Ryzen 5 3400g vs i3 10100: AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i3-10100: What is the difference?

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i3-10100: What is the difference?

58points

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

51points

Intel Core i3-10100

vs

64 facts in comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i3-10100

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 3400G better than Intel Core i3-10100?

  • 267MHz higher ram speed?
    2933MHzvs2666MHz
  • 2nm smaller semiconductor size?
    12nmvs14nm
  • 1MB bigger L2 cache?
    2MBvs1MB
  • 128KB bigger L1 cache?
    384KBvs256KB
  • Has an unlocked multiplier?
  • 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    0.5MB/corevs0.25MB/core
  • Supports ECC memory?
  • 300MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    1400MHzvs1100MHz

Why is Intel Core i3-10100 better than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G?

  • 5°C higher maximum operating temperature?
    100°Cvs95°C
  • 50MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    350MHzvs300MHz
  • 2MB bigger L3 cache?
    6MBvs4MB
  • 11. 35% higher PassMark result (single)?
    2649vs2379
  • 64GB larger maximum memory amount?
    128GBvs64GB
  • 14.78% higher multi-core Geekbench 5 result?
    4109vs3580
  • 16% higher Cinebench R20 (multi) result?
    2284vs1969
  • 8.74% higher Cinebench R20 (single) result?
    448vs412

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i3-10100

vs

Intel Core i5-7400

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i3-10100

vs

Intel Core i3-10105

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i3-10100

vs

Intel Core i3-10100F

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

vs

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core i3-10100

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

vs

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i3-10100

vs

Intel Core i5-4570

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

Intel Core i3-10100

vs

Intel Core i5-3470

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i3-10100

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 4100

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G

Intel Core i3-10100

vs

Intel Core i5-10400

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 4600G

Intel Core i3-10100

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i3-10100

vs

Intel Core i7-7700

Price comparison

Cheap alternatives

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

3 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

6. 7/10

3 User reviews

Intel Core i3-10100

5 User reviews

Intel Core i3-10100

9.2/10

5 User reviews

Features

Value for money

7.3/10

3 votes

9.4/10

5 votes

Gaming

6.0/10

3 votes

9.2/10

5 votes

Performance

7.3/10

3 votes

9.4/10

5 votes

Reliability

6.3/10

3 votes

9.2/10

5 votes

Energy efficiency

7.0/10

3 votes

9.2/10

5 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

4 x 3.7GHz

4 x 3.6GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2.CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.2GHz

4.3GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✖Intel Core i3-10100

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8. L2 core

0.5MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1MB/core

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2933MHz

2666MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

43.71GB/s

41.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✖Intel Core i3-10100

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-10100)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9. bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-10100)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

465.7seconds

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-10100)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

1460.1seconds

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-10100)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1. uses multithreading

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✔Intel Core i3-10100

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✔Intel Core i3-10100

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✔Intel Core i3-10100

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✔Intel Core i3-10100

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-10100)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✔Intel Core i3-10100

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✖Intel Core i3-10100

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-10100)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Core i3 10100 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3400G: performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i3 10100

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

We compared two 4-core desktop CPUs: the 3.6 GHz Intel Core i3 10100 against the 3.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 3400G. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Core i3 10100

60

Ryzen 5 3400G

55

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Core i3 10100

26

Ryzen 5 3400G

25

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Core i3 10100

56

Ryzen 5 3400G

54

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Core i3 10100

45

Ryzen 5 3400G

47

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 3400G and 10100

Advantages of Intel Core i3 10100

  • Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666 RAM
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size
  • Newer — released 10-months later
  • 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 3 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

  • Unlocked multiplier
  • More modern manufacturing process – 12 versus 14 nanometers
  • Around 2.11 GB/s (5%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Core i3 10100
+7%

1146

Ryzen 5 3400G

1075

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Core i3 10100
+16%

5640

Ryzen 5 3400G

4857

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Core i3 10100
+12%

2659

Ryzen 5 3400G

2366

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Core i3 10100

8850

Ryzen 5 3400G
+6%

9404

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Core i3 10100
+8%

1054

Ryzen 5 3400G

972

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Core i3 10100
+8%

4270

Ryzen 5 3400G

3937

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i3 10100 and AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

General

Vendor Intel AMD
Released May 1, 2020 July 7, 2019
Type Desktop Desktop
instruction set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Comet Lake-S Picasso
Model number i3-10100
Socket LGA-1200 AM4
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 630 Radeon RX Vega 11

Performance

Cores 4 4
Threads 8 8
Base Frequency 3. 6 GHz 3.7 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency 4.3 GHz 4.2 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 36x 37x
Bus Bandwidth 8 GT/s
L1 Cache 64K (per core) 96K (per core)
L2 Cache 256K (per core) 512K (per core)
L3 Cache 6MB (shared) 4MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No Yes
Transistors 4.9 billions
Fabrication process 14 nm 12 nm
TDP 65 W 45-65 W
Max. temperature 100°C 95°C
Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU Base Clock 350 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1100 MHz 1300 MHz
Shading Units 192 704
TMUs 24 44
ROPs 3 8
Execution Units 24 11
TGP 15 W 65 W
Max. Resolution 4096×2304 — 60 Hz 3840×2160 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Core i3 10100

0.38 TFLOPS

Ryzen 5 3400G

1.746 TFLOPS

Memory support

Memory types DDR4-2666 DDR4-2933
Memory Size 128 GB 64 GB
Max. Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 43.71 GB/s
ECC Support No Yes
Official site Intel Core i3 10100 official page AMD Ryzen 5 3400G official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
PCI Express Lanes 16 8

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Core i3 10100

194 (53%)

Ryzen 5 3400G

172 (47%)

Total votes: 366

Сompetitors

1.
Core i3 10100 or Ryzen 3 3200G

2.
Core i3 10100 or Ryzen 5 4600G

3.
Core i3 10100 or Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G

4.
Core i3 10100 or Core i3 10100F

5.
Ryzen 5 3400G or Ryzen 5 5500U

6.
Ryzen 5 3400G or Ryzen 5 5600G

7.
Ryzen 5 3400G or Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G

Intel Core i3-10100 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Summary

  • Intel Core i3-10100

    137%

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

    100%

Relative performance

  • Intel Core i3-10100

    137%

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

    100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Intel Core i3-10100
Much higher single threaded performance (around 37% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
Around 37% higher average synthetic performance.
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
None

Gaming

HWBench recommends Intel Core i3-10100

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.


