Intel hd graphics 510 vs radeon x1650: AMD Radeon X1650 vs Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)

Intel HD Graphics 510 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and ATI Radeon X1650 GTO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 510

Buy on Amazon

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

Buy on Amazon

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
4. 9x more texture fill rate: 11.4 GTexel / s vs 2.348 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
128x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 256 MB
8.3x better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 622 vs 75

Launch date	1 September 2015 vs 2 December 2007
Texture fill rate	11.4 GTexel / s vs 2.348 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 90 nm
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 256 MB
PassMark — G3D Mark	622 vs 75

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

Around 96% higher core clock speed: 587 MHz vs 300 MHz
2. 4x better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 384 vs 161

Core clock speed	587 MHz vs 300 MHz
PassMark — G2D Mark	384 vs 161

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

PassMark — G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

PassMark — G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

Name	Intel HD Graphics 510	ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
PassMark — G3D Mark	622	75
PassMark — G2D Mark	161	384
Geekbench — OpenCL	2699
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.381
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	215.873
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	11.675
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	15.094
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	902
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	1333
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	1786
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	902
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	1333
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	1786
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 510	ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
Architecture	Generation 9. 0	R500
Code name	Skylake GT1	RV530
Launch date	1 September 2015	2 December 2007
Place in performance rating	1423	377
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Boost clock speed	950 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	587 MHz
Floating-point performance	182. 4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	90 nm
Pipelines	12
Texture fill rate	11.4 GTexel / s	2.348 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	157 million
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Interface	PCIe 3. 0 x1	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	9.0c
OpenGL	4.5	2.0
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory type	LPDDR3 / DDR4	DDR2
Shared memory	1
Memory bandwidth		12. 54 GB / s
Memory clock speed		784 MHz
Quick Sync

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare Intel HD Graphics 510 with others

Intel
HD Graphics 510

vs

ATI
Mobility Radeon HD 4100 IGP

Intel
HD Graphics 510

vs

NVIDIA
GeForce GT 550M

Intel
HD Graphics 510

vs

AMD
Radeon HD 7470 OEM

Intel
HD Graphics 510

vs

AMD
Radeon HD 7480D

Intel
HD Graphics 510

vs

NVIDIA
GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

Intel
HD Graphics 510

vs

NVIDIA
GRID K340

VGA Legacy MKIII — Text articles (comments on)

Subscribe to this RSS feed

This is the list of people and in future maybe also companies i’d like to thank for any donations they made. If you like the site and have some excess money or graphics card you don’t need anymore, then your name might me here too. We are accepting money donations through paypal — these will be used for paying hosting and domains fees. Even more we like various graphics cards. Usually we must pay at last postage (to Czech Republic), so if you’re not willing send them for free, then please offer only rare and unusuall cards. By rare i mean cards from 80’s, TIGA and other various profi 2D cards, early 3D cards or not usuall ones, non PC cards, mobile chips used on cards with common interfaces (PCI, AGP, PCI-E), profi 3D cards and ofc any prototypes. Basically if theres missing card with chip you own, we’re interested. And if only one collector have it, there’s very high chance, that someone else want it too. Besides your nick/name i gladly show here also link to your personal or company site / store if you will be interested.

So far on site are these collectors — you can choose who will be lucky one getting your card/s…..
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. (Czech Republic, Přerov) — site creator, like most various profi 3D cards because these are forgotten. Will be also very happy for any non ATi/NVIDIA 3D card missing in his collection.
Palcal (Czech Republic, near Brno) — big fan of Diamond brand and TIGA based profi 2D cards. He’s even collecting various revisions of Diamond. Sadly not having time for updating his HUGE collection, so only part is on site.
Zaatharen (Czech Republic) — mostly collecting 3D cards. But takes anything he’s missing.
Pirx (Germany) — fan of miro brand cards and everything on VL-Bus + some highend ISA cards.
Pepino (Czech Republic, Brno) — likes most various rare 3D cards and everything older.

So BIG THANKS goes to these donators….

