Phenom ii x4 630: AMD Athlon II X4 630 Specs

Athlon II X4 630 [in 3 benchmarks]


AMD
Athlon II X4 630

Buy

  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution

Summary

AMD started AMD Athlon II X4 630 sales on September 2009 at a recommended price of $63. This is Propus architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 45 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2800 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket AM3 processor with a TDP of 95 Watt. It supports DDR3 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at


2.09%

of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.


Athlon II
X4 630

vs


EPYC
7h22

General info


Athlon II X4 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance rating 1898
Value for money 6.02
Market segment Desktop processor
Architecture codename Propus (2009−2011)
Release date September 2009 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP) $63 of 305 (Core i7-870)
Current price $27 (0.4x MSRP) of 14999 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs


Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores 4 (Quad-Core)
Threads 4
Boost clock speed 2.8 GHz of 5.8 (Core i9-13900K)
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) of 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401)
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550)
L3 cache 0 KB of 32768 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998)
Chip lithography 45 nm of 5 (Apple M1)
Die size 169 mm2
Number of transistors 300 million of 57000 (Apple M1 Max)
64 bit support +
Windows 11 compatibility

Compatibility


Information on Athlon II X4 630 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 of 8 (Opteron 842)
Socket AM3
Thermal design power (TDP) 95 Watt of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Memory specs


Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 630’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory types DDR3 of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X)

Benchmark performance


Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Athlon II X4 630. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.


Athlon II X4 630
2.09

  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 Single-Core
  • GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%


Athlon II X4 630
2109

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%


Athlon II X4 630
338

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%


Athlon II X4 630
1134


Mining hashrates


Cryptocurrency mining performance of Athlon II X4 630. Usually measured in megahashes per second.


Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 3.6 Mh/s  

Relative perfomance


Overall Athlon II X4 630 performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.



AMD Phenom II X4 B93
100


Intel Celeron G3930T
100


Intel Pentium G3440T
100


AMD Athlon II X4 630
100


Intel Core i3-2125
99. 52


Intel Pentium G3258
99.52


Intel Pentium G2140
99.52

Intel equivalent


We believe that the nearest equivalent to Athlon II X4 630 from Intel is Celeron G3930T, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 2 positions in our rating.


Celeron
G3930T


Compare


Here are some closest Intel rivals to Athlon II X4 630:


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
100.48


Intel Pentium G3440T
100


Intel Celeron G3930T
100


AMD Athlon II X4 630
100


Intel Pentium G3258
99. 52


Intel Pentium G2140
99.52


Intel Core i3-2125
99.52

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.


Phenom II
X4 B93


Compare


Core i3
2125


Compare


Core 2
Quad Q9450


Compare


Athlon II
X4 631


Compare


Phenom II
X4 830


Compare


Core 2
Quad Q9400


Compare

Recommended graphics cards

These graphics cards are most commonly used with Athlon II X4 630 according to our statistics.


GeForce GTS
450

4.4%


GeForce GTX
550 Ti

4.4%


GeForce GTX
750 Ti

4.3%


GeForce GT
730

4.1%


GeForce GTX
650

4.1%


GeForce GTS
250

3.3%


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

3.2%


GeForce GT
630

3. 1%


GeForce GT
1030

3.1%


GeForce GT
710

2.5%

User rating


Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


Questions and comments


Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.


Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

The First $99 Quad Core CPU

by Anand Lal Shimpion September 16, 2009 12:00 AM EST

  • Posted in
  • CPUs

150 Comments
|

150 Comments

IndexSYSMark 2007 PerformanceAdobe Photoshop CS4 PerformanceVideo Encoding Performance3D Rendering PerformanceExcel & Content Creation PerformanceArchiving PerformanceGaming PerformancePower Consumption & OverclockingFinal Words

How does AMD respond to Lynnfield? Is it by drastically cutting prices on Phenom II? Nope. By introducing the world’s first quad-core processor to debut at $99. Now that’s cool.

It’s called the Athlon II X4 and its existence shouldn’t be any surprise. AMD quietly announced it along with the Athlon II X2 line.

Today we get two models: the Athlon II X4 630 and the Athlon II X4 620, priced at $122 and $99 respectively. The only difference between the two is clock speed; the 630 runs at 2.8GHz while the 620 runs at 2.6GHz. These are both AM3 chips meaning they’ll work in AM3 motherboards with DDR3 memory or AM2+ boards with DDR2 memory.

Processor Clock Speed L2 Cache L3 Cache TDP Price
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE 3. 4GHz 2MB 6MB 140W $245
AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE 3.2GHz 2MB 6MB 125W $245
AMD Phenom II X4 945 3.0GHz 2MB 6MB 125W $225
AMD Phenom II X3 720 BE 2. 8GHz 1.5MB 6MB 95W $145
AMD Phenom II X2 550 BE 3.1GHz 1MB 6MB 80W $105
AMD Athlon II X4 630 2.8GHz 2MB 0MB 95W $122
AMD Athlon II X4 620 2. 6GHz 2MB 0MB 95W $99
AMD Athlon II X2 250 3.0GHz 2MB 0MB 65W $87

This isn’t a harvested Phenom II nor is it a pair of Athlon II X2s, instead it looks like we have a brand new die on our hands (some Athlon II X4s will be crippled Phenom IIs but AMD insists that the new die will be used). The Athlon II X4 has four cores on a single die, but unlike the Athlon II X2 each core only has a 512KB L2 per core. You can tell by the die shot that the core-to-cache ratio is much higher than on the X2:

The 45nm Athlon II X4 Propus die

The 45nm Athlon II X2 die (note the larger L2 per core)

Like the rest of the Athlon II lineup there is no L3 cache. This helps keep the die small (and affordable) but also hurts performance:

Processor SYSMark 2007 Overall E-Learning Video Creation Productivity 3D
AMD Phenom II X4 920 (2.8GHz) 173 151 212 167 167
AMD Athlon II X4 630 (2. 8GHz) 157 128 221 131 162
% of Phenom II X4 91% 85% 104% 78% 97%

 

At the same clock speed the Athlon II X4 should offer roughly 90% of the performance of a Phenom II X4.

Processor Cores Manufacturing Process L1 Cache L2 Cache L3 Cache Die Size Transistor Count
AMD Phenom II X4 4 45nm 128KB per core 512KB per core 6MB 258 mm2 758M
AMD Athlon II X4 4 45nm 128KB per core 512KB per core 0MB 169 mm2 300M
AMD Athlon II X2 2 45nm 128KB per core 1MB per core 0MB 117 mm2 234M
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8xxx 4 45nm 64KB per core 4MB 0MB 164 mm2 456M

 

The price is unbeatable. If we ignore the 630 for a moment, the Athlon II X4 620 is by far the cheapest route to four cores on the market. Intel’s most affordable quad-core is the Core 2 Quad Q8200 at $163, while AMD would previously charge you $163 for a Phenom X4 9600B. This is where the AM3/AM2+ compatibility play really helps out. Motherboard/memory costs are as cheap as possible thanks to AMD’s incredible socket flexibility.

And just in case you’re wondering, yes, the Athlon II X4 620 actually delivers performance competitive with the Q8200 but for 60% of the cost. It’s not all that clear cut, there are some cases where the 620 is faster but others where the Q8200 is much faster. On average it ends up being a wash but you’ll want to pay attention to the coming pages to see how the cookie crumbles as it does vary from test to test.

Codename Propus

Overclocking isn’t unfortunately as good as the Phenom IIs; the result of a conscious design decision or simply the early nature of the Propus die. That being said, without a single extra millivolt I was able to hit 3.25GHz on my Athlon II X4 620 sample — making it even more valuable. Extra voltage proved mostly useless, I could only approach 3.4GHz with an extra 300mV.

Let’s see, have I thoroughly ruined the surprise? Check. Now let’s get to the tests.

The Test

Motherboard: Intel DX58SO (Intel X58)
Intel DX48BT2 (Intel X48)
Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-UD5P (AMD 790FX)
Chipset: Intel X48
Intel X58
AMD 790FX
Chipset Drivers: Intel 9.1.1.1015 (Intel)
AMD Catalyst 8. 12
Hard Disk: Intel X25-M SSD (80GB)
Memory: Qimonda DDR3-1066 4 x 1GB (7-7-7-20)
Corsair DDR3-1333 4 x 1GB (7-7-7-20)
Patriot Viper DDR3-1333 2 x 2GB (7-7-7-20)
Video Card: eVGA GeForce GTX 280
Video Drivers: NVIDIA ForceWare 180.43 (Vista64)
NVIDIA ForceWare 178.24 (Vista32)
Desktop Resolution: 1920 x 1200
OS: Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit (for SYSMark)
Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit

SYSMark 2007 Performance
IndexSYSMark 2007 PerformanceAdobe Photoshop CS4 PerformanceVideo Encoding Performance3D Rendering PerformanceExcel & Content Creation PerformanceArchiving PerformanceGaming PerformancePower Consumption & OverclockingFinal Words

Tweet

PRINT THIS ARTICLE

CPU-Z Benchmark for AMD Athlon II X4 630 (4T)

