Rx 6800 xt vs 3080: AMD RX 6800-XT vs Nvidia RTX 3080

AMD RX 6800-XT vs Nvidia RTX 3080

  • CPU
  • GPU
  • SSD
  • HDD
  • RAM
  • USB

VS

YouTube*NEW*

About

Watch Gameplay  

CSGO

Dust 2 1080p Max
278 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+14%
244 EFps
GTAV

Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
144 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+11%
130 EFps
Overwatch

Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
247 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+10%
224 EFps
PUBG

M249 Training 1080p Max
189 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+11%
170 EFps
Fortnite

UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
223 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+15%
194 EFps

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 362,156 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

353,788 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 227% Gigabyte(1458 403D) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 147% Asus(1043 8830) ≥ 4GB

Poor: 147%

Great: 227%

SPEED RANK: 6th / 688

8,368 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 170% Gigabyte(1458 232A) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 90% PowerColor(148C 2406) ≥ 4GB

Poor: 90%

Great: 170%

SPEED RANK: 16th / 688

Effective 3D Speed

Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
206 % Much faster effective speed.
+40%
147 %
Lighting

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
268 fps Much better lighting effects.
+49%
180 fps
Reflection

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
250 fps Better reflection handling.
+16%
215 fps
MRender

Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
303 fps 318 fps +5%
Gravity

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
228 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+45%
157 fps
Lighting

Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
304 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+41%
216 fps
Reflection

High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
326 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+29%
252 fps
MRender

Render target array GShader (Sphere)
332 fps 393 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+18%
Gravity

NBody particle system (Galaxy)
247 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+43%
173 fps

Market Share

Based on 56,119,051 GPUs tested.

See market share leaders

Market Share

Market Share (trailing 30 days)
3. 24 % Insanely higher market share.
+3,140%
0.1 %
Value

Value For Money
71.2 % Much better value.
+33%
53.5 %
User Rating

UBM User Rating
91 % Much more popular.
+57%
58 %
Price

Price (score)
$685 $650 Slightly cheaper.
+5%
Age

Newest
25 Months 23 Months Slightly more recent.
+8%
Parallax

Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
320 fps 462 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+44%
Splatting

Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
182 fps 328 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+80%
Parallax

Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
279 fps 383 fps Much better texture detail.
+37%
Splatting

Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
170 fps 279 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+64%

ADVERTISEMENT

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works
  • — Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • — See speed test results from other users.
  • — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

  •   

    Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti

  •   

    Nvidia RTX 3070

  •   

    Nvidia RTX 3050

  •   

    Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)

  •   

    Nvidia RTX 3080

  •   

    Nvidia RTX 4090

  •   

    Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)

  •   

    Nvidia RTX 2060

  •   

    Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB

  •   

    Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)

  •   

    AMD RX 6600-XT

  •   

    AMD RX 5600-XT

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVidia RTX 3080 (Updated 2022)

The old Team Red and Team Green dispute is back again this year!

The epic fight between AMD and Nvidia carries on, through the new video cards. We saw AMD release the RDNA2-based Radeon graphics cards – the RX 6000-series, and Nvidia taking their 2nd gen RTX architecture, the Ampere-powered RTX 30-series straight out of the oven.

While Nvidia had major stock issues with the RTX 30-series that were in greater demand than expected, AMD launched the RX 6800, RX 6800 XT and RX 6900 XT to match their rival.

When it comes to finding a GPU that offers the best performance per price ratio, two video cards come to mind: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and NVidia GeForce RTX 3080. But which model should you get and which one has an advantage?

Nvidia is known as the best performance GPU maker, but what if AMD is overthrowing that position with its Radeon RX 6800 XT? There’s only one way we can find out, so let’s compare these GPUs in terms of specs, benchmark test results, and pricing.

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVidia RTX 3080 – Specs & Features

When it comes to memory, the two GPUs are not just different in terms of quantity, but also in terms of speeds. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT does come with 60% more VRAM than the GeForce RTX 3080, but the latter comes with a memory that has faster bandwidth speeds since it’s a GDDR6X memory.

