Rx580 vs 5700: RX 5700 vs RX 580 Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-8700K vs i7-7700K)

• GPU frequency 485MHz higher?
  1605MHz vs 1120MHz
• 3.65 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
  9.75 TFLOPS vs 6.1 TFLOPS
• 79 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
  121.9 GPixel/s vs 42.9 GPixel/s
• 6000MHz higher effective clock speed?
  14000MHz vs 8000MHz
• 111.8 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? 9more memory bandwidth?
  448GB/s vs 224GB/s
• 256 more stream processors?
  2560 vs 2304
• 639MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
  1905MHz vs 1266MHz

AMD Radeon RX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

AMD Radeon RX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

AMD Radeon RX 580

VS

NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1660 Super

MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX GEFORCE GTX GEFORIA RADOR

VS 9000 NVIDI 9000 NVIDI 9000 NVIDI 9000 NVIDI 9000 NVIDS0003

MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

AMD Radeon RX 580

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660

MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

AMD Radeon RX 580

VS

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

VS

GIGABYTE RX 5700 XT

AMD RADIRI 9000 VS 9000 NVITS 9000 NVITS 9000 NVITS0003

MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

AMD Radeon RX 580

vs

AMD Radeon RX 570

MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

AMD Radeon RX 580

VS

ZOTAC GEFORCE GTX 960

MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming

AMD Radeon RX 580

VS 9000 9000 NVIDIOl000 0 User reviews

MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

0. 0 /10

0 User reviews

Features

Value for money

9.0 /10

1 Votes

Reviews not yet

Games

10.0 /10

1 VOTES

Reviews are not

9000 1 VOTES

reviews not yet

fan noise

8.0 /10

1 Votes

reviews not yet

Reliability

9,0003 9,0003

004

8.0 /10

1 Votes

Reviews not yet

Productivity

1. TECTION FECTION GP

1120MHz

1605MHz 9000

2.turbo GPU

1266MHz

1905MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel rate

42.9 GPixel/s

121.9 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4.flops

6.1 TFLOPS

9.75 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

193 GTexels/s

304.8 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

2000MHz

1750MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

8000MHz

14000MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

224GB/s

448GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

256bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5. GDDR memory versions

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

6. Supports memory debug code

✖AMD Radeon RX 580

✖MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔AMD Radeon RX 580

✔MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

The video card has the ability to connect multiple displays. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5. GPU temperature at boot

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 580)

Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon RX 580

✖MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔AMD Radeon RX 580

✔MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8. supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon RX 580

✖MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (MSI Radeon RX 5700XT)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon RX 580

✔MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

2.HDMI connectors

More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

HDMI 3. Version

HDMI 2.0

HDMI 2.0

New HDMI versions support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

Price match

Cancel

Which graphics cards are better?

Test RX 580 8GB vs RX 5700 XT

Today we are testing two legendary graphics cards from AMD, RX 580 vs RX 5700 XT. This is not a performance comparison test directly, but rather a test that will show how much AMD has been able to raise their cards, and what the new RDNA architecture on NAVI chips has brought us. We will compare video cards with a powerful Ryzen 5 3600x gaming processor.

Both video cards will be from Sapphire in Nitro+ performance, the top-end variants.

the performance of the RX 5700 XT is really impressive. It’s getting closer to the RTX 2070 Super.

You can improve the performance of the RX 580, watch and read the overclocking of the RX580 on our website.

RX 580 vs RX 5700 XT. Tested games

We will compare RX 580 vs RX 5700 XT in 6 popular games, from different developers with different optimization of games for hardware:

1. Battlefield V (2018) by DICE

The overclocked i7 4770k can still surprise you.

Test bench configuration

• Processor : Ryzen 7 2700x, 8 cores, 16 theads 3.7GHz-4.3GHz.
• Motherboard : Asus Prime X470-PRO.
• Video card : Sapphire RX 580 8GB NITRO+.
• Video card : Sapphire RX 5700 XT NITRO+.
• RAM : DDR4 HyperX Fury 4x8Gb Dual 3200MHz.
• M.2 : Apacer AS2280P2 240GB NVME (Windows 10).
• HDD : Western Digital Blue 1TB 7200RPM / 64MB Cache. Under games.
• Power supply : be quiet! System Power 750W.
• Video driver : Adrenalin 20.2.2 (26.02.2020).
• Gameplay recording : AMD Relive.