Intel Core i5-7600K

Intel Core i3-8350K

Intel Core i3-9100F

Intel Core i3-9100

Intel Core i5-7600

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i5-6600K

Intel Core i5-4690K

AMD Ryzen 3 1300X

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

Intel Core i5-6600

Intel Core i5-4690

Intel Core i5-7500

Intel Core i3-8100

Intel Core i5-4670K

Intel Core i5-4670

Intel Core i5-4590

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Core i5-3570K

Intel Core i5-7400

Intel Core i5-3570

Intel Core i5-4590S

Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3

Intel Core i5-3550

AMD Ryzen 3 1200

Intel Core i5-4460

Intel Core i5-6400

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Core i5-7300HQ

Intel Core i5-2500K

Intel Core i5-4440

Intel Core i3-1115G4

Intel Core i5-2500

Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2

Intel Core i5-3450

Intel Core i5-4430

Intel Core i5-3470S

Intel Core i5-3350P

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i5-6300HQ

Intel Core i5-3330

Intel Core i5-2320

Intel Pentium Gold G6400

Intel Core i5-2310

Intel Core 2 Extreme X9650

Intel Core i5-2300

Intel Core i3-1005G1

Intel Core i3-7100

Intel Xeon X5460

Intel Pentium Gold G5420

Intel Core i3-10110U

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Pentium Gold G5400

AMD Athlon 3000G

Intel Core i3-8145U

Intel Pentium G4600

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650

Intel Xeon E5450

Intel Xeon X5450

Intel Core i3-4170

Intel Core i5-2400S

Intel Pentium G4560

Intel Core i5-7300U

Intel Core i5 760

Intel Core i3-4160

Intel Core i7-7500U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

Intel Xeon E5440

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500

AMD Athlon 200GE

Intel Core i3-4150

Intel Core i3-8130U

Intel Core i5 750

Intel Core i3-4130

Intel Core i7-5600U

Intel Xeon E5430

Intel Core i7-6600U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400

Intel Core i5-4200H

Intel Core i5-7200U

Intel Core i7-5500U

Intel Core i5-4300M

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300

Intel Core i3-3240

Intel Core i7-3520M

Intel Core i7-6500U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300

Intel Core i5-4210M

AMD Ryzen 3 3250U

Intel Xeon X3430

AMD A10-6800K

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i3-2130

Intel Core i5-6300U

Intel Core i5-4200M

Intel Celeron J4125

Intel Core i5-5300U

Intel Core i7-4600U

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600

Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200

Intel Core i5-3340M

Intel Core i3-3210

Intel Core i3-2120

Intel Core i7-2640M

AMD A8-6600K

AMD Ryzen 3 2200U with

AMD A10-9700

Intel Core i5-3320M

Intel Core i7-2620M

AMD Ryzen 3 3200U with

Intel Core i5-6200U

Intel Core i7-4510U

AMD Athlon X4 760K

AMD Athlon X4 860K

AMD A10-5800K

Intel Core i5-5200U

Intel Pentium Silver N5000

AMD FX -4300

Intel Core i3-2100

Intel Core i5-3230M

Intel Core i5 650

AMD A10-7850K

Intel Core i5-2540M

Intel Core i5-4310U

Intel Core i7-4500U

Intel Core i3 550

Intel Core i7-3537U

AMD A8-5600K

Intel Core i5-3210M

Intel Core i5-2520M

AMD A8-9600

Intel Core i5-4300U

AMD A8-7600

Intel Core i3 540

Intel Core i5-2450M

AMD Athlon X4 840

Intel Core i3-7100U

Intel Pentium 5405U

AMD A8-7650K

Intel Celeron N4100

Intel Core i3 530

Intel Core i5-2430M

AMD Athlon X4 740

Intel Core i3-4000M

Intel Core i5-4210U

Intel Core i3-6100U

Intel Pentium 4415U

Intel Core i3-7020U

AMD FX -4100

AMD Phenom II X4 965

Intel Core i5-2410M

Intel Core i3-5010U

Intel Pentium N4200

Intel Core i5-4200U

Intel Core i3-3120M

Intel Core i5-3337U

Intel Celeron N3450

Intel Core i5 M 560

Intel Core i5 M 480

AMD Phenom II X4 955

Intel Core i3-5005U

Intel Core i3-3110M

Intel Core i5-3317U

AMD Athlon II X4 645

Intel Core i3-2370M

AMD Phenom II X4 945

Intel Core i5 M 460

Intel Core i3-6006U

AMD Athlon II X4 640

Intel Core i5 M 450

AMD A12-9720P RADEON R7; 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G

Intel Core i5 M 520

Intel Core i3-2350M

Intel Core i3-2330M

Intel Core i3-2328M

(YOU) AMD Athlon II X4 630

Intel Core i5 M 430

Intel Core i3-4030U

AMD A8-7410

AMD A10-9600P

Intel Core i3-2310M

Intel Core i3 M 370

AMD A8-6410

AMD A6-7310

Intel Core i3 M 380

Intel Core i3 M 330

Intel Core i3-4005U

Intel Core i3-4010U

Intel Core i3 M 350

AMD A6-6310

Intel Core i3-3217U

AMD A8-4500M

Intel Pentium N3540

Intel Pentium N3710

AMD A4-5000

Intel Pentium N3700

Intel Atom x5-Z8350

Athlon II X4 630 & 620: Affordable Quad Cores

The newly released Athlon II X4 630 and 620 finally bring quad core performance to the $100 level. With respective prices of $120 and $100, the high value X4 630 and X4 630 continue AMD’s sniping of Intel.

September 24, 2009 by Lawrence Lee

Product AMD Athlon II X4 630
AM3 Processor
AMD Athlon II X4 620
AM3 Processor
Manufacturer AMD AMD
MSRP US$120 US$100

The first quad core processors from AMD, the original Phenom line, failed to
top the performance of Intel’s offerings due in part to low clock speeds and
high power consumption. Even though they were modestly priced, they still did
not offer enough value to sway most high-end PC builders to AMD’s side. As a
result, Intel never felt the need to compete with AMD on price, and continued
to attach a price premium to their quad core CPUs. Phenom
II
helped AMD get back into the game, but they continued too kept their
quad cores at a distance with $200+ price-tags. The poor, unwashed masses with
only $100 to spare could not dream of having any more than a simple dual core
CPU.


Athlon II X4 die image. 4 individual cores with their own L2 caches, and
no L3 cache at all.


Our Athlon II X4 630 and 620 samples.

The newly released Athlon II X4 630 and 620 finally brings quad core computing
to the $100 level. With respective prices of $120 and $100, the 2.8 GHz X4 630
and 2.6 GHz X4 620 takes a serious stab at undercutting the $140 Q8200, currently
Intel’s cheapest quad core. Like the Athlon II X2, the X4 models lack the ample
L3 cache of the Phenom II’s. While this will undoubtedly have an impact on performance,
it also makes manufacturing these CPUs much cheaper. With prices like these,
even the most frugal PC builders will be compelled to take a look.

Comparison Table: $100~$150 Desktop Processors

Model

Clock Speed

Total L2 Cache

Total L3 Cache

TDP

Street Price*

Phenom II X4 810

2.60 GHz

2MB

4MB

95W

$145

Core 2 Quad Q8200

2. 33 GHz

4MB

N/A

95W

$140

Athlon II X4 630

2.80 GHz

2MB

N/A

95W

$123

Phenom II X3 720 BE

2.80 GHz

1.5MB

6MB

95W

$119

Core 2 Duo E7500

2.80 GHz

3MB

N/A

65W

$120

Phenom II X2 550 BE

3. 10 GHz

1MB

6MB

80W

$102

Athlon II X4 620

2.60 GHz

2MB

N/A

95W

$99

Pentium E6500

2.93 GHz

2MB

N/A

65W

$95

* best prices from Newegg/PriceGrabber as of September
21st, 2009

Besides the Q8200, the X4 630’s main competition comes from its own triple
core cousin, the X3 720 Black Edition. The lower clocked X4 620 really has no
equal as its price puts it squarely in dual core country. Its performance against
its closest rivals, the Pentium E6500 and X2 550 Black Edition will depend mainly
on the application, and whether it supports multiple threads.


CPU-Z screenshot: X4 630 at load.


CPU-Z screenshot: X4 620 at load.

TEST METHODOLOGY

Common Test Platform:

  • Zerotherm Zen FZ120
    CPU cooler
  • Corsair
    XMS3
    memory 2x2GB, DDR3-1600 @ 1333MHz, 9-9-9-24 (1066 MHz,
    8-8-8-20 for LGA775)
  • Asus EN9400GT Silent Edition
    graphics card – 512MB
  • Western Digital VelociRaptor
    hard drive – 300 GB, 10,000 RPM, 16MB cache, SATA
  • Seasonic
    SS-400ET
    ATX power supply
  • Microsoft
    Windows Vista SP1
    operating system – Home Premium, 32-bit
  • nVidia
    Forceware 190. 26
    graphics driver

Intel LGA775:

  • Intel
    Core 2 Quad Q8200S
    processor – 2.33 GHz, 45nm, 65W
  • Intel
    Core 2 Quad Q6600
    processor – 2.40 GHz, 65nm, 95W, G0 stepping
  • Asus
    P5Q3
    motherboard – P45 chipset

AMD AM3:

  • AMD
    Phenom II X4 810
    processor – 2.60 GHz, 45nm, 95W
  • AMD Athlon II X4 630 processor – 2.80 GHz, 45nm, 95W
  • AMD Athlon II X4 620 processor – 2.60 GHz, 45nm, 95W
  • AMD
    Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition
    processor – 2.80 GHz, 45nm,
    95W
  • AMD Phenom II X2 550 Black Edition
    processor – 3.10 GHz, 45nm, 80W
  • Asus M4A78T-E motherboard
    – 790GX chipset (onboard video disabled)

Measurement and Analysis Tools

  • CPU-Z
    to monitor CPU frequency and voltage.
  • CPUBurn
    processor stress software.
  • Prime95
    processor stress software.
  • Cyberlink
    PowerDVD
    to play H.264/VC-1/Blu-ray video.
  • Eset NOD32 as
    an anti-virus benchmark.
  • WinRAR as an
    archiving benchmark.
  • iTunes
    an audio encoding benchmark.
  • TMPGEnc
    Xpress
    as a video encoding benchmark.
  • PCMark05
    as a general system benchmark.
  • Seasonic
    Power Angel
    AC power meter, used to measure the power consumption
    of the system.
  • Custom-built, four-channel variable DC power supply, used to power
    and regulate the CPU fan.

Benchmark Test Details

  • Eset NOD32: In-depth virus scan of a folder containing 32 files of
    varying size with many of them being file RAR and ZIP archives.
  • WinRAR: Archive creation with a folder containing 68 files of varying
    size (less than 50MB).
  • iTunes: Conversion of an MP3 file to AAC.
  • TMPGEnc Xpress: Encoding a 1-minute long XVID AVI file to VC-1 (1280×720,
    30fps, 20mbps).

Our testing procedure is designed to determine the overall system power consumption
at various states (measured using a Seasonic Power Angel). To stress CPUs we
used Prime95 (large FFTs setting) or CPUBurn (which produced the higher power
draw). We also performed a short series of benchmarks featuring real-world timed
tests and synthetics.

Cool’n’Quiet and/or Intel SpeedStep were enabled (unless otherwise noted).
The following features/services were disabled during testing to prevent spikes
in CPU/HDD usage that are typical of fresh Vista installations:

  • Windows Sidebar
  • Indexing
  • Superfetch

Undervolting

Testing was also conducted with the main processors undervolted as low as possible
while remaining stable enough to survive Prime95’s torture test for 10 minutes.
Power savings from undervolting can be significant and the reduction in thermal
dissipation also makes for easier cooling. We managed to undervolt our X4 630
from 1.325V down to 1.200V. Our X4 620 sample had a higher stock voltage, 1.400V,
which we were able to decrease to 1.1625V.


CPU-Z screenshot: X4 630 undervolted to 1.200V from 1.325V.

CPU-Z screenshot: X4 620 undervolted to 1.1625V from 1.400V.