Productivity

No clear winner declared

Features
Intel Core i3-10100 AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
ABM
ADX
RdRand
TBT 2. 0
SSE4A
SSE4.1
AES
SHA
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost

Architecture
Intel Core i3-10100 AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Architecture Intel_Cometlake vs AMD Zen+
Market Desktop vs Desktop
Memory Support DDR4-2666 MHz
Dual-channel
vs DDR4
Codename Comet Lake vs Picasso
Release Date Apr 2020 vs Jul 2019

Cores
Intel Core i3-10100 AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Cores 4 vs 4
Threads 8 vs 8
SMPs 1 vs 1
Integrated Graphics UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon RX Vega 11

Cache
Intel Core i3-10100 AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
L1 Cache 64K (per core) vs 128K (per core)
L2 Cache 256K (per core) vs 512K (per core)
L3 Cache 6MB (shared) vs 4MB (shared)

Physical
Intel Core i3-10100 AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Socket Intel Socket 1200 vs AMD Socket AM4
Max Case Temp 72°C vs unknown
Package FC-LGA1200 vs µOPGA-1331
Die Size unknown vs 210mm²
Process 14 nm vs 12 nm

Performance
Intel Core i3-10100 AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Cpu Frequency 3600 MHz vs 3700 MHz
Turbo Clock 4300 MHz vs 4200 MHz
Base Clock 100 MHz vs 100 MHz
Voltage N/A vs variable
TDP 65 W vs 65 W
  • Intel Core i3-10100

    5160 points

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

    4620 points

Points — higher is better

  • Intel Core i3-10100

    20736 points

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

    19861 points

Points — higher is better

  • Intel Core i3-10100 (simulated)

    239. 19

  • AMD Ryzen 5 3400G (simulated)

    173.93

points — higher is better

Intel Core i3-10100 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i3-10100

The Intel Core i3-10100 operates with 4 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.30 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1200 CPU socket. This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Comet Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2020

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G operates with 4 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.20 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3. 0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Picasso (Zen+) Architecture is enhanced with 12 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q2/2019

Intel Core i3-10100

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Compare Detail

3.60 GHz Frequency 3.70 GHz
4 Cores 4
4.30 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 4.20 GHz
4.10 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 4.00 GHz
Yes Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking Yes
normal Core Architecture normal

Intel UHD Graphics 630

GPU

AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics

1.10 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
14 nm Technology 12 nm
1.10 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
12 DirectX Version 12
3 Max. displays 3
DDR4-2666 Memory DDR4-2933
2 Memory channels 2
Max memory
No ECC Yes
L2 Cache
6.00 MB L3 Cache 4.00 MB
3.0 PCIe version 3.0
16 PCIe lanes 12
14 nm Technology 12 nm
LGA 1200 Socket AM4
65 W TDP 65 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
Q2/2020 Release date Q2/2019

Show more data

Show more data

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11. 5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Intel Core i3-10100 AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
65 W Max TDP 65 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i3-10100








AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i3-10100

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G on one side and the Intel Core i3-10100 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core i3-10100
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Zen+

Comet Lake
Core name

Picasso

Comet Lake-S
Family

Ryzen 5 3000

Core i3-10000
Part number(s), S-Spec

YD3400C5M4MFH,

YD3400C5FHBOX

BX8070110100,

BXC8070110100,

CM8070104291317,

QTP6, SRh4N

Release date

Q3 2019

Q2 2020
Lithography

12 nm

14 nm+++
Transistors

4. 950.000.000


Cores

4

4
Threads

8

8
Base frequency

3,7 GHz

3,6 GHz
Turbo frequency

4,2 GHz

4,3 GHz
Cache memory

4 MB

6 MB
Max memory capacity

64 GB

128 GB
Memory types

DDR4-2933

DDR4-2666
Max # of memory channels

2

2
Max memory bandwidth

43,71 GB/s

41,6 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes

12

16
TDP

65 W

65 W
Suggested PSU

600W ATX Power Supply

600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Comet Lake)
GPU cores

11


GPU execution units

24
GPU shading units

704

192
GPU base clock

300 MHz

350 MHz
GPU boost clock

1400 MHz

1100 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

1. 746 GFLOPS

460,8 GFLOPS
Socket

AM4

LGA1200
Compatible motherboard

Socket AM4 Motherboard 

Socket LGA 1200 Motherboard 
Maximum temperature

95°C

100°C
CPU-Z single thread

461

468
CPU-Z multi thread

2.518

2.449
Cinebench R15 single thread

162

184
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

752

905
Cinebench R23 single thread

980

1. 114
Cinebench R23 multi-thread

4.814

5.269
PassMark single thread

2.353

2.638
PassMark CPU Mark

9.338

8.934
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core

4.337

5.101
(Windows 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

14.118

16.447
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

237,1 GFLOPS

342,9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

217 pts / W

253 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-10100 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Core i3-10100 was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

461

2.518
Intel Core i3-10100

468

2.449

In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i3-10100

184

905
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

162

752

In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 20%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i3-10100

1.114

5.269
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

980

4.814

In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 9%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

2.353

9.338
Intel Core i3-10100

2.638

8. 934

In single core, the difference is -11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 5%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i3-10100

5.101

16.447
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

4.337

14.118

In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 16%.

On Linux 64-bit:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

5.096

17.759
Intel Core i3-10100

4.771

14.186

In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 25%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G Intel equivalentIntel Core i3-10100 AMD equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i3-10100FIntel Core i3-10100TIntel Core i3-10100YIntel Core i3-10105Intel Core i3-10105FIntel Core i3-10105T

How Does AMD’s 3400G Compare With Intel’s 10100?

Compare AMD’s Ryzen 5 3400G with Intel’s Core i3 10100. Which CPU is better for gaming, general apps, and professional tools?

Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Check Price on Amazon

Amazon Affiliate Link

Core i3 10100

Intel Core i3-10100
Check Price on Amazon

Amazon Affiliate Link

This article compares AMD’s Ryzen 5 3400G with Intel’s Core i3 10100, exploring which CPU is better for:

  • Gaming — the latest graphics-intense games
  • General Apps — web browsing, streaming, and office applications
  • Professional Tools — 2D and 3D graphics tools, video editors, compilers, and engineering tools

Gaming on the Ryzen 5 3400G vs.

Core i3 10100

Ella Don / Unsplash

Ryzen 5 3400G

When using AMD’s Ryzen 5 3400G CPU for gaming, you can expect mediocre game performance with a high-performance CPU cooler or poor game performance with a basic or stock CPU cooler.

Core i3 10100

When using Intel’s Core i3 10100 CPU for gaming, you can expect mediocre game performance with a high-performance CPU cooler or poor game performance with a basic or stock CPU cooler.

Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Check Price on Amazon

Amazon Affiliate Link

Core i3 10100

Intel Core i3-10100
Check Price on Amazon

Amazon Affiliate Link

Gaming Considerations

While a good GPU is critical for gaming performance, your CPU will also have a significant impact. If the CPU is too slow, it can be a bottleneck for your GPU, which can reduce your framerate or cause stuttering. The most important CPU capabilities for gaming are single-core max boost frequency and the number of cores. A high base frequency is also critical for inadequately cooled CPUs.

Depending on the game, the CPU will often handle tasks including scene management, gameplay logic, physics calculations, and asset loading.

Having multiple CPU cores can improve performance with games that utilize them. However, developers cannot split up every task to take advantage of a growing number of cores. Most modern games don’t benefit from having more than 6–8 cores. Game performance will experience diminishing returns as you add more CPU cores.

Cores

3400G:
The 3400G’s 4 cores allow for mediocre performance with the latest graphics-intense games.

10100:
The 10100’s 4 cores allow for mediocre performance with the latest graphics-intense games.

Learn more about Core Counts below.

Base Frequency

3400G:
The 3400G’s 3.7 GHz base frequency is good for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, when not boosting. You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.