On the radeon rx 580 review that will change your idea of ​​this card.

Comparison video version Ryzen 2700x vs 3600x

Battlefield V (2018)

RX 580 vs RX 5700 XT Battlefield V

RX 580 8GB :

• 1% Low — 56 fps
• AVG — 66 fps

RX 5700 XT :

• 1% Low — 95 fps
• AVG — 118 fps

From the first game, we can see that AMD managed to really make an excellent competitive product. And this is only a transitional architecture. We are waiting for RDNA2.

The difference from RX 580 to 1%Low is 69% and the average FPS is 78.78%.

Tests gtx 1660 vs rx 580 in top games.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)

RX 580 vs RX 5700 XT in Shadow of the Tomb Raider

RX 580 8GB:

• 1% Low — 72 fps
• AVG — 77 fps RX 90 5065
• • 1% Low — 100 fps
  • AVG — 128 fps

  In Shadow of the Tomb Raider, the difference in 1% Low was 66.23%, and the average FPS was 38.8%.

  Assassin’s Creed Odyssey (2018)

  RX 580 vs RX 5700 XT in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

  RX 580 8GB:

  • 1% LOW — 40 FPS
  • AVG — 50 FPS

  RX 5700 XT:

  • 1% LOW — 49 FPS

in Assassin Creed ODEDDDED just as bad for Radeon video cards. The RX 5700 XT was only able to hit 62FPS at max settings, but in this case we have a CPU problem, not a graphics card. It was the Ryzen 5 3600x that limited the performance of the RX 5700 XT.

Hitman 2 (2018)

RX 580 vs RX 5700 XT in Hitman 2

RX 580 8GB:

• 1% LOW — 41 FPS
• AVG — 64 FPS

RX 5700 XT:

• 1% LOW — 67 FPS

93 FPS

V HITMAN 2. by 45-64%. And here the emphasis is on the processor in the case of the RX5700XT.

Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order

RX 580 VS RX 5700 XT in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Oder

• 1% Low — 78 fps
• AVG — 100 fps

Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order showed the smallest gap. But even here, the performance of the RX 5700 XT was limited by the processor.

Metro Exodus 2 (2018)

RX 580 vs RX 5700 XT in Metro Exodus 2

RX 580 8GB:

• 1% Low — 47 fps
• AVG — 59 fps
2. Amazing result Almost two-fold superiority of the new RDNA architecture. And here the performance of the RX 5700 XT rested on the processor.

   Conclusions

   What can be said from the test results? First, the Ryzen 5 3600x limits the performance of the RX 5700 XT. This video card requires a more powerful processor. Secondly, AMD really managed to make a powerful product for good money. At launch, the RX 5700 XT was priced like an RTX 2060 and performed better than an RTX 2070.

   You can safely upgrade to an RX 5700 XT, but don’t forget about the processor. This graphics card requires at least a Ryzen 5 3600x, otherwise the card’s power will be limited.

   For more tests on Ryzen 3600x vs 2700x processors, see our Youtube channel:

   Contents

   1. Introduction
   2. Features
   3. Tests
   4. Key differences
   5. Conclusion
   6. Comments

   Video card

   Video card

   Introduction

   We compared two graphics cards: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs. AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.

   AMD Radeon Pro 5700 is a Radeon Pro Mac generation (Navi Series) integrated graphics card based on RDNA 1. 0 architecture released Aug 4th, 2020.

   AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP is a Polaris (RX 500) generation GCN 4.0 graphics card released Oct 15th, 2018. It comes with 4GB GDDR5 memory running at 1750MHz, has 1x 8-pin power connector and consumes up to 165 watts.