TEST RESULTS

Our test systems consist of 2x2GB of DDR3 memory, a GeForce 9400GT graphics
card, WD VelociRaptor hard drive and an OEM Seasonic power supply. Unfortunately
we did not have a Q8200 at our disposal so instead we a Q8200S (the 45W
version of the Q8200) and a Q6600, an older 95W 65 nm processor using a slower
1066 MHz front bus, but with a higher 2.4 GHz clock speed and twice as much
L2 cache. It is safe to assume an actual Q8200 will fall somewhere in-between
these two processors in terms of power consumption. The ambient temperature
was 22°C.

Test Results: General System Power Consumption (AC)

Processor

Idle

VC-1
Playback

CPU Load
(half cores)

CPU
(all cores)

C2Q Q8200S

64W

75W

99W

115W

X4 620 (UV)*

66W

86W

99W

124W

X2 550 BE

65W

85W

N/A

129W

C2Q Q6600

69W

83W

120W

139W

X4 630 (UV)*

71W

89W

111W

139W

X4 620

66W

87W

117W

153W

X4 630

71W

89W

122W

157W

X3 720 BE

76W

97W

N/A

153W

X4 810

79W

99W

127W

159W

*X4 630 undervolted by 0. 125V, X4 620 by 0.2375V.

Overall the X4 630 consistently used about 5W more than the lower clocked X4
620, not enough to be considered significant. Both proved to be more power efficient
than their Phenom II cousins, the X3 720 and X4 810, but only when idle or with
a light load like VC-1 video playback. It seems L3 cache creates a noticeable
energy demand. System power consumption between the two Athlon II X4’s and the
95W Q6600 were also similar except at full load where the Q6600 used 15~20W
less.

Undervolting reduced the X4 630’s full load consumption by 18W, while the X4
620 saved 29W. This was no surprise as we were able to undervolt the 620 by
almost twice the amount as the 630. When undervolted, our X4 620 sample probably
uses about the same amount of energy as a Q8200.

Performance

Test Results: Benchmarks

Processor

NOD32

WinRAR

iTunes

TMPGEnc

PCMark05

C2Q Q8200S

2:59

3:43

4:20

3:56

7648

C2Q Q6600

2:56

3:41

4:35

3:59

7740

X2 550 BE

2:34

3:09

4:44

4:54

7217

X4 810

3:05

3:32

5:38

3:29

7756

X4 630

3:10

3:58

5:21

3:19

8203

X3 720 BE

2:47

3:16

5:13

5:08

7738

X4 620

3:23

4:05

5:44

3:32

7660

Our brief benchmark suite favored the Q8200S over the X4 620/630. The Q8200S
held a large lead over the two Athlons in our iTunes encoding test, and posted
smaller wins in our anti-virus and file archiving tests. The X4 620 and 630
beat Intel’s offerings in video encoding with TMPGEnc — the type of task
where quad cores typically shine. Overall we’d say the Athlon II X4’s need another
200~300 MHz to truly compete with the Q8200 in our test suite, but if you typically
use more thread-aware applications, the balance will tip in the other direction.

The 2.8 GHz Athlon II X4 630 performed similarly to the 2.6 GHz Phenom X4 810
— an extra 200 MHz in clock speed seems to make up for the 630’s lack of
L3 cache. It should be noted however that the X4 800 series has 4MB of L3 cache
while the 900 series sports 6MB.

Average/Total Benchmark Power Consumption

Average Benchmark Power Consumption

Processor

NOD32

WinRAR

iTunes

TMPGEnc

C2Q Q8200S

75W

84W

78W

96W

X4 620 UV*

85W

82W

88W

104W

C2Q Q6600

86W

99W

92W

116W

X4 630 UV*

93W

90W

97W

116W

X4 620

93W

89W

99W

124W

X4 630

99W

95W

106W

131W

X2 550 BE

106W

105W

108W

118W

X4 810

109W

104W

112W

137W

X3 720 BE

112W

111W

118W

130W

*X4 630 undervolted by 0. 125V, X4 620 by 0.2375V.

Total Benchmark Power Consumption (watt-hours)

Test State

NOD32

WinRAR

iTunes

TMPGEnc

Total

C2Q Q8200S

3.73

5.20

5.63

6.29

20.85

X4 620 UV*

4.79

5.58

8.41

6.12

24.91

C2Q Q6600

4. 20

6.08

7.03

7.70

25.01

X4 630 UV*

4.91

5.95

8.65

6.41

25.92

X4 620

5.24

6.06

9.46

7.30

28.06

X4 630

5.23

6.28

9.45

7.24

28. 20

X2 550 BE

4.53

5.51

8.52

9.64

28.20

X4 810

5.60

6.12

10.52

7.95

30.19

X3 720 BE

5.20

6.04

10.26

11.12

32.62

*X4 630 undervolted by 0.125V, X4 620 by 0.2375V.

When we calculated the total number of watt-hours used during our tests, we
found that the new Athlon II’s beat their Phenom II cousins — the X4 810
by 7% and the X3 720 by 14%. The dual core X2 550 matched their energy efficiency
due its superior performance in the simpler applications in our test suite,
thanks to its L3 cache and higher clock speed. The Q6600 used about 11% less
while the 65W Q8200S dominated both Athlons by 26%. Undervolting brought the
two processors basically on par with the Q6600.

Thermals

Temperatures

Sensor

X4 630

X4 620

Stock

UV*

Stock

UV*

Core

35°C

31°C

34°C

28°C

CPU

41°C

38°C

41°C

38°C

Zerotherm FZ120 with Nexus fan @ 950 RPM.
Ambient temperature: 22°C.
*X4 630 undervolted by 0.125V, X4 620 by 0.2375V.

In our open testbed, cooled by a Zerotherm FZ120 heatsink using a Nexus 120
mm fan running at ~950 RPM, the temperatures reported by SpeedFan were fairly
low. The heatsink body was also cool to the touch. When stressed with CPUBurn,
both processors stabilized at 41°C (CPU sensor) 38°C (motherboard sensor).
Undervolting resulted in a 6-7°C decrease for the X4 630, and slightly more
for the X4 620. The Nexus fan was practically inaudible from one meter — with
a good heatsink keeping the new Athlon II’s cool without much noise pollution
is a relatively simple matter.

FINAL THOUGHTS

Our timed benchmarks showed evidence that the Athlon II X4 630 and 620 perform
slightly slower than Intel’s cheapest quad core, the Q8200, in mundane everyday
tasks like anti-virus scanning and file archiving. However, there is $20~$40
price difference, so from a value standpoint, they’re about the same. On the
other hand, the Q8200 fell to both the 630 and 620 in our most demanding test,
which involved video encoding. This result was echoed by benchmarks performed
by Xbit
Labs
and Anandtech
which showed that video encoding and rendering applications heavily favors AMD.
If video is your bag, but you’re hurting for cash, a X4 630 or 620 may be just
what the doctor ordered.

These new processors also complicate AMD’s lineup, with the big loser being
the Phenom II X3 series. The X4 630 is virtually the same price as the X3 720,
but it has an extra core and is more energy efficient. Pinned between the X4
640 and 630 as well as the higher-clocked Phenom II X2’s, there’s really no
place for the X3 720 anywhere in AMD’s lineup, not unless price-cuts are initiated
across the board.

Power consumption has been improved compared to the Phenom II’s, but they’re
still a step behind Intel in this regard. The difference when idle and under
light load is small though and as that’s how most systems operate during the
majority of their lifetime, it’s almost a non-issue. If you prefer to run your
system with as little power as possible, undervolting is an option. Our 630
and 620 samples undervolted well, resulting in a 8% and 11% improvements in
overall energy efficiency respectively during our timed benchmarks. Whether
at stock settings or undervolted, neither chips were difficult to cool quietly.

Removing the L3 cache from their Phenom II’s has resulted in better energy
efficiency and lower manufacturing costs which have been passed onto the consumer.
Best of all, AMD did not sacrifice much in the way of performance. The Athlon
II X4 630 and 620 represent the beginning of a new front in the age-old processor
war. They perform well enough to compete with Intel’s cheapest quad core CPU,
but with a lower price-tag. With the X4 630 and 620 going for $120 and $100
respectively, it seems that they want to put an AMD quad core processor in every
desktop. If Intel wants a piece of the action, they’ll have to lower themselves
to AMD’s level.

If you have an existing compatible AM2+/AM3 motherboard with a single/dual
core processor, or an original Phenom, the X4 630 and 620’s are attractive upgrade
options. For a new system, there are a couple of issues to consider besides
the price and performance of the CPU. The first being upgradeability —
AM3 is AMD’s latest socket, while LGA775, the only socket for which Intel has
sub-$200 processors, is all but a lame duck. Intel has shifted focus to LGA1156
and they are of course pushing their LGA775 user base to upgrade, which can
be a pricey transition given the higher cost of their motherboard chipsets.
AMD motherboards on the other hand continue to deliver more features at lower
cost, and most of them include a superior integrated graphics solution, such
as the HD 4200 incorporated in the 785G
chipset
.

Our thanks to AMD
and for
Athlon II X4 samples used in this review.

* * *

Articles of Related Interest
AMD’s
785G Chipset Boards: 780G Evolved
Intel Q9550S: A Greener Quad Core?
AMD Phenom II X2 550 BE & Athlon
II X2 250
AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition for
AM3
Phenom II: AMD pulls closer
Intel Core i7: Nehalem Launched

* * *

Discuss this article in the
SPCR forums.

AMD Athlon II X4 630 Specs, Price, and FPS in Games


4 4 2.8 GHz
Cores Threads Base Frequency

Geekbench 5 Single-Core

338

13%

Geekbench 5 Multi-Core

1132

4%

Availability

AMD Athlon II X4 630 Quad-core (4 Core) 2.80 GHz Processor — Socket AM3 PGA-938 — 2 MB — Yes — 45 nm — 95 W — 159.8

Buy on Amazon

CA$79.98

In Stock

Updated 107 minutes ago

Graphics Card

Resolution

Select game resolution

Graphics Settings

Select game graphics

Offset

Apply Offset

Value Rating

Performance Rating

Value per FPS

You will receive

… FPS

Alternatives for Athlon II X4 630

1080p, High

No alternatives — this is the best option

Specifications

General
Release Date Sep 16th, 2009
Segment Desktop
Socket AMD Socket AM3
Collection Athlon II X4
Codename Propus
Performance
Cores 4
Threads 4
Base Frequency 2. 8 GHz
Other
Power Consumption 95 W
Overclockable No
Integrated Graphics None

Builds Using AMD Athlon II X4 630

1080p, High

Find out which of the 2 CPUs performs better, view a side-by-side specification comparison.