10100:
The 10100’s 3.60 GHz base frequency is good for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, when not boosting. You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.

Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.

Single-Core Boost

3400G:
With a high-end cooler, the 3400G’s 4.2 GHz single-core max boost frequency is excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.

10100:
With a high-end cooler, the 10100’s 4.30 GHz single-core max turbo boost frequency is excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.

Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.

P-Core Boost

3400G:
The 3400G does not have Performance cores.

10100:
The 10100 does not have Performance cores.

Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.

Overclocking Support

3400G:
The 3400G CPU’s lack of support for overclocking cannot benefit performance with the latest graphics-intense games.

10100:
The 10100 CPU’s lack of support for overclocking cannot benefit performance with the latest graphics-intense games.

Learn more about Overclocking below.

DDR Support

3400G:
The 3400G CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz can be mediocre for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.

10100:
The 10100 CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2666 MHz can be mediocre for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.

Learn more about DDR Support below.

PCIe

3400G:
The 3400G CPU’s support for PCIe 3.0 can be poor for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, as it will limit the potential of the latest SSDs and graphics cards.

10100:
The 10100 CPU’s support for PCIe 3.0 can be poor for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, as it will limit the potential of the latest SSDs and graphics cards.

L3 Cache

3400G:
The 3400G’s lackluster 4 MB of L3 cache is poor for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.

10100:
The 10100’s lackluster 6 MB of L3 cache is poor for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.

Learn more about Cache Sizes below.

General Apps on the Ryzen 5 3400G vs. Core i3 10100

Ryzen 5 3400G

When using AMD’s Ryzen 5 3400G CPU for general apps, you can expect good app performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.

Core i3 10100

When using Intel’s Core i3 10100 CPU for general apps, you can expect good app performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.

Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Check Price on Amazon

Amazon Affiliate Link

Core i3 10100

Intel Core i3-10100
Check Price on Amazon

Amazon Affiliate Link

General App Considerations

If you’re only planning to stream shows, use office apps, or browse the internet, you won’t need a top-end CPU to get good performance. The most important CPU capability for general app usage is the single-core max boost frequency. A high base frequency is also helpful for inadequately cooled CPUs.

Browsers depend on your CPU to quickly load pages and video content and manage multiple browser tabs. Higher single-core boost frequencies can speed up page load times.

Office and web applications are typically single-threaded, so running a single application won’t take advantage of a many-core CPU.

The more cores a CPU has, the more applications you can run simultaneously without noticing a performance impact.

Office and web applications rarely max out the CPU for long periods. These applications can use boost speeds when a burst of processing power is needed, returning to the more efficient base frequencies afterward.

Cores

3400G:
The 3400G’s 4 cores allow for excellent performance with modern apps.

10100:
The 10100’s 4 cores allow for excellent performance with modern apps.

Learn more about Core Counts below.

Single-Core Boost

3400G:
With a high-end cooler, the 3400G’s 4.2 GHz single-core max boost frequency is excellent for performance with modern apps. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.

10100:
With a high-end cooler, the 10100’s 4.30 GHz single-core max turbo boost frequency is excellent for performance with modern apps. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.

Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.

P-Core Boost

3400G:
The 3400G does not have Performance cores.

10100:
The 10100 does not have Performance cores.

Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.

DDR Support

3400G:
The 3400G CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz can be mediocre for performance with modern apps.

10100:
The 10100 CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2666 MHz can be mediocre for performance with modern apps.

Learn more about DDR Support below.

Professional Tools on the Ryzen 5 3400G vs.

Core i3 10100

Ryzen 5 3400G

When using AMD’s Ryzen 5 3400G CPU for professional tools, you can expect mediocre tool performance with a high-performance CPU cooler or poor tool performance with a basic or stock CPU cooler.

Core i3 10100

When using Intel’s Core i3 10100 CPU for professional tools, you can expect mediocre tool performance with a high-performance CPU cooler or poor tool performance with a basic or stock CPU cooler.

Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Check Price on Amazon

Amazon Affiliate Link

Core i3 10100

Intel Core i3-10100
Check Price on Amazon

Amazon Affiliate Link

Professional Tool Considerations

Video editors, 2D and 3D graphics tools, software compilers, and engineering tools require high-performing CPUs.

Professional tools are often well optimized to use many cores. CPU cores allow tools to parallelize processing tasks. Increasing the number of cores can divide the time required to process a task if the tool has good multi-threading support.

To maximize performance with professional tools, you’ll want to use a CPU with a high boost frequency and many CPU cores. Good heat dissipation is needed to maintain boost frequencies for extended periods.

While graphics applications use your GPU for some rendering tasks, most calculations and data operations are still dependent on your CPU.

Cores

3400G:
The 3400G’s 4 cores allow for mediocre performance with professional tools.

10100:
The 10100’s 4 cores allow for mediocre performance with professional tools.

Learn more about Core Counts below.

Base Frequency

3400G:
The 3400G’s 3. 7 GHz base frequency is good for performance with professional tools, when not boosting. You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.

10100:
The 10100’s 3.60 GHz base frequency is good for performance with professional tools, when not boosting. You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.

Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.

Single-Core Boost

3400G:
With a high-end cooler, the 3400G’s 4.2 GHz single-core max boost frequency is excellent for performance with professional tools. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.

10100:
With a high-end cooler, the 10100’s 4.30 GHz single-core max turbo boost frequency is excellent for performance with professional tools. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.

Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.

P-Core Boost

3400G:
The 3400G does not have Performance cores.

10100:
The 10100 does not have Performance cores.

Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.

Overclocking Support

3400G:
The 3400G CPU’s lack of support for overclocking cannot benefit performance with professional tools.

10100:
The 10100 CPU’s lack of support for overclocking cannot benefit performance with professional tools.

Learn more about Overclocking below.

DDR Support

3400G:
The 3400G CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz can be mediocre for performance with professional tools.

10100:
The 10100 CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2666 MHz can be mediocre for performance with professional tools.

Learn more about DDR Support below.

PCIe

3400G:
The 3400G CPU’s support for PCIe 3.0 can be poor for performance with professional tools, as it will limit the potential of the latest SSDs and graphics cards.

10100:
The 10100 CPU’s support for PCIe 3.0 can be poor for performance with professional tools, as it will limit the potential of the latest SSDs and graphics cards.

L3 Cache

3400G:
The 3400G’s lackluster 4 MB of L3 cache is poor for performance with professional tools.

10100:
The 10100’s lackluster 6 MB of L3 cache is poor for performance with professional tools.

Learn more about Cache Sizes below.

Considerations When Choosing a CPU

Core Count

AMD’s Ryzen 5 3400G CPUs have 4 cores.

Intel’s Core i3-10100 CPUs have 4 cores.

Increased core counts can improve the performance of games and professional tools that use them. Most modern games don’t benefit from having more than 6–8 cores. Even general apps can benefit from many cores when numerous applications are open simultaneously. Web browsers don’t significantly take advantage of multiple cores when loading a single page. However, more CPU cores can improve performance when running demanding web apps in multiple windows.

