AMD Ryzen 7 1700x vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: What is the difference?
56points
AMD Ryzen 7 1700x
50points
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 1700x
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Why is AMD Ryzen 7 1700x better than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X?
- 10°C higher maximum operating temperature?
95°Cvs85°C - 10W lower TDP?
95Wvs105W - Has FMA4?
Why is AMD Ryzen 7 2700X better than AMD Ryzen 7 1700x?
- 8.82% faster CPU speed?
8 x 3.7GHzvs8 x 3.4GHz - 266MHz higher ram speed?
2933MHzvs2667MHz - 2nm smaller semiconductor size?
12nmvs14nm - 12.93% higher PassMark result?
17623vs15605 - 0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.3GHzvs3.8GHz - 17.28% higher PassMark result (single)?
2437vs2078 - 18. 44% higher Cinebench R20 (multi) result?
3951vs3336 - 19.48% higher Cinebench R20 (single) result?
411vs344
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
vs
Intel Core i5-10300H
Intel Core i3-1115G4
vs
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
vs
Intel Core i5-10210U
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
vs
Intel Core i7-11800H
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 7 1700x
1 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 7 1700x
8.0/10
1 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
2 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
9. 0/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.0/10
1 votes
8.5/10
2 votes
Gaming
7.0/10
1 votes
8.0/10
2 votes
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
8.0/10
2 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Energy efficiency
8.0/10
1 votes
7.5/10
2 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
8 x 3.4GHz
8 x 3.7GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
3.8GHz
4.3GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 7 1700x
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
2MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2667MHz
2933MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700x)
43.71GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700x)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD Ryzen 7 1700x
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700x)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9. bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700x)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5. Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
246.7seconds
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
743.5seconds
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 7 1700x
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 7 1700x
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 1700x
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 7 1700x
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700x)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 1700x
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 7 1700x
✖AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700x)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 1700X: performance comparison
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
We compared two 8-core desktop CPUs: the 3.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 2700X against the 3.4 GHz Ryzen 7 1700X. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Ryzen 7 2700X
58
Ryzen 7 1700X
50
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Ryzen 7 2700X
48
Ryzen 7 1700X
42
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Ryzen 7 2700X
46
Ryzen 7 1700X
41
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Ryzen 7 2700X
53
Ryzen 7 1700X
47
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 1700X and 2700X
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Newer — released 1-year and 2-months later
- More modern manufacturing process – 12 versus 14 nanometers
- 13% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz)
- Around 3.97 GB/s (10%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
- 14% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1074 vs 944 points
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than the Ryzen 7 2700X – 95 vs 105 Watt
- More than 10° C higher critical temperature
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+12%
1106
Ryzen 7 1700X
989
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+15%
10143
Ryzen 7 1700X
8857
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+18%
2455
Ryzen 7 1700X
2080
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+13%
17602
Ryzen 7 1700X
15557
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+14%
1084
Ryzen 7 1700X
947
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+16%
7365
Ryzen 7 1700X
6358
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 1700X
General
Vendor | AMD | AMD |
Released | April 19, 2018 | March 2, 2017 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Zen+ | Zen |
Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
Integrated GPU | No | No |
Performance
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Threads | 16 | 16 |
Base Frequency | 3. 7 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 37x | 34x |
L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
L3 Cache | 16MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Transistors | 4.8 billions | 4.8 billions |
Fabrication process | 12 nm | 14 nm |
TDP | 105 W | 95 W |
Max. temperature | 85°C | 95°C |
Memory support
Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
Memory Size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. Memory Bandwidth | 43.71 GB/s | 39.74 GB/s |
ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
Official site | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X official page | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X official page |
PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Ryzen 7 2700X
4 (57.1%)
Ryzen 7 1700X
3 (42.9%)
Total votes: 7
ompetitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
2.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
3.
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
4.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X or Ryzen 7 2700X?
Name
Message
Promotion
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X: 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
High-end Desktop processor released in 2017 with 8 cores and 16 threads. With base clock at 3.4GHz, max speed at 3.8GHz, and a 95W power rating. Ryzen 7 1700X is based on the Summit Ridge 14nm family and part of the Ryzen 7 series.
High-end Desktop processor released in 2018 with 8 cores and 16 threads. With base clock at 3.7GHz, max speed at 4.3GHz, and a 105W power rating. Ryzen 7 2700X is based on the Pinnacle Ridge 12nm family and part of the Ryzen 7 series.
High-end Desktop processor released in 2019 with 8 cores and 16 threads. With base clock at 3.6GHz, max speed at 4.4GHz, and a 65W power rating. Ryzen 7 3700X is based on the Matisse 7nm family and part of the Ryzen 7 series.
Ryzen 7 1700X
RTX 2080 Ti
16GB 3200MHz
1080p ultra
|
Ryzen 7 2700X
RTX 2080 Ti
16GB 3200MHz
1080p ultra
|
Ryzen 7 3700X
RTX 2080 Ti
16GB 3200MHz
1080p ultra
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Category | Desktop | Desktop | Desktop |
Target | high-end | high-end | high-end |
Socket Compatibility | AM4 | AM4 | AM4 |
Integrated Graphics | None | None | None |
Cooler Included | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Overclock Potential | 5 % | 2 % | 2 % |
Year | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 |
GPU Year | 2018 | 2018 | 2018 |
Price | 399 USD | 329 USD | 274 USD |
GPU Price | 1299 USD | 1299 USD | 1299 USD |
Number of Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
Number of Threads | 16 Threads | 16 Threads | 16 Threads |
Core Frequency | 3. 4 GHz | 3.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Boost Frequency | 3.8 GHz | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
Power Consumption | 95 W | 105 W | 65 W |
GPU Power Consumption | 250 W | 250 W | 250 W |
Price-Value Score | 65. 2 % | 78.1 % | 92.7 % |
Speed Score | 70 % | 80 % | 77 % |
Productivity Score | 74 % | 78 % | 80 % |
Gaming Score | 83 % | 85 % | 91 % |
RAM Bottleneck | 1 % | 1 % | 1 % |
RAM Speed Bottleneck | 8 % | 5 % | 6 % |
Max 1080p Bottleneck | 34. 1 % | 31.8 % | 16.2 % |
Max 1440p Bottleneck | 17 % | 15.9 % | 8.1 % |
Max 4K Bottleneck | 8.5 % | 8 % | 4.1 % |
GPU Average 1080p FPS | 126.2 FPS | 132.4 FPS | 150. 7 FPS |
GPU Average 1440p FPS | 105.8 FPS | 109.7 FPS | 116.7 FPS |
GPU Average 4K FPS | 66.8 FPS | 68.8 FPS | 70.9 FPS |
Having an excellent base clock speed of 3.7GHz helps the Ryzen 7 2700X achieve better performance in most applications. The Ryzen 7 2700X comes with an excellent boost clock speed for gaming and single-thread tasks. Ryzen 7 1700X consumes less power at 95W. With an efficient 12nm manufacturing process, the Ryzen 7 2700X has better thermals. The Ryzen 7 2700X is relatively newer.
Having an excellent base clock speed of 3.6GHz helps the Ryzen 7 3700X achieve better performance in most applications. The Ryzen 7 3700X comes with an excellent boost clock speed for gaming and single-thread tasks. Ryzen 7 3700X consumes less power at 65W. With an efficient 7nm manufacturing process, the Ryzen 7 3700X has better thermals. The Ryzen 7 3700X is relatively newer.
Having an excellent base clock speed of 3.7GHz helps the Ryzen 7 2700X achieve better performance in most applications. The Ryzen 7 3700X comes with an excellent boost clock speed for gaming and single-thread tasks. Ryzen 7 3700X consumes less power at 65W. With an efficient 7nm manufacturing process, the Ryzen 7 3700X has better thermals. The Ryzen 7 3700X is relatively newer.
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Specifications
The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X is a Desktop processor with 8 cores, launched in 2017. It is part of the Ryzen 7 lineup, using the Zen architecture with Socket AM4. The core-count is effectively doubled, to 16 threads. Ryzen 7 1700X has 16MB of L3 cache and operates at 3.4 GHz by default, but can boost up to 3.8 GHz, depending on the workload. AMD is building the Ryzen 7 1700X on a 14 nm production process. You may freely adjust the unlocked multiplier on Ryzen 7 1700X, which simplifies overclocking greatly, as you can dial in any overclocking frequency up to 4GHz. AMD’s processor supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel interface. It is worth noting that this processor does not have integrated graphics. This processor can run on motherboards with the following chipsets: A320, B350, B450, X370, X470, X570.
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is a Desktop processor with 8 cores, launched in 2018. It is part of the Ryzen 7 lineup, using the Zen+ architecture with Socket AM4. The core-count is effectively doubled, to 16 threads. Ryzen 7 2700X has 16MB of L3 cache and operates at 3.7 GHz by default, but can boost up to 4.3 GHz, depending on the workload. AMD is building the Ryzen 7 2700X on a 12 nm production process. You may freely adjust the unlocked multiplier on Ryzen 7 2700X, which simplifies overclocking greatly, as you can dial in any overclocking frequency up to 4.4GHz. With a TDP of 105 W, the Ryzen 7 2700X consumes a lot of power, so good cooling is definitely needed. AMD’s processor supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel interface. It is worth noting that this processor does not have integrated graphics. This processor can run on motherboards with the following chipsets: A320, B350, B450, X370, X470, X570.
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is a Desktop processor with 8 cores, launched in 2019. It is part of the Ryzen 7 lineup, using the Zen 2 architecture with Socket AM4. The core-count is effectively doubled, to 16 threads. Ryzen 7 3700X has 32MB of L3 cache and operates at 3.6 GHz by default, but can boost up to 4.4 GHz, depending on the workload. AMD is building the Ryzen 7 3700X on a 7 nm production process. You may freely adjust the unlocked multiplier on Ryzen 7 3700X, which simplifies overclocking greatly, as you can dial in any overclocking frequency up to 4. 5GHz. AMD’s processor supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel interface. It is worth noting that this processor does not have integrated graphics. This processor can run on motherboards with the following chipsets: A320, B350, B450, X370, X470, X570.
