Psu for sli 980: Reddit — Dive into anything

Power Supply for 980 Ti SLI | What Watts of PSU Should be Used?

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti is an upmarket desktop graphics card with a TDP of 250 watts and 6GB of GDDR5 video memory. But when it comes to SLI, it requires a power supply minimum of 850 watts or greater.

In this article, you’ll know about the power supply for the 980 Ti SLI graphics card in detail.

1. Power Supply Wattage

Here, a power supply converts the alternating current into the direct current needed by the components inside your computer. You should notice the supported wattage while buying a power supply unit. In this case, you can consider two kinds of power supply wattage (PSW). Like an estimate of the highest quality and an estimate of the average quality. According to 980 Ti –

High-quality estimate
Instruments Peak Power Usage
GTX 980 Ti GPU 250 watts
High-class CPU (for example core i7) 240 watts
Motherboard 80 watts
SSDs 36 watts
3 case fans 18 watts
2 CPU fans 12 watts
Estimate sum: 636 watts
Recommended PSW: 800 watts

Source: techreviewer

Average-quality estimate
Instruments Peak Power Usage
GTX 980 Ti GPU 250 watts
Average-class CPU (for example core i5) 150 watts
Motherboard 80 watts
SSDs 18 watts
2 case fans 12 watts
2 CPU fans 12 watts
Estimate sum: 522 watts
Recommended PSW: 650 watts

Source: techreviewer

Adding a 100–150 watts buffer to your anticipated usage is often a smart idea. This buffer will offer you some leeway in the event of errors in judgment and will enable future additions of devices.

Most of the time, it is safer to ensure system stability by purchasing a little bit more wattage than you require. If you want to overclock your CPU or GPU, don’t forget to take the extra power into consideration. Depending on how much you overclock these devices, overclocking could demand an additional approximate 50–100 watts.

2. Power Efficiency Level

Higher-efficiency power supply units use less energy and generate less heat, which increases their dependability and lowers noise. By displaying a power supply’s efficiency rating, the 80-plus certification program aids in the promotion of energy efficiency. A higher initial cost may be associated with higher-efficiency power supplies. However, over time, they might enable you to spend less on power.

Conversely, power supply units with lower power output will use less energy even when they are not in use. This means that choosing the power supply unit with the proper wattage rather than the one with the highest 80-plus certification may allow you to save more on electricity overall. According to 980 Ti –

Power supply unit efficiency level
Rating 10% Load 20% Load 50% Load 100% Load
80-plus 80% 80% 80%
80-plus titanium 90% 92% 94% 90%
80-plus platinum 90% 92% 89%

Source: techreviewer

3. Power Cables

In terms of power supply, the cable is an important component. Here are the relatable factors including cables –

Cables

Many cables are typically included with the power supply to connect your components. On the other hand, additional, unneeded power cables might bother you by obstructing ventilation. In contrast, you can only attach the necessary cables to the modular and semi-modular power supply. Semi-modular power supply has some cables welded on and offers the opportunity to attach others.

Cable length

The majority of the power supply will have cables that are sufficiently long to handle medium-sized towers with ease. To make sure that the cables are long enough to allow for effective cable management, and you have a large tower, then you may wish to check proper documentation and reviews.

Cable connector

Verify that the power supply unit has the appropriate connectors to support the system hardware. By giving fewer options and shorter lengths, the less expensive option may reduce expenses on connectors and cables. To find out which connector types are required, you can see the user guide for your motherboard and graphics card. 

If you wish to create a new arrangement, choose one well, recently produced power supply unit as it is likely to include the required connectors. However, you can encounter some conflicts if you use outdated parts or a power supply.

Suggested Power Supply for 980 Ti SLI

If you want to reduce the cost of your electricity bill or if you don’t anticipate using your computer frequently each day. In those circumstances, a power supply unit with a cheaper upfront cost but poorer efficiency would be a better option. A more efficient power supply unit, on the other hand, would be preferable if you have greater environmental concerns and want to maintain higher CPU or GPU utilization.

It will be wise to not exceed 150 watts beyond your anticipated power requirements. An appropriate power supply will reduce your electricity expenses because higher-wattage power supply units use more power even when they are not in use.

So, if you are interested in an average-quality estimate power supply (450-750 watts) then you may go for an 80-plus platinum-rated unit. For the high-quality (750-1000 watts), you can go for the 80-plus titanium-rated unit.

