Phenom II X2 560 BE
AMD
Phenom II X2 560 BE
Buy
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Summary
AMD started Phenom II X2 560 BE sales 21 September 2010. Based on a Callisto architecture, this desktop processor is primarily aimed at home systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 45 nm manufacturing technology, with a max turbo frequency of 3.3 and an unlocked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is
AMD Socket AM3
processor with a TDP of 80 Watt. It supports DDR3 memory.
We have no data on Phenom II X2 560 BE benchmark results.
General info
Phenom II X2 560 BE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | |
Market segment | Desktop processor | |
Architecture codename | Callisto (2009−2010) | |
Release date | 21 September 2010 (12 years old) | |
Current price | $90 | of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | |
Threads | 2 | |
Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | of 4.![]() |
Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | of 6 (Core i9-13900KS) |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | of 7475.2 (Apple M2 Pro 10-Core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | of 36864 (Apple M2 Max) |
L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | of 768 (EPYC 7373X) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
Die size | 258 mm2 | |
Number of transistors | 758 million | of 9900000 (Ryzen 5 7645HX) |
64 bit support | + | |
Windows 11 compatibility | — | |
Unlocked multiplier | + |
Compatibility
Information on Phenom II X2 560 BE compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | of 8 (Opteron 842) |
Socket | AM3 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Phenom II X2 560 BE’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.
PCIe version | 2.0 | of 5 (Core i9-12900K) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Phenom II X2 560 BE. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
We have no data on Phenom II X2 560 BE benchmark results.
Recommended GPUs
People consider these graphics cards to be good for Phenom II X2 560 BE, according to our PC configuration statistics.
GeForce GTX
550 Ti
14.1%
GeForce GTS
450
8.5%
GeForce GT
710
4.7%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
3.8%
GeForce GT
440
3. 3%
Radeon HD
6670
2.8%
GeForce GTX
560
2.8%
GeForce GTX
750 Ti
2.3%
Radeon R7
240
1.9%
Radeon HD
5570
1.9%
These are the fastest graphics cards for Phenom II X2 560 BE in our user configuration statistics.
There is a total of 213 configurations based on Phenom II X2 560 BE in our database.
GeForce RTX
4090
1.4% (3/213)
Radeon RX
6700
0.5% (1/213)
GeForce GTX
1080 Ti
0. 5% (1/213)
GeForce RTX
3060
0.5% (1/213)
GeForce RTX
2060
0.5% (1/213)
Radeon RX
5600 XT
0.5% (1/213)
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
0.5% (1/213)
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
3.8% (8/213)
GeForce GTX
960
0.9% (2/213)
Radeon R9
280
0.5% (1/213)
User ratings: view and submit
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X2 560 BE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Page not found
Page not found
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/phenom-ii-x2-560-be%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular CPUs
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
AMD Phenom II X2 560 specs : tests, competitors, price
- 003 Phenom II X2 560
Processor Phenom II X2 560
Quantity cores — 2.
The base frequency of the Phenom II X2 560 cores is 3.3 GHz.
Price in Russia
Do you want to buy Phenom II X2 560 cheaply? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.
Family
- Phenom II X2 545
- Phenom II X2 550
- Phenom II X2 555
- Phenom II X2 565
9 0024 Benchmarks AMD Phenom II X2 560
Gaming speed
Gaming and similar performance , according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CAD programs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
||
Minimum | Average | Maximum |
58 | Memory: 79 | 90 |
Memory 81. |
||
28 | 1 core: 45 | 51 |
1 core 18.9 |
||
44 | 2 cores: 84 | 99 |
2 cores 17.9 |
||
Demanding tasks |
||
Minimum | Average | Maximum |
52 | 4 cores: 86 | 99 |
4 cores 9. |
||
57 | 8 cores: 88 | 99 |
8 cores 4.9 |
Extreme |
||
Minimum | Average | Maximum |
54 | All cores: 87 | 99 |
All cores 1.6 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Compare
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Passmark
AMD Athlon II X3 415e
1441
AMD A8-3520M APU
1438
AMD Phenom II X2 565 9001 9
1435
AMD A4-6300 APU
1428
Intel Celeron N4000
1422
AMD Phenom II X2 560
1417
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3
1407
Intel Celeron 1020E
1406
Intel Pentium G850
1405
Intel Pentium 2030M
1402
Intel Pentium G6951
1383
Tests in games
FPS measured by us in popular games on AMD Phenom II X2 560 and compliance with system requirements. Please note that the official requirements of developers in games do not always match the data of real tests. Also, the result is strongly influenced by the overclocking of the system and the graphic settings in the game. We test at high settings in FullHD resolution to get numbers close to real gameplay.