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X General
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|---|---|---|
Foundry | GlobalFoundries | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
Manufacturer | AMD | AMD | AMD |
Codename | Zen | Zen | Zen 2 |
Core Family | Summit Ridge | Pinnacle Ridge | Matisse |
Market | Desktop | Desktop | Desktop |
Series | AMD Ryzen 7 | AMD Ryzen 7 | AMD Ryzen 7 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop | Desktop |
Architecture | Zen | Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge) | Zen 2 |
Achitecture codename | Zen | Zen+ | Zen2 |
Microarchitecture | Zen | Zen+ | Zen 2 |
Market price | $ 203. 51 | $ 212.69 | $ 299 |
Production Status | Active | Active | Active |
Release date | on March 2017 | on April 2018 | on July 2019 |
Released | Mar 2017 | Apr 2018 | Jul 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $329 | $329 |
Price now | $204 | $213 | $364 |
Place in performance rating | 160 | 112 | 45 |
Value for money (0-100) | 21. 69 | 23.77 | 19.58 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Process Size | 14 nm | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Compatibility
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|---|---|---|
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 105 Watt | 65 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 20 | 20 | — |
PCIe lanes | 20 | 20 | 20 |
PCIe revision | n / a | 3. 0 | — |
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 |
Socket | AM4 | AM4 | AM4 |
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|---|---|---|
# of Cores | 8 | 8 | 8 |
# of Threads | 16 | 16 | 16 |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 3. 8 GHz | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
CPU Cores | 8 | 8 | 8 |
CPU Threads | 16 | 16 | 16 |
Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 16MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) | 32MB |
Core Clock | 3. 4 GHz | 3.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Core Count | 8 | 8 | 8 |
Frequency | 3.40 GHz | 3.70 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
Hyperthreading | Yes | Yes | Yes |
L1 Cache | 8 x 64 kB Instruction 8 x 32 kB Data |
8 x 64 kB Instruction 8 x 32 kB Data |
8 x 32 kB Instruction 8 x 64 kB Data |
L1 cache | 768 KB | 768 KB | 512 KB |
L2 Cache | 8 x 512 kB | 8 x 512 kB | 8 x 512 kB |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
L3 Cache | 2 x 8 MB | 1 x 16 MB | 2 x 16 MB |
L3 cache | 16384 KB | 16 MB | 32 MB |
L3-Cache | 16. 00 MB | 16.00 MB | 32.00 MB |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
Simultaneous Multithreading | Yes | Yes | Yes |
TDP | 95 W | 105 W | 65 W |
TDP down | — | — | — |
TDP up | — | — | — |
Turbo (1 Core) | 3. 80 GHz | 4.30 GHz | 4.40 GHz |
Turbo (8 Cores) | 3.60 GHz | 3.85 GHz | 4.00 GHz |
Turbo Clock | up to 3.8 GHz | up to 4.35 GHz | up to 4.4 GHz |
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Memory Specifications
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|---|---|---|
ECC | Yes | Yes | Yes |
ECC Support | No | No | No |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 39. 74 GB / s | 43.71 GB / s | 47.68 GB / s |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB | — |
Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Memory channels | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200 |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200 |
Max. Memory | 64 GB | 128 GB |
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specs
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|---|---|---|
64 bit support | + | + | + |
Die Size | 192 mm² | 192 mm² | unknown |
Die size | 213 mm2 | 209. 78 mm2 | — |
Includes CPU Cooler | Yes | Yes | No |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.61 kh/s | — | — |
Multiplier | 34.0x | 37.0x | 36.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 | 8 |
Number of threads | 16 | 16 | 16 |
Overclocking | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Package | µPGA | µOPGA-1331 | |
Part # | YD170XBCAEMPK | YD270XBGAFBOX | 100-000000071 |
Part# | YD170XBCAEWOF | unknown | unknown |
SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Technology | 14 nm | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Tjunction max. | 95 °C | 95 °C | 95 °C |
Transistor count | 4800 Million | 4940 Million | 19,200 million |
Transistors | 4800 million | 4800 million | 19,200 million |
Unlocked | + | + | + |
Voltage | variable | variable | variable |
tCaseMax | unknown | unknown | unknown |
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Integrated Graphics
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|---|---|---|
DirectX Version | |||
Execution units | |||
GPU (Turbo) | No turbo | No turbo | No turbo |
GPU frequency | |||
Generation | |||
Integrated Graphics | None | None | None |
Integrated graphics | — | — | — |
Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Max. displays | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technologies and Extensions
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|---|---|---|
AES-NI | + | + | + |
AVX | + | + | + |
FMA | FMA3 | — | — |
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Virtualization Technologies
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|---|---|---|
AMD-V | + | + | + |
Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | AMD-V, SEV | AMD-V, SEV |
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Other
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | Ryzen 7 3700X | |
---|---|---|---|
Packaging | Boxed | Boxed | OEM/Tray |
SenseMI | + | — | — |
XFR | + | — | — |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4. 1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost XFR |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost 2 XFR 2 |
— |
Bottleneck Analysis
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X: 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis based on the benchmark of 6 games:
CPU | GPU | RAM | Resolution | Quality Settings | Average Bottleneck (Lower is better) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 27. 2% |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 23.9% |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 15.4% |
Grand Theft Auto V
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
Forza Horizon 4
Apex Legends
Battlefield V
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Streaming Analysis
Benchmarks depends entirely on what game you plan to stream.
Streaming Summary of Ryzen 7 1700X, Ryzen 7 2700X, Ryzen 7 3700X based on the benchmark of 9 games:
CPU | GPU | RAM | Resolution | Quality Settings | Average Bottleneck (Lower is better) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 32. 8% |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 32.8% |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 32.8% |
Destiny 2
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
Fortnite Battle Royale
Overwatch
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Apex Legends
Rainbow Six Siege
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Battlefield V
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X: 80+ Gaming Benchmarks
CPU | GPU | RAM | Resolution | Quality Settings | 80+ Game Average FPS | Average FPS Relative Benchmarks | 80+ Game Average Low 1% FPS | Low 1% FPS Relative Benchmarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 236. 5 FPS | 100 % | 196.6 FPS | 100 % |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 219.1 FPS | 92.6 % | 182.3 FPS | 92.7 % |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 209.8 FPS | 88.7 % | 174.7 FPS | 88.9 % |
Average FPS
Low 1% FPS
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 — A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 — Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 — Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 — Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 — How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 — Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 — The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X’s capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 — Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X’s capabilities.
10900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 — 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 — In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel’s latest.
Critics Reviews
The Ryzen 7 1700X offers a simple path to overclocked performance that matches its more expensive 1800X counterpart. The 1700X lags behind Intel’s faster quad-cores in many gaming applications …
The Ryzen 7 1700X is around $60 cheaper than its flagship Ryzen 7 1800X stablemate, yet offers achingly similar performance. So it ought to be the perfect example of AMD’s new Zen architecture . ..
We tested the Flagship processor, now we review the Ryzen 7 1700X Processor that is a 100 bucks cheaper. The 8-core processor will be tested on an X370 motherboard. … Overclocking With The Ryzen …
The Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 7 1700 are identical to their big brother the Ryzen 7 1800X in every way aside from base clocks and boost speeds. The Ryzen 7 1700 is the only one of the three that doesn’t have the XFR (eXtended Frequency Range) technology which will raise the base and boost clocks by 100 MHz as long as your cooling is sufficient.
AMD’s eight-core Ryzen 7 2700X shines for workstation apps and multitasking, and gamers who pair it with a high-end video card should get better 1080p gaming than with first-gen Ryzen. That’s a …
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X. First let’s do a little history lesson and look at the differences between both CPUs. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X was launched on April 19, 2018. The Ryzen 7 2700X was a refresh of the Zen architecture that the previous Ryzen 7 1700X was based on.
The Ryzen 7 2700X is a perfect example of all of this: not only does it outperform the original Ryzen chips, but it even topples the mighty Intel Core i7-8700K. Read more: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen 7 2700X would seem to suggest a Ryzen 7 1700X replacement. However, it actually replaces the flagship Ryzen 7 1800X. AMD claims that its 2700X offers up to 12% more performance than Ryzen 7 …
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is AMD’s flagship CPU. Built using a new 12nm manufacturing process, it’s basically just a speed-bumped version of last year’s AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, but there are a couple …
AMD rates its Ryzen 7 2700 at a much lower 65W thermal design power than its 105W Ryzen 7 2700X. That’s partly why the 2700’s base frequency is a much more conservative 3.2 GHz, while its maximum …
The top-end Ryzen 7 2700X includes the new Wraith Prism cooler, which features programmable RGB lights for the fan, logo, and fan cowling, as well as switchable performance modes. The default «L …
The Ryzen 7 2700X also has a feature called Pure Power which is a technology that lets the Ryzen chips, as well as other variants of Ryzen, to function effectively and adequately as possible. Another feature that the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has is the Store MI Technology. It’s a really good feature for the processor since it combines great speed …
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X review: Zen pusher. That makes the Ryzen 7 2700X AMD’s latest flagship processor, and thus brings with the full set of AMD’s updates.
When compared to Ryzen, it was 11% faster than the Ryzen 7 3700X at 1080p, which is a reasonable performance uplift. That said, if you plan on playing at 1440p with an RTX 2080 Ti or perhaps 1080p …
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler by AMD. 4.8 out of 5 stars 2,635 ratings | 248 answered questions #1 Best Seller in Computer CPU Processors. Price: $273.47 & FREE Shipping. Details & FREE Returns Return this item for free.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. The Ryzen 7 3700X is the direct successor to the Ryzen 7 2700X, but instead of just a refresh this time AMD managed a generational microarchitecture improvement called Zen 2 as well as a better node/manufacturer process at 7nm. In addition, AMD moved to a chiplet design, instead of one monolithic chip design.
The Ryzen 7 3700X has the same eight cores and 16 threads as its predecessor. The main benefits the Ryzen 7 3700X derives from the Zen 2 platform, then, are a much larger L3 cache (with Ryzen 3000 . ..
AMD’s Ryzen 7 3700X is a generational CPU update that’s worth shouting about. Packed with the very latest AMD chiplet architecture, AMD Zen 2, and a minimal 65W TDP, this chip is the best …
AMD hasn’t sampled the Ryzen 7 3800X yet, which features a higher 105W rating and 3.9 / 4.5 GHz base/boost clocks, which is higher than the Ryzen 7 3700X’s 3.6 / 4.4 GHz base/boost frequency.
AMD’s third generation Ryzen CPUs boast higher clockspeeds and more cores than the previous first and second gen parts, and the Ryzen 7 3700X is now one of the best CPUs for gaming.Zen 2 CPUs are …
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 3.6 GHz 8-Core/16 Threads AM4 Processor with Wraith Prism Cooler, 100-100000071BOX: Amazon.com.au: Computers & Accessories
How Does AMD’s 2700X Compare With Their 1700X?
Compare AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X with their Ryzen 7 1700X. Which CPU is better for gaming, general apps, and professional tools?
Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
This article compares AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X with their Ryzen 7 1700X, exploring which CPU is better for:
- Gaming — the latest graphics-intense games
- General Apps — web browsing, streaming, and office applications
- Professional Tools — 2D and 3D graphics tools, video editors, compilers, and engineering tools
Gaming on the Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Ryzen 7 1700X
Ella Don / Unsplash
Ryzen 7 2700X
When using AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPU for gaming, you can expect good game performance with a high-performance CPU cooler or mediocre game performance with a basic or stock CPU cooler.
Ryzen 7 1700X
When using AMD’s Ryzen 7 1700X CPU for gaming, you can expect mediocre game performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.
Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Gaming Considerations
While a good GPU is critical for gaming performance, your CPU will also have a significant impact. If the CPU is too slow, it can be a bottleneck for your GPU, which can reduce your framerate or cause stuttering. The most important CPU capabilities for gaming are single-core max boost frequency and the number of cores. A high base frequency is also critical for inadequately cooled CPUs.
Depending on the game, the CPU will often handle tasks including scene management, gameplay logic, physics calculations, and asset loading.
Having multiple CPU cores can improve performance with games that utilize them. However, developers cannot split up every task to take advantage of a growing number of cores. Most modern games don’t benefit from having more than 6–8 cores. Game performance will experience diminishing returns as you add more CPU cores.
Cores
2700X:
The 2700X’s 8 cores allow for excellent performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
1700X:
The 1700X’s 8 cores allow for excellent performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
Learn more about Core Counts below.
Base Frequency
2700X:
The 2700X’s 3.7 GHz base frequency is good for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, when not boosting. You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.
1700X:
The 1700X’s 3.4 GHz base frequency is mediocre for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, when not boosting. You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
Single-Core Boost
2700X:
With a high-end cooler, the 2700X’s 4. 3 GHz single-core max boost frequency is excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
1700X:
With a high-end cooler, the 1700X’s 3.8 GHz single-core max boost frequency is good for performance with the latest graphics-intense games. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
Overclocking Support
2700X:
When using a high-end cooler, the 2700X CPU’s support for overclocking can be excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
1700X:
When using a high-end cooler, the 1700X CPU’s support for overclocking can be excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
Learn more about Overclocking below.