   Descriptions

   Graphics Card

   Name

   AMD Radeon Pro 5700

   AMD Radeon RX 580 204803

   Release date

   AUG AUG, 2020

   OCT 15TH, 2018

   9000

   0003

   12.44 TFLOPS (2:1)

   5.259 TFLOPS (1:1)

   FP32 (float) performance

   6.221 TFLOPS

   5.259 TFLOPS

   FP64 (double) performance

   388.8 GFLOPS (1:16)

   328.7 GFLOPS (1:16)

   CLOCK Speeds

   Basic frequency

   1243 MHz

   1168 MHZ

   Maximum frequency

   1350 MHZ

   1284 MHZ 9000 9000 9000 9000 MID Frequencies 9000 Memory Frequencies 9000 Memo0003

   Render Config

   Shading Units

   2304

   2048

   Texture Units

   144

   128

   Raster Units

   64

   32

   Compute Units

   36

   32

   Graphics Features

   DirectX

   12 (12_1)

   12 (12_0)

   Opengl

   4. 6

   4.6

   OpenCL

   2.1

   2.1

   VULKAN

   1.2

   1.2

   Board Design

   Heating

   130W

   150W

   Power Conventors

   Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.

   AMD Radeon Pro 5700
   +58%

   AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP

   3DMark Graphics

   3DMark is a test tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.

   AMD Radeon Pro 5700

   AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP

   Blender bmw27

   Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

   AMD Radeon Pro 5700

   AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP

   Key Differences

   Why is AMD Radeon Pro 5700 better than AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP?

   Newer — 1 year late release

   Has 58% better performance

   Has 14% less power consumption — 130 W vs. 150 W

   More modern manufacturing process — 7 nm vs. 14 nm

   Has 4 GB more memory

   More advanced type of memory — GDDR6 vs. GDDR5

   Has 72% higher bandwidth — 384.0 GB/s vs 224.0 GB/s

   Has 111% faster pixel fill rate — 86.40 GPixel/s vs 41.09 GPixel/s

   Has 19% faster speed texture fills — 194.4 GTexel/s vs 164.4 GTexel/s

   Has more texture units +16

   Has more raster units +32

   Has 256 more shading units

   Has 4 more compute units

   Conclusion

   Which is better Radeon Pro 5700 or Radeon RX 580 2048SP?

   The Radeon Pro 5700 delivers 58% better performance, consumes up to 14% less energy and holds 4 GB more memory. Based on our research, Radeon Pro 5700 3990X is more powerful than Radeon RX 580 2048SP.

   What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to Radeon Pro 5700?

   The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is AMD’s closest competitor to the Radeon Pro 5700. It is 4% more powerful, and holds the same amount of memory.

   What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to Radeon Pro 5700?

   The Quadro P4200 Mobile is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the Radeon Pro 5700. It is 5% more powerful, uses 24% less energy, and holds the same amount of memory.

   How does Radeon Pro 5700 perform compared to Radeon RX 580 2048SP and other graphics cards?

   Relative performance

   General performance

   Desktop performance

   Professional performance

   90,000 gold, not glitter? GECID.com.

   ::>Video cards
   >2022
   > Radeon RX 6500 XT versus RX 5500 XT, RX 580 and GTX 1060: gold not glitter?

   11-05-2022

   In one of the previous articles, we went over the strengths and weaknesses of the Radeon RX 6500 XT video accelerator. We tested it in three modes: PCIe 4.0, PCIe 3.0 and with active Smart Access Memory technology, and compared it with current competitors in the price range. Based on the results of the comparison, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti can be written off as scrap, but the GeForce GTX 1650 has a chance in motherboards with PCIe 3.0 and below.

   This time we will pair the RX 6500 XT with popular opponents from past generations — the Radeon RX 5500 XT, RX 580 and GTX 1060. You asked about them in the community of our YouTube channel.

   In order not to procrastinate, let’s just say thanks to the store TELEMART.ua for the video card RX 6500 XT. It presents a wide range of ready-made PCs, laptops, components, peripherals and products for gamers. If you want to save money, then look in the sections of promotions and discounted goods — there are a lot of interesting things. the store has a wide range of other pieces of iron, ready-made PCs, laptops and peripherals.