Ryzen 5 5600X

CA$299.99

Ryzen 7 5800X

CA$358.98

Ryzen 7 5800X

CA$358.98

Ryzen 5 3600

CA$230

Ryzen 7 5800X

CA$358.98

Ryzen 9 5900X

CA$507.99

Ryzen 5 5600X

CA$299.99

Ryzen 9 5900X

CA$507.99

Ryzen 7 5800X

CA$358.98

Ryzen 5 3600X

CA$340

Ryzen 5 5600X

CA$299.99

Ryzen 5 5600G

CA$189.99

Refine results to filter 1558 processors by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a CPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.

Found 1558 CPUs.

Popularity

Processor

Performance

Ryzen 5 5600X

Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020


Performance Rating


CA$299.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 7 5800X

Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020


Performance Rating


CA$358.98 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i9-9900

Release Date: Apr 23rd, 2019


Performance Rating



Ryzen 9 5900X

Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020


Performance Rating


CA$507.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i7-12700K

Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021


Performance Rating


CA$551.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i9-12900K

Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021


Performance Rating


CA$728.98 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i5-9600K

Release Date: Oct 19th, 2018


Performance Rating


CA$306. 04 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 5 3600

Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019


Performance Rating


CA$230 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i5-12600K

Release Date: Nov 4th, 2021


Performance Rating


CA$406.5 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 9 5950X

Release Date: Nov 5th, 2020


Performance Rating


CA$707.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i5-11260H

Release Date: May 11th, 2021


Performance Rating



Ryzen 5 5600G

Release Date: Apr 13th, 2021


Performance Rating


CA$189.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i5-3550

Release Date: Apr 29th, 2012


Performance Rating


CA$111.78 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i9-9900K

Release Date: Oct 19th, 2018


Performance Rating


CA$1,042.6 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 7 4800H

Release Date: Jan 6th, 2020


Performance Rating



Core i5-11400F

Release Date: Mar 16th, 2021


Performance Rating


CA$229. 34 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i7-6700K

Release Date: Aug 1st, 2015


Performance Rating


CA$439.32 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i5-10400F

Release Date: Apr 30th, 2020


Performance Rating


CA$189.5 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i7-8700K

Release Date: Oct 5th, 2017


Performance Rating


CA$450 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 7 3700X

Release Date: Jul 7th, 2019


Performance Rating


CA$374.81 on Amazon

In Stock


Core i3-10100F

Release Date: Unknown


Performance Rating



Core i7-11700K

Release Date: Mar 16th, 2021


Performance Rating


CA$396.7 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 5 2600X

Release Date: Apr 19th, 2018


Performance Rating


CA$300 on Amazon

In Stock


Athlon X4 860K

Release Date: Aug 12th, 2014


Performance Rating


CA$45. 1 on Amazon

In Stock


Ryzen 5 5600H

Release Date: Unknown


Performance Rating



  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • Next

AMD Athlon II X4 620 and Athlon II X4 630 Processor Review

By Nathan Kirsch •

AMD Launches Propus For Under $100

AMD announced this morning, the first ever quad-core processor for less than $100 Suggested System Builder Price (SSBP). This is a significant announcement as quad-core processor prices have really fallen over the years and are now relatively affordable no matter what country you reside. Without further ado let’s take a look at the new processors.

AMD announced two AMD Athlon II X4 processors this morning. The AMD Athlon II X4 620 processor is the industrys first and only sub-$100 quad-core processor at this time as it is priced at $99. The other processor is the AMD Athlon II X4 630 processor, which costs $122 and has a multiplier increase that is good for a higher overall clock frequency. Both of these processors feature a 200MHz bus with a 2000MHz HT link and memory support for both DDR2 (up to 1,066 MT/s) and DDR3 (up to 1,333 MT/s). So, what is missing to make these processors so inexpensive?

Well, it seems that AMD has done away with all of the L3 cache on the AMD Athlon II X2 series. They did this by doing a double sourcing method in order to get the cores. AMD sent us an e-mail confirming that they are building AMD Athlon II X4 processors that are based on both the new ‘Propus’ 169mm die and the older ‘Deneb’ 258mm die size. When an AMD Deneb core (Phenom II X4 processor) fails the L3 cache test the L3 cache is disabled, so it basically becomes an Athlon II X4 processor. This makes good business sense as a processor isn’t being wasted due to a problem with the L3 cache. Instead, the fallout just gets stamped with a part number; in this case it will become an Athlon II. It will be interesting to see if consumers will be able unlock the L3 cache on any Deneb based AMD Athlon II X4 processors by simply enabling Advanced Clock Calibration (ACC). Companies like AsRock have been marketing how their boards unlock ‘hidden’ features like this, so time will tell. The other method uses a new die called Propus, which is designed from the ground up as an Athlon II X4 processor.

The smaller die of Propus means that it will be less expensive to manufacture and allows AMD to hit aggressive price points for quad core processors like we are seeing today as they have fallen below the $100 mark for the first time ever. They are built with the same great architecture as the Phenom II X4. That means they are built by GLOBALFOUNDARIES at Fab 1 in Dresden, Germany using the 45nm DSL SOI (silicon-on-insulator) process that all the other higher-end Phenom II processors use.

The first of the new processors that we will be looking at today will be the AMD Athlon II X4 620, which can be purchased for a cool $99.99. The processor runs between 0.925V-1.425v for normal operation and has an overall clock frequency of 2.6GHz. The processor is multiplier locked with a 13x multiplier as it is NOT a Black Edition processor. If you want to overclock this processor you’ll have to do that by increasing the 200MHz base clock. The CPU’s HT link is set to 2000MHz and features just the L2 cache level, which is 512KB of L2 per core. Featuring a 95W TDP means that the Athlon II X4 620 has the same power rating as a triple-core Phenom II processor.

Taking a closer look at the AMD Athlon II X4 630 processor with CPU-Z 1.52.2 you can see that this is a quad-core processor based off the ‘Propus’ core again, but the clock frequency is 2.8GHz. The processor is multiplier locked just like the Athlon II X4 620 processor, but it has a higher 14x multiplier. All the other features between the two processors are the same, so it, too, is a multiplier locked processor. The higher multiplier should be of interest to overclockers as a result. For an extra $30 the multiplier jump alone should be enough to justify the price premium. Speaking of price, let’s take a look at the Phenom II and Athlon II processor pricing.

CPU Name Cores Clock L2/L3 Cache HT Bus Socket TDP Price
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE 4 3.4GHz 2+6MB 4000MHz AM3 140W $179
AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE 4 3.2GHz 2+6MB 4000MHz AM3 125W $165
AMD Phenom II X4 945 4 3.0GHz 2+6MB 4000MHz AM3 125W $159
AMD Phenom II X4 925 4 2. 8GHz 2+6MB 4000MHz AM3 95W $139
AMD Phenom II X4 910e 4 2.6GHz 2+6MB 4000MHz AM3 65W $169
AMD Phenom II X4 905e 4 2.5GHz 2+6MB 4000MHz AM3 65W $175
AMD Phenom II X4 810 4 2.6GHz 2+4MB 4000MHz AM3 95W $139
AMD Phenom II X3 720BE 3 2.8GHz 1.5+6MB 4000MHz AM3 95W $104
AMD Phenom II X3 710 3 2.6GHz 1.5+6MB 4000MHz AM3 95W $99
AMD Phenom II X3 705e 3 2.5GHz 1.5+6MB 4000MHz AM3 65W $119
AMD Phenom II X2 555 2 3. 2GHz 1+6MB 4000MHz AM3 80W $99
AMD Phenom II X2 550 2 3.1GHz 1+6MB 4000MHz AM3 80W $91
AMD Athlon II X4 635 4 2.9GHz 2MB 4000MHz AM3 95W $120
AMD Athlon II X4 630 4 2.8GHz 2MB 4000MHz AM3 95W $102
AMD Athlon II X4 620 4 2.6GHz 2MB 4000MHz AM3 95W $99
AMD Athlon II X3 440 3 3.0GHz 1.5MB 4000MHz AM3 95W $84
AMD Athlon II X3 435 3 2.9GHz 1.5MB 4000MHz AM3 95W 3 2.7GHz 1.5MB 4000MHz AM3 95W $72
AMD Athlon II X2 255 2 3. 1GHz 2MB 4000MHz AM3 65W $75
AMD Athlon II X2 250 2 3.0GHz 2MB 4000MHz AM3 65W $65
AMD Athlon II X2 245 2 2.9GHz 2MB 4000MHz AM3 65W $61
AMD Athlon II X2 240 2 2.8GHz 2MB 4000MHz AM3 65W $53

The AMD Phenom II and Athlon II product stack is strong as usual with prices starting out at just $53 for the AMD Athlon II X2 240 and rising up to $179 for the Phenom II X4 965 BE. The AMD Athlon II X4 630 is nearly twice the price of the AMD Athlon II X2 240 and rightly so as it has double the cores. When an Athlon II X4 processor is combined with a sub-$100 motherboard featuring the AMD 785G chipset, you can clearly see that AMD has a great platform at a very solid price point for Windows 7 when it launches next month.

It seems AMD has their processors priced right, so let’s get to testing to see how these new budget friendly processors do against a few dozen others.

Questions or comments?
View this thread in our forums!

AMD Athlon II X4 630 Specifications / Overclockers.ua

  • News
  • Specifications
  • Reviews
  • Processors
  • Motherboards
  • Memory
  • Video cards
  • Cooling systems
  • Enclosures
  • Power supplies
  • Accumulators
  • Peripherals
  • Systems
  • 14 htt/bclk 20056 L1 cache, KB 128 x 4 CB 512 x 4

    9005,

    -1.425 TDP, W 45 mm 169 Temperature limit °C 93950XRyzen 9 3900XTRyzen 9 3900XRyzen 7 3800XTRyzen 7 3800XRyzen 7 3700XRyzen 5 3600XTRyzen 5 3600XRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 3 3300XRyzen 3 3200GRyzen 3 3100Athlon 3000GRyzen 7 2700XRyzen 7 2700Ryzen 5 2600XRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 5 2500XRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 2400GERyzen 3 2300XRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 2200GEAthlon 240GEAthlon 220GEAthlon 200GERyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 1600XRyzen 5 1600 AFRyzen 5 1600Ryzen 5 1500XRyzen 5 1400Ryzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200 AFRyzen 3 1200FX-8350FX-8320FX-8150FX-8120FX-8100FX-6350FX-6100FX-4170FX-4100A10-7870KAthlon 5350A10-7850KAthlon X4 860KAthlon X4 760KAthlon X4 750KAthlon X4 740Athlon X2 340A10-5800KA10-5700A8-5600KA8-5500A6-5400KA4-5300A8-3850A8-3800Athlon II X4 631A6-3650A6-3600A6-3500A4-3400A4-33010T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2200 + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan)Duron 950 (Spitfire)Duron 900 (Morgan)Duron 900 (Spitfire)Duron 850Duron 800Duron 750Duron 700Duron 650Duron 600Athlon 1000 (Orion)Athlon 1000 (Thunderbird) Athlon 950 (Pluto) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelPentium Gold G7400Celeron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5-11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5- 7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3. 73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2. 26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2. 8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 950Celeron 900Celeron 850Celeron 800Celeron 766Celeron 733Celeron 700Celeron 667Celeron 633Celeron 600Celeron 566Celeron 533ACeleron 533Celeron 500Celeron 466Celeron 433 (S370)Celeron 433 (Slot 1)Celeron 400 (S370)Celeron 400 (Slot 1)Celeron 366 (S370)Celeron 366 (Slot 1)Celeron 333 ( S370) Celeron 333 (Slot 1) Celeron 300A (S370) Celeron 300A (SLOT 1) Celeron 300CELERON 266