DDR Support
2700X:
The 2700X CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz can be mediocre for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
1700X:
The 1700X CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2667 MHz can be mediocre for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
Learn more about DDR Support below.
PCIe
2700X:
The 2700X CPU’s support for PCIe 3.0 can be poor for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, as it will limit the potential of the latest SSDs and graphics cards.
1700X:
The 1700X CPU’s support for PCIe 3.0 can be poor for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, as it will limit the potential of the latest SSDs and graphics cards.
L3 Cache
2700X:
The 2700X’s 16 MB of L3 cache is mediocre for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
1700X:
The 1700X’s 16 MB of L3 cache is mediocre for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
Learn more about Cache Sizes below.
General Apps on the Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Ryzen 7 1700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
When using AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPU for general apps, you can expect good app performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.
Ryzen 7 1700X
When using AMD’s Ryzen 7 1700X CPU for general apps, you can expect good app performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.
Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
General App Considerations
If you’re only planning to stream shows, use office apps, or browse the internet, you won’t need a top-end CPU to get good performance. The most important CPU capability for general app usage is the single-core max boost frequency. A high base frequency is also helpful for inadequately cooled CPUs.
Browsers depend on your CPU to quickly load pages and video content and manage multiple browser tabs. Higher single-core boost frequencies can speed up page load times.
Office and web applications are typically single-threaded, so running a single application won’t take advantage of a many-core CPU.
The more cores a CPU has, the more applications you can run simultaneously without noticing a performance impact.
Office and web applications rarely max out the CPU for long periods. These applications can use boost speeds when a burst of processing power is needed, returning to the more efficient base frequencies afterward.
Cores
2700X:
The 2700X’s 8 cores allow for excellent performance with modern apps.
1700X:
The 1700X’s 8 cores allow for excellent performance with modern apps.
Learn more about Core Counts below.
Single-Core Boost
2700X:
With a high-end cooler, the 2700X’s 4. 3 GHz single-core max boost frequency is excellent for performance with modern apps. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
1700X:
With a high-end cooler, the 1700X’s 3.8 GHz single-core max boost frequency is excellent for performance with modern apps. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
DDR Support
2700X:
The 2700X CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz can be mediocre for performance with modern apps.
1700X:
The 1700X CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2667 MHz can be mediocre for performance with modern apps.
Learn more about DDR Support below.
Professional Tools on the Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Ryzen 7 1700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
When using AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPU for professional tools, you can expect good tool performance with a high-performance CPU cooler or mediocre tool performance with a basic or stock CPU cooler.
Ryzen 7 1700X
When using AMD’s Ryzen 7 1700X CPU for professional tools, you can expect mediocre tool performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.
Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Professional Tool Considerations
Video editors, 2D and 3D graphics tools, software compilers, and engineering tools require high-performing CPUs.
Professional tools are often well optimized to use many cores. CPU cores allow tools to parallelize processing tasks. Increasing the number of cores can divide the time required to process a task if the tool has good multi-threading support.
To maximize performance with professional tools, you’ll want to use a CPU with a high boost frequency and many CPU cores. Good heat dissipation is needed to maintain boost frequencies for extended periods.
While graphics applications use your GPU for some rendering tasks, most calculations and data operations are still dependent on your CPU.
Cores
2700X:
The 2700X’s 8 cores allow for excellent performance with professional tools.
1700X:
The 1700X’s 8 cores allow for excellent performance with professional tools.
Learn more about Core Counts below.
Base Frequency
2700X:
The 2700X’s 3.7 GHz base frequency is good for performance with professional tools, when not boosting. You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.
1700X:
The 1700X’s 3.4 GHz base frequency is mediocre for performance with professional tools, when not boosting. You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
Single-Core Boost
2700X:
With a high-end cooler, the 2700X’s 4.3 GHz single-core max boost frequency is excellent for performance with professional tools. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
1700X:
With a high-end cooler, the 1700X’s 3.8 GHz single-core max boost frequency is good for performance with professional tools. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
Overclocking Support
2700X:
When using a high-end cooler, the 2700X CPU’s support for overclocking can be excellent for performance with professional tools.
1700X:
When using a high-end cooler, the 1700X CPU’s support for overclocking can be excellent for performance with professional tools.
Learn more about Overclocking below.
DDR Support
2700X:
The 2700X CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz can be mediocre for performance with professional tools.
1700X:
The 1700X CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2667 MHz can be mediocre for performance with professional tools.
Learn more about DDR Support below.
PCIe
2700X:
The 2700X CPU’s support for PCIe 3.0 can be poor for performance with professional tools, as it will limit the potential of the latest SSDs and graphics cards.
1700X:
The 1700X CPU’s support for PCIe 3.0 can be poor for performance with professional tools, as it will limit the potential of the latest SSDs and graphics cards.
L3 Cache
2700X:
The 2700X’s 16 MB of L3 cache is mediocre for performance with professional tools.
1700X:
The 1700X’s 16 MB of L3 cache is mediocre for performance with professional tools.
Learn more about Cache Sizes below.
Considerations When Choosing a CPU
Core Count
AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPUs have 8 cores.
AMD’s Ryzen 7 1700X CPUs have 8 cores.
Increased core counts can improve the performance of games and professional tools that use them. Most modern games don’t benefit from having more than 6–8 cores. Even general apps can benefit from many cores when numerous applications are open simultaneously. Web browsers don’t significantly take advantage of multiple cores when loading a single page. However, more CPU cores can improve performance when running demanding web apps in multiple windows.
CPU Clock Speeds
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has a 3.7 GHz base frequency and supports a 4.3 GHz single-core max boost frequency.
The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has a 3.4 GHz base frequency and supports a 3.8 GHz single-core max boost frequency.
Single-core performance is essential for some games, as many don’t take full advantage of multiple cores. Professional tools depend on high single and multi-core boost frequencies to maximize their processing speed.
Boost frequencies are only achieved under ideal circumstances. The safest strategy for consistent gaming performance with a basic cooler is to get a processor with a higher base clock speed. However, with adequate cooling, you may be able to maintain speeds near the max boost frequency.
Check out my article, Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X, for recommended coolers that can maintain these boost frequencies on the 2700X.
Check out my article, Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for AMD’s Ryzen 7 1700X, for recommended coolers that can maintain these boost frequencies on the 1700X.
DDR Support
The 2700X CPU’s fastest supported DDR memory type is DDR4, with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz.
The 1700X CPU’s fastest supported DDR memory type is DDR4, with a max stock speed of 2667 MHz.
You can exceed these stock speeds officially supported by CPUs when overclocking memory, such as with an XMP profile. Motherboard specifications will indicate their supported overclocked-memory speeds. To be able to overclock DDR memory, your motherboard chipset needs to support memory overclocking.
Faster PC memory can improve game and professional tool performance by reducing the time it takes to perform calculations and data operations.
Using the quickest RAM may not have as much of an impact as upgrading your CPU and graphics card or adding more RAM.
Learn about our recommended RAM for the 2700X in Choosing the Best RAM for AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPU.
Learn about our recommended RAM for the 1700X in Choosing the Best RAM for AMD’s Ryzen 7 1700X CPU.
Cache Size
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has an L3 cache capacity of 16 MB.
The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X has an L3 cache capacity of 16 MB.
A CPU’s cache is a small amount of memory, close to the CPU cores, containing recently used data. An L3 cache capacity of at least 20 MB is ideal for games and professional tool performance.
Games and professional tool performance can improve as cache size increases, as it can reduce delays when retrieving commonly used assets from memory. While nearly any task will use a CPU’s cache, a large cache becomes less impactful for general PC usage, such as browsing webpages.
Remember that cache sizes often increase with core counts, so if you want to increase your L3 cache, you may need to get a CPU with more cores.
Overclocking
The 2700X supports overclocking.
The 1700X supports overclocking.
Overclocking is mainly relevant for PC gamers who want to maximize their game framerates. CPU overclocking increases frequencies past their default limits. Excellent heat dissipation via fans or another solution is required to maintain system stability while overclocking.
Professional tools can benefit from overclocked frequencies. However, overclocking may introduce some possibility of system instability, which may be less acceptable in business scenarios.
Best AIO Liquid Cooler
Enermax Liqmax III 360
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Best Air Cooler
Noctua NH-D15, Premium CPU Cooler
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Learn More About the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Which Chipsets Work With AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPU?
- Choosing the Best Power Supply for AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPU
- Choosing the Best Motherboard for AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X
- Is the Ryzen 7 2700X CPU Good for Gaming?
- Choosing the Best RAM for AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPU
- Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X
- What Is the TDP of the Ryzen 7 2700X CPU?
- How Many Cores Do AMD Ryzen 7 2700X CPUs Have?
Learn More About the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Which Chipsets Work With AMD’s Ryzen 7 1700X CPU?
- Choosing the Best Power Supply for AMD’s Ryzen 7 1700X CPU
- Choosing the Best Motherboard for AMD’s Ryzen 7 1700X
- Is the Ryzen 7 1700X CPU Good for Gaming?
- Choosing the Best RAM for AMD’s Ryzen 7 1700X CPU
- Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for AMD’s Ryzen 7 1700X
- What Is the TDP of the Ryzen 7 1700X CPU?
- How Many Cores Do AMD Ryzen 7 1700X CPUs Have?
Have a suggestion or correction for this article? Send us an email at:
corrections@techreviewer. com
You can also contact the author at:
[email protected]
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X — Fortnite Battle Royale with RTX 2070 SUPER Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
RTX 2070 SUPER with
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Fortnite Battle Royale
RTX 2070 SUPER with
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 1700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
Multi-Thread Performance
14638 Pts
16960 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
1881 Pts
2190 Pts
Fortnite Battle Royale
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X in Fortnite Battle Royale using RTX 2070 SUPER — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
Ryzen 7 1700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
106.0 FPS |
1080p |
118. 2 FPS |
1440p |
67.8 FPS |
1440p |
75.6 FPS |
2160p |
36.7 FPS |
2160p |
40.9 FPS |
w1440p |
55.9 FPS |
w1440p |
62.3 FPS |
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
165.5 FPS |
1080p |
181.3 FPS |
1440p |
113.4 FPS |
1440p |
124.4 FPS |
2160p |
67.0 FPS |
2160p |
73.6 FPS |
w1440p |
96.2 FPS |
w1440p |
105.5 FPS |
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
224. 9 FPS |
1080p |
244.4 FPS |
1440p |
159.0 FPS |
1440p |
173.2 FPS |
2160p |
97.3 FPS |
2160p |
106.3 FPS |
w1440p |
136.5 FPS |
w1440p |
148.8 FPS |
Low Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
343.9 FPS |
1080p |
370.6 FPS |
1440p |
250.3 FPS |
1440p |
270.8 FPS |
2160p |
158.0 FPS |
2160p |
171.6 FPS |
w1440p |
217.1 FPS |
w1440p |
235.2 FPS |
Ryzen 7 1700X
- The Ryzen 7 1700X is more power efficient and generates less heat.