04/2022 — Per Christian Henden — PayPal
02/2022 — — Paypal
01/2022 — Návělek Vojtěch donated UMC UM6845EB to Vlask.
12/2021 — Per Christian Henden — Paypal
08/2021 — aaronkatrini donated to Vlask CGA card with CIC8645 chip.
11/2020 — Ian Hanschen shared many 3Dlabs datasheets.
11/2020 — Allan Dunsmuir — Paypal
11/2018 — Haj Peters — PayPal
07/2018 — Matěj Holyszewski — PayPal
03/2018 — František Friš donated Avance Logic ALG2301.A to Vlask.
06/2018 — Stephan Schaarschmidt donated Sun XVR-1000 to Palcal.
05/2018 — Cynthia Becerril and Jerry Parry — PayPal
05/2017 — Libor Boldan donated Compaq PowerStorm 300 PCI version to Vlask.
02/2017 — Erik Janitens — PayPal
01/2017 — Dominikt Suhrmann — PayPal
11/2016 — Ben Lamb — PayPal
06/2016 — Rhuwyn donated 2x XGI Volari Z7 to Vlask and Palcal.
09/2012 — Mirek Jahoda (extrahardware.cz) donated Axxyss 24bit Navajo and Olivetti GO 380 to Vlask.
05/2011 — T613 donated miro Crystal 20SD twin PCI to Vlask.

This is my latest project. Some people asked me about doing CPU tree, cause they liked graphics cards version. Well years passed and still noone did CPU version. So because i’m still unemployed (no IT work found in my area), i said myself lets do it. Anyone can help. This will be bigger project than graphics tree and i will need help for sure. Closer info and discussion can be found on CPU-World forums.

If you feel brave enough for helping, just choose your favourite CPU maker and tell us on CPU-World forum. Sample file for VUE editor can be downloaded in attachments. Will update also big version with all parts connected (you can start also by editing this bigger file) — can be downloaded here. Last updated full file size picture can be seen/downloaded here. If you dont like editing in VUE, you can still send text info about cpu and i will add them. So far these people are working on:

Vlask — everything except stuff that these people did:
achtung049 — Compaq, DEC, HP.
henriok — PPC/POWER.
Tralalák — VIA.

CPU tree actual draft small version

09-01-2015: Added Nec.
08-24-2015: Added Mostek and Intergraph.
08-23-2015: Added Fairchild Semiconductor.
08-22-2015: Added Signetics. Updated Intel with Quark.
08-19-2015: Added Ross Technology.
08-18-2015: Added Acorn Computers (now known as ARM).
08-04-2015: Added Chips and Technologies, MIPS Technologies and Quantum Effect Devices/PMC-Sierra.
07-29-2015: Added Moscow Center of SPARC Technologies, UMC and updated Texas Instruments with x86 clones.
07-27-2015: Added Fujitsu, Loongson, Nvidia and ShenWei.
07-25-2015: Added Texas Instruments, Rise Technology and Western Design Center.
07-24-2015: Added MOS Technology, Transmeta and NexGen.
07-22-2015: Added Cyrix and Sun.
07-19-2015: Added Zilog, Motorola and National Semiconductor. AMD updated with Geode, Elan and Athlon SFF.
07-16-2015: Basic AMD tree done.
07-10-2015: Basic Intel tree done.
06-28-2015: First draft and info page made.

Initial price at time of release of card. Highest price for best model (maximum memory, added various modules..). Chipsets and mobile variants have price for 10 000 chips (without memory and other parts).

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra — 24 secret facts, review, specifications, reviews.

Top specifications and features

Passmark score
GPU base clock
RAM
Memory Bandwidth
Effective memory speed

Passmark

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra score:
6
Best score:
29325

Performance

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra:
1156
Best score:

Memory

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra:
48
Best score:

General Information

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra:
513
Best score:

Features

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra:
64
Best score:

Description

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra graphics card based on Celsius architecture has 25 million transistors, tech. process 150 nm. The frequency of the graphics core is 250 MHz. In terms of memory, 0.1 GB is installed here. DDR1, clocked at 230 MHz and with a maximum throughput of 7.36 Gb/s. The texture size is 2 GTexels/s.

In tests, the NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra video card showed itself as follows — according to the Passmark benchmark, the model scored 6 points. At the same time, the maximum number of points for today is 260261 points.
Directx version — 7. OpenGL version — 1.5. nine0005

In terms of compatibility, the video card is connected via the AGP 4x interface.
In our tests, the video card scores 2980 points.