Right now, games do not need more than 10 GB of VRAM, but in the future, they will undoubtedly be more demanding, which is where the GeForce RTX 3080 may struggle to keep up with the competition. Adobe Premiere can also benefit from more VRAM, and this is where the Radeon RX 6800 XT wins.

Looking at the memory bus, we see that the Radeon RX 6800 XT is smaller than the GeForce RTX 3080. However, AMD’s Infinity Cache adds an extra 128 MBs, closing the gap and even surpassing the competition.

Not even the GDDR6X VRAM type can save the GeForce RTX 3080 from this loss.

Looking at the shading units, cores and CUs, the Radeon RX 6800 XT is capable (in theory) of a performance of 41.47 TFLOPs, 20.74 TFLOPs, and 1.296 TFLOPs in FP16, FP32, and FP64 performance respectively, as seen in the spec sheet above.

Meanwhile, the GeForce RTX 3080 is equipped with 8,704 CUDA Cores, 272 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 68 RT cores, and 272 Tensor cores. This would yield a theoretical performance of 29.77 TFLOPs (FP16 and FP32) and 0.4651 TFLOPs (FP64).

We will talk about rendering power in the benchmark results and see how the two GPUs compare not just in theoretical scores, but also in tests.

In terms of power consumption, the Radeon RX 6800 XT performance (as marketed by AMD) surpasses the GeForce RTX 3080, and it should need more power. However, it needs even less power than its rival, and this also means it runs cooler. So, once again, AMD wins in terms of power efficiency as seen on the spec sheet.

Of course, each GPU comes with its own features. We see the RDNA2 architecture on the Radeon RX 6800 XT, along with Infinity Cache, new Ray Accelerators and AMD Smart Access Memory.

Nvidia also brings a new architecture and new features, including a different thermal performance for “for a quieter and cooler gaming system. ” Then, there’s DLSS AI Acceleration and Ray tracing.

Let’s see how these GPUs perform in different tests.

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVidia RTX 3080 – Benchmarks

Nvidia revealed the performance of the NVidia RTX 3080 against the RTX 2080 and the GTX 1080. With RTX ON (RT + DLSS), at 4K, highest game settings, the RTX 3080 reached almost 80 FPS in Control and Minecraft. Meanwhile, at the same settings, it was able to reach 60 FPS. It’s safe to say that the RTX 3080 is a great upgrade over the RTX 2080, the latter offering nearly 50% less performance.

AMD also revealed benchmarks – more than what Nvidia shared so far about their GPUs. They put the RX 6800 XT against not only its predecessors but also against the competition. We chose the Borderlands benchmark from AMD to show you a comparison between the two tests.

We see the RX 6800 XT on the second spot, head to toe with the GeForce RTX 3090 and not with its direct competitor – the RTX 3080! Reaching nearly 66 FPS, the RX 6800 XT shames the GeForce RTX 3080, which can only reach around 58 FPS.

What we don’t know from AMD is whether the GeForce RTX 3080 had RTX on and DLSS or not. If AMD were to use Ray Tracing in these tests, numbers would look totally different. But enough with tests from AMD and Nvidia. Let’s see if what they’re bragging about is true.

RX 6800 XT vs NVidia RTX 3080 (Core i0-10900K) – Ultra Settings, 1920×1080, 2560×1440, 3440×1440

Looking at the test results in the list above, we see that both GPUs yield nearly the same results.

The RX 6800 XT delivers from 68 FPS to 131 FPS when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, Cyberpunk 2077, Red Dead Redemption 2 and other games at 1080p Full HD. At 1440p Quad HD, we ran the same games and saw an average of 62 FPS.

The RTX 3080 delivers from 67 FPS to 130 FPS when running the same games at the same settings. At 1440p Quad HD, we ran these games and saw an average of 63 FPS.

However, these tests don’t show us everything about what these GPUs can do.

