealth Stock Coolers |
Test System and Configuration
Swipe to scroll horizontally
AMD Socket AM4 (X570) | |
Ryzen 7 3800X, Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 5 3600X, Ryzen 5 3600, Ryzen 7 2700X | |
MSI MEG X570 Godlike | |
2x 8GB G. Skill Flare DDR4-3200 | |
Ryzen 3000 — DDR4-3200, DDR4-3600 | |
Second-gen Ryzen — DDR4-2933, DDR4-3466 | |
Intel LGA 1151 (Z390) | |
Intel Core i7-9700K, Core i5-9600K, Core i5-9400F | |
MSI MEG Z390 Godlike | |
2x 8GB G.Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2667 & DDR4-3466 | |
AMD Socket AM4 (X470) | |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | |
MSI X470 Gaming M7 AC | |
2x 8GB G. Skill FlareX DDR4-3200 @ DDR4-2933 | |
All Systems | |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
2TB Intel DC4510 SSD | |
EVGA Supernova 1600 T2, 1600W | |
Windows 10 Pro (1903 — All Updates) | |
Cooling | |
Corsair h215i | |
Custom Loop, EKWB Supremacy EVO waterblock, Dual-720mm radiators | |
AMD Wraith Prism, Wraith Stealth Stock Coolers |
MORE: Best CPUs
MORE: CPU Benchmark Hierarchy
MORE: All CPUs Content
Current page:
Overclocking and Test Setup
Prev Page Non-X Marks the Spot
Next Page Power Consumption
Paul Alcorn is the Deputy Managing Editor for Tom’s Hardware US. He writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage and enterprise hardware.
Help With OC Ryzen 5 3600
What’s the safe voltage of a early banch Ryzen 5 3600 for 24/7?
i’m using [email protected] (1.306v under heavy load) and i’m afraid of Degradation.
On AIDA stability test my CPU reach ~73°C.
Should i use PBO instead?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
1 — 20 of 21 Posts
1devomer
·
Banned
byDenoso
·
Registered
rdr09
·
Premium Member
1devomer
·
Banned
Melan
·
OCN is bad civilization
1devomer
·
Banned
Melan
·
OCN is bad civilization
byDenoso
·
Registered
byDenoso
·
Registered
rdr09
·
Premium Member
byDenoso
·
Registered
rdr09
·
Premium Member
1devomer
·
Banned
rdr09
·
Premium Member
1devomer
·
Banned
rdr09
·
Premium Member
byDenoso
·
Registered
1devomer
·
Banned
byDenoso
·
Registered
1 — 20 of 21 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top
AMD Ryzen 5 5500 review and test — i2HARD
The release of the Ryzen 5000 line at the end of 2020 marked new heights of performance. The bar of price tags also shifted up by $50, but the real cost was even worse, and many were waiting for the replenishment of the line with younger processors. Despite the regular rumors about the ryzen 5 5600, months, quarters passed, and there were still no new products. And now, after a year and a half, AMD has finally introduced the budget Ryzen 5500, 5600 and 5700X. And if the last two are slightly underclocked 5600X and 5800X, then the Ryzen 5 5500, the hero of today’s review, is the offspring of the 5600G, devoid of graphics.
Recommended price pleases. It is almost 2 times cheaper than the 5600X, while it also has 6 cores and 12 threads on the Zen 3 microarchitecture, but the maximum frequency is 400 MHz lower. The affinity with the 5600G means a lot more differences. The most critical of them is the size of the L3 cache. Its 2 times less. PCI-Express is also not new: the 3rd version, with the existing fifth or the 4th in the last generation, is not impressive. However, there are also several advantages. Here, a single-crystal layout, not a chiplet one, which should have a positive effect on temperatures. Also, two memory controllers have not gone away, allowing you to work in 1 to 1 mode with RAM at much higher frequencies, but more on that later.
Contents:
- Test bench
- Stock tests
- Benchmark tests
- Temperatures and consumption
- Tests in games
- Cost and test results in stock
- Acceleration
- Benchmark tests
- Tests in games
- Single Rank vs Dual Rank
- Conclusion
Test bench
Let’s start, as always, with the stock. Classic XMP 3200 MHz CL16 will provide two single-rank Crucial Ballistix modules on Micron Rev.B chips with a total capacity of 32 GB.