Ryzen 7 2700X
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
- The Ryzen 7 2700X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Compare Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X specifications
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X Architecture
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Zen | Zen |
Generation | Ryzen 7 (Zen) |
Ryzen 7 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge)) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Part# | YD170XBCAEWOF | unknown |
Production Status | Active | Active |
Released | Mar 2017 | Apr 2018 |
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cache
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 16MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X Cores
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 8 | 8 |
# of Threads | 16 | 16 |
Integrated Graphics | N/A | N/A |
SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X Features
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4. 1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost XFR |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost 2 XFR 2 |
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X Notes
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
This processor comes with an unlocked base clock multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking. | This processor comes with an unlocked base clock multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking. |
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X Performance
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 3. 4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Multiplier | 34.0x | 37.0x |
Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
TDP | 95 W | 105 W |
Turbo Clock | up to 3.8 GHz | up to 4.35 GHz |
Voltage | variable | variable |
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X Physical
Ryzen 7 1700X | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
---|---|---|
Die Size | 192 mm² | 192 mm² |
Foundry | GlobalFoundries | GlobalFoundries |
Package | µPGA | µOPGA-1331 |
Process Size | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | AMD Socket AM4 |
Transistors | 4800 million | 4800 million |
tCaseMax | unknown | unknown |
Share Your Comments 0
Compare Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700X in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X vs.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
The AMD Ryzen 7 1700X operates with 8 cores and 16 CPU threads. It run at 3.80 GHz base 3.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 95 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 CPU socket. This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 20 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Summit Ridge (Zen) Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q1/2017
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X operates with 8 cores and 16 CPU threads. It run at 4.30 GHz base 3.85 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 105 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 CPU socket. This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 20 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) Architecture is enhanced with 12 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q2/2018
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Compare Detail
3.40 GHz | Frequency | 3.70 GHz |
8 | Cores | 8 |
3.80 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.30 GHz |
3.60 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.85 GHz |
Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
Yes | Overclocking | Yes |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
14 nm | Technology | 12 nm |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
DirectX Version | ||
Max. displays | ||
DDR4-2666 | Memory | DDR4-2933 |
2 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
Yes | ECC | Yes |
— | L2 Cache | — |
16. 00 MB | L3 Cache | 16.00 MB |
3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
20 | PCIe lanes | 20 |
14 nm | Technology | 12 nm |
AM4 | Socket | AM4 |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
Q1/2017 | Release date | Q2/2018 |
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11. 5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Monero Hashrate kH/s
The crypto currency Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only efficiently be calculated using a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a high number of CPU cores, cache and a fast connection of the memory via as many memory channels as possible
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | |
95 W | Max TDP | 105 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 vs Ryzen 7 1700:
performance comparison
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Which is better: AMD Ryzen 7 2700 at 3. 2 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 4.1) or Ryzen 7 1700 at 3.0 GHz (with Turbo Core up to 3.7)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 8-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Ryzen 7 2700
54
Ryzen 7 1700
49
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nuclei 9 are involved0003
RYZEN 7 2700
43
Ryzen 7 1700
40
Energy Enactivity
Energy Effects Chip
Ryzen 7 2700
49
Ryzen 7 1700 9000
44
Renting Nanorevial
Ryzen 7 2700
50
Ryzen 7 1700
46
Key differences
What are the main differences between 1700 and 2700
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Appeared 1 year and 2 months later than the rival
- More modern technical process — 12 vs. 14 nanometers
- 11% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4.1 GHz vs. 3.7 GHz)
3.97 GB/s (10%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Ryzen 7 2700
+11%
1065
Ryzen 7 1700
958
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Ryzen 7 2700
+11%
9005
Ryzen 7 1700
8133
Passmark CPU (Single Core)
Ryzen 7 2700
+10%
2204
Ryzen 7 1700
1998
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Ryzen 7 2700
+7%
15781
Ryzen 7 1700
14748
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Ryzen 7 2700
+6%
1019
Ryzen 7 1700
960
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Ryzen 7 2700
+8%
6817
Ryzen 7 1700
6313
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen 7 1700 full technical specifications list
General information
Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
Release date | April 19, 2018 | March 2, 2017 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Zen+ | Zen |
Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
Integrated graphics | No | No |
Performance
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Number of threads | 16 | 16 |
Frequency | 3. 2 GHz | 3.0 GHz |
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 36x | 30x |
Level 1 cache | 96KB (per core) | 96KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 512KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 16MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Power consumption
Number of transistors | 4.8 billion | 4.8 billion |
Process | 12 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
Critical temperature | 95°C | 95°C |
Memory support
Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
Max. size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. bandwidth | 43.71 GB/s | 39.74 GB/s |
ECC support | Yes | Yes |
Other
Official site | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 website | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 website |
PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Max. PCI Express lanes | 20 | 20 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Ryzen 7 2700
13 (54.2%)
Ryzen 7 1700
11 (45.8%)
Total votes: 24
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 1700 or Ryzen 7 2700?
Name
Message
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700: What is the difference?
58 ballla
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
57 Ballla
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
VS
64 Facts compared to
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
AMD RYZEN 7 2700
more than AMD RyZen 7 2700?
- 64GB more than the maximum memory?
128GB vs 64GB
- Has NX bit?
- Has FMA4?
Why is AMD Ryzen 7 2700 better than AMD Ryzen 7 1700?
- 6. 67% higher CPU speed?
8 x 3.2GHz vs 8 x 3GHz
- 266MHz higher RAM speed?
2933MHz vs 2667MHz
- Semiconductor size 2nm smaller?
12nm vs 14nm
- 7.06% higher PassMark result?
15752 vs 14713
- 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.1GHz vs 3.7GHz
- 11.46% higher PassMark score (single)?
2218 vs 1990
- 9.87% higher Geekbench 5 multi-core result?
6243 vs 5682
- 11.52% higher single core Geekbench 5 result?
939 vs 842
Which comparisons are the most popular?
128GB vs 64GB
8 x 3.2GHz vs 8 x 3GHz
2933MHz vs 2667MHz
12nm vs 14nm
15752 vs 14713
4.1GHz vs 3.7GHz
2218 vs 1990
6243 vs 5682
939 vs 842
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
vs
Intel Core i5-7600K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
vs
AMD RYZEN 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
VS
Intel Core i7-7700K
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
VS 9000 AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD 3600
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
VS
Intel Core i7-7700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Core INTEL CORE INTEL CORE AMD Ryzen 7 1700
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
AMD RYZEN 5 2600
AMD Ryzen 7 24000 AMD Ryzen 7 27 AMD RYZEN 7 3700X
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600g
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 9000) VS 9000 VS 9000 AMD AMD0003
AMD RYZEN 7 2700
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800x
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
VS
Intel Core i3-7100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
9000 VS
Intel Core I78700
Intel Core I78700
Intel Core I78700
Intel Core I78700 Complexation of prices
Users reviews
General rating
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1 Reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
/10 9000
1 Reviews of Users
9000 AMD Ryzen 7 27 22 22 22 27 22 27 22 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 240003
2 reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
10. 0 /10
2 Reviews of users
Functions
Cost ratio
6.0 /10
1 VOTES
9000 9000 9000 907 /
2 Votes
Games
10.0 /10
1 Votes
10.0 /10
2 Votes
performance
10.0 /10 9
1 votes
10.0 /10
2 Votes
Reliability
10.0 /10
1 Votes
10.0
2 Votes
9000 9000 9000 9000 9061
1 Votes
9.0 /10
2 Votes
Productivity
1. Ski -resistance of the central processor
8 x 3GHZ
8 x 3.2GHZ
The speed of the central processor shows how many processing cycles per second can perform the processor for a second. , considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
3.7GHz
4.1GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 7 1700
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0. 5MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
2MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2667MHz
2933MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700)
43.71GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3rd DDR version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4 memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7. Supports memory debug code
✖AMD Ryzen 7 1700
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)
A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender test result (bmw27)
252.5seconds
243.7seconds
The Blender test (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
783.3seconds
750.9seconds
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9. performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700)
This means the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multi-threading
✔AMD Ryzen 7 1700
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700
processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 7 1700
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 1700
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 7 1700
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6 bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 1700
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 7 1700
✖AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through digital rights management (DRM) technology .
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 2700 Processor Overview
Launched last year, AMD Ryzen processors with Zen architecture have renewed competition in the desktop chip market. The new CPUs turned out to be quite good, bringing intrigue to a segment where Intel’s positions seem to be unshakable. A year later, the company introduced the second generation of processors, transferring new chips to a 12-nanometer process technology, increasing clock frequencies and improving acceleration algorithms, while maintaining compatibility with the Socket AM4 platform. As part of the new Pinnacle Ridge line, the company introduced two 8-core models — Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 2700. Let’s check how much the 2nd generation Ryzen chips have improved and how the older models of the series will look in direct comparison with the main opponent from Intel — Core i7 -8700K.
Help
ZMIST
- 1 Architecture AMD Zen+ and process process 12 nm
- 2 Precision Boost 2 and XFR2
- 3 Ryzen 7 2xx
- 4 Coler Wraith PRISM
- 7 Test bench configuration
- 8 Performance
- 9 Gaming performance
- 10 Full HD “at maximum speed”
- 11 Power consumption
- 12 Results
.
AMD Zen+ architecture and 12nm process technology
GlobalFoundries helped speed up the launch of AMD’s new line of processors by launching mass production of chips using the 12nm process technology. This turned out to be very handy and allowed AMD to keep up with the processor update schedule for its desktop platform.
The manufacturer claims to use the optimized Zen + architecture for new processors, but if we generalize the changes, we are more likely talking about the already well-known Zen, and the most significant difference between Pinnacle Ridge chips and their Summit Ridge predecessors was the same transition to new technological norms and increase in operating clock frequencies.
In its presentation materials, AMD highlights improved IPC performance as well as cache latency at all levels. Again, here the effect will be to a greater extent from an increase in operating frequencies, however, we assume that some optimizations were also carried out at the architecture level. We will try to verify this in practice.
Another bonus of Pinnacle Ridge was the official support for DDR4-2933 RAM, while for the previous generation Ryzen, the manufacturer guaranteed the modules to work in DDR4-2666 mode. However, we do know that the Summit Ridge has also played with faster kits. Since the announcement, the developers have been diligently optimizing the AGESA microcode, trying to improve the performance of Ryzen with high-speed memory modules. It was not possible to radically change the situation here, but the improvements are quite noticeable. With good sets based on Samsung B-die chips, first-generation processors can operate in DDR4-3400/3466 modes.
Precision Boost 2 and XFR2
For new chips, the manufacturer has thoroughly revised the algorithm of dynamic acceleration of computing units. First generation Ryzen processors actually have two Precision Boost auto-overclocking states. In the mode with a load of 1-2 cores, the maximum boost is used, and if more threads are involved, the processor noticeably drops the operating frequency, only slightly exceeding the base one.
Pinnacle Ridge chips use a multivariate Precision Boost 2 algorithm that allows much more efficient use of processor resources under changing workload conditions.
The presented screen clearly demonstrates the differences in the operation of acceleration technologies in processors of both generations. As you can see, as the number of threads involved increases, the actual clock speed of the Pinnacle Ridge is smoothly adjusted in 25 MHz steps. Of course, this applies not only to the top model Ryzen 7 2700X, but also to the rest of the chips of the new family.
Another option for 12nm processors is support for the XFR 2 mechanism. The technology gives an additional boost if, according to internal telemetry, the processor can still accelerate without consequences. The first version of XFR, used for Summit Ridge, worked with one core, the second can be extended to all computers. Therefore, for Ryzen 2nd generation, it makes sense to use the most efficient cooling systems, this will allow you to get a performance boost.
Ryzen 7 processor line 2xxx
At launch, the new line of processors includes two 8-core models — Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen 7 2700X . The younger one has a frequency formula of 3.2 / 4.1 GHz, while the current flagship is additionally accelerated — 3.7 / 4.3 GHz. Recall that in the Summit Ridge series, the top chip was the Ryzen 7 1800X. There is no formal successor among Pinnacle Ridge yet, but judging by the frequency configurations, AMD decided to limit itself to two 8-core chips in order to simplify the choice for potential owners.