   In the meantime, we recall the key features of the test video card GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6500 XT EAGLE. It modestly adheres to the reference frequencies in the specification and pleases with good dynamic overclocking in games thanks to the WINDFORCE 2X cooler. At low load, it suspends its work.

   Nominally, the Radeon RX 6500 XT replaced the 4 GB Radeon RX 5500 XT in the market. This member of the first generation RDNA family appeared in December 2019of the year. In terms of characteristics, it is much better: 1408 stream processors versus 1024, 2 times the memory bus width, 2 times more PCIe 4.0 lanes. And even the price tag at the start is lower – $169 versus $199. So let’s see if the new architecture, the change in the process technology and Infinity Cache can catch up?

   The second internal opponent is the even older, but also more popular Radeon RX 580 , which debuted in 2017, which also costs about the same on the used market. It is a member of the 14nm 4th generation GCN family. Its Polaris 20 XTX GPU has 2304 stream processors, 144 texture units and 32 raster units. Although the frequencies by modern standards are not impressive. 8 GB of GDDR5 memory runs at a lower clock speed of 8 GHz, but the bus is 256 bits and all 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes.

   And for the role of an external opponent they picked up a 6-gigabyte video card GeForce GTX 1060 , which can be found on the secondary even a little cheaper. She debuted in 2016 but still remains popular. The GPU has 1280 CUDA cores, 80 texture units and 48 raster units. The effective frequency of GDDR5 memory is 8 GHz. Bandwidth — 192 GB / s with a 192-bit bus.

   We got to know the participants. Now let’s walk through the test bench on the Socket LGA1700 platform.

   Based on the 6-core Intel Core i5-12400 with a frequency formula of 2.5 — 4.4 GHz. Heat dissipation does not exceed 117 watts.

   The ASUS PRIME B660M-A WIFI D4 microATX motherboard uses a reinforced PCIe 4.0 x16 slot for graphics cards. With models of past generations, it will switch to 3.0 mode.

   All issues regarding processor cooling were closed by dropsy ASUS TUF GAMING LC 240 ARGB .

   In order not to play with overclocking, we immediately took 16 GB of RAM DDR4-3600 PATRIOT Viper Steel . This is a peer-to-peer kit based on SK hynix chips with XMP profile support.

   Operating system, benchmarks and game clients installed on M.2 SSD PATRIOT P300 512 GB. For games, they took a similar, but more capacious 2-terabyte model. Both are created in M.2 2280 format with PCIe 3.0 x4 interface. They are not hot, so there are no own radiators.

   Stable power was provided by the «golden» Seasonic G12 GC-650 . It has a basic list of protections, efficient circuitry, easy-to-lay cables, a quiet fan, and a 5-year warranty.

   The Lian Li PC-O11 Air case contained all the components without problems. The front, top, back and even one of the sides are dotted with ventilation holes. Behind them, you can install up to 14 fans.

   Before stepping into the world of selected games, we stop at synthetics. In OpenCL, for example, LuxMark , the main outsider turned out to be the GeForce GTX 1060, which is significantly behind the red competitors. The difference between the 5500 XT and 6500XT is within the margin of error, regardless of the PCI-E version used.

   Further green friendly Blende r and CUDA mode . Here already 1060 proved to be the best. True, the RX 580 comes right on her heels. And what is even more interesting, the 580th bypasses its younger relatives by an average of 30%.

   3DMark Time Spy built video cards with a clear ladder with a completely equal difference between the participants. So, the weakest video card turned out to be 1060, slightly better than RX580, then 5500 XT and, finally, 6500XT in any of the interfaces. The difference between neighboring cards is small, within 4-7%.

   3DMark Wild Life Extreme has slightly redrawn the places. The outsiders are still 1060, but the RX 5500 XT 4G scored the most points. It outperformed the 6500 XT by 5%.

   Unfortunately, the two low-end AMD cards couldn’t handle the 3DMark Port Royal . This was taken advantage of by the GeForce GTX 1060, which in soft mode pulled out a victory in this test, and even with a 62% lead over the RX 6500 XT installed in the PCI E 4.0 slot.