Intel’s 12th generation and newer CPUs have performance (P) cores and efficiency (E) cores. The P cores are comparable to previous generation cores. E cores are focused on adding additional threads in an energy-efficient manner. They take up much less room on the CPU and generate less heat. However, their smaller cache and minimal interconnect capabilities make them more appropriate for offloading background tasks.

CPU Clock Speeds

The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G has a 3.7 GHz base frequency and supports a 4. 2 GHz single-core max boost frequency.

The Intel Core i3-10100 has a 3.60 GHz base frequency and supports a 4.30 GHz single-core max turbo boost frequency.

Single-core performance is essential for some games, as many don’t take full advantage of multiple cores. Professional tools depend on high single and multi-core boost frequencies to maximize their processing speed.

Boost frequencies are only achieved under ideal circumstances. The safest strategy for consistent gaming performance with a basic cooler is to get a processor with a higher base clock speed. However, with adequate cooling, you may be able to maintain speeds near the max boost frequency.

Check out my article, Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for AMD’s Ryzen 5 3400G, for recommended coolers that can maintain these boost frequencies on the 3400G.

Check out my article, Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for Intel’s Core i3-10100, for recommended coolers that can maintain these boost frequencies on the 10100.

DDR Support

The 3400G CPU’s fastest supported DDR memory type is DDR4, with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz.

The 10100 CPU’s fastest supported DDR memory type is DDR4, with a max stock speed of 2666 MHz.

You can exceed these stock speeds officially supported by CPUs when overclocking memory, such as with an XMP profile. Motherboard specifications will indicate their supported overclocked-memory speeds. To be able to overclock DDR memory, your motherboard chipset needs to support memory overclocking.

Faster PC memory can improve game and professional tool performance by reducing the time it takes to perform calculations and data operations.

Using the quickest RAM may not have as much of an impact as upgrading your CPU and graphics card or adding more RAM.

Learn about our recommended RAM for the 3400G in Choosing the Best RAM for AMD’s Ryzen 5 3400G CPU.

Learn about our recommended RAM for the 10100 in Choosing the Best RAM for Intel’s Core i3-10100 CPU.

Cache Size

The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G has an L3 cache capacity of 4 MB.

The Intel Core i3-10100 has an L3 cache capacity of 6 MB.

A CPU’s cache is a small amount of memory, close to the CPU cores, containing recently used data. An L3 cache capacity of at least 20 MB is ideal for games and professional tool performance.

Games and professional tool performance can improve as cache size increases, as it can reduce delays when retrieving commonly used assets from memory. While nearly any task will use a CPU’s cache, a large cache becomes less impactful for general PC usage, such as browsing webpages.

Remember that cache sizes often increase with core counts, so if you want to increase your L3 cache, you may need to get a CPU with more cores.

Overclocking

The 3400G does not support overclocking.

The 10100 does not support overclocking.

Overclocking is mainly relevant for PC gamers who want to maximize their game framerates. CPU overclocking increases frequencies past their default limits. Excellent heat dissipation via fans or another solution is required to maintain system stability while overclocking.

Professional tools can benefit from overclocked frequencies. However, overclocking may introduce some possibility of system instability, which may be less acceptable in business scenarios.

Best AIO Liquid Cooler

Enermax Liqmax III 360
Check Price on Amazon

Amazon Affiliate Link

Best Air Cooler

Noctua NH-D15, Premium CPU Cooler
Check Price on Amazon

Amazon Affiliate Link

Learn More About the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

  • Which Chipsets Work With AMD’s Ryzen 5 3400G CPU?
  • Choosing the Best Power Supply for AMD’s Ryzen 5 3400G CPU
  • Choosing the Best Motherboard for AMD’s Ryzen 5 3400G
  • Is the Ryzen 5 3400G CPU Good for Gaming?
  • Choosing the Best RAM for AMD’s Ryzen 5 3400G CPU
  • Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for AMD’s Ryzen 5 3400G
  • What Is the TDP of the Ryzen 5 3400G CPU?
  • How Many Cores Do AMD Ryzen 5 3400G CPUs Have?

Learn More About the Intel Core i3 10100

  • Which Chipsets Work With Intel’s Core i3-10100 CPU?
  • Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for Intel’s Core i3-10100
  • Choosing the Best Power Supply for Intel’s Core i3-10100
  • Is the Core i3-10100 CPU Good for Gaming?
  • Choosing the Best RAM for Intel’s Core i3-10100 CPU
  • Choosing the Best Motherboard for Intel’s Core i3-10100
  • How Many Cores Do Intel Core i3-10100 CPUs Have?
  • What Is the TDP of the Core i3-10100 CPU?

You can find detailed 10100 specifications on Intel’s site.

Have a suggestion or correction for this article? Send us an email at:
[email protected]

You can also contact the author at:
[email protected]

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs Intel Core i3-10100: What is the difference?

58 BALLLA

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

51 BALLLA

Intel Core i3-10100

VS

64 Facts compared to

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Intel Core I3-10100

Why AMD Ry Intel Core i3-10100?

  • 267MHz higher RAM speed?
    2933MHz vs 2666MHz
  • Semiconductor size 2nm smaller?
    12nm vs 14nm
  • 1MB more L2 cache?
    2MB vs 1MB
  • 128KB more L1 cache?
    384KB vs 256KB
  • Has an unlocked multiplier?
  • 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    0.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
  • Supports memory debug code?
  • 300MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    1400MHz vs 1100MHz

Why is Intel Core i3-10100 better than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G?

  • 5°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
    100°C vs 95°C
  • GPU frequency 50MHz higher?
    350MHz vs 300MHz
  • 2MB more L3 cache?
    6MB vs 4MB
  • 11. 35% higher PassMark score (single)?
    2649 vs 2379
  • 64GB more than maximum memory?
    128GB vs 64GB
  • 14.78% higher Geekbench 5 multi-core result?
    4109 vs 3580
  • 16% higher Cinebench R20 score (multi-core)?
    2284 vs 1969
  • 8.74% higher Cinebench R20 result (single core)?
    448 vs 412

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i3-10100

VS

Intel Core i5-7400

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Intel Intel Intel Intel Intel. vs

Intel Core i3-10105

AMD Ryzen 5 3400g

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i3-10100

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 30004 AMD Ryzen 5

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core i3-10100

VS

AMD RYZEN 3 3200G

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

VS

Intel Core I5-9400F

Intel Core i3-10100 9 Intel Core i5-4570

AMD RYZEN 5 3400G

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 5700g

Intel Core i3-10100

VS

Intel Core I5-3470

AMD Ryzen 5 3400g 9000 5 5600X

Intel Core i3-10100

VS

AMD Ryzen 3 4100

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

AMD RYZEN 3 PRO 4350G

9000 INTEL CORE INTEL Intel CORE INTL

AMD RYZEN 5 3400G

VS

AMD RYZEN 5 4600G

Intel Core i3-10100

VS

Intel Core i7-3770

000 Price Match

cheaper

Reviews of users

General rating

AMD RYZEN 5 3400G

3 Reviews of users

AMD RYZEN 5 3400G

/10

9000 3 reviews of users 9000 NTTEL CORE CORE COR User reviews

Intel Core i3-10100

9. 2 /10

5 User reviews

Features

Value for money

7.3 /10

3 Votes

/10

5 Votes

6.0260 /10

3 VOTES

/10

9000 9000

9000 9000 9000 9000 7.3 /10

3 Votes

/10

5 Votes

Reliability

6.3 /10

3 VOTES

9.2 /10 9000

VOTES

Energy efficiency

7.0 /10

3 Votes

/10

5 Votes

1. Specific Central Processor

X 3.7GHZ

4 X 3.6GHZ 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 processor cycles shows how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

