Ryzen 5 3600xt vs ryzen 7 3700x: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs Ryzen 5 3600XT: performance comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs Ryzen 5 3600XT: performance comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.6 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 3700X with 8-cores against the 3.8 GHz Ryzen 5 3600XT with 6-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review
Differences
Performance
Specs
Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Ryzen 7 3700X

Ryzen 5 3600XT

Multi-Core Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Ryzen 7 3700X

Ryzen 5 3600XT

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Ryzen 7 3700X

Ryzen 5 3600XT

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Ryzen 7 3700X

Ryzen 5 3600XT

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 3600XT and 3700X

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Has 2 more physical cores

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

Newer — released 1-year and 1-month later
2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz)

Promotion

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 7 3700X
+2%

1358

Ryzen 5 3600XT

1331

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 7 3700X
+26%

12260

Ryzen 5 3600XT

9731

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Ryzen 7 3700X

2683

Ryzen 5 3600XT
+4%

2778

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 7 3700X
+22%

22843

Ryzen 5 3600XT

18797

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Ryzen 7 3700X

1284

Ryzen 5 3600XT
+6%

1358

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Ryzen 7 3700X
+11%

8476

Ryzen 5 3600XT

7613

Submit your Cinebench R23 result

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 5 3600XT

General

Vendor	AMD	AMD
Released	July 7, 2019	July 7, 2020
Type	Desktop	Desktop
instruction set	x86-64	x86-64
Codename	—	Zen 2 (Matisse)
Integrated GPU	No	No

Performance Cores
P-Cores	8	6
P-Threads	16	12
Base Frequency (P)	3. 6 GHz	3.8 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P)	4.4 GHz	4.5 GHz

Total
Total Cores	8	6
Total Threads	16	12
Bus Frequency	100 MHz	100 MHz
Multiplier	36x	36x
L1 Cache	64K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 Cache	32MB (shared)	32MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier	Yes	Yes

Package

Transistors	3. 8 billions	3.8 billions
Fabrication process	7 nm	7 nm
TDP (PL1)	65 W	95 W
Socket	AM4	AM4
Peak temperature	95°C	95°C

Memory Support

Memory types	— DDR4-3200	— DDR4-3200
Memory Size	128 GB	128 GB
Max. Memory Channels	2	2
Max. Memory Bandwidth	47.68 GB/s	47.68 GB/s
ECC Support	Yes	No

Official site	AMD Ryzen 7 3700X official page	AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT official page
PCI Express Version	4. 0	4.0
PCI Express Lanes	16	16

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Ryzen 7 3700X

191 (50.3%)

Ryzen 5 3600XT

189 (49.7%)

Total votes: 380

Сompetitors

1.
Ryzen 7 3700X or Ryzen 7 7800X3D

2.
Ryzen 7 3700X or Ryzen 7 5800X3D

3.
Ryzen 7 3700X or Ryzen 7 7700X

4.
Ryzen 7 3700X or Ryzen 7 5800X

5.
Ryzen 7 3700X or Ryzen 5 5600X

6.
Ryzen 7 3700X or Core i5 13600K

7.
Ryzen 7 3700X or Ryzen 5 7600X

8.
Ryzen 7 3700X or Ryzen 7 5700X

Compare other CPUs (540+)

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT or Ryzen 7 3700X?

Name

Message

Promotion

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT on one side and the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X on the other side.

The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 12 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,5GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor	AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT	AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Market (main)	Desktop	Desktop
ISA	x86-64 (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture	Zen 2	Zen 2
Core name	Matisse	Matisse
Family	Ryzen 5 3000	Ryzen 7 3000
Part number(s), S-Spec	100-100000281BOX	100-000000071, 100-100000071BOX
Release date	Q3 2020	Q3 2019
Lithography	7 nm FinFET	7 nm FinFET
Transistors	3. 800.000.000	3.800.000.000
Cores	6	8
Threads	12	16
Base frequency	3,8 GHz	3,6 GHz
Turbo frequency	4,5 GHz	4,4 GHz
Cache memory	32 MB	32 MB
Max memory capacity	128 GB	128 GB
Memory types	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Max # of memory channels	2	2
Max memory bandwidth	47,68 GB/s	47,68 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes	20	20
TDP	95 W	65 W
Suggested PSU	600W ATX Power Supply	600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics	None	None
Socket	AM4	AM4
Compatible motherboard	Socket AM4 Motherboard	Socket AM4 Motherboard
Maximum temperature	95°C	95°C
CPU-Z single thread	534	508
CPU-Z multi thread	4. 272	5.459
Cinebench R15 single thread	210	200
Cinebench R15 multi-thread	1.680	2.100
Cinebench R20 single thread	500	480
Cinebench R20 multi-thread	3.800	4.760
Cinebench R23 single thread	1.340	1.334
Cinebench R23 multi-thread	9.913	13.795
PassMark single thread	2.786	2.676
PassMark CPU Mark	18. 813	22.767
(Windows) Geekbench 4 single core	5.822	5.602
(Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core	29.247	34.342
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core	1.297	1.239
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core	6.962	8.521
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	452,1 GFLOPS	546 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	308 pts / W	528 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is less. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT was designed earlier.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.

	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	508 5.459
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT	534 4.272

In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 28%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.

	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	200 2. 100
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT	210 1.680

In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 25%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.

	Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	480 4.760
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT	500 3. 800

In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 25%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.

	Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	1.334 13.795
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT	1.340 9.913

In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 39%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.

	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	2.676 22.767
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT	2.786 18.813

In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 21%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	5.602 34.342
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT	5.822 29.247

In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 17%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	1.239 8.521
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT	1.297 6.962

In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 22%.

On Linux:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	1.331 8.729
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT	1.407 7.746

In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 13%.

On macOS:

	Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	1.251 7.897
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT	1.254 6.918

In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 14%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.