Here you want to use the 980 Ti 2-Way SLI, which means two 980 Ti graphics cards are setting together, then you should have at least 850 watts of power supply, in another word, use an 80-plus titanium-rated power supply. 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What power supply do I need for 980 Ti?

You need to have a power supply of 450-750 watts for lower efficiency or 750-1000 watts for higher efficiency.

Does the GTX 980 Ti support SLI?

Yes, GTX 980 Ti graphics card supports SLI which is GTX 980 Ti 2-Way SLI. It is remarkable to the users, especially gamers, for its outstanding performance.

How much power does a 980 Ti use?

A single 980 Ti graphics card uses 250 watts of power supply on its own. But along with other components, it can be up to 650 watts to 800 watts. 

How much power does SLI use?

In general, a scalable link interface aka SLI uses a power supply of at least 850 watts. A little bit better supply will be preferable. 

Conclusion

If the 980 Ti is your primary interest, you can select a power supply system with an average estimate of 450 to 750 watts or a high estimate of 750 to 1000 watts. However, if you have a 980 Ti SLI, you must have at least 850 watts of power, which naturally gravitates toward a high-efficiency power supply.

Will the GTX-1060 work with the stock PSU in the Dell-XPS 8900? — dell xps 8900

329569

1 Questions

View all

nick traianovski

@nickteee

Rep: 13

1

Posted:

Options

  • Permalink
  • History
  • Subscribe

I am looking to upgrade to the EVGA GTX 1060 (non reference) in my Dell XPS 8900. There seems to be quite controversy over wether or not the PSU can be trusted to suplly the amount of power needed for higher end cards. On Dell’s website it is stated that the PSU supports up to a GTX 980 but I don’t know, based on my research, if I should trust my card with the power supply.

Answer this question

I have this problem too

Is this a good question?

Yes
No

Score
1

Cancel

Most Helpful Answer

Eric Viitala

@edesign

Rep: 1.8k

eDesign Electronics

Posted:

Options

  • Permalink
  • History

So. ..according to Dell, the XPS 8600 comes with a 460w power supply that will power video up to 225w. The GTX 1060 uses 120w, so you should be fine unless you are running a whole bunch of fans and lights. The PSU supports up to a GTX 980, but the GTX 980 pulls more watts (150w) than the GTX 1060 (120w). I think you will be good.

Was this answer helpful?

Yes
No

Score
3

Cancel

Choosing a heavy duty power supply: test results of 12 models

Table of contents

  • Introduction
  • List of models
  • Pre-selection
  • List of Blocks Prequalified
  • Final selection
  • Comparison with 850 W models
  • Conclusion

Introduction

We continue to sum up the intermediate results of mass testing of power supplies. Before you is the final material of this cycle, so I propose to start it in an unusual way — with general discussions about the PSU power required for various systems. This is a good opportunity to present the scope of current heavy duty contributors and to systematize previous reviews. nine0023

First, let’s determine the typical load level provided by high-performance video cards — these are the main consumers in a modern gaming system. To do this, you can refer to one of the reviews of my colleague, who uses high-precision equipment to monitor the power supplied through the PCI-e connector on the motherboard and along the 12 V lines of the power supply.

Many mid-range graphics cards that are suitable for a fairly comfortable game in Full HD resolution today consume less than 150 watts. Their power supply requirements are very low. What about more powerful solutions? Under intense gaming load, the popular GeForce GTX 970 / GTX 980 consume 170-190 watts, and the most voracious GeForce GTX Titan (Black / X) — up to 260-270 watts. The range for productive AMD accelerators is approximately the same — from 170 W (Radeon R9 380) to 230-245 W (Radeon Fury X / R9 390). The maximum overclock, suitable for everyday use, increases the power consumption of any of the models by approximately 60-120 watts.

In most cases, it is enough to leave about 100-120 W for the processor and other equipment. Even if we are talking about a serious modern overclocked CPU, 200 watts of power can only be obtained when all cores are fully loaded in a stress test. Applications that create a significant combined load (video card plus processor) are 99% of the games, and they still actively use only one or two CPU cores. The typical level of processor consumption in this mode does not exceed 50-70 W.