   And finally, we complete the synthetics with a data pool from AIDA64. Here, the weak side of the Radeon RX 6500 XT is immediately visible — all read and write operations are performed 2 times faster on cards of previous generations.

   Next we move on to gaming benchmarks in FullHD resolution.

   Test World of Tanks all video cards pulled with ultra graphics without any problems. Even the 0.1% Low is in the 60 fps zone. By the way, we also have very close values ​​in terms of average frame rate. The leader in the face of the RX 6500 XT with PCI E 4.0 + SAM is ahead of the closing 580 by only 11%. And only 5% separates it from its counterpart of the previous generation, the RX 5500 XT.

   Good old The Witcher tested with Ultra High settings. AMD 5000 and 6000 series cards are literally equal. The difference is within 1-2 fps. They are followed by RX 580 with an 8% lag in average fps. And the GTX 1060 closes the four, it is separated from the red leaders by 18% in average fps and 15% in 0.1% Low.

   In Cyberpunk 2077 , medium graphics settings can be considered optimal for our four. We remind you that in the case of the Radeon RX 6500 XT, this game is sensitive to the PCI-E interface of the motherboard. With the 3rd version of the bus, the card turns out to be the weakest of the entire 4-ki. For example, the closest competitor in the face of the GTX 1060 is ahead of it by 5% in average fps and 30% in very rare events. But even if you install the RX 6500 XT in the 4th version of the slot, it still looks a little worse in terms of drawdowns than the leader — the old RX 580.

   Vulcan and high settings in DOOM Eternal. Again, even in its native environment, the RX 6500XT does not look very good compared to its opponents. With the PCI E 3.0 interface, it is the weakest both in terms of drawdowns and average fps. If we switch to version 4.0 and further tweak the SAM technology, then the maximum that the RX 6500 XT manages to do is to take second place. On the very first RX 5500 XT, with a margin of 4% in terms of average fps.

   Network “jesters” are represented by Rainbow Six Siege on ultra settings and 100% render. Unexpectedly…or maybe not…the old guard showed themselves very cool. The RX 580 takes the top spot, closely followed by the GTX 1060, just a couple of fps behind. The RX 5500 XT, of course, could beat them, because its average fps is 10% higher than the leader, but drawdowns, friends, are a shame, more than three times lower than those of the RX 580 and GTX 1060. The heroine of the comparison grazes the rear .

   Assassin’s Creed Valhalla ran on high graphics in DX12. In this benchmark, I don’t want to measure this error in 1-2 frames at all in order to determine all places. Only two are enough. The first place is taken by RX 6500 XT with PCI E 4.0 interface and all its opponents. Indeed, it so happened that the fps performance of these video cards is almost identical. Well, in second place, as an outsider, we again have the RX 6500 XT with PCI E 3.0. From past videos, we already know that high graphics with high textures are very bad for her, as evidenced by drawdowns of up to 20 frames per second, against more than 30 for other cards.

   For Far Cry 6 , we chose medium graphics. This time, without exception, all video cards digested this benchmark well. If we start from drawdowns, then the first place is shared by the RX 5500 XT and RX 6500 XT on the 4th version of the interface with SAM. Their figure is the minimum 62 frames per second. Which isn’t all that far off compared to the RX 580 and GTX 1060 at 56 and 50 respectively.

   Another project that made me happy — Forza Horizon 5 on high settings. It can be said that the old GeForce GTX 1060 caught up with the RX 6500 XT in very rare events — in both versions of the interface. Yes, and its predecessor RX 5500 XT too. True, if you take out the only trump card of the “six thousandth”, the SAM technology, then its drawdowns improve significantly — they leave the nearest pursuer by 26%.

   God of War with an average graphics is such a leveler for our video cards. The RX 580 and GTX 1060 fps are almost identical, plus or minus a couple of frames. Well, a step up — a couple of «Ryks» fresher. Their minimum drawdowns of 5-8% look better than those of the old ladies.