Due to the massively increased operating frequencies, the Ryzen 7 2700X’s TDP has been increased to 105W. Obviously, the extra megahertz didn’t come easy, even with the 12nm process. An important difference between the new flagship and its predecessor was the obligatory complete set of retail chips with a standard cooling system. If the Summit Ridge with the “X” index in the model name was often shipped without a cooler, then the Ryzen 7 2700X comes with a new AMD Wraith Prisme air cooler with additional spectacular RGB lighting. This option is definitely better than no cooler, however, with this cooler, it will not be possible to fully reveal the potential of a top-end processor. We will return to this issue later.
The Ryzen 7 2700X is priced at $329. But, despite the fact that Pinnacle Ridge chips have been on sale for two months, the retail price of this model is still above $375.
Ryzen 7 2700 is another 8-core processor in the Pinnacle Ridge line, which differs from the older model in lower operating frequencies — 3. 2 / 4.1 GHz. Obviously, the supply voltage level is lower here, because the CPU fits within the 65 W TDP. The Ryzen 7 2700 also comes with a simpler cooling system — Wraith Spair (LED) with red backlight. Of course, the chip has an unlocked multiplier, which allows you to independently adjust the processor frequency with a resolution of 25 MHz, but for overclocking, you will probably need to replace the stock cooler with a more efficient model.
Ryzen 7 2700 MSRP is $299. At the same time, this model in Ukrainian retail can already be bought even cheaper.
Like its predecessors, the Pinnacle Ridge processors received low-melting indium solder under the cover. Thus, the manufacturer saved the owners from headaches due to the efficiency of heat removal directly from the processor chip. Practical tests confirm that it makes no sense for Ryzen to remove the heat spreader cover and replace the internal thermal interface. He’s already great here. That’s why Pinnacle Ridge also has a simple dependence: a more efficient cooler means better cooling.
Along with the Pinnacle Ridge processors, the developer also introduced an updated top-end AMD X470 chipset. However, 12nm chips will work without problems with AMD 3xx motherboards, but only after a firmware update.
Wraith Prism Cooler
As we noted, the Ryzen 7 2700X comes with the new Wraith Prism cooler with additional RGB lighting.
In general, it can be called new only with some stretch. Rather, it is a slightly modified version of the Wraith MAX cooler.
The basis of the radiator block is a stacked cassette of aluminum plates, penetrated by four 6 mm heat pipes. The design of Wraith Prism assumes direct contact of the tubes with the processor.
The heat sink sole is not perfect, only rough sanding is done here. However, possible voids should be filled with thermal paste. Initially, a thermal interface has already been applied in the contact area.
The radiator block is blown by a 92 mm axial fan with translucent blades. The rotation speed is adjustable from 800–3000/3800 rpm, depending on the mode used.
One of the highlights of the Wraith Prism is spectacular RGB lighting. Separate LEDs are installed in the stator part of the fan. Additionally, two translucent strips in the cooler’s protective cover are illuminated. A separate illumination is also provided for the AMD logo.
On one of the side faces of the cooler there is an L-H toggle switch that allows you to select the fan speed, as well as a couple of additional connectors, initially covered with rubber plugs. Using one of the connectors, the fan can be connected to the motherboard connector for an external LED strip (if there is one, of course). After that, the cooler illumination can be synchronized with the general illumination of the platform. The second connector can be used to connect the Wraith Prism to the internal USB 2.0 header on the PCB. In this case, the cooler lighting can be controlled individually. Both cables are included in the kit.
A special utility is available to set the illumination. The AMD Wraith Prism cooler was developed jointly with Cooler Master, so the proximity of the logos of both companies in this application is not surprising. Curiously, during the first run, the utility offered to update the cooler controller firmware. Several modes are available for use, with the impeller, concentric stripes and logo controlled independently. The largest number of modes are available for circles. If necessary, they can beat the message in Morse code format.
Wraith Prism isn’t ideal for the Ryzen 7 2700X. When all computing units are loaded, the CPU clock frequency is kept at 3825–3900 MHz. At the same time, with a more efficient cooler, the Ryzen 7 2700X automatically accelerates to 3950-4000 MHz under the same conditions.
Overclocking
The transition to a more advanced manufacturing process of crystals often promises an improvement in the frequency potential of processors. For Pinnacle Ridge, this is also true, but the increase was not very large. At the extremes, the 12nm silicon wafers provided an additional 100-200MHz to what could be squeezed out of the Summit Ridge. For 8-core Ryzen 7 models, this is about 4100-4200 MHz.
Our Ryzen 7 2700X instance allowed us to increase the clock speed to 4125 MHz during the load on all computing cores. To get stable operation of the CPU in this mode, it was necessary to increase the supply voltage to 1.425 V. Considering that in the normal mode this chip independently increases the frequency to 3975–4000 MHz, then such an additional increase is hardly noticeable. Recall that when loaded on a smaller number of blocks, the processor automatically accelerates to 4300+ MHz, and therefore, in tasks with weak parallelism, the Ryzen 7 2700X in normal mode will be even more productive than the option with a fixed 4100-4200 MHz on all cores. When developing the top model, the manufacturer used almost the entire potential of the processor, so attempts to further speed up this model do not make much practical sense. Here everything is already dispersed to us.
Otherwise, the prospects for overclocking the Ryzen 7 2700 are presented. In normal mode, with a load on all blocks, this processor with good cooling accelerates to 3300-3350 MHz. In express mode, we managed to bring this value to 4075 MHz by increasing the supply voltage to 1.4 V. The total frequency increase was + 21.6%, and therefore we can certainly expect a good increase in performance in multi-threaded tasks. In general, there is nothing outstanding here, but the potential of Pinnacle Ridge is still somewhat higher than that of its predecessors. For example, our Ryzen 7 1700X only clocked up to 3900 MHz.
Summarizing, we can say that overclocking of the top Pinnacle Ridge model is possible, but it will no longer be possible to give a noticeable acceleration — the Ryzen 7 2700X operates almost at the frequency limit in air-cooled conditions. Overclocking the Ryzen 7 2700 is more justified, although for good results you will have to increase the supply voltage and take care of heat dissipation.
Memory and cache latency
Before starting practical measurements of processor performance in applied applications, we were interested in evaluating the improvements promised by the manufacturer in working with RAM and CPU cache. To do this, we used the corresponding test step from the AIDA64 package. Note that all platforms were equipped with a dual-channel G.Skill SniperX 2x8GB DDR4-3400 (F4-3400C16D-16GSXW) memory kit with standard timings of 16-16-16-36 .
First, let’s compare the Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen 7 1700X as the closest participants in terms of operating frequency. As you can see, the throughput has not actually changed, but the memory latency has improved by 7% — from 70.7 to 66.1 ns. The delays of the L2 and L3 buffers have also improved. Moreover, caches of the second and third levels have accelerated even more than stated. In such «subtle matters», we still won’t rely entirely on the results of one diagnostic utility, but we can note that the latency of RAM and cache memory in chips with the Zen + architecture is indeed slightly improved. Well, let’s see how this will affect practical results in the future.
If we compare the figures with those for Intel processors, then AMD chips still cannot get a similar latency when working with RAM. The Core i7-8700K has 27% lower RAM latencies than the Ryzen 7 2700X. However, it is worth recognizing that AMD has made significant progress here. After the announcement of the first Ryzen, the delays were at the level of 85-90 ns, but AGESA optimizations and support for faster modules managed to improve the situation. As you can see, Zen+ has also contributed.
Test bench configuration
Processors | Ryzen 7 2700X, Ryzen 7 2700, Ryzen 7 1700X | AMD, www.amd.com |
Intel Core i7-8700K | Intel, www.intel.ua | |
Video card | ASUS ROG-POSEIDON-GTX1080TI-P11G-GAMING | ASUS, www.asus.ua |
Motherboard | ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate (AMD X470) | AMD, www. amd.com |
ASUS ROG MAXIMUS X Hero (Intel Z370) | ASUS, www.asus.ua | |
RAM | G.Skill SniperX 2x8GB DDR4-3400 (F4-3400C16D-16GSXW) | AMD, www.amd.com |
Accumulator | HyperX Savage 960 GB (SHSS37A/960G) | HyperX, www.hyperxgaming.com |
Power supply | Thermaltake Toughpower Grand TPG-1200M (1200 W) | Thermaltake, www.thermaltakeusa.com |
Monitor | Acer Predator XB271HK (27″, 3840×2160) | Acer, www.acer.ua |
Performance
The obvious opponent of the top Ryzen 7 2700X is the older model from Intel’s mass line — Core i7-8700K. Recall that the manufacturer recently introduced the anniversary 6-core Core i7-8086K, which has even higher clock speeds, but it is still a limited edition chip with a substantially increased price tag. As for the Core i7-8700K, this model is now offered at retail for $360-370, while the new AMD flagship, despite the announced $359, still costs a little more — $ 390-400. However, let’s not forget that the Core i7-8700K comes without a cooler, while all Ryzen 7 2700X are equipped with a standard Wraith Prism cooler. Therefore, already now we can talk about the price parity of both processors.
Ryzen 7 2700X | Ryzen 7 2700 | Ryzen 7 1700X | Core i7-8700K | |
Family | Pinnacle Ridge | Pinnacle Ridge | Summit Ridge | Coffee Lake |
Production technology | 12 nm | 12 nm | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Number of cores/threads | 8/16 | 8/16 | 8/16 | 6/12 |
Frequency formula | 3. 7/4.3 GHz | 3.2/4.1 GHz | 3.4/3.8 GHz | 3.7/4.7 GHz |
L2 cache size | 8×512 KB | 8×512 KB | 8×512 KB | 6×256 KB |
L3 cache size | 16 MB | 16 MB | 16 MB | 12 MB |
Memory support | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
Integrated graphics | — | — | — | Intel UHD 630 |
Processor socket | Socket AM4 | Socket AM4 | Socket AM4 | LGA1151 |
Unlocked multiplier | + | + | + | + |
Thermal Pack (TDP) | 105W | 65 W | 95 W | 95 W |
MSRP at time of announcement | $329 | $299 | $399-309-289 | $359 |
The Core i7-8700K has a decent headroom for additional overclocking. To get an idea of the possibility of an overclocked Coffee Lake top, we also added the results of a moderately overclocked processor up to 4.9 GHz to the charts. This level is available to most instances of this model.
To compare the capabilities of the Ryzen 7 2700X with those of the Summit Ridge chips, we also used the Ryzen 7 1700X (3.4/3.8 GHz) in the test. Although this is not the flagship of the previous generation processor line, in terms of frequency formula it is slightly inferior to the Ryzen 7 1800X (3.6 / 4.0 GHz), but otherwise it is no different from the top. Additional interest is given by the nominal heritage of both models.
Ryzen 7 2700 results will also be very helpful. Still, this is the most affordable 8-core model of the still small Pinnacle Ridge family. Here the difference from the most pumped flagship will be indicative. In addition, we added the results of the overclocked chip to 4075 MHz to assess whether the lower model can come close to the results of the Ryzen 7 2700X.
Traditionally, we start practical tests of new processors with a simple and visual Cinebench R15, which allows us to estimate the balance of forces of the participants as a first approximation. It is not surprising that the forced Ryzen 7 2700 takes the first place in multi-threaded mode. In such conditions, the increased operating frequency of all computers gives an advantage, allowing the chip to bypass even the new flagship in the normal mode. In a bundle Ryzen 7 2700 vs. The Ryzen 7 1700X has a slight advantage over the previous generation model, which is easily explained by the 100-200 MHz higher operating frequency when all computers are loaded. The Core i7-8700K processor managed to achieve similar indicators here only after overclocking to 4.9GHz. In normal mode, the 6-core Intel is almost 10% behind the younger Pinnacle Ridge.