    Go to all processors

    Compare

    AMDRYZEN 9 7950XRYZEN 9 7900XRRYZEN 5 76660XRYZEN 5 766660XRYZEN 5 766660XRYZEN 5 766660XRYZEN 5,76660XRYZEN 5,76660XRYZEN 5 766660XRYZEN 95950XRyzen 9 5900XRyzen 7 5800X3DRyzen 7 5800XRyzen 7 5700XRyzen 7 5700GRyzen 5 5600XRyzen 5 5600Ryzen 5 5600GRyzen 5 5500Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GRyzen 7 PRO 4750GERyzen 5 PRO 4650GRyzen 5 PRO 4650GERyzen 3 PRO 4350GRyzen 3 PRO 4350GERyzen Threadripper 3960XRyzen 9 3950XRyzen 9 3900XTRyzen 9 3900XRyzen 7 3800XTRyzen 7 3800XRyzen 7 3700XRyzen 5 3600XTRyzen 5 3600XRyzen 5 3600Ryzen 5 3400GRyzen 3 3300XRyzen 3 3200GRyzen 3 3100Athlon 3000GRyzen 7 2700XRyzen 7 2700Ryzen 5 2600XRyzen 5 2600Ryzen 5 2500XRyzen 5 2400GRyzen 5 2400GERyzen 3 2300XRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 2200GEAthlon 240GEAthlon 220GEAthlon 200GERyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 1600XRyzen 5 1600 AFRyzen 5 1600Ryzen 5 1500XRyzen 5 1400Ryzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200 AFRyzen 3 1200FX-8350FX-8320FX-8150FX-8120FX-8100FX-6350FX-6100FX-4170FX-4100A10-7870KAthlon 5350A10-7850KAthlon X4 860KAthlon X4 760KAthlon X4 750KAthlon X4 740Athlon X2 340A10-5800KA10-5700A8 -5600KA8-5500A6-5400KA4-5300A8-3850A8-3800Athlon II X4 631A6-3650A6-3600A6-3500 A4-3400A4-3300Phenom II X6 1100TPhenom II X6 1090T BEPhenom II X6 1075TPhenom II X6 1065TPhenom II X6 1055TPhenom II X6 1045TPhenom II X6 1035TAthlon II X4 650Athlon II X4 645Athlon II X4 640Athlon II X4 635Athlon II X4 630Athlon II X4 620eAthlon II X4 620Athlon II X4 615eAthlon II X4 615Athlon II X4 610eAthlon II X4 605eAthlon II X4 605Athlon II X4 600eAthlon II X3 460Athlon II X3 455Athlon II X3 450Athlon II X3 445Athlon II X3 440Athlon II X3 435Athlon II X3 425eAthlon II X3 425Athlon II X3 420Athlon II X3 420eAthlon II X3 415eAthlon II X3 410Athlon II X3 405eAthlon II X3 400Athlon II X2 265Athlon II X2 270uAthlon II X2 260Athlon II X2 255Athlon II X2 250eAthlon II X2 250Athlon II X2 245eAthlon II X2 245Athlon II X2 240eAthlon II X2 240Athlon II X2 235eAthlon II X2 220Athlon II X2 215Athlon II X2 210eAthlon II 160uSempron 180Sempron 150Sempron 145Sempron 140Sempron 130Athlon X2 7850Athlon X2 7750Athlon X2 7550Athlon X2 7450Athlon X2 6500 BEPhenom II X4 980 BEPhenom II X4 975 BEPhenom II X4 970 BE (Zosma)Phenom II X4 970 BEPhenom II X4 965 BEPhenom II X4 960T BEPhenom II X4 955 BEPhenom II X4 945Phenom II X4 940Phenom II X4 925Phenom II X4 920Phenom II X4 IIphenom 910 905ePhenom II X4 900ePhenom II X4 850Phenom II X4 840Phenom II X4 840TPhenom II X4 830Phenom II X4 820Phenom II X4 810Phenom II X4 805Phenom II X3 740 BEPhenom II X3 720Phenom II X3 715 BEPhenom II X3 710Phenom II X3 705ePhenom II X3 700ePhenom II X2 570 BEPhenom II X2 565 BEPhenom II X2 560 BEPhenom II X2 555 BEPhenom II X2 550 BEPhenom II X2 550Phenom II X2 545Phenom II X2 521Phenom II X2 511Phenom X4 9950 BEPhenom X4 9850 BEPhenom X4 9850Phenom X4 9750BPhenom X4 9750Phenom X4 9650Phenom X4 9600 Black EditionPhenom X4 9600BPhenom X4 9600Phenom X4 9550Phenom X4 9500Phenom X4 9450ePhenom X4 9350ePhenom X4 9150ePhenom X4 9100ePhenom X3 8850Phenom X3 8750 BEPhenom X3 8750BPhenom X3 8750Phenom X3 8650Phenom X3 8600BPhenom X3 8600Phenom X3 8550Phenom X3 8450ePhenom X3 8450Phenom X3 8400Phenom X3 8250eAthlon X2 BE-2400Athlon X2 BE-2350Athlon X2 BE-2300Athlon 64 FX-74Athlon 64 FX-72Athlon 64 FX-70Athlon 64 FX-62Athlon 64 FX-60Athlon 64 X2 6400+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 6400+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (Windsor) Athlon 64 X2 5800+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 5600+ (Brisbane) X2 5400+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (Windsor)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black EditionAthlon 64 X2 5000+ (Brisbane)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4850eAthlon 64 X2 4800+ (Bris bane)Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Windsor 2MB)Athlon 64 X2 4600+Athlon 64 X2 4450eAthlon 64 X2 4400+ (Brisbane) Windsor 1MB)Athlon 64 X2 4050eAthlon 64 X2 4000+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Windsor 2MB) Athlon 64 X2 3800+Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Brisbane) Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 X2 4400+Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Toledo)Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (Manchester) (Manchester)Athlon 64 LE-1660Athlon 64 LE-1640Athlon 64 LE-1620Athlon 64 LE-1600Athlon 64 4000+Athlon 64 3800+Athlon 64 3500+Athlon 64 3200+Athlon 64 3Athlon 64 FX-557 -55Athlon 64 FX-53Athlon 64 FX-51Athlon 64 4200+Athlon 64 4000+ (San Diego)Athlon 64 4000+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3800+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3700 +Athlon 64 (Manchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3500+ (San Diego)At hlon 64 3500+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3500+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3500+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Manchester)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3000+ (Winchester)Athlon 64 3700+Athlon 64 3400+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3400+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3200+ (Venice)Athlon 64 3200+ (Newcastle)Athlon 64 3200+ (Clawhammer)Athlon 64 3000+ ( Venice) Athlon 64 3000+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 3000+ (Clawhammer) Athlon 64 2800+ (Newcastle) Athlon 64 2800+ (Clawhammer) +Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3400+Sempron 3300+Sempron 3100+ (Palermo)Sempron 3100+ (Paris)Sempron 3000+ (Palermo)Sempron 3000+ (Paris)Sempron 2800+Sempron 2600+ (Winchester)Sernpron 2600+ ( Palermo) Sempron 2500+Sempron 3000+Sempron 2800+ (Thorton) )Athlon XP 3200+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 3100+Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB400)Athlon XP 3000+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2900+Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2800+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2700+Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2600+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB333)Athlon XP 2500+ (FSB266)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2400+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2200 + (Thorton)Athlon XP 2200+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 2100+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorton)Athlon XP 2000+ (Thorubbred)Athlon XP 2000+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1900+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1900+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1800+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1800+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1700+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1700+ (Palomino)Athlon XP 1600+ (Thoroughbred)Athlon XP 1600 + (Palomino) Athlon XP 1500+ Athlon 1400 (FSB266) ATHLON 1400 (FSB200) Athlon 1333athlon 1300athlon 1200 (FSB266) Athlon 1200 (FSB200) Ath26 (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) ATHLON (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon (FSB200) Athlon) Athlon 950Athlon 900Athlon 850Athlon 800Athlon 750Athlon 700Duron 1800Duron 1600Duron 1400Duron 1300Duron 1200Duron 1100Duron 1000Duron 950 (Morgan)Duron 950 (Spitfire)Duron 900 (Morgan)Duron 900 (Spitfire)Duron 850Duron 800Duron 750Duron 700Duron 650Duron 600Athlon 1000 (Orion)Athlon 1000 (Thunderbird) Athlon 950 (Pluto) Athlon 900 (Thunderbird) Athlon 850 (Pluto) Athlon 850 (Thundebird) Athlon 800 (Pluto) Athlon 800 (Thunderbird) Athlon 750 (Pluto) Athlon 750 (Thunderbird) Athlon 700 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Pluto) Athlon 650 (Argon) Athlon 650 (Thunderbird) Athlon 600 (Pluto) Athlon 600 (Argon) Athlon 550 (Pluto) -2 533 (CXT)K6-2 500 (CXT)K6-2 475 (CXT)K6-2 450 (CXT)K6-2 400 (CXT)K6-2 380 (CXT)K6-2 366 (CXT)K6- 2 350 (CXT)K6-2 350K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333 (CXT)K6-2 333K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300 (CXT)K6-2 300K6-2 266K6 300K6 266K6 233K6 200K6 