Thus, as we have already noted more than once in our reviews, a high-quality 500-watt block is more than enough for almost any system with a single video card. Moreover, for PCs with mid-range accelerators (real consumption up to 200 W), we can recommend a lower power PSU — 400-450 W (especially if the owners are not going to overclock). The only pity is that among them there are many simple office models that are simply not intended for use as part of a gaming system (lack of necessary connectors, a weak 12 V line). And truly high-quality PSUs of this group cost the same as running «five hundred». nine0023

A practical example: a test system with a hot Radeon HD 6970 (and this is another 40 nm process technology, TDP — 250 W, at the level of modern flagships) and a quad-core processor with a typical gaming load very rarely exceeds 250 W. So, a 300-watt unit would be enough for her. And this is actually the case: with certain limitations, the stand successfully worked from a similar power supply when testing low-power solutions (300-350 W).

With two Radeon HD 6970 graphics cards in particularly demanding games, you can get ~450-470 W, but even to reach 500 W you have to use stress tests. A significant overclocking of video cards with an increase in voltage adds about 150-200 watts more. And here we come to the topic of multi-GPU systems. nine0023

recommendations

According to experts, the total number of computers using SLI/CrossFire technologies in 2015 was about 300,000. exceeds 1% of the total number of gaming PCs. Suffice it to recall that there are more than 125 million active accounts in the Steam service alone. Of course, these are very rough approximations, but they are enough to represent the situation on the market. nine0023

What kind of PSU does this conditional one percent of users need? Let’s go back to the values ​​above. A pair of powerful accelerators without serious overclocking consumes no more than 400 W (we are talking about models of the GeForce GTX 980 level), but if you take the most extreme option (something like a pair of GeForce GTX Titan X with overclocking), you can really get to 700 W. Moreover, it should be taken into account that due to the imperfection of the work of Multi-GPU technologies and (in some cases) excessive performance, the load on cards working in pairs is usually slightly lower than on single ones. This leads to a reduction in energy consumption. nine0023

Dual-processor accelerators (probably the most common use of SLI/CrossFire technologies today) consume slightly less bundles of a similar class. The main reasons are the limited capabilities of the cooling and power systems of a single video card. For example, here are the results of Nvidia GTX Titan Z (~400W) and AMD Radeon R9 295X2 (~500W). Here it is necessary to take into account the very limited overclocking potential of such solutions.

Thus, for mid-level SLI/Crossfire bundles and dual-processor accelerators, power supplies up to 700 W can be considered the best choice. With proper system planning and the use of «cold» video cards (for example, GeForce GTX 970) can be limited even to 600-650 watts. The most voracious bundles may require the use of an 850 W PSU, but the “kilowatt” remains unclaimed in this case too.

Finally, let’s look at rare cases in which the potential of a super-powerful PSU can be fully unlocked. The maximum consumption of video cards, which I managed to find in recent laboratory materials, is 1050 watts. The exotic configuration of two dual-processor AMD Radeon R9 295X2 managed to «eat» so much. Nvidia accelerators working in 3-SLI can also come close to this result. Finally, the last option that we can’t ignore is extreme overclocking using low temperatures (component consumption often increases in such modes). Needless to say, all these scenarios are exceptionally rare, even taking into account the fact that we have already gone deep into the wilds of the “1%”. nine0023

Thus, sales of «kilowatt» (and even more powerful) units should be extremely low. However, in reality, a lot of such solutions are being implemented — just look at dozens of offers on Yandex Market: such models are sold even by small stores that count every penny and will not be associated with a product that is difficult to find a buyer.

Consequently, psychological moments again come to the fore: a distorted idea of ​​the required power and the desire to purchase a power source “with a margin”. If for a mediocre gaming system that even a 350-watt unit will pull out, it is “accepted” to buy a 600-watt one, why not get a 1200-watt one for a bunch of a pair of GeForce GTX 980 or Radeon R9 390X?

With our mass methodology, which is oriented towards practical tests (using a real system instead of a «refined» load bench), it is not possible to achieve a load level of 1000 watts. And such data will be of interest to very few readers — how often does someone seriously plan to build a system with several GPUs (in any configuration)? The maximum bench with two flagship-level accelerators is ~800 W. At the same time, to obtain such modes, you have to use very serious overclocking with an increase in voltage and simultaneously load both video cards and all processor cores with stress tests. nine0023

Given these limitations, the task of the new review is reduced to two points.