For instance, AMD’s Rage Mode is a significant boost, offering overclocking with one touch of a button. Along with Smart Access Memory, the RX 6800 XT becomes up to 13% better than the RTX 3080 – but only in specific games (such as Forza Horizon 4).

Let’s not forget that Ray Tracing is also a sensitive subject when it comes to AMD’s performances. In synthetic benchmarks, we see the RX 6800 XT losing against not only its opponent but also against the RTX 2080 Ti.

In terms of Ray Tracing, Nvidia’s RTX 3080 has the upper hand when it comes to achieving better FPS, due to its dedicated RTX cores.

In addition, turning on DLSS will yield better performance at no cost to visual fidelity – sometimes even improving it. With DLSS turned on, the FPS grows by nearly 65% in some games.

On paper, looking at the test results, and using the default settings for each GPU, there’s no noticeable difference in terms of performance.

However, once you start using Nvidia’s DLSS and Ray Tracing features, the performance and visuals of the RTX 3080 significantly improve. Even though AMD tries catching up with their Rage Mode and Smart Access Memory feature, it’s still left behind. Moreover, Smart Access Memory will only work with AMD Ryzen 5000 CPUs.

We’re still waiting for AMD to finish their work on FidelityFX, which will be AMD’s answer to Nvidia’s DLSS. On the other hand, Nvidia is also working on their own version of Smart Access Memory, which will work with any next-gen CPU.

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVidia RTX 3080 – Price

The RX 6800XT was launched at a $649 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3080 was launched at a $699 MSRP. For a $50 difference, Nvidia is the clear loser here if we were to look at the sheet provided by GPUcheck. The RX 6800XT has an overall score of 74/100, while the GeForce RTX 3080 has a score of 65/100.

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVidia RTX 3080 – Verdict

Imagine being able to play Minecraft in 4K with ray tracing on and Nvidia DLSS at 93 FPS. Now use AMD’s Radeon RX 6800 XT at the same settings and try playing at barely 30 FPS. Even though AMD tries to keep up with other options such as adaptive sharpening and varying-rate shading, it cannot offer the same option as DLSS (yet).

The verdict is that although the overall performance is the same, Nvidia’s extra features are worth the extra cash. If we wanted to build a new gaming PC, we’d grab an NVidia RTX 3080 GPU without a second thought – but that’s mostly because we’d play games that use DLSS and Ray Tracing. Unfortunately, it isn’t easy to find an NVidia RTX 3080 on the market right now.

If you’re looking to buy a powerful video card that plays standard rendered 4K resolution games, both the NVidia GeForce RTX 3080 and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT offer great performances. In the end, two factors will influence your choice: availability and price.

pending FFX SR GECID.com. Page 1

::>Video cards
>2021
> Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs RX 6800XT and RTX 3080/3070/3060Ti/2080Ti in FHD, QHD and 4K: Pending FFX SR

16-01-2021

Page 1
Page 2
One page

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 and 6800 XT graphics cards went on sale on November 18 in very limited quantities. Even now it is very difficult to find them in retail at an adequate price. The recommended cost of the first is $579, and the second is $649.

They differ from each other in GPU configuration. The RX 6800 got the Navi 21 XL chip with support for 3840 stream processors instead of the 4608 in the Navi 21 XT. The GPU clock speeds of the RX 6800 XT are 145-200 MHz higher. This leads to an increase in performance and TDP. But the video memory subsystem in both cases consists of 16 GB GDDR6 with an effective frequency of 16 GHz and a 256-bit bus. Also available in 128 MB Infinity Cache.

In addition, the RX 6800 supports all the technologies that we talked about in the 6800 XT review. We will not go deep: for those who are interested, see the previous comparison with a more detailed description. Here we only briefly recall the key points.

First of all, this is a full implementation of the DirectX 12 Ultimate API, including Mesh Shading, Sampler Feedback, VRS and ray tracing. Hardware support for ray tracing is provided using special Ray Accelerator blocks and is accelerated by Infinity Cache.