In the single-threaded Cinebench R15 test, the situation changes to a diametrically opposite one. Core i7-8700K is beyond competition. Even without additional overclocking, the top Coffee Lake is 15% ahead of the Ryzen 7 2700X here. Even the branded “superboost” with frequency pumping up to 4300+ MHz did not save the latter. In single-threaded tasks, Intel processors still have an advantage, and with the release of Pinnacle Ridge, the situation has not changed in any way.
Note that the Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the overclocked Ryzen 7 2700. This is exactly the situation we mentioned. With a light load, the top-end chip receives additional acceleration of individual cores, so frequency equalization, even when it comes to overclocking, will not always benefit this model. Again, the advantage of the Ryzen 7 2700 over the Ryzen 7 1700X is logical. The increased frequency decides, but here it is higher for the updated model.
The situation with archivers is curious. It would seem that the same task, but the results are so different. In WinRAR 3.60, the unconditional victory of the Intel processor. In the case of AMD chips, one gets the impression of force majeure resistance. The results of all chips in the family are very close, even despite the noticeably different clock speeds of the participants.
But 7-Zip uses all the computing resources to the fullest. The first place belongs to the overclocked Ryzen 7 2700, the Ryzen 7 2700X is slightly behind it in normal mode. Only additional overclocking helped the Core i7-8700K chip to rise from the last position in the test. Let’s pay attention to the fact that the test of the new version of 7-Zip (18.05) has noticeably increased the speed of decompression, so the results obtained cannot be compared with those for the archiver of previous revisions.
We have selected several utilities that evaluate the rendering speed. On the one hand, this is not the most typical task for most users of home systems, on the other hand, you often think about processor performance just when performing resource-intensive tasks that take a lot of time. And here, visual art applications with good multi-threaded optimization are indicative indicators. In such conditions, even the first generation Ryzen processors felt very confident, and with the release of updated chips, AMD’s position has only improved. In stock modes, the Core i7-8700K was consistently inferior to the Ryzen 7 2700X. Moreover, in some cases the difference was minimal, in others it reached 20%.
Additional overclocking to 4.9 GHz helped the older 6-core Intel improve its position and even outperform its counterpart in Fryrender. Note the very close positions of Ryzen 7 2700 and Ryzen 7 1700X at all stages.
While transcoding videos in the HandBrake app, the Core i7-8700K’s high frequency capability also served it well. Equal to those of the Ryzen 7 2700X, Intel’s processor takes the lead after an additional frequency spurt. When rendering video in 4K using Adobe Premier Pro CC, we see a similar picture, except that the minima and maxima are less pronounced.
PerformanceTest 9 and GeekBench 4.2.3 synthetic apps register similar scores for Ryzen 7 2700X and Core i7-8700K. Under conditions of heterogeneous loads, the former is helped by a larger number of cores / threads, while the latter is saved by more efficient computers. The Intel chip again helps out with a high frequency potential, allowing it to take the first position in both test disciplines after overclocking.
At the end of the computational steps, we present the results of the processor test from 3DMark Time Spy. All 8-core Ryzen numbers are very optimistic. The Core i7-8700K barely outperformed the Ryzen 7 2700/1700X, while overclocking only brought it closer to the stock Ryzen 7 2700X. Well, Pinnacle Ridge’s performance here is excellent, but it’s the perfect picture of the game world in which the processor is loaded at 100%. Reality can sometimes be completely different.
Gaming performance
To evaluate the performance of processors in real games, we equipped the test system with a very fast graphics card — ASUS ROG POSEIDON GTX1080TI P11G GAMING. The graphics adapter can fully open up when using a liquid cooling system, but in air it is one of the fastest versions of the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti with very good factory overclocking (1594/11010 MHz).
Even when it comes to games, in the processor test, first of all, I want to evaluate the computing capabilities of the CPU directly, so we used graphics modes with a resolution of 1920×1080 and medium graphics quality settings. Thus, we reduced the load on the GPU, allowing the processors to show their abilities.
The first results in Tom Clancy’s The Division are generally very good for AMD chips. However, in this case, even with medium quality settings, there is a big emphasis on the graphic component, so the actual spread of indicators for all systems is not very large.
The latest installments in the Far Cry series are not well multi-threaded. According to CPU load monitoring, Far Cry Primal relies on only 2-3 threads at best, so additional processing cores are simply not used here. In such situations, the Core i7-8700K will have an advantage, which can actually be seen in the diagrams.
In the new Far Cry 5, despite the mention of AMD Ryzen and Radeon in the opening credits, the situation is not much different from what we saw in Primal. Here, we can only note the noticeable advantage of the Ryzen 7 2700X over the overclocked Ryzen 7 2700 in terms of the minimum number of frames. This once again confirms the weak multithreading and the importance of the performance of a single computer.
We also saw similar results in the resource-intensive Deus Ex:Mankind Divided, the still relevant The Witcher: Wild Hunt and the age-old Dirt Rally. In all cases, the platform with the Core i7-8700K showed a noticeable advantage. When overclocking the processor, we got a noticeable increase in performance, which removes the question of possible restrictions on the part of the video card in the modes used.
Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands evens things out a bit. The Core i7-8700K has a 7% advantage over the Ryzen 7 2700X, although again we see a slight dependence on processor frequencies in this game. At least when it comes to top chips from both manufacturers. By the way, the CPU load indicators in the built-in benchmark are far from the actual values, they are significantly underestimated. Instead of displaying 20-25%, according to the system monitor and data from MSI Afterburner, the Ryzen 7 2700X chip was loaded at 40-60% here. That is, it cannot be said that the game is not processor-dependent.
We diluted classic games with the specific strategy Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation, which has a built-in benchmark and is often used to assess the capabilities of new pieces of iron. The integrated processor test favors the Core i7-8700K. Even though this game has previously been used as one of the benchmarks for good multi-threaded optimization, with 16 threads it is difficult to characterize it as such. Ryzen 7 2700X sees CPU usage at 80-90%, which is very good, but still not perfect.
In the Total War: WARHAMMER II battle scene test, the Intel chip is the winner. The advantage over the Ryzen 7 2700X is relatively small (~7.5%), but it is there, and the additional overclocking of the Core i7-8700K increases the gap to 21%.
Something similar can be seen in Rise of the Tomb Raider. Overclocking to 4.9 GHz gives a boost to the 6-core Intel processor. At the same time, we see that the Ryzen 7 2700 fixedly increased to 4075 MHz does not give it any advantage over the Ryzen 7 2700X running in stock mode. Additional overclocking of the top model Pinnacle Ridge will not bring noticeable results in games. Growth is more likely to be expected in multi-threaded applications, and even then, if your instance runs stably at 4200+ MHz.
If you overclock the younger model — Ryzen 7 2700, then you can count on an increase in the number of frames / s in games (5-15%). Whether it is worth fighting for them is up to you. Here it is also important to clarify that in our case the system was equipped with a top-end video card, and for games the Full HD mode was used with medium graphics quality settings. With an increase in resolution and image quality, the impact of additional CPU frequency on the final result will decrease.
Assassin’s Creed: Origins was not original in terms of resource preferences. It is also a very CPU-intensive game with good multi-threaded optimization. However, besides the number of cores/threads, there are many other factors that affect the final result. As a result, we have an 11% advantage of the Core i7-8700K over the Ryzen 7 2700X. Overclocking the Intel chip adds only 4% to the average number of frames / s, which is not much at all for +600 MHz.
A similar pattern can be seen in Final Fantasy XV. Unless the gap between the platform with the Intel chip is even smaller here, and additional overclocking practically does not bring any results.
Replacing the graphics engine in WoT did not radically improve the situation with multi-threaded optimization in this game. 1-2 threads are still actively used here, so it is not surprising that the Core i7-8700K has a serious advantage over AMD chips. The announced cooperation with Intel in the development of the Core engine probably primarily concerned the possibility of a tolerable game on the manufacturer’s integrated graphics and hardly implied any additional optimizations for the architecture of Intel chips. Of course, if that does not count the rejection of multi-threaded processing.
Analyzing the data obtained, we can say that the top-end Core i7-8700K chip in games has a strong advantage over the Ryzen 7 2700X. More often we are talking about 5-15%, but in projects with weak multi-threaded optimization, the gap can be up to 20-30%. By overclocking the Core i7-8700K, you can count on an additional performance boost, especially when it comes to games at medium settings.
Ryzen 7 2700X does not require additional overclocking, in games it will not bring any dividends, except that it will increase the overall power consumption of the system. The processor, when loaded on 1-2 cores, automatically accelerates up to 4300+ MHz, and when using the maximum number of computers, the operating frequency does not drop below 3900 MHz. But the Ryzen 7 2700 can be boosted, getting an increase in the number of frames / s.
Full HD «at maximum speed»
If you have a top-end video card, focusing on system performance in games with average graphics quality is correct from the point of view of processor testing methodology. However, the results obtained under such conditions are rather of academic interest. It is obvious that the owner of a bunch of powerful video cards and processors will certainly use the maximum graphics quality settings. For this reason, we decided to satisfy our curiosity and compare the number of frames / c in the same games, but using presets with the maximum picture quality. The most curious was the balance of power between the Core i7-8700K and the Ryzen 7 2700X.
According to the results of measurements, the Core i7-8700K processor still looks somewhat preferable. In some games, the gap remained quite significant (~20%), but in most projects, the performance difference was reduced to 5-10%. If you turn off the frame / s counter, then in practice it is difficult to feel the difference between both platforms. With the increase in resolution to 1440p, the indicators will converge even more, and the 4K mode will simply equalize all test participants.
Power Consumption
Considering the increased TDP for the Ryzen 7 2700X to 105W, we were of course interested in the energy efficiency of the new Pinnacle Ridge chips.
We measured the power consumption of systems during the resource-intensive task of encoding video in the HandBrake app. As you can see, despite the use of a 12-nanometer process technology, an increase in operating frequencies also increases the power consumption of processors. The Ryzen 7 2700X drew about 25W more than the Ryzen 7 1700X with a claimed 95W TDP. Additional overclocking also increases performance, so when planning independent experiments with frequencies, you need to think about efficient heat dissipation.
Let’s pay attention to the fact that with the often equal performance indicators of Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 7 2700, the latter is more economical even at high loads. Still, the new process technology brings certain advantages to Pinnacle Ridge. Although, if you need to further increase the operating frequencies, simultaneously increasing the supply voltage, then we are no longer talking about some special energy efficiency.
Results
Pinnacle Ridge family processors have become a natural continuation of generally successful AMD chips with Zen architecture. The new models have added in performance and have a listed price on par with that of their predecessors. The transition to a new process technology allowed the manufacturer to increase the base clock frequencies by 200-300 MHz, pulling up the performance indicators of Pinnacle Ridge. Perhaps, even before the official launch of the new chips, we expected that the 12-nanometer process technology would significantly improve the frequency potential of Ryzen (4.5+ GHz), but the real increase here turned out to be more modest.
The Ryzen 7 2700X, the new flagship of AMD’s desktop processor lineup, uses almost the entire resource of an 8-core silicon wafer. For the top model, the manufacturer has set high frequency values with an aggressive acceleration algorithm. It is interesting for those who want to get the most productive AMD chip without experimenting with overclocking on their own. The Ryzen 7 2700 is cheaper and is inferior to the older model only in the frequency formula and the bundled cooler. The unlocked multiplier allows you to adjust the values if you wish, but in this case you cannot do with the base cooler.