   And finally Dying Light 2 . Went through here twice. First, we chose average graphics at DX 11. The weakest link was the GeForce GTX 1060 with drawdowns of up to 28 frames per second. Next comes the trinity of RX 580, 5500 XT and 6500 XT PCI E 3.0, which have a 25% higher braking performance — 35 fps. The status of the winner, technically, can be assigned to the same 6500 XT, but with the 4th version of the PCIE interface. Technically, because the minimum fps is only two frames higher — 37 vs. 35.

   On the second run, we tweaked the settings a little and switched to DX 12. Fps grew a little for everyone, except for the RX 580 and RX 5500 XT. The latter even got the lowest framerate drop.

   Results

   What conclusions suggest themselves, we think you have already understood everything yourself. If you’re the lucky owner of a Radeon RX 580 with 8GB of memory or a GeForce GTX 1060 with 6GB of memory, keep them tight, dust them off, change the thermal paste, and baptize and lower the Power Limit for the summer just in case. Changing them to a Radeon RX 5500 XT or RX 6500 XT makes little sense, even if you are moving to a new motherboard with a PCI E 4.0 interface. In most games, the old ladies show about the same frame rate, and sometimes much higher if the game is very demanding on memory bandwidth and its volume.

   If we compare the new product with its predecessor from the 5000 series, the advice is the same. The Radeon RX 6500 XT, even being in the 4th PCI E, often shows either close or even lower fps. For example, in Rainbow Six Siege, the RX 6500 XT sank twice as low as the RX 5500 XT. And the 8-gigabyte RX 5500 XT, as we remember, feels even better.

   So the only destiny of the Radeon RX 6500 XT now is to close holes in the assortment of the new hardware market, in case of assembly from scratch or the desire to have a more energy efficient PC. When looking for a video card for at least some kind of compromise gaming, everything will depend on the price and availability on the market, both new options and used ones. Therefore, if you choose the RX 6500 XT, remember about the life hack with a decrease in the quality of textures, which allows you to play all games normally on it.

   Authors: Sergei Budilovsky and Denis Koziolek

   Also suggest reading:
   Radeon RX 6500 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti test & comparison | PCIE 4.0 vs 3.0: maybe everyone was wrong?
   Playing on Intel UHD Graphics 770 — test in 18 games: is it already possible without a discrete?
   Radeon RX 6600 Full HD test: play or play with rays?

   AMD Ellesmere vs AMD Radeon RX 580. Comparative characteristics and benchmarks of video cards

   VS

   AMD Ellesmere

   AMD Radeon RX 580

   General information

   The general information section of the video card comparison list contains release date, type, overall rating and other useful data to determine the winner between AMD Ellesmere and AMD Radeon RX 580. Please note that the comparison is based on all indicators, and below are ratings from synthetic benchmarks that define different criteria in games and work applications.

   Not Rated

   Position in the performance rating

   149

   No data

   Price and quality ratio

   71.43

   GCN 4.03

   Architecture

   Polaris

   Ellesme 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

   Type

   Desktop

   no data

   Release date

   18 April 2017 (4 years ago)

   n.a.0003

   $ 229

   $ 49

   A current price

   $ 566 (2.5x MSRP)

   No data

   Quality

   23.02

   Ellesme 9000

   Desktop

   Specifications

   Which video card is better in AMD Ellesmere vs AMD Radeon RX 580 comparison in manufacturing process, power consumption, and GPU base and turbo frequency is the most important part contained in the video card ranking.

   2304

   conveyors

   2304

   No data

   Tibility of the nucleus

   1257 mHz

   No data nm

   Process

   14 nm

   n.a.