4.2GHz

4.3GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Has unlocked multiplier

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✖Intel Core i3-10100

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 Cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.5MB/core

0. 25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

1MB/core

1.5MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

2933MHz

2666MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

43.71GB/s

41.6GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.maximum memory capacity

Maximum memory capacity (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

7.Supports memory troubleshooting code

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✖Intel Core i3-10100

Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100)

A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5. Result Cinebench R20 (single core)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

465.7seconds

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100)

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

1460.1seconds

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100)

The Blender (classroom) test measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9. performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✔Intel Core i3-10100

processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✔Intel Core i3-10100

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✔Intel Core i3-10100

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✔Intel Core i3-10100

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✔Intel Core i3-10100

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

✖Intel Core i3-10100

Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using Digital Rights Management (DRM) technology ).

9. interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 3400G)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-10100)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

Intel Core i3 10100 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3400G:

performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i3 10100

AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

Which is better: Intel Core i3 10100 at 3.6 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.3) or AMD Ryzen 5 3400G at 3.7 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 4.2)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 4-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

  1. Overview
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Features
  5. Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single -flow performance

Rating in tests using one core

Core I3 10100

60

Ryzen 5 3400G

55

Multi -flow performance

Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus

Core I3 10000 9000 26

Ryzen 5 3400G

25

Energy efficiency

Efficiency of energy consumption by chip

Core i3 10100

56

Ryzen 5 3400g

NanoreView

Contraul

Key differences

What are the main differences between 3400G and 10100

Reasons to choose Intel Core i3 10100

  • Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666
  • Has 2 MB more L3 cache
  • Launched 10 months later than rival
  • 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 3 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

  • Unlocked multiplier
  • More modern process technology — 12 vs 14 nanometers
  • 2.11 GB/s (5%) higher maximum memory bandwidth

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Core i3 10100
+7%

1146

Ryzen 5 3400G

1075

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

Core i3 10100
+16%

5640

Ryzen 5 3400G

4857

Passmark CPU (Single Core)

Core i3 10100
+12%

2659

Ryzen 5 3400G

2366

Passmark CPU (multi-core)

Core i3 10100

8850

Ryzen 5 3400G
+6%

9404

Geekbench 5 (single core)

Core i3 10100
+8%

1054

Ryzen 5 3400G

972

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Core i3 10100
+8%

4270

Ryzen 5 3400G

3937

▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

Specifications

List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i3 10100 and AMD Ryzen 5 3400G

General information

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Release date May 1, 2020 July 7, 2019
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Comet Lake-S Picasso
Model number i3-10100
Socket LGA-1200 AM4
Integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 Radeon RX Vega 11

Performance

Cores 4 4
Number of threads 8 8
Frequency 3. 6 GHz 3.7 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost 4.3 GHz 4.2 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 36x 37x
Tire speed 8 GT/s
Level 1 cache 64KB (per core) 96KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 256KB (per core) 512KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 6MB (shared) 4MB (shared)
Unlocked multiplier No Yes

Power consumption

Number of transistors 4.9 billion
Process 14 nanometers 12 nanometers
Power consumption (TDP) 65 W 45-65W
Critical temperature 100°C 95°C
Integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU frequency 350 MHz 300 MHz
Boost GPU frequency 1100 MHz 1300 MHz
Shader blocks 192 704
TMUs 24 44
ROPs 3 8
Compute units 24 11
TGP 15W 65 W
Max. resolution 4096×2304 — 60Hz 3840×2160 — 60Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Core i3 10100

0.38 teraflops

Ryzen 5 3400G

1.746 teraflops

Memory support

Memory type DDR4-2666 DDR4-2933
Max. size 128 GB 64 GB
Number of channels 2 2
Max. bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 43.71 GB/s
ECC support No Yes

Other

Official site Site Intel Core i3 10100 AMD Ryzen 5 3400G website
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
Max. PCI Express lanes 16 8

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Core i3 10100

194 (53%)

Ryzen 5 3400G

172 (47%)

Total votes: 366

Competitors

1.
Core i3 10100 and Ryzen 3 3200G

2.
Core i3 10100 and Ryzen 5 4600G

3.
Core i3 10100 and Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G

4.
Core i3 10100 and Core i3 10100F

5.
Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 5 5500U

6.
Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 5 5600G

7.
Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G

What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 3400G or Intel Core i3 10100?

Name

Message

Comparison of Intel Core i3-10100 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-10100 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Picture quality in graphics, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability , Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.

Intel Core i3-10100

versus

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

Benefits

Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-10100

  • Newer processor, approx. 4.2 GHz
  • Approximately 5% more maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 95°C
  • Approximately 50% larger L3 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • 2x more max memory size: 128 GB vs 64 GB
  • About 13% more performance in PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark: 2631 vs 2329
Release date 27 May 2020 vs 30 Sep 2019
Maximum frequency 4. 30 GHz vs 4.2 GHz
Maximum core temperature 100°C vs 95°C
Level 3 cache 6MB vs 4MB
Maximum memory size 128 GB vs 64 GB
PassMark — Single thread mark 2631 vs 2329

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

  • CPU unlocked, unlocked multiplier allows easy overclocking
  • Newer CPU manufacturing process allows it to be more powerful but consume less power: 12nm vs 14nm
  • Cache L1 is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access

  • L2 cache is 2 times (s) larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 6% better: 9295 vs 8767
Unlocked Unlocked / Locked
Process 12 nm vs 14 nm
Level 1 cache 384 KB vs 256 KB
Level 2 cache 2MB vs 1MB
PassMark — CPU mark 9295 vs 8767

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Core i3-10100
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

PassMark — Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
Name Intel Core i3-10100 AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
PassMark — Single thread mark 2631 2329
PassMark — CPU mark 8767 9295
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 4780

