AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 3500U on one side and the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G on the other side. The first is dedicated to the mainstream-class laptop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,7GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 3500U | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | ||||||
| Market (main) | Mainstream-class laptop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen+ | Zen+ | ||||||
| Core name | Picasso | Picasso | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 5 3000 | Ryzen 3 3000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
YM3500C4T4MFG |
YD3200C5M4MFH, |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2019 | Q3 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 4. 940.000.000 |
4.950.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,1 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,7 GHz | 4,0 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 4 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-2400 |
DDR4-2933 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 35,76 GB/s | 43,71 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 12 | 12 | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | — | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Picasso) | AMD Radeon Vega 8 (Picasso) | ||||||
| GPU cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 512 | 512 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 1. 229 GFLOPS |
1.229 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | FP5 | AM4 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | — | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 105°C | 95°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 366 | 429 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1.991 | 1.666 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 784 | 982 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 3.451 | 3.909 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2. 112 |
2.216 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 7.915 | 7.204 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
3.218 | 4.137 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
9.297 | 11.434 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
117,3 GFLOPS | 184,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
620 pts / W | 176 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G is bigger, that the PDT of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U is lower. Both were produced in the same year.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
366 1.991 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
429 1.666 |
In single core, the difference is -15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 20%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
982 3.  909 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
784 3.451 |
In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 13%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
2.  1127.915 |
| AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
2.216 7.204 |
In single core, the difference is -5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 10%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
4.137 11.  434 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
3.218 9.297 |
In single core, the difference is 29%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 23%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 3 3200G Intel equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 5 3500AMD Ryzen 5 3500CAMD Ryzen 5 3500X
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GEAMD Ryzen 3 3200U
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U / 3250U Lower-Mid-Range Laptop CPU – Laptop Processors
The AMD Ryzen 3 3200U / 3250U belongs to the lower mid range processors for notebooks.
It has two computing cores as opposed to four of the truly mid-tier chips such as the Ryzen 5 3500U from the same family. The Ryzen 3 3200U / 3250U has a maximal clock speed of 3.5 GHz, which is only a small boost over the previous-gen Ryzen 3 2200U.
The Ryzen 3 3200U and the newer 3250U are basically the same processor. The only difference is that the maximal temperature of the 3200U is rated at 105°C, while on the 3250U it’s 95°C.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U / 3250U CPU Benchmark
The benchmarks confirm the lower-mid-tier status of the Ryzen 3 3200U / 3250U and its negligible over the Ryzen 3 2200U. The gap between the 3 3200U / 3250U and the quad-core 5 3500U is much bigger, as expected. The Ryzen 3 also can’t quite keep up with its current direct competitor by Intel, the Core i3-8145U.
However, in the real world-use the Ryzen 3 3200U / 3250U is a very capable processor for the usual daily computing chores, such as web surf, writing essays, spreadsheet calculations, media playback, and similar.
For most users, the Ryzen 3 is sufficient performance-wise. The more powerful quad-core chips like the Ryzen 5 and Intel Core i5 are recommended if you regularly do heavier computing duties like movie making or professional photo editing, although these chips aren’t full-blown workstation-class CPUs neither.
The Ryzen 3 3200U / 3250U has only the basic Radeon Vega 3 integrated graphics. Gaming is another reason why one would like to get a laptop with the Ryzen 5 series instead of Ryzen 3, because the former has noticeably better Vega 8 integrated graphics. Nevertheless, the Ryzen 3 3200U / 3250U with Vega 3 is capable of running many of the popular games, mostly with lowered graphics and resolution settings, as shown in this YouTube gameplay video playlist:
Note: The benchmark scores of the listed processors are averages measured across various devices with these processors.