166K5 PR166K5 PR150K5 PR133K5 PR120K5 PR100K5 PR90K5 PR75IntelPentium Gold G7400Celeron G6900Core i9-11900KCore i9-11900KFCore i9-11900Core i9-11900FCore i9-11900TCore i7-11700KCore i7-11700KFCore i7-11700Core i7-11700FCore i7-11700TCore i5-11600KCore i5-11600KFCore i5-11600Core i5-11600TCore i5-11500Core i5-11500TCore i5-11400Core i5-11400FCore i5-11400TCore i3-10325Core i3-10305Core i3-10305TCore i3-10105Core i3-10105FCore i3-10105TPentium Gold G6605Pentium Gold G6505Pentium Gold G6505TPentium Gold G6405Pentium Gold G6405TCore i9-10900KCore i9-10900KFCore i9-10900Core i9-10900FCore i7-10700KCore i7-10700KFCore i7-10700Core i7-10700FCore i5-10600KCore i5-10600KFCore i5-10600Core i5-10500Core i5-10400Core i5-10400FCore i3-10320Core i3-10300Core i3-10100Pentium Gold G6600Pentium Gold G6500Pentium Gold G6400Celeron G5925Celeron G5920Celeron G5905Celeron G5900Core i9-9900KCore i7-9700KCore i5-9600KCore i7-8700KCore i7-8700Core i5-8600KCore i5-8400Core i3-8350KCore i3-8100Pentium Gold G5400Core i7-7700KCore i7-7700Core i7-7700TCore i5-7600KCore i5- 7600Core i5-7600TCore i5-7500Core i5-7500TCore i5-7400Core i5-7400TCore i3-7350KCore i3-7320Core i3-7300Core i3-7300TCore i3-7100Core i3-7100TCore i7-6950XCore i7-6700KCore i7-6700Core i7-6700TCore i5-6600KCore i5-6600Core i5-6600TCore i5-6500Core i5-6500TCore i5-6400Core i5-6400TCore i3-6300Core i3-6300TCore i3-6100Core i3-6100TCore i7-5960XCore i7-5775CCore i5 -5675CCore i7-4960XCore i7-4930KCore i7-4820KCore i7-4790KCore i5-4690KCore i7-4770KCore i7-4770Core i5-4670KCore i5-4670Core i5-4570Core i7-3970XCore i7-3960XCore i7-3930KCore i7-3820Core i7-2700KCore i7-2600KCore i7-2600Core i7-2600SCore i5-3330Core i5-2500KCore i5-2500Core i5-2500SCore i5-2500TCore i5-2405SCore i5-2400Core i5-2400SCore i5-2390TCore i5-2320Core i5-2310Core i5-2300Core i3-2130Core i3-2125Core i3-2120Core i3-2105Core i3-2100Core i3-2100TPentium G860Pentium G850Pentium G840Pentium G632Pentium G630Pentium G622Pentium G620Celeron G540Celeron G530Celeron G440Core i7-990XCore i7-980Core i7 980XCore i7-975 ExtremeCore i7 970Core i7 965 ExtremeCore i7 960Core i7 950Core i7 940Core i7 930Core i7 920Core i7-880Core i7-875KCore i7-870Core i7-860SCore i7-860Core i5-760Core i5-750SCore i5-750Core i5-680Core i5-670Core i5-661Core i5- 660Core i5-655KCore i5-650Core i3-560Core i3-550Core i3-540Core i3-530Pentium G6960Pentium G6951Pentium G6950Atom D525Atom D510Atom D425Atom D410Atom 330Atom 230Core 2 Extreme QX9775Core 2 Extreme QX9770Core 2 Extreme QX9650Core 2 Quad Q9650Core 2 Quad Q9550sCore 2 Quad Q9550Core 2 Quad Q9505Core 2 Quad Q9450Core 2 Quad Q9400sCore 2 Quad Q9400Core 2 Quad Q9300Core 2 Quad Q8400sCore 2 Quad Q8400Core 2 Quad Q8300Core 2 Quad Q8200sCore 2 Quad Q8200Core 2 Duo E8600Core 2 Duo E8500Core 2 Duo E8400Core 2 Duo E8300Core 2 Duo E8200Core 2 Duo E8190Core 2 Duo E7600Core 2 Duo E7500Core 2 Duo E7400Core 2 Duo E7300Core 2 Duo E7200Core 2 Extreme QX6850Core 2 Extreme OX6800Core 2 Extreme QX6700Core 2 Quad Q6700Core 2 Quad Q6600Core 2 Extreme X6900Core 2 Extreme X6800Core 2 Duo E6850Core 2 Duo E6800Core 2 Duo E6750Core 2 Duo E6700Core 2 Duo E6600Core 2 Duo E6550Core 2 Duo E6540Core 2 Duo E6420Core 2 Duo E6400 (Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6400 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E6320Core 2 Duo E6300 ( Allendale)Core 2 Duo E6300 (Conroe 2M)Core 2 Duo E4700Core 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Duo E4500Core 2 Duo E4400Core 2 Duo E4300Pentium Dual-Core E6800Pentium Dual-Core E6700Pentium Dual-Core E6600Pentium Dual-Core E6500Pentium Dual-Core E6300Pentium Dual-Core E5800Pentium Dual-Core E5700Pentium Dual-Core E5500Pentium Dual-Core E5400Pentium Dual-Core E5300Pentium Dual-Core E5200Pentium Dual-Core E2220Pentium Dual-Core E2210Pentium Dual-Core E2200Pentium Dual-Core E2180Pentium Dual-Core E2160Pentium Dual-Core E21 4065 XEPentium D 960Pentium D 955 XEPentium D 950Pentium D 945Pentium D 940Pentium D 935Pentium D 930Pentium D 925Pentium D 920Pentium D 915Pentium D 840 XEPentium D 840Pentium D 830Pentium D 820Pentium D 805Pentium 4 EE 3. 73Pentium 4 EE 3.46Pentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 672Pentium 4 671Pentium 4 670Pentium 4 662Pentium 4 661Pentium 4 660Pentium 4 651Pentium 4 650Pentium 4 641Pentium 4 640Pentium 4 631Pentium 4 630Pentium 4 620Pentium 4 571Pentium 4 570JPentium 4 561Pentium 4 560JPentium 4 560Pentium 4 551Pentium 4 550JPentium 4 550Pentium 4 541Pentium 4 540JPentium 4 540Pentium 4 531Pentium 4 530JPentium 4 530Pentium 4 521Pentium 4 520JPentium 4 520Pentium 4 519KPentium 4 519JPentium 4 517Pentium 4 516Pentium 4 515JPentium 4 515Pentium 4 511Pentium 4 506Pentium 4 505JPentium 4 505Pentium 4 3.8FPentium 4 3.6FPentium 4 3.4FPentium 4 3.2FPentium 4 3.4EPentium 4 EE 3.4Pentium 4 3.4Pentium 4 3.2EPentium 4 EE 3.2Pentium 4 3.2 Pentium 4 3.06Pentium 4 3.0EPentium 4 3.0Pentium 4 2.8EPentium 4 2.8APentium 4 2.8CPentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.8Pentium 4 2.67Pentium 4 2.66Pentium 4 2.6CPentium 4 2.6Pentium 4 2.53Pentium 4 2.5Pentium 4 2.4EPentium 4 2.4APentium 4 2.4CPentium 4 2.4BPentium 4 2.4Pentium 4 2.26APentium 4 2. 26Pentium 4 2.2Pentium 4 2.0APentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8 APentium 4 1.8 Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6 APentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 2.0Pentium 4 1.9Pentium 4 1.8Pentium 4 1.7Pentium 4 1.6Pentium 4 1.5Pentium 4 1.4Pentium 4 1.3Pentium III-S 1400Pentium III 1400Pentium III 1333Pentium III-S 1266Pentium III 1200Pentium III-S 1133Pentium III 1133APentium III 1000BPentium III 1133Pentium III 1100Pentium III 1000EBPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 900Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550EPentium III 533EBPentium III 500EPentium III 1000BPentium III 1000Pentium III 933Pentium III 866Pentium III 850Pentium III 800EBPentium III 800Pentium III 750Pentium III 733Pentium III 700Pentium III 667Pentium III 650Pentium III 600BPentium III 600Pentium III 600EBPentium III 600EPentium III 550Pentium III 550EPentium III 533BPentium III 533EBPentium III 500Pentium III 450Pentium II Overdrive 333Pentium II Overdrive 300Pentium II 450Pentium II 400Pentium II 350Pentium II 333Pentium II 300APentium II 300Pentium II 266APentium II 266Pentium II 233Pentium Overdrive MMX 200Pentium Overdrive MMX 180Pentium Overdrive MMX 166Pentium Overdrive MMX 150Pentium Overdrive 166Pentium Overdrive 150Pentium Overdrive 125Pentium Overdrive 133Pentium Overdrive 120Pentium Pro 200MHz (1024 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (512 KB)Pentium Pro 200MHz (256 KB)Pentium Pro 180MHzPentium Pro 166MHzPentium Pro 150MHzPentium 233 MMXPentium 200 MMXPentium 166 MMXPentium 200Pentium 166Pentium 150Pentium 133Pentium 120Pentium 100Pentium 90Pentium 75Pentium 66Pentium 60Celeron G1101Celeron E3500Celeron E3400Celeron E3300Celeron E3200Celeron E1600Celeron E1500Celeron E1400Celeron E1200Celeron 450Celeron 445Celeron 440Celeron 430Celeron 420Celeron 220Celeron D 365Celeron D 360Celeron D 356Celeron D 352Celeron D 355Celeron D 351Celeron D 350Celeron D 346Celeron D 345JCeleron D 345Celeron D 341Celeron D 340JCeleron D 340Celeron D 336Celeron D 335JCeleron D 335Celeron D 331Celeron D 330JCeleron D 330Celeron D 326Celeron D 325JCeleron D 325Celeron D 320Celeron D 315Celeron D 310Celeron 2. 8Celeron 2.7Celeron 2.6Celeron 2.5Celeron 2.4Celeron 2.3Celeron 2.2Celeron 2.1Celeron 2.0Celeron 1.8Celeron 1.7Celeron 1400Celeron 1300Celeron 1200Celeron 1100ACeleron 1000ACeleron 1100Celeron 1000Celeron 950Celeron 900Celeron 850Celeron 800Celeron 766Celeron 733Celeron 700Celeron 667Celeron 633Celeron 600Celeron 566Celeron 533ACeleron 533Celeron 500Celeron 466Celeron 433 (S370)Celeron 433 (Slot 1)Celeron 400 (S370)Celeron 400 (Slot 1)Celeron 366 (S370)Celeron 366 (Slot 1)Celeron 333 ( S370)Celeron 333 (Slot 1)Celeron 300A (S370)Celeron 300A (Slot 1)Celeron 300Celeron 266

    You can select
    up to 10 processors simultaneously by holding Ctrl

    • U.A. | EN

    9Both processors have 4 streams Process processors of both processor models is 45 nanometers The number of channels for two CPUs is 2, Both CPUs are supported