Performance comparison

Intel Core i3-10100 AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Architecture name Comet Lake Zen+
Issue date 27 May 2020 30 Sep 2019
Place in the rating 505 525
Processor Number i3-10100 PRO 3400G
Series 10th Generation Intel Core i3 Processors 3000
Status Launched
Applicability Desktop Desktop
Family Ryzen 5
OPN Tray YD340BC5M4MFH
Support 64 bit
Base frequency 3. 60 GHz 3.7 GHz
Bus Speed ​​ 8 GT/s
Level 1 cache 256KB 384KB
Level 2 cache 1MB 2MB
Level 3 cache 6MB 4MB
Process 14nm 12nm
Maximum core temperature 100°C 95 °C
Maximum frequency 4.30 GHz 4. 2 GHz
Number of cores 4 4
Number of threads 8 8
Number of GPU cores 11
Unlocked
Maximum number of memory channels 2 2
Maximum memory bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 43.71 GB/s
Maximum memory size 128GB 64GB
Supported memory types DDR4-2666 DDR4-2933
ECC support
Device ID 0x9BC8
Graphics base frequency 350MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency 1. 10 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD Technology
Intel® Clear Video Technology
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Video memory size 64GB
Integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 Radeon RX Vega 11
Number of execution units 11
Maximum GPU clock 1400 MHz
Number of shaders 704
Maximum number of monitors supported 3 3
DisplayPort
HDMI
4K resolution support
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort [email protected]
Maximum resolution via eDP [email protected]
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1. 4 [email protected]
DirectX 12 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Maximum number of processors in configuration 1
Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm
Supported sockets FCLGA1200 AM4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 65 Watt
Thermal Solution PCG 2015C
Configurable TDP 45-65 Watt
Number of PCI Express lanes 16 20
PCI Express revision 3. 0 3.0
PCIe configurations Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 1×16+1×4
Scalability 1S Only
Total number of SATA ports 4
USB revision 3.0
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection Technology
Intel® OS Guard
Intel® Secure Key Technology
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Secure Boot
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Idle States
Extended instructions Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
AMD Secure technology
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

the cheapest 12 threads of GECID.

com.

::>Processors
>2022
> AMD Ryzen 5 4500

07-19-2022

In our last AMD Ryzen 5 5500 review, we were happy that AMD finally had budget processors on a new architecture. And here’s the trump card from the «red» sleeve — a new processor on the old Zen 2 architecture — Ryzen-5-4500.

In some stores, this is the most affordable 6 cores in 12 threads for over 100 dollars. What can they do? Is Ryzen 5 5500 or Ryzen 5 3600 worse than Intel’s competitors? How do they accelerate? All answers are here and now!

So, since 2020, AMD has been releasing Ryzen 5000 series processors on the Zen 3 architecture. 4500. It was presented on April 4, still fresh. In fact, this is the APU 4600G already familiar to us only with the graphics turned off.

There is a monolithic die structure, support maximum PCIe 3.0 interface and 6 cores running in 12 threads. 65W TDP and only 8MB L3 cache. But the frequencies of the new processor are slightly lower — officially from 3. 6 to 4.1 GHz, although in many motherboards up to 4.2 GHz. It seems to be a strange decision, but on the other hand, the declared price of $129in reality, somewhat less. So it turned out to be another 12-strike for inexpensive — that suits us.

We received the processor itself from the CompX store. This is a place with a huge selection of components for building different PCs and more. In total, more than 30 thousand products. There are both new and old hardware with a more pleasant price tag. What if there is no experience in sorting it all out and arranging it — there are geek consultants who are well versed in these issues. Plus there is fast delivery or pickup.

Choice of CPU-competitors

What processors do we compare the hero of the video with and why were they chosen?

The first cohort is AMD’s internal competitors. For starters, the good old Ryzen 5 3600. For the price, it is about 1000 UAH more expensive than the Ryzen 5 4500. At the same time, it has 4 times more L3 cache than the hero of the video, and the maximum frequency is 100 MHz higher.

And the second is the recently tested AMD Ryzen 5 5500. It costs about the same as the AMD Ryzen 5 3600, but offers a new architecture and better raw performance. This processor has a fairly low power consumption, 16 MB L3 cache and a maximum frequency of 4.2 GHz.

Further from the «blue» — Intel Core i3-10100. This is the most affordable processor of this level on Hotline.ua at the moment, but the difference with the Ryzen 5 4500 is small — just a couple of hundred hryvnias. Also, the Core i3 has only 4 cores in 8 threads, a tiny 6 MB L3 and a maximum frequency of 4.3 GHz.

Intel Core i3-12100F — also seems to be 4-core and 8-thread, but much more powerful. New Alder Lake-S architecture. Plus, it is the only one here that supports PCIe 4.0 and even 5.0. Cool stone and only a couple of hundred more expensive than the younger competitor and the hero of the video. But it has one drawback — expensive motherboards. We’ll break it down at the end of the article.

And finally, the 5th competitor Intel Core i5-10400. Its minimum price for the version with a boxed cooler starts from 4,000 hryvnias. The maximum frequency is 4.3 GHz, the L3 cache is 12 MB.

Under what conditions did the CPU work?

Motherboards that ran all the processors before you. There were three in total:

  • Ryzen 5 3600/4500/5500 | SocketAM4 | ASUS ROG Strix B550-F Gaming (Wi-Fi)
  • Core i3-12100F | LGA 1700 | ASUS PRIME Z690-P D4
  • Core i3-10100/i5-10400 | LGA 1200 | ASUS TUF Z490-PLUS (WI-FI)

The liquid cooling system Cooler Master MasterLiquid PL240 FLUX provided the ideal temperature for the subjects. Among other things, it stands out with a new more compact two-chamber pump. It provides a steep flow-to-pressure ratio, which improves cooling efficiency.

Our RAM can be considered «popular» — 2 strips PATRIOT VIPER Steel DDR4-3600 . It is quite fast, stylish and works with timings 18-22-22-42.

A video card in the processor test, of course, must be powerful so as not to limit their potential. We have this Palit GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GameRock OC .

M.2 PCIe SSD PATRIOT P300 1TB.

In addition to excellent speed performance, it pleases with adequate temperature, as it supports thermal throttling technology.

Since the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti video card eats like a horse, or at least a pony, we put the power supply with a margin — Seasonic Prime PX-850 . It has a platinum certification, which means it is as cold and quiet as possible, which will allow us to normally watch the new season of the Umbrella Academy during the tests.

A assembled everything in the be quiet! PURE BASE 500DX Black . It has good ARGB LED lighting on the front and insides. Plus, a good configuration of the port area is a modern USB 3.2 Type C and a backlight mode switch.

“In order not to overheat in the summer, you need to provide cooling in advance!”. And to the maximum! Therefore, three more from the be quiet! LIGHT WINGS 140mm PWM Triple Pack .

Comparison of Ryzen 5 4500 with competitors Let’s start by confirming the proximity of the memory controller to the CPU core in a monolithic crystal. The AIDA64 video hero is as cool as the Ryzen 5 5500. In terms of write speed, they are almost twice as fast as the poor Ryzen 5 3600 and even 5-6% of the strongest from Intel.

However, the 7-ZIP Ryzen 5 3600 is slightly ahead of the new Ryzen 5 4500. In turn, the new product loses 14% in archive packing speed, but significantly outperforms all Intel.

In 3DMark Time Spy, the Ryzen triple performed plus or minus on the same level. Of course, our hero has the biggest lead over the Core i3-10100 — almost 50% in terms of CPU Score. But the advantage over the Core i5-10400 is not so great — only 2%.

On average, in computing tasks, the new Ryzen 5 4500 is ahead of most competitors:

  • Ryzen 5 3600 — by 4%, due to the advantage in working with memory;
  • Core i3-10100 — by 33%;
  • Core i3-12100F — by 3%, which is a compliment for Intel, given that it has 4 fewer threads;
  • and even Core i5-10400 the novelty bypassed 10%;
  • and lost only Ryzen 5 5500 not very significant 8%.