Ryzen 5 3600 and 5600X to mark the frontier, and the i3-12100 as the blue camp opponent. The cooling system is one of the best tower coolers with four ID-Cooling SE-224-XT Black v2 heat pipes. The rest of the components are in front of you, the operating system is Windows 10.
- Video card: Palit GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GameRock OC
- Processor # 1: AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Processor # 2: AMD Ryzen 5 5500
- Processor # 3: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- CPU #4: Intel Core i3-12100
- Motherboard #1: ASRock B550 Taichi Razer Edition
- Motherboard #2: ASUS TUF Gaming Z690-Plus WIFI D4
- RAM Crucial Ballistix WhiteBL2K16G32C16U4 System cooling: ID-Cooling SE-224-XT BLACK V2
- Storage: Crucial MX500 2 TB
- Power supply: Deepcool DQ850-M-V2L
- Chassis: Open Stand
- Operating system: Windows 10
Tests in stock
Tests in benchmarks
There is not much interesting in Hades. The higher latencies and slower cache speeds of the 5500 compared to the 5600X are due to the lower core clock, and full write speed is a matter of architecture, none of which will be critical in most applications.
In CPU-Z, the almost equal frequency of 3600 and 5600 leads to only a 10% difference due to the microarchitecture, 5600X demonstrates the result by the same amount more simply due to the frequency. The 12100, of course, is not able to compensate for the lack of two cores with their performance, so it falls well behind in the multithread test.
In Cinebench R23, the load is higher, so the ryzens, due to the power limit and higher temperatures, lowered the frequency, especially the 5600X, due to which the gap between the i3 and the six-cores was reduced.
A varied set of small Geekbench benchmarks scaled by memory speed and AVX-512 instructions allowed the quad-core to catch up with the ryzens, with the 5500 barely outperforming the 3600 in the multi-threaded test.
The rendering of the project in Adobe Premiere Pro is also almost indistinguishable in terms of speed between 3600 and 5600. And the result of the other participants is not very different.
Temperatures and power consumption
The temperature and power test this time turned out to be perhaps the most unpredictable of our experience. Let’s start with the fact that the 3600 is incredibly hot. Yes, we have a budget tower for four heat pipes, but even under LSS it is decently heated. It is very likely that the thermal interface under the cover is defective, because in our review of the 5600X we also compared it with the 3600XT, which was much colder. The surprises don’t end there. The 5500, unlike the 5600X, does not hit the power limit at a much higher voltage for the same 6 cores, has 15 watts lower power consumption, but is still hotter than the 5600X. i3 turned out to be the coldest, despite the thermal paste under the cover, according to our assumptions.
Tests in games
Next, as always, games.
Cyberpunk graphics preset: ultra ray tracing, RT reflections off, DLSS: ultra performance, high crowd density. The vast majority of games parallelize worse than synthetics. Cyberpunk is no exception, so high performance per core, coupled with a fast memory subsystem, gives the i3 an edge over the younger ryzens. On average FPS 5500 is in the middle between 3600 and 5600X, but on rare and very rare events statistics it is closer to 3600.
Far Cry 6, ultra preset, DXR reflections and shadows enabled, HD textures disabled. This game parallelizes worse, so the advantage in the number of cores is minimal here, but high performance per core due to microarchitecture or banal frequency allows the 5600X and 12100 to gain a significant lead over the 3600 and 5600. The frametime on the i3 is the most even.
Shadow of Lara, highest graphics preset, resolution modifier 20%. While there was only a mountain in the field of view, the 5600X filled itself with an average FPS due to the large L3 cache, surpassing the 5500 in this indicator by a third, but when the camera dropped to the market, its FPS was already less than 20% higher. And the lag of 12100 has become less than 10%. The power consumption of the novelty is ridiculous, a little over 30 watts.
StarCraft II, all settings maxed out. In dual-threaded play, the ryzens feel free to maintain their max clock while the i3 sticks to an all-core boost due to the little background activity created by monitoring. However, the i3 is only marginally behind the 5600X, while the 3600 and 5500 are well behind.
Total War Saga: Troy, ultra preset, grass and units: extreme, resolution and anti-aliasing to a minimum. And here is an exception to the rule — a game that looks more like a synthetic test than a game benchmark. No amount of high IPC saves the i3 from missing two cores. The 5500 is again closer in performance to the 3600 than to the 5600X.