  • Finding out the real capabilities of the blocks and comparing them with each other at available load levels (up to 800 W). Taking into account the most frequent scenarios for the use of such power supplies, it is these data that are of the greatest interest;
  • Comparison of heavy-duty units with the best participants of the previous review — 850-watt models, which are the most powerful devices, and their purchase is justified for most users. Here we can finally clarify the issue of purchasing a PSU with a margin. nine0006

The rest of the selection is made according to already familiar rules.

  1. At the first stage (large section «Preliminary selection») the main task is to eliminate the most «weak» (uncompetitive) devices. Consistently from the general list will be excluded:
  • Models that do not meet our actual power requirements;
  • Models that do not provide the proper (defined by the ATX standard) quality of voltage stabilization; nine0006
  • Noise non-compliant models (really noisy units not suitable for everyday use).

  • After screening out these (least successful) devices, we will compile a list of PSUs that have passed the preliminary selection and meet the mandatory requirements. It is from among them that the selection of the best models in several price categories will be made at the second stage.
  • It should be noted that in the material below there are a lot of references to our methodology for mass testing power supplies. Before reading, we strongly recommend that you familiarize yourself with it. The general scheme remained unchanged, although testing of heavy-duty PSUs made some adjustments to the process, which will be discussed below. So let’s get started. nine0023

    List of models

    Here is the complete list of tested models in alphabetical order. In all cases, links to detailed reviews are provided.

    • Chieftec GPM-1000C;
    • Chieftec GPM-1250C;
    • Corsair RM1000;
    • Corsair RM1000i;
    • Cougar GX 1050W;
    • Enhance EPS-1710GA4;
    • EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G1;
    • EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G2;
    • EVGA SuperNOVA 1200 P2; nine0006
    • Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W;
    • Lepa B1000-MB;
    • OCZ FTY1000W.

    Nine of the fourteen units are in the 1000 W category. The Cougar GX 1050W has slightly more power (1050 W), but for the price and the actual load capacity of the 12 V line, it can be ranked in the same group. Two solutions represent a class of ultra-powerful devices — these are EVGA SuperNOVA 1200 P2 (1200 W) and Chieftec GPM-1250C (1250 W).

    Most of the comparators are 80 Plus Gold certified: Chieftec GPM-1000C, Chieftec GPM-1250C, Corsair RM1000, Corsair RM1000i, Cougar GX 1050W, EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G1, EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G2 and OCZ FTY1000W. Two more blocks — EVGA SuperNOVA 1200 P2 and Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W — «platinum» flagships. But only one model belongs to the middle class — Lepa B1000-MB (80 Plus Bronze). This is not surprising: if you quickly “scroll” the market, it is obvious that among ultra-high-power models there are noticeably more “gold” and “platinum” solutions than middle-class devices. nine0023

    At first glance, there is a paradox, but in reality everything is logical. Even in the previous summary testing of 700-850 W units, it was noted that only relatively expensive devices show high results. And all models that can be classified as middle class suffer from a sharp drop in performance when switching to high-load modes. This is a very noticeable difference between the older power groups (over 700 W) and the younger ones (300-600 W), where there are many worthy PSUs with the 80 Plus/80 Plus Bronze certificate. nine0023

    In case of insufficient efficiency, the heat dissipation in severe modes of powerful models is very high, which leads to a regular deterioration in performance and a significant increase in noise level. There is only one “salvation” here — the 80 Plus Gold certificate, and even better — Platinum. And even more important is the efficiency level for “kilowatts”: a ten percent difference between “bronze” and “gold” for such blocks can result in an extra 100 W of heat dissipation.

    Pre-selection

    This time the pre-selection will be short, without division into separate stages. The reason is simple — the class of all participants is very high, and the load of 800 W is not the limit for them. As a result, almost all models meet the mandatory requirements of the methodology; there are no data that need detailed analysis. However, there are some interesting points worth noting.