AMD pioneered Smart Access Memory technology. Although it has existed for a long time in the form of the Re-Size BAR function of the PCIe interface, no one has shown interest in it before, and after the announcement of AMD by NVIDIA, Intel and motherboard manufacturers have actively taken up its adaptation.

AMD Anti-LAG technology in conjunction with Radeon Boost reduces Input Lag in games. It will be especially useful in competitive shooters and eSports disciplines. This is an analogue of NVIDIA Reflex.

AMD also has a set of FidelityFX technologies to improve the visual quality of games. Later, Super Resolution technology will appear in it — an analogue of NVIDIA DLSS.

Finally, let’s recall the support for HDMI 2.1 and USB Type-C interfaces, as well as hardware acceleration of the AV1 format.

We will get acquainted with the capabilities of the novelty using the example of the PowerColor Radeon RX 6800 Red Dragon OC video card. She received two BIOS chips with Silent and OC profiles. In the first case, the game and boost frequencies are 1905 and 2140 MHz, and in the second — 1950 / 2170 MHz. This is higher than the reference 1815/2105 MHz. We tested in OC mode.

This video card is not good for overclocking alone. She also received an 8 + 2-phase power subsystem with DrMOS chips and an efficient cooler. Its massive build includes a large copper base, a two-piece aluminum heatsink, seven 6mm heatpipes, a metal backplate, and three fans: two 100mm and one 90mm. They are based on reliable double ball bearings. Not without red LED-backlight and semi-passive mode thanks to Mute Fan technology.

For correct operation, the new product requires two 8-pin PCIe connectors. The set of external interfaces has one HDMI and three DisplayPort.

The following opponents participated in the comparison. Inside AMD’s lineup, we’ll take a look at the RX 6800 versus 6800 XT . The second is a reference model with a vapor chamber, an aluminum heatsink and three fans as part of the cooler.

The RX 6800 has no direct external competitor. It sits between the more expensive $699 RTX 3080 and the cheaper $499 RTX 3070. The first of these is represented by the INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 iCHILL X4 model. It boasts a factory overclocked GPU dynamic frequency from 1710 to 1770 MHz. In games, the speed will be even higher due to the efficient cooler with 8 heat pipes and 4 fans.

The honor of the less expensive representative of Ampere will defend Palit GeForce RTX 3070 JetStream OC . It also received a factory overclocked GPU dynamic frequency from 1725 to 1815 MHz. That is, the RX 6800 and a couple of competitors are placed in the same conditions. And the novelty from Palit has a stylish design, addressable RGB lighting, two BIOS chips, DrMOS chips in the power circuits and an efficient cooler with 2 fans.

To complete the picture, we added the reference NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti to the comparison. It is not a direct competitor — the difference in recommended prices is $180 or 45%. Is it worth it to pay extra or can you save money? The video card itself looks very stylish with a dual-fan cooling system. Unlike the older versions, the cooler has lost the evaporation chamber, but it is not needed in a 200-watt video card. The GPU and 8GB of GDDR6 memory run at reference clock speeds. For power, you need to connect a new 12-pin connector — that’s where the corresponding cable from Seasonic came in handy!

The comparison would not be complete without a member of the Turing family. The RTX 3070 competes with the RTX 2080 Ti in terms of performance, so the MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GAMING X TRIO was added to the tests. Thanks to Telemart for it. This is a real flagship of the last generation with a factory overclocked GPU dynamic frequency up to 1755 MHz and a massive 3-fan TRI-FROZR cooler.

In synthetic we also added the results of PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 5700 XT OC and Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock to evaluate the new product against the backdrop of a larger number of previous generation video cards.

Let’s take a quick look at the test bench. It is based on the once top 16-thread processor Core i9-9900K .

We did not manually overclock it, but used the bus function on the ASUS Prime Z390-A board.

3-section dropsy assigned to CPU temperature NZXT Kraken X73 with FDB bearings.

The 32 GB kit DDR4-3600 CORSAIR Dominator Platinum RGB solved all the problems with RAM.

OS, benchmarks and other software installed on M2 SSD Kingston A1000 480 GB.