CS:GO, minimum settings, maximum textures and anti-aliasing. The solid 32 MB L3 cache of the 5600X was ideal for this shooter, due to which it is 1.5 times faster than the 3600, but according to the statistics of very rare events, they are almost equal. i3-12100 does not shine with a large cache. Only 12 MB, but the ability to use it, as well as fast cores, helped to bypass the first two ryzens, and at less than 1% and 0.1% it leads in this quartet.
On average for the ward, it turns out that the new product is a little faster than the ryzen 5 3600 and it is still far from the 5600X. 12100 still outperforms it in most games. The only exception is Troy. If you believe that all games will be like this in the future, then choosing six-core is a priority for you.
Cost and test results in stock
However, one more important parameter must be taken into account — cost. The recommended prices are one thing, but the real ones. However, the price tag is inadequate. Even with a more expensive motherboard, the 12100 looks much more attractive than all the ryzens.
If you consider Aliexpress, then 5500 costs almost the same as 3600. If you are not embarrassed by PCI Express 3.0, then it is better to choose it. Paying a little over two thousand for a 5600X or 5600 is worth it. As for the 12100, it is undoubtedly cheaper. And if you take it for the sake of “here and now”, then even with a more expensive motherboard it is more profitable. However, a lot of motherboards based on the B450 and B550 chipsets will allow you to upgrade to some 5800X3D, while a budget motherboard based on the H610 chipset will not withstand anything more than 12400 without limits. Yes, and the memory is not particularly chasing.
Also, don’t forget that i3 is not as strong in rendering as it is in games. Here six-core is preferable. But keep in mind that this is Aliexpress with its risks. We ordered 5600, and 3600 arrived instead.
Overclocking
Now about overclocking. For the Ryzen 5 3600 and 5600X, the memory setup came out the same. This is 3800 MHz with the first timing of 14. The cores were overclocked in different ways. If for the 3600 the only option was to fix the frequency at around 4300 MHz, then for the 5600X they made the adjustment through the Curve Optimizer.
On the 5500, single rank ballistics feel great. In our case, we managed to take 4733 MHz in 1: 1 mode with the first timing 17 without any problems. A further increase in frequency requires a much higher voltage on the SoC. At the same time, the cores turned out to be stubborn, so they also tuned them through the Curve Optimizer.
The limited voltage on the SA of the i3-12100 around 900 mV allowed us to conquer the same 3800 MHz with the first timing 14, as on the first two ryzens. There is no processor overclocking here, and he does not need an undervolt, so there are no changes here.
Benchmark tests
In AIDA64, the new product demonstrates decent memory performance, but in terms of latency, the result is almost the same as that of the 5600X.
In CPU-Z, the choice of overclocking via Curve Optimizer resulted in an increase in the lead from 3600 in the single-thread test and to a decrease in the multi-thread test.
In Cinebench, the 5600X no longer hits the power limit, so its lead hasn’t been shaken.
But in Geekbench i3-12100 weakened. Memory tuning on ryzen’ah gave a much greater increase.
And only in the premiere, an additional gigahertz of the memory frequency allowed the 5500 to outperform the 5600X by a couple of seconds. Let’s remember this one victory.
Tests in games
Cyberpunk also loves high memory bandwidth, but 5500 average FPS remained exactly centered between 3600 and 5600X, however, the statistics of rare and very rare events became closer this time to 5600X. The i3-12100 received less overclocking, which forced it to drop to third place.
In FarCry 6, the quad-core intel continues to breathe in the back of the 5600X. More memory overclocking and a 200 MHz increase in the maximum core frequency did not help the 5500 and it is still slightly faster than the 3600. Only small bursts in frametime are at the 5600X level.
There were no cardinal changes in the chest either. The strength of the 5600X cache is undeniable, so the FPS 5500 is again much closer to 3600, and the i3 was outperformed only in the most difficult section, and even then by a couple of frames.
Surprisingly, in Starcraft i3-12100 caught up with 5600X in average FPS, although before that memory overclocking gave the second a bigger boost. And the increase in frequency on ryzen did not foreshadow the loss of superiority. But life is full of surprises. The result of 5500 was once again not surprising.
In Troy, high memory bandwidth allowed for 5500 FPS average between 3600 and 5600X. Before that, it was closer to 3600. i3 was completely behind. If in stock the 3600 was only 10% faster than it, now the gap has increased to 25%.