Traditionally, at the end of the review, we will compare these results with CPU prices and, for better clarity, with motherboard prices. And now let’s move on to gaming tests, because everything here is also very interesting.

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla helped give processors prizes at ultra graphics settings and 50% render scale. Specifically, the last point allows you to rest against the ability of the CPU. Now the Ryzen 5 4500 was able to outperform only the Core i3-10100 and only in rare and very rare events — by 9% and 20%, respectively. The hero of the video lost the rest of the processors. Not enough cash?

Total War Saga: Troy loads processors and «tail and mane». Especially with extreme grass settings and army sizes. Here, the 12 threads of the Ryzen 5 4500 significantly outperformed the 8-thread Intel. For example, in terms of subsidence, the new product bypasses the old Core i3 by 71%, and the young one by 26%. Although, to be honest, if the Core i5-10400 in this benchmark lost 17% to the new Ryzen.

Reverse situation in Cyberpunk 2077 at ultra graphics settings, same beams with ultra DLSS performance. The Ryzen 5 4500 shares last place with the 8-thread Core i3-10100.

You liked the calculation of the total number of frames in the last review, so we take it for permanent residence in our comparison. So, how were the places in gaming benchmarks distributed, if you put together all the characteristics of very rare events from all games? Who slowed down the most, and who the least?

  1. Ryzen 5 5500 — 235 fps
  2. Core i3-12100F — 227 fps
  3. Core i5-10400 — 226 fps
  4. Ryzen 5 3600 — 224 fps
  5. Ryzen 5 4500 — 204 fps
  6. Core i3-10100 = 184 fps

As you can see, our hero is not as powerful in games as he is in work. As a result, it takes 5th place out of 6, overtaking only the old and weak Core i3-10100. Well, what an achievement. Although if you look at real prices, then everything is quite logical.

Overclocking Ryzen 5 4500

Overclocking of the new product is also not a lot. As, in fact, it was with the Ryzen 55500 in the last video. We managed to throw in just 200 MHz to the maximum frequency. To do this, we raised the multiplier to 44 and fixed the voltage at around 1. 375 V. As a result, we got 4.4 GHz. This is the most stable result of all tested.

The most noticeable bonus was recorded in the CPU-Z benchmark — plus 5% and 9% in multi-threaded and single-core workloads, respectively.

CineBench R23 got the second place in acceleration – plus 4-5%. This is directly proportional to the increase in frequency.

Actually, the difference is not significant further and further. On average, for all benchmarks, overclocking the cores brought only a 3% bonus in work tasks.

Same thing in games. The only stat that has grown in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla is very rare events. It was at least 48, but it became 52 fps. Or 8% better.

Total War Saga: Troy has a 5% increase in average fps and the same 8% — 0.1% low.

These are definitely not the numbers that can be seen without monitoring.

In general, it makes no sense to overclock the Ryzen 5 4500 in the vast majority of cases. Because such overclocking cannot be called absolutely free. The temperature of the processor increased by almost 10 degrees. And this is in a well-ventilated case and is armed with a dropsy. So we do not recommend frying the Ryzen 5 4500 after a few percent of the bonus.

AMD Ryzen 5 Memory Overclocking 4500

The same can be said about trying to squeeze the juice out of this «rock» by accelerating the RAM. We raised the frequency of our dice from Ryzen 5 3600 to 4532 MHz. Nearly 1000!

And as a result, it brought only a few percent in synthetics. And in games, sometimes the frame rate even dropped due to increased timings and latency.

Recall that after such manipulations, the Ryzen 5 5500 showed an acceleration equivalent to the bonus from overclocking the core frequency. And here is such a disappointment.

How does the Ryzen 5 4500 handle tough games?

After failures with overclocking, you need to digress from comparisons and analysis of numbers. Let’s take a break and see how this new budget phone plays cool games in Full HD resolution. In other words, what about the gameplay?

Battlefield 2042 crashed on ultra graphics with ray tracing turned off.

So that the life of the processor does not seem like honey, they played in the Conquest mode for 128 players. In general, the gameplay is comfortable and smooth, with an average of 63 fps. There are a few blunts at the beginning and sometimes small twitches can slip through. But they can not be called at least somehow critical — so the flight on ultra-graphics went well.

Far Cry 6 and ultra graphics without ray tracing. As with the Ryzen 5 5500, there was a conflict with monitoring in this game. Therefore, the actual frame rate is 15-20 fps higher than the numbers that we managed to shoot. But even so, friends, an average of 64 fps and a comfortable exploration of locations.

СoD: Warzone on the maximum graphics started perfectly from the first match, which is extremely rare. There is nothing to complain about, the control is obedient, the picture is pleasant. The average frame rate is around 100!

Almost the maximum graphics settings were turned up in Rust as well. What we got can be called relatively comfortable gameplay. Relatively, because you have to put up with frequent freezes, and sometimes with incomprehensible short-term drawdowns of up to 40 fps. Especially when large-scale buildings created by gamers appear in the frame. What is eloquently indicated by red bursts of frame duration and a 0.1% low indicator at 21 fps.

Well, we can say that all 8 difficult games on the maximum graphics went perfectly. Explicit questions for Rust only. But she has such a labyrinth of settings that the devil will break his leg. Therefore, there is an option to move a few sliders to the left in exchange for stabilizing the video sequence. So, we confirm — Ryzen 5 4500 is a good budget companion for a gaming graphics card.

Conclusions on the Ryzen 5 4500 and competitors

Now let’s put all the information on the shelves, using the price idea we like. We also immediately add the prices of processors and motherboards — everything as you asked.

Prices for processors with a boxed cooler. hotlines. Early July:

  • Ryzen 5 3600 from 4 600 UAH
  • Ryzen 5 5500 from 4 562 UAH
  • Core i5-10400 from 4 090 UAH
  • Core i3-12100F from 3 700 UAH
  • Ryzen 5 4500 from 3 545 UAH
  • Core i3-10100 from 3 287 UAH

Prices for motherboards. hotlines. Early July:

  • LGA1700 | i3-12100F | from 2 462 UAH
  • LGA1200 | i3-10100 | i5-10400 | from 1 615 UAH
  • Socket AM4 All Ryzen 5 | from 1 249 UAH

Processor and motherboard connection prices. hotlines. Early July:

  • Core i3-12100F from UAH 3700 | + from 2462 UAH fee | = from 6 162 UAH
  • Ryzen 5 3600 from UAH 4600 |+ from UAH 1249 fee | = from 5 849 UAH
  • Ryzen 5 5500 from UAH 4,562 |+ from UAH 1,249 fee | = from 5 811 UAH
  • Core i5-10400 from 4090 UAH | + from 1615 UAH fee | = from 5 705 UAH
  • Core i3-10100 from 3287 UAH | + from 1615 UAH fee | = from 4 902 UAH
  • Ryzen 5 4500 from UAH 3,545 |+ from UAH 1,249 fee | = from 4 794 UAH

Given the marginal price difference, more threads, and cheaper motherboards, the Ryzen 5 4500 is annihilating the Core i3-10100. On average, AMD is 33% better in work tasks and 7-21% better in games. At the same time, when assembling the system from scratch, a bundle of a new CPU and a board will cost even a little less.