    Processors share the same L1 cache 512 KB Processors share the same L2 cache 2048 Kilobytes FSB Data AMD Phenom II N950 — 1800MHz 16-bit HyperTransport (3. 6 GT/s) II N950 Phenom II N950 is very far behind in terms of base clock speed, 2100 MHz vs.0233 The Phenom II N950 processor contains significantly fewer transistors, 234 million versus 300 million The Athlon II X4 630 will need more powerful cooling, since its thermal power is 95 watts 0 Phenom II N950 confidently wins in terms of heat dissipation, its TDP is lower than the competitor and equals 35 watts

    Comparison of instructions and technologies

    Energy saving technologies
    Technology or instruction name AMD Athlon II X4 630 AMD Phenom II N950 Short description
    PowerNow! PowerNow! idle frequency reduction technology.
    Cool’n’Quiet Coolness and silence.
    CoolCore Technology Complements Cool’n’Quiet. Temporarily disable unused processor blocks.
    DDPM (Dual Dynamic Power Management) Dual dynamic power management.
    Standard extension set
    Technology or instruction name AMD Athlon II X4 630 AMD Phenom II N950 Brief description
    MMX (Multimedia Extensions) Multimedia extensions.
    SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) Streaming SIMD processor extension.
    SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 2.
    SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3.
    SSE4A (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4A) Processor Streaming SIMD 4A Extension.
    AMD64 64-bit microprocessor architecture developed by AMD.
    3DNow! Optional MMX extension for AMD processors.
    Safety technology
    Technology or instruction name AMD Athlon II X4 630 AMD Phenom II N950 Short description
    EVP (Enhanced Virus Protection) Improved virus protection.
    Virtualization technologies
    Technology or instruction name AMD Athlon II X4 630 AMD Phenom II N950 Short description
    AMD-V AMD-V Virtualization Technology.

    Benchmarks

    Overall performance rating

    The rating is calculated according to an internal formula, taking into account all the data: test results in all benchmarks, number of cores and threads, instructions, overclocking technologies, release year, clock frequency, socket, structure, temperature mode, and other characteristics. The results of the overall rating showed that Athlon II X4 630 surpasses its rival Phenom II N9 in most parameters.50. The Phenom II N950 barely scores 1879 points compared to its competitor.

    PassMark CPU Mark

    All of our CPUs passed the PassMark tests. The benchmark includes a large set of tools for large-scale evaluation of personal computer data, including the CPU. Among which are integer calculations, extended instructions checking, floating point calculations, encryption, compression, game physics calculations, multi-threaded and single-threaded tests. In particular, it is possible to compare the obtained indicators with other configurations in the database. This is perhaps the most common benchmark on the web. Performance Test Shows Slightly Better Phenom II N9 Processor Performance50 (2485 points) over the Athlon II X4 630 (2061 points). The Athlon II X4 630 falls slightly behind in this test.

    Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test

    It is possible to test multi-processor systems. The Single-Core version in its test uses only one rendering thread and one core. Works on Mac, Windows operating systems. Uses the method of geometric optics — ray tracing. MAXON appeared, it was based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D. This benchmark for testing video cards and processors is already obsolete by now. The main performance testing mode is multi-level reflections, working with light, simulated global illumination, spatial lights, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, and procedural shaders.

    Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-threaded test

    Multi Core is another way to test in Cinebench R10 benchmark, which uses multi-threaded and multi-core testing mode. It is important to note that the possible number of threads in this version is limited to sixteen.

    Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test

    Multi-threaded version of the CINEBENCH 11.5 benchmark, it has the ability to test the processor to the fullest, using all threads and cores. It differs from previous versions, 64 threads are already used here. Testing the Athlon II X4 630 in the Cinebench R11.5 benchmark gave 3.26 points, which indicates a higher performance of this model. While Phenom II N9The 50 gets 2. 27 points, far behind its rival in this test.

    Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

    Good old multifunctional Cinebench 11.5 from Maxon. In tests, as before, ray tracing technology is used, a high-polygonal 3D space is calculated with a large number of crystalline and glass and translucent spheres. His tests are still relevant. In this Single-Core variant, tests are performed using one core and one thread. The result of the test is the «frames per second» parameter. The single-thread test results for the Athlon II X4 630 in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed high performance compared to the competitor, with a score of 0.68 points. But the Phenom II N9 itself50, scoring 0.47 points in this test, is far behind it.

    Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-thread test

    Multi-Thread version of Cinebench 15 — will load your assembly to the fullest, demonstrating everything it can. All cores and threads of the central processor are involved in the process of rendering complex 3D models. The program is ideal for testing new multi-threaded processors from AMD and Intel, as it is capable of using 256 threads. The Athlon II X4 630, with a score of 253.81, unequivocally scores higher in Cinebench 15’s Multi-Core test. While its rival Phenom II N950 is far behind with a score of 190.09 in the test.

    Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

    Cinebench Release 15 is the most up-to-date benchmark from the Finnish Maxon development team. In the Single Core version, only 1 thread is involved in rendering. It tests the entire system: both processors and video cards. For CPU, the result of the analysis will be the value of PTS points, and for graphics controllers — the number of frames per second FPS. A complex 3D scene is rendered with a large number of light sources, highly detailed objects and reflections. The single-threaded test of the Athlon II X4 630 processor in the Cinebench R15 program indicates its high performance, the result is 64.27 points. Compared to him, his competitor in the face of Phenom II N950 fails this test with a score of 48. 46.

    Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded benchmark

    Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-threaded benchmark. It’s broad multi-platform support for a variety of operating systems and devices makes Geekbench’s most valuable benchmarks to date. The Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core Athlon II X4 630 scores 5429.73, which is significantly better than the Phenom II N950. In this test, the Phenom II N950 gets a very low score of 4120 compared to the Athlon II X4 630.

    Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

    For the first time in this version of the tester, mobile devices on Android and iOS operating systems are also supported. The Single-Core version uses one processor thread. The latest single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 to date for testing laptops and desktop PCs. The program, like its earlier versions, runs on operating systems running Mac OS, Linux, Windows. Athlon II X4 630 scores higher in Geekbench 4.0 single-thread test with a score of 1819.82 points. But its competitor Phenom II N950 is doing much worse — 1353 points.

    Geekbench 3 (32bit) Multi-threaded test

    Multi Core version of Geekbench 3 benchmark — can allow you to arrange a powerful stress test on your PC and show how stable your system is.

    Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test

    The 32-bit version of the benchmark loads one thread and one CPU core. The Geekbench multi-platform tester is usually used to evaluate the system under Mac, but it can work on both Windows and Linux. The main purpose is to check the speed of processors.

    Geekbench 2

    In our archive you can find about two hundred processor models that have test data in this program. To date, there are newer versions, the current fifth and fourth. An outdated version of the Geekbench 2 benchmark.

    X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1

    This is a practical test of processor performance through transcoding HD files to H.264, the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. This test is faster compared to Pass 2, because the calculation is done at a constant speed. Ideal test for multi-threaded CPUs and many cores. The frame rate processed per second is the result of the check. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Athlon II X4 630 is significantly higher and amounts to 71.93 fps. But the Phenom II N950 did a poor job, its speed was 53.33 FPS.

    X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2

    This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. You need to understand that a real task is being simulated, and the x264 codec is used in many video programs. The result is a better quality video file. The final value is also determined by frames per second. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the rendering is already done at a non-constant rate. That is why the test results realistically reflect the performance of the system. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the Athlon II X4 630 processor in mpeg4 format, the result was 15. 98 FPS Its rival Phenom II N950 showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 12.06 FPS.

    3DMark06 CPU

    Benchmark for testing video system and CPU. This test is very often used by gamers and overclockers and those who like to overclock the system. Based on DirectX 9.0 by Futuremark. Processors are tested in two ways: an artificial intelligence calculates the pathfinding, and another test emulates a physics engine using PhysX. The Athlon II X4 630 performed much faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, scoring 3733.72 points. The Phenom II N9 processor coped worse with this task50 received 2974 points.

    3DMark Fire Strike Physics

    Approximately two hundred processors on our website have 3DMark Fire Strike Physics test data. It represents a test that performs game physics calculations.

    WinRAR 4.0

    A well-known data archiver. The tests were performed under the Windows operating system. The compression speed was checked by the RAR algorithm, for this purpose huge volumes of randomly generated files were used. The resulting speed during compression «kilobytes per second» — this is the result of testing. Athlon II X4 630 has a clear advantage in WinRAR data compression and packing speed, the result of file processing is 2150 Kb/s. Phenom II N9 is far behind him50, the speed of which did not exceed 1278.9 Kb / s.

    TrueCrypt AES

    This is not exactly a benchmark, but the results of its use can evaluate the performance of the system. Unfortunately support for this project was discontinued in 2014. It includes the ability to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. Our site shows the results of encryption speed in gigabytes per second using the AES algorithm. It can run on different Linux, Windows and Mac OS X operating systems.

    Comparison of AMD Athlon II X4 630 and AMD Phenom II X4 910

    Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X4 630 and AMD Phenom II X4 910 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility.
    Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation ( Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

    AMD Athlon II X4 630

    versus

    AMD Phenom II X4 910

    Benefits

    Reasons to choose AMD Athlon II X4 630

    • Newer processor, 7 month(s) release date difference:
    • 3 approx. 8 GHz faster 2.6 GHz

    • Performance in PassMark — Single thread mark about 15% higher: 1140 vs 988
    • Performance in PassMark — CPU mark about 19% more: 2109 vs 1776
    Release date September 2009 vs February 2009
    Maximum frequency 2. 8GHz vs 2.6GHz
    PassMark — Single thread mark 1140 vs 988
    PassMark — CPU mark 2109 vs 1776

    Reasons to choose AMD Phenom II X4 910

    • Approximately 4% increase in Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance: 361 vs 347
    • Approximately 125% increase in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance: 1155
    Geekbench 4 — Single Core 361 vs 347
    Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 1258 vs 1155

    Benchmark comparison

    CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X4 630
    CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 910

    PassMark — Single thread mark
    CPU 1
    CPU 2
    PassMark — CPU mark
    CPU 1
    CPU 2
    Geekbench 4 — Single Core
    CPU 1
    CPU 2
    Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core
    CPU 1
    CPU 2
    Name AMD Athlon II X4 630 AMD Phenom II X4 910
    PassMark — Single thread mark 1140 988
    PassMark — CPU mark 2109 1776
    Geekbench 4 — Single Core 347 361
    Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 1155 1258
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.635
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 8.536
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.166
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 3.684