In counter, the 5600X received an increase only from tuning via PBO. For other processors, memory overclocking gave at least something. However, the layout has not changed. 3600 and 5500 are almost equal, and 12100 has not lost second place to anyone in average FPS and less than 1%, as well as leadership in statistics of very rare events.
The average value for all games only confirmed our observations. The position of 5500 has not changed much. It’s still slightly faster than the 3600, but well behind the 5600X. 12100 has become closer to it, and the gains from overclocking also speak of this. Despite the plus gigahertz in memory compared to the 5600X, overclocking gave 5% more FPS on average FPS. 12100 also received a little, and this despite a good controller by the standards of non-CPUs.
Single Rank vs Dual Rank
Another fly in the ointment for the 5500 is the fact that dual-rank memory will run noticeably worse. Recall that the participating ballistics on Micron Rev.B chips are peer-to-peer. The same modules may contain more well-known Micron Rev.E chips. Such modules are already dual-rank, and the frequency of 4333 MHz with the first timing of 18 turned out to be the ceiling for them. Gear Down Mode is not disabled on them, so CL17 is unattainable in our case.
And despite being dual-ranked, performance is lower with these modules. While on rivals with their 3800 MHz ceiling, the result will be better or at least not worse. Dual-rank modules based on Samsung B-Die chips are even worse in frequency. There was no launch above 4000 MHz. Therefore, keep in mind that the high memory frequency for the 5500 is achievable on peer-to-peer modules.
Conclusion
Who is the Ryzen 5 5500 for? For those who can’t or don’t want to pay extra for 5600 or 5600X. For those who are looking for a more promising upgrade compared to i3 with a budget board. Or for someone who does not have 4 cores. If it costs not much more than 3600, then the novelty will be faster. And, finally, for enthusiasts who want to play with high-frequency memory.
How to Overclock AMD Ryzen Processors with Ryzen Master
Functionality
The program gives you the opportunity to monitor all kinds of indicators of your processor in Real Time. You have the ability to make changes to certain parameters, or simply monitor them. For ease of use, these options have been divided into two sections. Often this software is used by players who want to improve the performance of their device. This is done by increasing the frequencies, as well as changing other parameters of the silicon chip. You can prepare several profiles with settings for yourself in order to switch between them when working with certain programs. It is very convenient to make yourself a profile with increased frequencies for games and a lighter profile for trivial tasks. It is worth noting that switching is done using hot keys, which you can bind yourself.
AMD Ryzen Master
With the AMD Ryzen Master Utility, you can easily overclock your AMD Ryzen processor and DDR4 RAM. One of the main advantages of the software is the ability to overclock the processor without restarting the computer and entering the BIOS settings. The frequency can be adjusted and increased for all AMD processors with an unlocked multiplier.
Powerful tools are available to monitor various CPU parameters. The Temperature tool determines the current temperature, the Peak Speed section displays recent peak frequency readings. The sections PPT (Total Socket Power) and TDC (Thermal Design Current) show the power consumption of the processor socket as a percentage of the maximum capabilities of the motherboard, and also reveal the current strength and the ratio of optimal and increased heat dissipation characteristics.
If you are interested in current values for a certain period, you can use the EDC (Electrical Design Current) option. In addition, the information panel contains a useful PTC (Proccessor Thermal Control) line that displays the temperature at which the CPU clock frequency will be reduced in order to protect it from critical overheating.
Despite the lack of Russian-language localization, the utility is very convenient to use. The main part of the window is occupied by the desktop, on which the user will change various configurations. At the top there is a Reset button designed to reset user settings to default. Pay attention to the Expand function, which allows you to view data on the change in temperature and frequency of the CPU core in the form of a detailed graph. This will help keep the device functioning correctly.
Below is a panel consisting of four profiles: Game mode, Creator mode, «Profile 1/Profile 2». You can choose one of the preset modes or create and save your own profiles to launch specific games and applications. You can switch between them with one click of the mouse.
The software can overclock integrated Radeon Vega graphics. It is recommended to increase the frequency in steps of 25-50 MHz, and then test new configurations. Dynamic Local Mode is available, which can automatically increase PC performance in heavy toys and graphic editors, which will start and run much faster and more stable.
Key features
- Software solutions only work with desktops and laptops based on Windows 7 operating system or later;
- Only changes to AMD Ryzen processors are supported;
- You can create several profiles with different parameters and quickly switch between them using hotkeys;
- The software solution was created by AMD itself;
- The application is provided free of charge, so that it can be downloaded by all users with the same processor.