The Core i3-12100F is powerful enough, not very expensive, and the only member that supports PCIe 4.0. The hero of the video beats him by 3% in work tasks, but by 9-16% loses games on average. There seems to be a chance, but look how much motherboards for LGA1700 cost! Therefore, assembling a new system with Intel will be even more expensive than with Ryzen 5 5500. And it is the best option, especially if the video card does not have an interface cut, and it will work with might and main in the PCIe 3.0 slot.

And the last «blue» is the Core i5-10400. The Ryzen 5 4500 beats it by 10% in work tasks, but in Intel games it is still better — by an average of 8-18%. At the same time, it is also more expensive — in conjunction with a fee for the same 19%. Therefore, if you look at the price / opportunity indicator in total, Ryzen 54500 wins. Even if we take into account that it is 8-14% better than the novelty in games, the old man costs 22% more. Therefore, «no»!

And if the gaming power of the Ryzen 5 4500 is not enough for you and there is a desire to add it, then among all competitors it is more expedient to choose the Ryzen 5 5500. It is better in games by 15-20% with a difference in cost of 21%. Everything is fair — how much you paid, so much you got.

As a result, the new AMD Ryzen 5 4500 processor, albeit on the old Zen 2 architecture and with a small L3 cache, still looks like one of the coolest options in the $100+ price range. And in general, these are the most affordable 6 cores in 12 threads, which, by the way, are almost swept off the shelves. Here and now, it provides excellent performance in both everyday work tasks and games. At the same time, it overshadows all competitors in terms of price / opportunity ratio, except for the older Ryzen 5 5500.

Author: Denis Koziolek

We also suggest reading:
AMD Ryzen 5 5500 vs. Ryzen 5 5600X/3600, Core i5-11400/10400 and Core i3-12100F: the people’s six-core?
Intel Alder Lake Up Close: Core i7-12700K vs. Core i7-11700K vs. Ryzen 7 5800X
Intel Core i5-12400 vs. Core i5-11400, Core i5-12600K vs. Ryzen 5 5600X Price/Features

From €129 for the junior Core i3-10100T (4/8) to €504 for the top Core i9-10900K (10/20). Estimated pricing for new 10th Gen Intel Core Desktop CPUs (Comet Lake-S)

News

Volodymyr Skripin
Volodymyr Skripin

We’ve written extensively about the new 10th Gen Intel Core (Comet Lake-S) desktop processors, but pricing hasn’t been released yet, aside from a few early listings from foreign online retailers. The Spanish edition of El Chapuzas Informatico helped to fill this gap by publishing the last and most important piece of the puzzle — estimated European prices for the entire range of new Intel processors. And now everyone who has been eyeing the update can assess the situation and make decisions regarding the update.

Helping

So, we have summarized the specifications and prices of the upcoming Comet Lake-S and current Coffee Lake Refresh-H processors in tables for greater convenience:

Processor Number of cores/threads Frequency (Base/Boost), GHz Video core Supported memory L3 cache size, MB TDP, W Price
Core i9-9900K 8 / 16 3. 6 / 5.0 UHD 630 DDR4-2666 16 95 $488
Core i9-9900KF 8 / 16 3.6 / 5.0 DDR4-2666 16 95 $463
Core i7-9700K 8 / 8 3.6 / 4.9 UHD 630 DDR4-2666 12 95 $374
Core i7-9700KF 8 / 8 3.6 / 4.9 DDR4-2666 12 95 $349
Core i7-9700 8 / 8 3.0 / 4.7 UHD 630 DDR4-2666 12 95 $323
Core i7-9700F 8 / 8 3.0 / 4.7 DDR4-2666 12 65 $298
Core i5-9600K 6 / 6 3.7 / 4.6 UHD 630 DDR4-2666 9 95 $262
Core i5-9600KF 6 / 6 3. 7 / 4.6 DDR4-2666 9 95 $237
Core i5-9500 6 / 6 3.0 / 4.4 UHD 630 DDR4-2666 9 65 $192
Core i5-9500F 6 / 6 3.0 / 4.4 DDR4-2666 9 65 $167
Core i5-9400 6 / 6 2.9 / 4.1 UHD 630 DDR4-2666 9 65 $182
Core i5-9400F 6 / 6 2.9 / 4.1 DDR4-2666 9 65 $157
Core i3-9350K 4 / 4 4.0 / 4.6 UHD 630 DDR4-2666 8 91 $173
Core i3-9350KF 4 / 4 4.0 / 4.6 DDR4-2666 8 91 $148
Core i3-9100 4 / 4 3. 6 / 4.2 UHD 630 DDR4-2400 6 65 $122
Core i3-9100F 4 / 4 3.6 / 4.2 DDR4-2400 6 65 $97

9th Generation Intel Core Processor Lineup (Coffee Lake Refresh-H)

Processor Number of cores/threads Frequency (Base/Boost), GHz Turbo Boost Max 3.0 (two fastest cores), GHz L3 cache size, MB TDP, W Price
Core i9-10900K 10 / 20 3.7 / 5.1 5.2 20 125 €504
Core i9-10900KF 10 / 20 3.7 / 5.1 5.2 20 125 €475
Core i9-10900 10 / 20 2.8 / 5. 0 5.1 20 65 €452
Core i9-10900F 10 / 20 2.8 / 5.0 5.1 20 65 €425
Core i9-10900T 10 / 20 1.9 / N/A N/A 20 35 €452
Core i7-10700K 8 / 16 3.8 / 5.0 5.1 16 125 €389
Core i7-10700KF 8 / 16 3.8 / 5.0 5.1 16 125 €362
Core i7-10700 8 / 16 2.9 / 4.7 4.8 16 65 €335
Core i7-10700F 8 / 16 2.9 / 4.7 4.8 16 65 €308
Core i7-10700T 8 / 16 2.0 / N/A N/A 16 35 €335
Core i5-10600K 6 / 12 4. 1 / 4.8 12 125 €263
Core i5-10600KF 6 / 12 4.1 / 4.8 12 125 €236
Core i5-10600 6 / 12 3.3 / 4.8 12 65 €222
Core i5-10600T 6 / 12 2.4 / N/A 12 35 €222
Core i5-10500 6 / 12 3.1 / 4.5 12 65 €200
Core i5-10500T 6 / 12 2.3 / N/A 12 35 €200
Core i5-10400 6 / 12 2.9 / 4.3 12 65 €190
Core i5-10400F 6 / 12 2.9/ 4.3 12 65 €163
Core i5-10400T 6 / 12 2. 0 / N/A 12 35 €190
Core i3-10320 4 / 8 3.8 / 4.6 8 65 €162
Core i3-10300 4 / 8 3.7 / 4.4 8 65 €151
Core i3-10300T 4 / 8 3.0 / N/A 8 35 €151
Core i3-10100 4 / 8 3.6 / 4.3 8 65 €129
Core i3-10100T 4 / 8 3.0 / N/A 8 35 €129

10th Gen Intel Core (Comet Lake-S) lineup

nanometer process technology and the old Skylake architecture, but will move to the new LGA 1200 socket (for now, LGA 1151 (2015)), and increase the number of physical cores to ten (in top models).