   Power Consumption (TDP)

   185 Watt

   n.a.0004 Number of textures processed in 1 second

   193.0

   No data

   Swimming of

   6.175 GFLOPS

   2304

   Converse / CUDA Nuclei

   2304

   9000

   5,700 million

   Number of transistors

   5,700 million

   n.a.0019

   Let’s discuss the dimensions (length, width, height) of AMD Ellesmere and AMD Radeon RX 580 graphics cards. As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces

   No data

   Interface

   PCIe 3.0 x16

   No data

   Length

   241 mm

   n/a

   Auxiliary power supply

   1x 8-pin

   Memory (frequency and overclocking)

   Graphics card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications. The higher the standard ( GDDR ), the better. It directly affects the speed and efficiency of data processing. What is the difference in type, base and turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between AMD Ellesmere and AMD Radeon RX 580:

   n.a. No data

   Memory bus width

   256 Bit

   No data

   Memory frequency

   8000 MHz

   N/A

   Memory bandwidth

   256.0 GB/s

   Port and display support .

   N/A

   Display connections

   1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

   N/A

   HDMI

   +

   API 9 support0019

   The confrontation between the two rivals AMD Ellesmere and AMD Radeon RX 580 is almost over. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.

   12 (12_0)

   Directx

   12 (12_0)

   4.6

   Opengl

   4.6

   AMD Ellesme Versus AMD Radeon RX 580 Comparison in the Benchmark tests 9000

   Popular CHI0127

   one.		AMD Ellesmere vs. AMD Radeon RX 580
   2.		AMD Radeon RX 580 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
   3.		NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 580
   four.		AMD Radeon RX 580 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
   5.		NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 580
   6.		NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. AMD Radeon RX 580
   7.		AMD Ellesmere vs. Intel HD Graphics 4600
   eight.		NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs. AMD Radeon RX 580
   9.		AMD Ellesmere vs. AMD Radeon RX 470
   ten.		AMD Radeon R9 280 vs. AMD Radeon RX 580
   eleven.		NVIDIA P106-090 vs. AMD Ellesmere
   12.		NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs. AMD Radeon RX 580
   13.		AMD Radeon RX 580 vs. Radeon RX 6500XT
   fourteen.		AMD Ellesmere vs. AMD Radeon HD 7870
   fifteen.		AMD Radeon HD 6670 vs. AMD Ellesmere

   SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5700 XT

   SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5700 XT

   The SAPPHIRE website uses cookies to enhance the experience of site visitors

   Visit Privacy for information on how to disable cookies.

   I agree

   • NITRO RX 6000 Series
   • NITRO RX 5000 Series
   • NITRO RX 500 Series
   • Previous generation

   Open all NITRO

   • Introduction
   • Game applications
   • Features
   • SAPPHIRE

   VIDEO CARDS FEATURES

   • Components
   • Stylish
   • Radeon
   • Adrenalin
   • TriXX
   • Specification

   SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5700 XT

   SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5700 XT graphics card delivers a smooth 4K gaming experience. Complete with SAPPHIRE branded high quality components, including our award-winning Tri-X cooling systems, and improved shrouds for increased board strength; NITRO+ RX 5700 XT delivers the amazing performance and stability every gamer needs. SAPPHIRE proprietary technologies such as Quick Connect detachable fans, intelligent fan control and advanced Tri-X cooling systems ensure efficient heat dissipation, minimal noise and maximum reliability. Enhance the aesthetic design of your PC case with the sleek design of the NITRO+ RX 5700 XT and all-new addressable RGB lighting that can be customized with the SAPPHIRE TriXX software. Boost the performance of your favorite games to get the edge over your friends with the new TriXX Boost feature. Get a NITRO boost with the SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 5700 XT!

   IMMERSION WITH GAME DYNAMICS

   PERFORMANCE IN 1440P

   • Forza Horizon 4
   • Gears of War 5
   • The Outer Worlds
   • Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus
   • Ghost Recon Breakpoint
   • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare

   PERFORMANCE IN 1440P

   CHANGE THE RULES

   Accurate Game Graphics

   to 2010 MHz Frequency Boost

   8 GB 256-bit GDDR6

   7nm FinFET

   ARGB backlit

   Tri-X cooling

   Fan Quick Connect

   SAPPHIRE VIDEO CARDS FEATURES

   Discover all the incredible features of the SAPPHIRE NITRO RX 5700 XT! We’ve divided our features into 3 categories so you can see at a glance all the features we’re proud to provide the best gaming experience for you