There are currently 0 games in our database. On average, in all gaming tests, the processor scored 37.1 points out of 100, where 100 is the fastest gaming processor to date.
Select a game
Specifications
Main
Socket Installed in motherboards with a suitable socket. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS. | AM3 |
Manufacturer Firm | AMD |
Performance
Cores The total number of physical cores. | 2 |
ThreadsNumber of threads.![]() |
2 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Missing |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in case of corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 3.3 GHz |
Cache and RAM
Video core
PCI
Details
Competitors
Games | Office | Heavy duty | |
---|---|---|---|
Better than | Intel Xeon E5450 | Intel Pentium G4400 | Intel Xeon X5472 |
Worse than | Intel Xeon W3505 | Intel Xeon W3505 | Intel Xeon W3505 |
Please note that competitors are selected automatically based on performance in a particular task. Therefore, some may puzzle you. We are improving our selection algorithm, treat with understanding.
Compare
AMD Phenom II X2 560 vs Intel Xeon E5450
AMD Phenom II X2 560 vs Intel Pentium G4400
AMD Phenom II X2 560 vs Intel Xeon X5472
AMD Phenom II X2 560 vs Intel Xeon W3505
AMD Phenom II X2 560 vs Intel Xeon W3505
AMD Phenom II X2 560 vs Intel Xeon W3505
Your comment can be here
Phenom II X2 560 BE
AMD
Phenom II X2 560 BE
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started Phenom II X2 560 BE sales 21 September 2010. This is Callisto architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at home systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured using 45nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 3.3, the multiplier is unlocked.
In terms of compatibility, this is a socket processor
AMD socket AM3
with TDP 80W. It supports DDR3 memory.
We don’t have any test results for the Phenom II X2 560 BE.
General information
Details of the Phenom II X2 560 BE type (desktop or laptop) and architecture, as well as launch time and cost at the time.
Performance rating | not included | |
Type | Desktop | |
Callisto (2009−2010) | ||
Release date | 21 September 2010 (12 years ago) | |
Price now | 90$ | of 14999 9282) |
Features
Phenom II X2 560 BE quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.
Core | 2 | |
Thread | 2 | |
Base frequency | 3.3 GHz | of 4.7 (FX-9590) |
Maximum frequency | 3.3 GHz | of 6 (Core i9-13900KS) |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | of 7475.2 (Apple M2 Pro 10-Core) |
Level 2 cache | 512 KB (per core ) | of 36864 (Apple M2 Max) |
L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 904 44 of 768 (EPYC 7373X) |
Process | 45 nm | of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
Die size | 258 mm 2 9007 6 | |
Number of transistors | 758 million | of 9
0 (Ryzen 5 7645HX) |
Support 64 bit 48 | ||
Windows 11 compatible | — | |
Free multiplier | + |
Compatible
Information on Phenom II X2 560 BE compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.
Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.
Max. number of processors per configuration | 1 | of 8 (Opteron 842) |
Socket | AM3 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 W | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Memory support
Types, maximum size and channels of RAM supported by Phenom II X2 560 BE. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.
RAM types | DDR3 | of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
Peripherals
Phenom II X2 560 BE supported peripherals and how to connect them.
PCI Express revision | 2.0 | of 5 (Core i9-12900K) |
Benchmark tests
These are the results of the Phenom II X2 560 BE performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.
We don’t have any test results for the Phenom II X2 560 BE.
Best graphics cards for Phenom II X2 560 BE
We have 213 configurations based on Phenom II X2 560 BE in our database.
Statistically, the most commonly used graphics cards with Phenom II X2 560 BE are:
GeForce GTX
550 Ti
14.1%
GeForce GTS
450
8.5%
GeForce GT
710
4.7%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
3.8%
GeForce GT
440
3. 3%
Radeon HD
6670
2.8%
GeForce GTX
560
2.8%
GeForce GTX
750 Ti
2.3%
Radeon R7
240
1.9%
Radeon HD
5570
1.9%
Here are the most powerful video cards used with Phenom II X2 560 BE according to user statistics:
GeForce RTX
4090
1.4% (3/213)
Radeon RX
6700
0.5% (1/213)
GeForce GTX
1080 Ti
0.5% (1/213)
GeForce RTX
3060
0.5% (1/213)
GeForce RTX
2060
0.5% (1/213)
Radeon RX
5600XT
0.5% (1/213)
GeForce GTX
1060 6GB
0.