Programs for the Ryzen
Ryzen Master
AMD Ryzen processors have an unlocked multiplier, so you can greatly increase system performance through overclocking. For this, AMD has released a special utility — Ryzen Master. With the help of its interface, overclocking is more comfortable than in the BIOS. It allows you to change the processor overclocking settings directly while working in the operating system environment. You can create 4 profiles with different settings. Profiles can be created for both processor and memory.
The program has replaced the AMD Overdrive utility and provides a lot of options for overclocking the processor and RAM. It is possible to monitor all important indicators, change the fan speed and much more. We considered working with it in the article how to use Ryzen Master.
Ryzen DRAM Calculator
If you want to overclock your RAM or adjust timings for your AMD based computer, you will need the Ryzen DRAM Calculator. The program was created by Yuri Bubliy, better known under the nickname 1usmus. The program does not change the timings and memory voltage, but allows you to calculate the optimal values for different performance levels, which you can then set in the BIOS.
There are three options for memory overclocking in the program. These are safe (SAFE), fast (FAST) and EXTREME (maximum). Read more about its capabilities in the article how to use the Ryzen Dram Calculator.
AMD StoreMI
Like other programs for the AMD Ryzen processor, this one is designed to improve performance, but this time for the disk subsystem. SSD drives are fast, but expensive. HDDs have more capacity and are cheaper, but are much slower than SSDs. This technology moves the most frequently accessed data to an SSD for faster access. This technology has been around for a long time, but AMD has agreed with its manufacturer so that all buyers of motherboards with 400 500 and TRX40 chipsets can use it for free. With AMD StoreMI, you can take advantage of both types of drives:
- high speed typical for SSD;
- HDD capacity, but at a lower price.
If you have an AM4 socket motherboard with A320, B350, or X370 chipsets, you can still take advantage of this technology, but at an additional cost.
Ryzen Controller
This utility is somewhat similar to Ryzen Master, but it is released by a third party and is intended for laptops only. At the same time, it is simpler than Ryzen Master, so it is easier to understand it. It can work not only on Windows, but also on Linux since it is written in Node.js. In this program, you can change the following parameters:
- temperature limit;
- fan speed;
- maximum electricity consumption limit and more.
Ryzen Timing Checker
Ryzen Timing Checker allows you to view timings, sub-timings, and other indicators related to computer RAM. Suitable for enthusiasts who want to know all the information about their RAM to achieve maximum performance.
1usmus Power Plan
This tool (actually — power plans) will give you the opportunity to increase the performance of your processor without your intervention. Everything will be set up automatically. It should be clarified that this add-on will not work correctly with all AMD Ryzen models — only with the third generation of these processors using the Zen 2 microarchitecture, for example, for the Ryzen 3600 or 3600X and other processors of its generation.
The program was created by Yuri Bubliy (1usmus), who is also the author of the Ryzen DRAM Calculator program described above. The principle of operation is as follows: the dynamic frequency increases, including for one core, as a result of which there is an increase in processor performance by several percent.
MSI Smart Tool
All other items on this list are programs for overclocking the ryzen processor, or at least to improve its performance. But this program has nothing to do with performance, but if you want to install Windows 7 on Ryzen, then you will need this or a similar utility. It allows you to write a Windows image to a USB flash drive while embedding drivers for USB devices and NVMe drives into it. Such utilities were released not only by MSI. Other manufacturers have their counterparts, but we will not list them here.
AMD Overdrive program interface
As always, you will need to run the program as a Windows 10 administrator. Unfortunately, all AMD Overdrive menu items are in English. See the values of all parameters in Russian.
In the window that opens, the first section Status Monitor (Status Monitoring) allows you to view all the data about the processor, graphics card, and the motherboard itself.
CPU Status | detailed processor status data: frequency, multiplier, voltage and temperature |
GPU Status | graphics card status data, most likely integrated (onboard) graphics |
Board status , voltage and speed of rotation of fans connected to the motherboard | |
Logging | all history of changes in temperature, voltage and speed of installed fans |
Second section Performance Control allows the user to adjust settings to achieve system stability, optimize performance and control the cooling system.
Clock/Voltage | frequency and voltage settings |
Memory | very detailed settings for RAM |