Games were registered for a faster and more capacious 2-terabyte Kingston KC2000.

For the rest, a 4 terabyte HDD was used Seagate BarraCuda .

The Seasonic PRIME PX-1000 80 PLUS Platinum certified kilowatt power source easily powered all components.

The NZXT H710i is a nice and spacious case to give the systems a divine look.

Monitor Philips Brilliance 329P9H helped with the output of the picture. Gameplays recorded by external system with AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K , i.e. without loss of performance.

First of all, we warmed up the system with the RX 6800 using a donut. The GPU temperature did not exceed 69°C. Everything worked stably, the cooler was quite quiet, the chokes did not squeal, and we started the test session with synthetics.

The alpha version of the benchmark LuxMark 4. 0 while does not favor AMD video cards. The RX 6800 couldn’t even outperform the 3060 Ti, but easily beat the RTX 2080 SUPER by 25% and the RX 5700 XT by 68%.

In Blender , the new «red» models look much more confident. The 6800 XT takes the lead, while the 6800 moves up to third place, behind only the RTX 3080.

3DMark Port Royal allows you to objectively and fully evaluate the effectiveness of video cards support for ray tracing. The RX 6800 outperforms the RTX 3060 Ti by 12% but lags behind the 3070 by 7%. The advantage of 6800 XT over its younger brother is 16%.

RTX 3080 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT: Powerful GPUs from Nvidia vs AMD

The GeForce RTX 3080 and Radeon RX 6800 XT are two premium graphics cards from Nvidia and AMD that deliver outstanding gaming performance. Released in 2020, the GPUs feature the new Ampère and RDNA2020 architectures respectively, bringing features such as native ray tracing and, in the case of the Nvidia variant, DLSS 2. In addition to that, the developers are talking quite a lot about its ability to play games in 2.0K with at 4 frames per second, surpassing the high-end versions of previous generations.

While the former costs at least R$ 7.599 in the national retail market, AMD GPUs still appear infrequently in stores in Spain, selling on import sites for at least R$ 5.773, without shipping estimates and possible fees. Compare the specifications of the two models and find out which powerful graphics card is best for you.

Galax graphics card: watch the brand releases for the new RTX 30

RTX 3080 during the Nvidia presentation; product directly competes with AMD RX 6800 XT — Photo: Playback/Nvidia

Do you want to get a mobile phone, TV and other goods at a discount? Meet Compare TechTudo

Radeon RX 6800 XT, one of AMD’s big bets in the premium graphics market, is a direct competitor to Nvidia’s RTX 3080. The GPU consists of a GPU with 72 compute objects and 4.608 flex processors. The Nvidia model consists of 8,704 CUDA cores.

In terms of speeds, Radeon registers 1.825 MHz for standard flex, 2.015 MHz for gaming (a speed that AMD claims is consistent) and can go as high as 2.250 MHz with turbo enabled. From Nvidia’s side, the regular RTX 3080 should run at the stock 1410MHz and 1710MHz with the turbo on. Knowing the numbers from the datasheet, the much faster Radeon speeds make up for this given that the AMD card has fewer compute cores.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is a much more affordable premium alternative that rivals the RTX 3080 — Photo: Reproduction / AMD

In terms of memory, the RX 6800 XT has 16GB of GDDR6 memory running at 16 gigabytes per second (gigabits per second). ), and when connected to a GPU via a 256-bit work platform, uses 510 GB/s of bandwidth. The Nvidia card has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory at 19 GB/s, a 320-bit working platform, and 760 GB/s bandwidth.

Of all these numbers, bandwidth is by far the most important. The Nvidia product exchanges 760 GB of data per second with the GPU, while the Radeon 510 GB. However, the AMD architecture is much more efficient with memory, so this discrepancy is eventually leveled out.

Another important feature of the two companies’ datasheet is that they both offer specialized hardware to simultaneously accelerate ray tracing effects. In AMD’s situation, RT has 72 cores, while Nvidia’s model has 68.