In general, the launch of Ryzen 2nd generation was without revolution. An additional 5–10% of productivity improves positions, but does not fundamentally affect the balance of power between two irreconcilable rivals in the market. AMD’s 8-core processors perform well under multi-threaded workloads, while Intel’s Coffee Lake chips still have some edge in games and offer more frequency potential. The processors of both manufacturers have their strengths and weaknesses, allowing you to choose the best option for your tasks. We hope that Pinnacle Ridge will allow AMD to prepare well for the release of future 7nm chips with Zen 2 architecture, and from Intel, in turn, we expect 8-core processors within LGA1151 and ideally with solder under the cover.
Specifications
squeezing the most out of the latest processors — i2HARD
Articles
Sannio
May 20, 2017
AMD’s revolutionary Ryzen processor technology delivers high levels of performance at a competitive price point. And while early adopters are still struggling with minor gaming and memory compatibility issues, the new processors are more than worth the price. The Ryzen 7 1800X is pretty disappointing as an overclocker, but the 1700 and 1700X, due to their lower clock speeds compared to the 1800X, show flagship-like overclocking potential at almost $250 less.
This in itself is quite impressive, and coupled with the fact that this chip competes with Intel’s 6900K (which costs around $1,300) at a much lower price point, it all makes sense why overclocking is so attractive, especially in the case of 1700.
But how exactly to do it? Read this article from Techradar to learn how to easily and safely overclock a Ryzen processor.
1. System preparation
In fact, all overclocking can be reduced to two basic principles. You take the processor core multiplier, increase it, and increase the operating voltage of the processor for stable operation. This continues until you reach the upper temperature limit and the maximum recommended voltage Vcore. With Ryzen, these two principles still work. So, for starters, you need to make sure you have a system in place to combat the number one enemy, heat.
Both the 1700X and 1800X have two temperature sensors — Tdie and Tctl. The first sensor shows the current temperature of the processor, the second — the temperature with an upward shift of 20°C. This is done for better performance of XFR technology and more aggressive fan speed control. However, you still need to make sure that you have a case with the right amount of air flow and a powerful cooling solution that can dissipate all the excess heat. An all-in-one AIO liquid cooler like NZXT’s Kraken X62 or Corsair’s Hydro h200i GT will do just fine.
In addition, you will probably want to take care of purchasing a motherboard that allows you to overclock the CPU, because despite the fact that all RYZEN have an open multiplier, only boards based on the X370 and B350 chipsets allow you to work with it.
And finally, you will need a suitable memory kit. Preferably one that has been certified to work on your motherboard. At the moment, the best overclocking kits are peer-to-peer RAM with Samsung B-die chips installed (for example, Geil Evo X GEX416GB3200C16DC).
In our case it all boils down to this build: Ryzen 7 1700X on Asus Crosshair VI Hero, with 16 GB (2×8 GB) HyperX Fury DDR4 memory from Kingston, running at 3000 MHz.
2. BIOS setup
It’s time to enter the BIOS to start setting up the system for pre-overclocking. Reboot your PC and press the DEL key on the first screen until you get to a screen not too different from the picture above.
By default, the BIOS of many manufacturers comes with a limited workspace to ensure that the uninitiated don’t start fiddling with anything overly critical. You will have to work around this by going into advanced mode. Here we will see the parameters that the motherboard has set by default.
3. BIOS update
Switching to advanced mode should take you to a screen similar to the image above (but again, it depends on the manufacturer), which will give you more important statistics about your system and how everything is working.
The first thing you should do is make sure the BIOS is up to date. To do this, check the BIOS version you are using and compare with the latest available on your motherboard manufacturer’s support web page.
If your BIOS is older than the latest online, download the latest BIOS file and extract the .CAP file to a FAT32 formatted USB drive. Connect the flash drive to the back of the computer, reboot it, select «Tool», then «EZ BIOS UPDATE», select the USB drive from the list of available drives and the . CAP file on it to update the BIOS.
The system should restart after a while, then just go back to the BIOS and go to the «Extreme Tweaker» section at the top.
4. Memory settings
On any ASUS motherboard, the largest number of CPU overclocking manipulations will take place on this screen. And the first thing to do is to assign default D.O.C.P profile values.
This can be thought of as analogous to Intel XMP. With it, you can select the required frequency of RAM with automatic installation of factory timings.
Now, by default, our memory kit will try to work with a frequency of 2933 MHz. This is not exactly what we need, because. Ryzen is still a little weird when it comes to memory support, and while BIOS updates will help, it may be a while before all memory kits start running at optimal frequencies.
Click the tab that opens that says «Memory Frequency» and change the indicator to 2400 or 2666, then you should not have problems.
5. CPU multiplier and base frequency adjustment
And now it’s time for the key aspect of overclocking. This is a multiplier setting to increase the frequency of the processor cores.
In short, imagine that your base frequency is 100MHz, which is then multiplied by the CPU multiplier factor to get the final figure. So, in our example, despite being set to «Auto», the factor is 34 under multi-core load, i.e. if you exclude all the XFR chips and turbo settings, then you end up with a frequency of 3.4 GHz for all 8 cores. So, for starters, it’s worth increasing the multiplier value by 1 or 2 to see how far you can go at the factory voltage. Just type in the number you want, press F10 to save and exit, and then go to your desktop for the next step.
6. Programs you will need
So, you are on the desktop, you have the new frequency settings set, and Windows loads without problems. Now you will need some programs to test overclocking.
There are several options, but we suggest using a combination of HWMonitor, CPU-Z and CineBench R15.
All of them are free and available online. HWMonitor will report the exact temperatures, clock speeds and utilization percentage of all the hardware in your system, CPU-Z will show the clock speeds, memory speed and VCore voltage and finally CineBench R15 is a powerful multi-threaded benchmark that uses the capabilities of all cores with virtually 100% load.
Another useful addition actually built into Windows is the task manager. Press Ctrl+Alt+Del to open it, click the drop down menu for details, select performance, click on CPU and right click on the graph to select «change graph for logical processors».
7. Run CineBench R15
CineBench R15 is a great solution for detecting cpu overclocking instability.
To test the chip, click «File» and select «Advanced». Then run a full processor test to stress the chip.
If the processor completes the test without blocking or PC crashes, then you can go and increase the multiplier by another 1-2 units. Eventually, you will reach a point where it will fail at base voltage and then you can proceed with additional settings in the BIOS to increase overclocking.
8. Back to BIOS
There are a few tricks to improve overall stability. Generally speaking, your CPU is powered by an 8-pin EPS connected to the top of the motherboard and providing 12V power. This is then converted to the required voltage by the VRMs located around the CPU socket.
By default, voltage is distributed across these VRMs based on temperatures, with some phases off until there is a need to compensate for temperatures associated with other VRMs, which reduces process stability. What can be done using Asus’ External Digi+ Power Control is to switch the system to work in «full phase» mode.
Just go to External Digi+ Power Control, scroll to CPU Power Duty Control and set it to «extreme» and then go to Power Phase control to set it to «extreme» as well.
In addition, you can turn off «VRM Spread Spectrum», which tries to stop fluctuations in the base frequencies by reducing excess EMI generated by the processor, which can interfere with radio-sensitive devices in the surrounding area.
9. Voltage regulation
So now all the phases are set to full, VRM Spread is disabled and you are going to increase the multiplier even more, but this time at a higher voltage. Return to the Extreme Tweaker main page and scroll down to CPU Core Voltage.
Here you can select «Offset mode» or «Manual mode». Manual is useful for selecting a fixed voltage per processor, while Offset uses automatic voltage control on the motherboard, with the ability to increase if needed.
We prefer to use Manual, simply because it’s easier to remember. What you need to do is increase the processor core voltage by 0.01-0.03V in one step.
Ryzen’s voltage rating is around 1.3625V, while the upper limit for high-end dual-band AIO cooling blocks is probably around 1.45V. Therefore, we do not recommend increasing it above this figure, as this can exhaust the processor in the long run. out of service.
After the appropriate voltage appears in the «Voltage Override» field, press Enter, F10, save and exit. Then go to the desktop, where you can repeat the stability check and continue with the usual operation until you hit either the thermal limit (where the processor starts to slow itself down) or the processor limit (where the processor constantly crashes, regardless of voltage).
10. Stability test
If with the help of our guide, you have reached this point, then you should have a solid overclock. We suggest that you roll back 50-100 MHz, leaving the voltage as it is, and test the stability of the processor, this time, in longer and more difficult tests. To do this, run the Prime9 test5 (for an hour or two) or the Linpack OCCT test, each of which will maximize the load on the processor for any given time.
Generally speaking, regardless of whether it is AMD or Intel, you are interested in temperatures around 70-80 degrees Celsius. A little higher and you will most likely shorten the life of your processor and reduce its overclocking potential.
rating of 2022 and which model to choose
The smooth operation of all computer components is ensured by a microcircuit, which is the central computing component. AMD is considered one of the largest computer processor manufacturers in 2022.
Its processors are valued for good power, performance, energy efficiency and other equally important characteristics.
The line of AMD processors is quite large, which makes it difficult for the buyer to make a choice.
To make your choice easier, we have compiled a rating. It includes the best AMD processor models in 2022 in terms of price / quality ratio.
Models were selected based on their technical characteristics, cost, test results, customer and expert reviews.
Rating of the TOP 10 best AMD Ryzen 7 processors of 2022
Place | Description | Price |
---|---|---|
TOP 4 best AMD Ryzen 7 processors by price/quality for 2022 | ||
1 | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | Get price |
2 | AMD Ryzen 7 1800X | Get price |
3 | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 | Get price |
4 | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | Get price |
Top 4 Best AMD Ryzen 7 Processors for Gaming | ||
1 | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | Get price |
2 | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X | Get price |
3 | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | Ask for price |
4 | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | Get price |
TOP 2 best AMD Ryzen 7 processors for mounting | ||
1 | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G | Get price |
2 | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | Get price |
Table of Contents
- Top 10 AMD Ryzen 7 Processors of 2022
- How to choose an AMD Ryzen 7 processor?
- TOP-4 AMD Ryzen 7 Price/Quality for 2022
- AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- AMD Ryzen 7 1800x
- AMD Ryzen 7 Pro
- AMD Ryzen 7,700 900
9001 AMD RYZEN 7 processors for games
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800x
- AMD Ryzen 7 3800x
- AMD Ryzen 7 3700x
- AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
9001 AMD-2 AMD Ryzen 7 for AMD Ryzen 7 for AMD Ryzen 7 for AMD Ryzen 7 4750G
- Clock frequency . This is the ability of the processor to process a certain number of operations in a certain period of time. The parameter starts at 2.9 GHz, which means that it can perform 2 billion 900 million operations per second.
- Number of cores . The more cores, the better the performance of the device. A multi-core processor allows you to physically separate the execution of several threads of tasks, one core is responsible for one, the other for another. This allows you to get rid of switching from thread to thread and improve overall performance.
- System bus frequency . The larger it is, the faster the exchange of information, and the more efficient the processor.
TOP 4 best AMD Ryzen 7 processors by price/quality for 2022
AMD Ryzen 7 is a professional-grade processor that is suitable for programmers, gamers and video editors.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 processor is suitable for building a powerful computer — office, gaming or multimedia .
It has eight cores that can process up to sixteen streams of information simultaneously, greatly improving performance in games, database analysis or 3D rendering.
The device has SenseMi technology that allows the chip to adjust the clock frequency in steps of 25 MHz without resetting the command queue .
It helps to maintain a stable computer speed, as well as reduce power consumption and heat levels.
If you need to realize the full potential of the processor, then simply run the AMD Ryzen Master application and increase the clock speed to the required level.
Powerful fan is included in the box with the product. Its LED backlight allows you to choose from 16.7 million colors.
Features :
- Number of cores — 8.
- Heat dissipation — 105 kW.
- Clock frequency — 3700 MHz.
Pros
- Does not heat up.