    So, not a single unit was excluded from the list due to insufficient power characteristics. Let me remind you that we usually filter out PSUs that cannot cope with a load that is 100 W less than the declared rating (for example, any high-quality «six hundred», in our opinion, should easily cope with a real load of 500 W). This approach allows not to reduce the list too much, but at the same time cut off the weakest blocks that do not correspond well to the declared power category. nine0023

    In this case, all models coped with the maximum load for our stand of 800 W. The expected result, because there are simply no «weak» PSUs in the list — just look at the table showing the ratio of the load capacity of the 12 V line and the declared power.

    nine0135


    99.6
    Name

    Declared load capacity

    lines 12 V, W

    nine0128
    The ratio of the power of the 12 V line and the declared rating of the unit,%
    Chieftec GPM-1250C

    1248

    99. 8
    EVGA SuperNOVA 1200 P2

    1198

    99.9
    Cougar GX 1050W

    1020

    97.1
    Corsair RM1000

    1000

    one hundred
    Corsair RM1000i

    1000

    one hundred
    Chieftec GPM-1000C

    999.6

    ~100
    EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G2

    999. 6

    ~100
    Enhance EPS-1710GA4

    996

    nine9.6
    EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G1

    996

    99.6
    Lepa B1000-MB

    996

    99.6
    OCZ FTY1000W

    996
    Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W

    960

    96

    In all cases the figure is very close to 100%. Only the Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W stands out from the general list of “kilowatt” power supplies, lagging behind other models by about 40 watts.

    An interesting result, because in other power groups the spread is much larger (figures start from 80%, for example, for a 500-watt PSU, the power of the 12 V line is often 420-460 W). nine0023

    Let’s move on to the next stage of selection. Here we consider the quality of stabilization, «catching» blocks that do not meet the requirements of the ATX standard in this parameter. Let me remind you that the voltage deviation at maximum load should not exceed 5% (there are some nuances here, but in this case they are not important). Thus, the allowable voltage spread on the main line of 12 V (it is subject to the greatest drawdowns) is from 11.4 to 12.6 V. Let’s see how the contestants performed at a load of 800 W. nine0023


    1000-1250 W units

    Line voltage 3.3/5/12 V

    At 800 W load

    B

    Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

    None of the blocks even came close to the thresholds. However, the voltage on the 12 V line for the OCZ FTY1000W and Cougar GX 1050W models sank below 11.8 V (deviation ~ 2%), which, by the standards of our methodology, is interpreted as a sufficient, but no longer “ideal” result. The Enhance EPS-1710GA4 and Corsair RM1000 performed slightly better. There is no crime here, but you need to take into account that drawdowns can become larger at maximum load. For such high-quality «gold» blocks of high power, these are not the best indicators. nine0023

    Now let’s see how things are with the noise level at the same load — 800 watts.


    1000-1250 W units

    Noise level

    From a distance of 150 mm

    At 800 W load

    dB

    Please enable JavaScript to see graphs

    Everything is more interesting here — two blocks did not meet the mandatory standard of 50 dB. The «bronze» Lepa B1000-MB, as expected, does not cope well with a significant load. Increased heat dissipation (the downside of low efficiency) requires a significant increase in fan speed. nine0023

    Quite unexpectedly, another unit dropped out of the race — the «platinum» flagship EVGA SuperNOVA 1200 P2 (one of the most expensive models on our list). Of course, the result is «on the verge» — only 51 dB. But from a device of such a high class, operating at partial load, we can expect more. Evidently, EVGA’s designers were too careful when setting the fan speed. Also, if you look at the graph in the SuperNOVA review, you can see a steady upward trend in rotational speed. And this means that with a greater load, the noise level will continue to rise. nine0023

    Considering the high level of competition (proximity of results) and the fact that all devices operate at partial load, the selection conditions can be tightened. Once again I will give a standard description of the subjective perception of various noise levels.

    • Up to 42 dB — the block is almost inaudible, such a PSU is suitable even for a very quiet system;
    • 43-46 dB — quiet operation, although the PSU will be slightly noticeable against the background of the system unit with the most “strangled” fans; nine0006
    • 46-49 dB — generally acceptable noise level, the block is clearly audible, but the vast majority of users will be satisfied with this indicator;
    • 50-55 dB — unsatisfactory values, the noise of the PSU is clearly visible and will annoy many users.

    Let’s not go too far and leave only completely «silent» models in the list. Let’s take a compromise value of 46 dB — it is after this mark that the block becomes clearly audible. This selection excludes the EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G2, Cougar GX 1050W and OCZ FTY1000W from our list. Separately, I note that the OCZ FTY1000W and Cougar GX 1050W simultaneously showed the weakest results in the test for the quality of stabilization. Thus, these BPs definitely could not compete for high places in the overall standings. nine0023

    So, the Cougar GX 1050W, EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G2, EVGA SuperNOVA 1200 P2, Lepa B1000-MB and OCZ FTY1000W drop out of the comparison.