The RTX 3080 has few advantages in 4K, but excels at ray tracing and delivers DLSS 2.0 — Photo: Disclosure/Nvidia

The AMD card is competitive in performance and features, but early comparisons and reviews point to certain Nvidia strengths. The RTX 3080 is much faster when it comes to 4K gaming and shows better performance with ray tracing enabled. In addition to that, it has DLSS 2.0, which uses AI (artificial intelligence) image reconstruction to create games with high graphical fidelity at a lower performance cost. This is a technology that AMD has not yet competed with.

Radeon equivalents matter too: the RX 6800 XT is much cheaper and has a lot more RAM on top, which is essential for those who want to play in 4K.

ranked PC gamer managed to make several comparisons showing that the RX 6800 XT comes pretty close when it comes to running games in 4K. In Metro Exodus, known for its incredible use of ray tracing, the AMD card averages 66fps in 4K with Ultra graphics, while the GeForce RTX 3080 goes a little further and hits 71fps at exactly the same settings and in the same conditions. The difference was almost the same when compared to using Horizon: Zero Dawn: 71 fps for Radeon and 77 fps for GeForce in 4K resolution and maximum graphics.

AMD card performs better in F1 2020 — Photo: Playback / Vinícius Mathias

In F1 2020, it was AMD’s turn to surprise, reaching an average of 141 fps when playing in 4K with Ultra graphics compared to 135 fps for the competitor Nvidia. Comparisons from other sites reinforce the preconceived notion that the two cards are very close, whether they run at 4K or 1440p. However, the Nvidia card still has a bit more free space due to higher performance, better ray tracing performance, and substantial DLSS differential.

According to Nvidia, the RTX 3080 has a TBP (abbreviation for «Total Card Capacity») of 320W, a number that reflects the proportion of power a product needs to operate in high-demand environments. It’s worth remembering that the name is different from the TDP value, which is related to the proportion of energy that the card dissipates as heat during use.

The AMD card proved to be much more efficient — Photo: Playback/AMD

For the Radeon card, AMD considers a TBP value of 300W. In practice, this allows us to say that the GPU is generally much cheaper, aside from the argument about why the RX 6800 XT tends to work less.

Both manufacturers also make suggestions regarding the power supply. For Nvidia, the ideal is that your system has a source of at least 750 watts of real power, which is exactly the same recommendation AMD makes.

AMD and Nvidia are having trouble keeping up with demand for new cards — Photo: Disclosure / Nvidia

The new Radeons have entered the ordering stage at off-the-shelf stores in Spain, but the listings are already sold out. This is the same problem of high demand and shortage that Nvidia has been grappling with since the release of the GeForce RTX 30, just like Sony and Microsoft have been with next-gen consoles.

Radeon editions were offered for sale in the domestic market at a price of 5.699 reais, but without a free deposit. On AMD import sites, the GPU costs 5.773 reais, excluding shipping to Spain and possible fees. The GeForce option appears here for at least 7.599 reais, even with a small deposit.

Non-factory overclocked Radeon releases repeat — Photo: Disclosure / AMD

Manufacturing partners of the two developers have already released their versions to the market. When it comes to Radeons, there’s not much to choose from: to date, the releases announced in Spain from Asus, Gigabyte and MSI all come without exception at exactly the same stock clock speeds as AMD’s and without overclocking.

The Nvidia GPU has more wiggle room. Gigabyte, Asus, and EVGA models are factory overclockable, while there are releases with plenty of good action from those manufacturers and developers with less contention like PCSi and Galax.

Assuming the supply stabilizes and getting either of the two is just a matter of budget, the options presented to the customer are not as vague as the similarities between the dishes might seem.

The price difference between the two makes Radeon pretty strong these days. This makes the AMD graphics card much more interesting, despite being inferior in 4K performance compared to the RTX 3080. The option for the Nvidia card is a guarantee of superior performance and quality using Ray Tracing, in addition to using DLSS 2.0, the system is little by little more substantial the differential is in the works of getting much more performance out of the graphics card.