    Performance comparison

    AMD Athlon II X4 630 AMD Phenom II X4 910
    Architecture name Propus Deneb
    Production date September 2009 February 2009
    Price at first issue date $63 $100
    Place in the ranking 2345 2057
    Price now $42. 99 $100
    Price/performance ratio (0-100) 21.49 9.58
    Applicability Desktop Desktop
    Support 64 bit
    Crystal area 169mm 258mm
    Level 1 cache 128 KB (per core) 128 KB (per core)
    Level 2 cache 512 KB (per core) 512 KB (per core)
    Process 45nm 45nm
    Maximum frequency 2. 8 GHz 2.6 GHz
    Number of cores 4 4
    Number of transistors 300 million 758 million
    Level 3 cache 6144 KB (shared)
    Supported memory types DDR3 DDR3
    Maximum number of processors in configuration 1 1
    Supported sockets AM3 AM3
    Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 95 Watt

    AMD Phenom II X6 1100T or AMD Athlon II X4 630

      Home
    • Processors
    • > 9000

      Family

      • Phenom II X6 1045T
        Compare
      • Phenom II X6 1055T
        Compare
      • Phenom II X6 1075T
        Compare
      • The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

        Office speed

        Phenom II X6 1100T

        56.9 (+19.7%)

        Athlon II X4 630

        45.7

        The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

        Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

        Speed ​​in heavy applications

        Phenom II X6 1100T

        32.5 (+26.2%)

        Athlon II X4 630

        24

        maximum

        The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

        At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

        Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

        Speed ​​of numerical operations

        Simple household tasks

        Phenom II X6 1100T

        47.7 (+20.1%)

        Athlon II X4 630

        38.1

        Demanding games and tasks

        Phenom II X6 1100T

        26.7 (+33%)

        Athlon II X4 630

        17.9

        Extreme

        Phenom II X6 1100T

        6. 5 (+46.2%)

        Athlon II X4 630

        3.5

        Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

        We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

        Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

        When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

        Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

        Benchmarks

        Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

        Cinebench R20 Multi Core

        AMD Phenom II X6 1100T

        1093 (+50.2%)

        AMD Athlon II X4 630

        544

        Passmark

        AMD Phenom II X6 1100T

        3698 (+43. 9%)

        AMD Athlon II X4 630

        2074

        Features

        Data is not yet complete, so tables may be missing information or existing features may be omitted.

        Basic

        Manufacturer AMD AMD
        DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer.
        ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation.
        Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. No data No data
        Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 09-2013 09-2016
        Model Official name.
        Cores The number of physical cores. 6 4
        ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 6 4
        Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Missing Missing
        Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.3 GHz 2.8 GHz
        Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. No data 2.8
        L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. No data No data
        Instructions
        Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support.
        Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No
        Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system.
        Number of QPI links
        TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. No data No data
        Cooling system specifications

        Video core

        Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings.
        GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. No data No data
        Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. No data No data
        Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect.
        Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time.

        RAM

        Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. No data No data
        Supported type of RAM The type of RAM determines its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price.
        RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available.
        RAM bandwidth
        ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data

        PCI

        PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. No data No data
        PCI configuration options
        Number of PCI lanes No data

        Data Security

        AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data
        Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data

        Decoration

        Dimensions No data No data
        Supported sockets No data No data
        Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data

        Which is better

        AMD Phenom II X6 1100T

        • On average, gaming performance is 12% better.
        • The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 11%.
        • In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 3%.
        • The number of physical cores is increased by 2.
        • The number of threads is increased by 2.
        • The base frequency is increased by 0.5 GHz.

        How are 9 similar?0527

        • Prices for new processors are about the same.

        Amd athlon ii x4 630 in Ukraine. Prices on AMD Athlon II X4 630 on Prom.ua

        processor AMD Athlon II X4 630 2.8GHZ SAM3 95W (ADX630WFK42Gi)

        in a warehouse in the Dnieper

        UAH

        9046 UAH

        299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 29 299 299 UA -magazin mainboard.com.ua

        Processor AMD Athlon II X4 630 2.8GHz, 95W

        Delivery from Lutsk

        UAH 380

        Buy

        Online store «Memory-Store.com.ua»

        AMD Athlon II X4 630 CPU ADX630WFK42GI 2.8GHz/2M/95W Socket AM2+ / AM3 Processor for PC

        Delivery from Kyiv

        UAH 32

        buy

        processor AMD Athlon II 630 X4 2. 8 AM3

        Delivery in Ukraine

        329 UAH

        Buy

        Internet Shopi

        processor (b/y) AMD Athlon II X4 640, SAM3, SAM, SAM, SAM (ADX640WFK42GR, ADX640WFK42GM) 635 630 645

        in a warehouse in Kyiv

        Delivery in Ukraine

        299 UAH

        Buy

        AMD Athlon II X4 638 CPU AD638XOJZ43GX/4M/65W SOCKET FM1 Processor for PCs in Square Delivery in Ukraine

        299 UAH

        Buy

        processor AMD Phenom II X4 955, 4 Nuclei, 3.2GC, AM3

        in a warehouse in Rivne

        745 UAH

        45

        AMD Athlon II X2 220 2.8GHZ/1M/65W SOKKET AM2+/AM3 Processor for PC ADX220OCK22GM

        in Kyiv

        Delivery in Ukraine

        145 GRN

        9004 9004 SECULATI AD970XAUM44AB)

        In stock

        Delivery across Ukraine

        1 255 UAH

        941 UAH

        Buy

        TOP SALES | NUKLEON.com.ua

        Processor AMD Athlon II X4 950 (AD950XAGM44AB)

        In stock

        Delivery across Ukraine

        UAH 1,623

        UAH 1,217

        Buy

        TOP SALES | Nukleon. com.ua

        See also

        AMD Athlon II X4 620 2.6GHZ SAM3 95W (ADX620WFK42Gi)

        in a warehouse in the Dnieper

        90 mainboard.com.ua

        Processor AMD Athlon II X4 640 3.0GHz sAM3 95w (ADX640WFK42GM)

        In stock in Dnipro

        in a warehouse in Lviv

        Delivery in Ukraine

        400 UAH

        Buy

        online store «Cyfrotown»

        processor AMD Athlon II X4 3.1GHZ, 95W

        Group of room

        400 400 400 Gr. Buy

        Online store «Memory-Store.com.ua»

        Processor AMD Athlon II X2 270 3.4GHz 65W

        Delivery from Lutsk

        150 UAH

        Buy

        com.ua»

        Processor AMD Athlon II X4 640 3.0GHz, 95W

        Delivery from Lutsk , 95W

        Delivery from Lutsk

        347 UAH

        Buy

        online store «Memory-store.com.ua»

        processor AMD Athlon II X3.0 GHZ SAM3

        in a form in Ukraine

        UAH 250

        Buy

        online store «Cyfrotown»

        processor AMD Athlon II X3 425, 2. 7GHz, SAM3, Tray ADX425WFK32GI used

        in Lviv

        90 90 GRRN

        GRRN

        online store «Cyfrotown»

        AMD Athlon II X3 425 (Adx425WFK32GI), used

        Delivery in Ukraine

        239 UAH

        online store «COMPX»

        ATHLON — Assassin’s Creed Odyssey with RX 570 performance comparison

        RX 570 with

        AMD Athlon II X4 630

        Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

        RX 570 with

        AMD Athlon II X2 240


        Athlon II X4 630
        Athlon II X2 240

        Multi-Thread Performance

        3134 Pts

        1642 Pts

        Single-Thread Performance

        956 Pts

        938 Pts

        Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

        Athlon II X4 630 vs Athlon II X2 240 Assassin’s Creed Odyssey using RX 570 — CPU performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K

        Athlon II X4 630
        Athlon II X2 240


        Ultra Quality
        Resolution Frames per second
        1080p

        12. 9 FPS

        1080p

        11.2 FPS

        1440p

        11.8 FPS

        1440p

        10.3 FPS

        2160p

        8.1 FPS

        2160p

        7.0 FPS

        w1440p

        10.6 FPS

        w1440p

        9.3 FPS

        High quality
        Resolution Frames per second
        1080p

        26.9 FPS

        1080p

        23.8 FPS

        1440p

        24.9 FPS

        1440p

        22.1 FPS

        2160p

        17.9 FPS

        2160p

        15.7 FPS

        w1440p

        22.6 FPS

        w1440p

        20. 2 FPS

        Medium quality
        Resolution Frames per second
        1080p

        41.0 FPS

        1080p

        36.4 FPS

        1440p

        38.0 FPS

        1440p

        33.9 FPS

        2160p

        27.6 FPS

        2160p

        24.4 FPS

        w1440p

        34.7 FPS

        w1440p

        31.1 FPS

        Low quality
        Resolution Frames per second
        1080p

        69.0 FPS

        1080p

        61.5 FPS

        1440p

        64.2 FPS

        1440p

        57. 4 FPS

        2160p

        47.1 FPS

        2160p

        41.7 FPS

        w1440p

        58.8 FPS

        w1440p

        52.8 FPS

        Athlon II X4 630
        • Athlon II X4 630 has a higher level 2 cache. Data/instructions that need to be processed can be loaded from fast L2 and the CPU doesn’t have to wait for very slow DDR 9 RAM0004
        • Athlon II X4 630 has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
        • The Athlon II X4 630 has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
        Athlon II X2 240
        • Athlon II X2 240 The Athlon II X2 240 processor is more energy efficient and generates less heat.

        Compare Athlon II X4 630 vs Athlon II X2 240 specifications

        Athlon II X4 630 vs Athlon II X2 240 Architecture
        Athlon II X4 630 Athlon II X2 240
        Codename Propus Regor
        Generation Athlon II X4
        (Propus)
        Athlon II X2
        (Regor)
        Market Desktop Desktop
        Memory Support DDR3 DDR3
        Part# ADX630WFK42GIADX630WFGIBOXADX630WFK42GMADX630WFGMBOX ADX240OCK23GQ
        Production Status End-of-life End-of-life
        Released Sep 2009 Jul 2009
        Athlon II X4 630 vs Athlon II X2 240 Cache
        Athlon II X4 630 Athlon II X2 240
        Cache L1 128K (per core) 256K
        Cache L2 512K (per core) 2MB
        Athlon II X4 630 vs Athlon II X2 240 Cores
        Athlon II X4 630 Athlon II X2 240
        # of Cores 4 2
        # of Threads 4 2
        Integrated Graphics N/A N/A
        SMP# CPUs 1 1
        Athlon II X4 630 vs Athlon II X2 240 Features
        Athlon II X4 630 Athlon II X2 240
        MMX
        3DNow!
        SSE
        SSE2
        SSE3
        SSE4A
        AMD64
        NXbit
        AMD-V
        MMX
        3DNow!
        SSE
        SSE2
        SSE3
        SSE4A
        AMD64
        NXbit
        AMD-V
        Athlon II X4 630 vs Athlon II X2 240 Performance
        Athlon II X4 630 Athlon II X2 240
        Base Clock 200 MHz 200 MHz
        Frequency 2.

        2024 © All rights reserved