- Powerful.
- Productive.
Cons
- Not the strongest cores.
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
The powerful AMD Ryzen 7 1800X is for users who need maximum performance for all kinds of tasks .
One of the advantages of the chip is its free multiplier. You can overclock it and achieve better parameters for further work.
The product has eight cores that operate at 3600 MHz . If the load is high, then the product immediately goes into boost mode with an increase to 4000 MHz. The total number of threads is 16, the chip is able to perform many tasks at once.
16 MB L3 cache provides high data processing speed . The device received an AM4 socket. This parameter must be taken into account to create compatibility with the motherboard.
The processor was manufactured using a 14 Nm process .
He helped to achieve high performance and energy savings. The power consumption of this chip is 95 W, and the maximum heating level is 90 degrees.
Features :
- Process technology — 14 Nm.
- Multiplier — 36.
- Memory capacity — 128 GB.
- Number of channels — 2.
Pros
- Multitasking.
- Eight cores.
- Price.
Cons
- Starting problems occur.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 octa-core model is a great choice for professionals.
The device can provide a level of performance that is sufficient for quality work with any programs and different data sizes.
One of the areas of use of the processor are computers, which are aimed at voluminous resources.
The product features a clock frequency of 3600 MHz . The maximum frequency in turbo mode is 4400 MHz. The model also has a free multiplier.
L2 and L3 cache sizes are 4 and 32 MB.
The device does not have a built-in graphics core . Given the very high level of performance of the product, this feature is not surprising: in many cases, the product needs a video card.
The memory used with the chipset is up to 128 GB . The memory frequency can range from 1500 to 3200 MHz.
Features :
- Number of cores — 8.
- Process technology — 7 Nm.
- Heat dissipation — 65.
Pros
- Performance.
- Price.
- Nimble.
Cons
- Artificial limitation of the CPU in terms of frequencies.
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is manufactured using a 12 Nm process for greater efficiency along with low power consumption and heat dissipation .
This device is best suited if you need an affordable and high-quality source of computing power.
The product’s eight cores, each running at 3 GHz, provide enough performance to run any application or program .
The processor is great for building a computer designed to run heavy applications, including heavy games. The 16MB third-generation cache provides additional efficiency when processing frequently accessed data.
Features :
- Number of cores — 8.
- Frequency — 3.7 GHz.
- Number of memory channels — 2.
Pros
- Eight cores.
- Low TDP.
- Solder under cover.
Cons
- Low overclocking frequency.
TOP-4 of the best AMD Ryzen 7 processors for games
Your attention is presented to the best models of AMD Ryzen 7 processors for games.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is the middle device in the Vermeer family, which is based on the Zen 3 architecture and includes a pair of semiconductor crystals: a 7nm CCD chipset with eight processing cores and a 12nm chipset in which memory controllers and PCI Express, as well as other external interfaces .
Given the support of the SMT system, this processor is suitable for the 8/16 core formula, which makes it a successor to the Ryzen 7 3800X with the latest architecture.
As for compatibility, this processor is suitable for socket AM4 with a TDP of 105 W and a maximum temperature of 95 degrees .
The product is capable of supporting DDR4-3200 memory and delivers a good benchmark performance of 32 percent.
Features :
- Cores — 8.
- Process technology — 7 Nm.
- Number of threads — 16.
Pros
- Performance.
- Nimble.
- Two-wire transcoding flies.
Cons
- Price.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X is a multi-threaded octa-core device based on a 7 nm process and integrates the top-end CPU.
The product is positioned as the main competitor of the Core i7 9700K from Intel.
This processor differs from its sister product 3700X in a high 3.9GHz clock frequency and increased heat dissipation in connection with this.
At increased loads, the CPU automatically increases the frequency to 4.5 GHz, and due to the unlocked multiplier, the user can overclock on their own .
A solid cache memory of 32 MB contributes to the high performance of the device.
The engine is able to function correctly with DDR4 3200 MHz RAM. Integrated graphics core is not provided, but the cooler is included in the package.
Specifications :
- Operating temperature — 95 degrees.
- Multiplier — 39.
- Number of channels — 2.
- Memory capacity — 128 GB.
Pros
- Productive.
- Powerful.
- Works great.
Cons
- Gets very hot.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is suitable for high performance multimedia, office and gaming PC applications .
Its eight cores are capable of processing sixteen streams of information at once, so you can count on optimal FPS in games and fast rendering of various objects.
The chip is based on a 7nm process that supports the latest clock control system.
It performs stably under any load, minimizing power consumption and heat dissipation.
If necessary, you can improve the performance of your computer yourself. To do this, you should launch the AMD Ryzen Master application and set the desired clock speed.
In the box with the device you will find a powerful fan with a light that can be configured .
Its heat pipes touch the lid of the device, eliminating the possibility of overheating. The special shape of the blades reduces the noise level by up to 39 dB and helps to keep the room quiet.
Specifications :
- Number of cores — 8.
- Clock frequency — 3600 MHz.
Pros
- Economical.
- Cold.
- Productive.
Cons
- Average overclocking performance.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X brand’s powerful octa-core device can handle the toughest tasks it faces and easily solve them for both experienced and novice owners, ranging from gaming to office or graphics .
Its specialized built-in technologies accelerate uptime. Depending on the complexity of the procedures performed, the device uses from one to sixteen streams, managing to ensure high-quality and fast operation of all applications and various programs.
Equipped with 14 MB of 3rd generation DDR4 memory, the multitasking experience is optimized for speed and efficiency.
The cooler prevents the product from overheating and protects against failures and breakdowns. The maximum frequency of the device is 4350 MHz, and the multiplier is unlocked.
Features :
- Process technology — 12 Nm.
- Heat dissipation — 105 W.
- Number of threads — 16.
Pros
- Doesn’t get very hot.
- Productive.
- Good price.
Cons
- Not the strongest cores.
Top 2 Best AMD Ryzen 7 Processors for Mounting
Below are the best AMD Ryzen 7 processors for mounting.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G desktop processor based on the Renoir architecture is primarily designed for office systems.
It has eight cores and sixteen threads and is made using a 7 Nm process technology. Its maximum frequency is 4400 MHz, the multiplier is unlocked.
The product is positioned by the manufacturer as a CPU for assembling medium-power computers, which can be used, in addition to an office one, as a home one.
This AM4 socket model shows compatibility with DDR4 memory that supports 3600-4400 MHz .
The largest supported RAM is 128 GB. The device also provides a modern video core with a clock frequency of up to 2100 MHz.
Characteristics :
- Multiplier — 36.
- Memory type — DDR4.
- Number of channels — 2.
Pros
- Performance.
- Video core.
- Does not get very hot.
Cons
- There are problems with video drivers.
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
The AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT processor is based on multiple semiconductor dies: two 7nm eight-core CCD chipsets with compute cores and one 12nm IOD chipset that houses the memory controller and Infinity Fabric 9 logic0456 .
Thanks to the use of two chiplets at once, the device has a giant L3 cache with a capacity of 64 MB and 12 processing cores, which are divided into four CCX complexes, each of which has three more cores and a 16 MB cache segment.
All these components are connected into one whole by a branded tire .
The frequency of the device is in the range of 3.8 to 4.7 GHz, which allows the processor to overclock 100 MHz more. At the same time, the device retains a thermal package of 105 W and a 142 W power consumption limit.
Features:
- Socket — AM4.
- Process technology — 7 Nm.
- Number of threads — 16.
- Multiplier — 39.
Pros
- Powerful.
- Productive.
Cons
- Price.
Customer Reviews
Brand/Model Rating
Number of voters
Add your review!
Sort by:
Most RecentHighest ScoreMost HelpfulWorst Rated
Be the first to review.
{{{ review.rating_title}}}
show more
Add your review!
Useful video
From the video you will get acquainted with the overview of the best processors: Today we will compare the performance of the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Ryzen 7 2700 processors. We will compare in games and a few benchmarks like Blender, Corona, etc. In general, in my standard performance. Now the situation is rather difficult in the computer hardware market, and even the old generations of Ryzen 5, 7 processors are expensive for the average user. So the video will be aimed at such a kind of sports interest and target users, buyers. Most likely, these assemblies, at least for now, can hardly be called optimal in terms of price / performance ratio. But if with processors this is half the trouble, then with video cards everything is much more complicated. It doesn’t matter what processor you buy, for games you need a video card, and so far it’s full of tin.
The 1700th processor reached the maximum on the B350 Prime board — 3.9GHz, and the 2700th 4.0GHz. So, if with a newer generation of the processor it turned out to increase + 100MHz, I don’t think it’s worth disdaining this and reducing the frequency to 3.9GHz. At least for the reason that for the 1700 3.9 this is a very good result, but the 2700 can take the bar even higher, well, this is the story of a completely different motherboard. The memory frequency on Ryzen is the same in all tests, it is 3066MHz, and the timings are also identical. You can view all the information in more detail on your screens. According to the plan, we will have a series of videos with the R7 2700. We will compare it with the R5 2600 and, of course, we will hook on the XEON E5-2622v3 and E5-2630v3 processors, at least with the eight-core processors we dealt with. There is also a desire to make a video where four processors will participate in the comparison at once. In the community, I will throw off the list of processors I test, and you will pick up a couple of combinations that are of most interest.
We will have the highest possible settings in games, resolution 720p. The results on the charts are pure FPS benchmark run, no capture and no overlay. There may be an error with the video.
- The first game on the test is Shadow of the Tomb Raider . The average frame rate across the entire benchmark is 110/103. In general, throughout the third episode, Ryzen 7 2700 is ahead of its opponent. In the market itself, where processors usually operate at almost 100%, these specimens pass this segment with a margin without any problems.
- Grand Theft Auto V Maximum settings. Antialiasing MSAAx2. Additional settings are disabled. The average frame rate is 123/110. Both copies go through a difficult segment for processors with a machine at a decent level.
- HITMAN 2 Average frame rate 91/84. On the video, you can see almost complete parity, with a minimal lag of the 1700th, but in general, the 1700th loses on the tested section. Most likely, it played a key role in the +100MHz lag on the core, and not the newer generation.
- DOTA 2 Maximum settings, resolution 1080. Average frame rate 195/155. And here the increase is clearly not due to the higher frequency of the processor, although it still brings 10 frames. The game is more responsive specifically to the Zen + generation.
- WATCH DOGS 2 Average frame rate 77/70. 7 frames to pull out in this project, a good result. The game seriously loads the processors, but these eight-cores have a good margin of performance even on a light one without friezes, etc. troubles, pass the most difficult test area.
- RESIDENT EVIL 2 The settings are conditionally very high, not exceeding 8Gb of video memory. Who played the one in the know that here you can easily put in 12Gb. Average frame rate 166/155.
- World War Z Ultra settings. The average frame rate on the benchmark is 146/125. The R7 2700 outperforms its counterpart on a fairly serious level.
- And the last game test for today is Call Of Pripyat Benchmark . The results of which, as usual, we will see a little later.
These are the results. I still really like the performance of the Ryzen 7 1700, because on the used market, you can’t buy a new one anymore, it costs less than the 1600th AF, the 2600th, and even more so the 2700th. There are even copies of the R5 1400 that are priced at the price of the R7 1700. There is some kind of obscurantism going on with the 1600 AF and the 2600. These used processors cost the same as the used R7 2700th. But in stores the same house, the boxed version of the 2600th is more expensive than the 2700th in the Tray version. Considering that this box has a very mediocre aluminum cooler. In my opinion, the most expensive thing in it is the turntable itself. In general, to summarize, today, on the used market, it is better to buy Ryzen 7 1700, and in the new version it is Ryzen 7 2700 by Tray.