Why NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra is better than others

No merits

Passmark score 6 . This parameter is lower than that of 36% of products
GPU base clock frequency 250 MHz. This parameter is lower than 91% of products
RAM 0.1 GB. This parameter is lower than that of 46% of goods
Memory bandwidth 7. 36 GB/s. This parameter is lower than 85% of products
Effective memory speed 460 MHz. This parameter is lower than 36% of products
GPU memory frequency 230 MHz. This parameter is lower than 86% of products
Technological process 150 nm. This parameter is higher than 96% of products
GDDR memory version 1 . This parameter is lower than that of 87% of goods

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra

review
Performance

Memory

general information

Functions

Ports

Tests in benchmarks

nine0002

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra Review: Highlights

GPU base clock

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.

250MHz

max 2459

Average: 1124.9 MHz

2459MHz

GPU memory frequency

This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth

230MHz

max 16000

Average: 1468 MHz

16000MHz

RAM

0. 1GB

max 128

Average: 4.6 GB

128GB

Texture size

A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all

2 GTexels/s

max 756.8

Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
nine0005

756.8 GTexels/s

Architecture name

Celsius

GPU name

NV15

Memory bandwidth

This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.

7.36GB/s

max 2656

Average: 257.8 GB/s

2656GB/s

Effective memory speed

The effective memory clock is calculated from the size and baud rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all

460MHz

max 19500

Average: 6984.5 MHz

19500MHz

RAM

0.1GB

max 128

Average: 4.6 GB

128GB

GDDR Memory Versions

Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates for improved overall performance
Show all

Mean: 4.9

Memory bus width

A wide memory bus indicates that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all

128bit

max 8192

Average: 283.9bit

8192bit

Process technology

The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

150 nm

Average: 34.7 nm

4 nm

Number of transistors

25 million
nine0005

max 80000

Average: 7150 million

80000 million

Width

183mm

max 421.7

Average: 192.1mm

421.7 mm

Purpose

Desktop

Sales start date

2000-08-14 00:00:00

Mean value:

Release price

49$9

max 419999

Average: $5679. 5

419999 $

DirectX

Used in demanding games, providing enhanced graphics

max 12.2

Mean: 11.4

12.2

opengl version

Later versions provide quality game graphics

1.5

max 4.6

Average: 4.2

4.6

DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI

Mean: 1.4

VGA

Yes

Interface

AGP 4x

Passmark test score

max 29325

Average: 7628. 6

29325

FAQ

How much RAM does NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra have 0.1 GB.

What version of RAM does NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra support GDDR1.

What is the architecture of the video card NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra

Celsius.

How NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra performs in benchmarks

The video card scored 6 points in the Passmark benchmark.

What version of DirectX does the NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra

DirectX 7 support.

Does the NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra DVI

support 1 DVI ports.

When was the NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra released?

2000-08-14 00:00:00.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M

AMD Radeon RX 6600

AMD Radeon HD 7670A

AMD Radeon RX 6600

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730

AMD Radeon RX 6600

nine0062
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850A

AMD Radeon RX 6600

AMD Radeon R7 M460

AMD Radeon RX 6600

ATI FirePro M5800

AMD Radeon RX 6600

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

AMD Radeon RX 6600

AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

AMD Radeon RX 6600

Intel UHD Graphics 620

AMD Radeon RX 6600

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

AMD Radeon RX 6600
nine0005

AMD Radeon R7 M350

AMD Radeon RX 6600

ATI Radeon HD 4850

AMD Radeon RX 6600

AMD Radeon R9 A375

AMD Radeon RX 6600

NVIDIA GeForce 930M

AMD Radeon RX 6600

AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT

AMD Radeon RX 6600

NVIDIA GeForce 830A

AMD Radeon RX 6600

AMD Radeon HD 7690M

AMD Radeon RX 6600
nine0005

Intel HD Graphics 530

AMD Radeon RX 6600

AMD FirePro M4150

AMD Radeon RX 6600

AMD Radeon HD 6750

AMD Radeon RX 6600

leave your feedback

specs and benchmarks in 16 games and 17 benchmarks

Intel started selling the HD Graphics 510 on September 1, 2015. This is a graphics card for laptops, based on the Generation 9.0 architecture, with a 14 nm process technology. It does not have its own memory and uses the system memory, so the performance depends on the characteristics of the RAM. nine0005

Connected via the Ring Bus interface. Power is not specified, the declared maximum power consumption is 15 watts.

Specifications

GPU

Architecture: Generation 9.0

Manufacturer: Intel

Process: 14 nm

Graphic card

Release date: September 1, 2015

Generation: HD Graphics-M (Skylake)

Data bus interface: Ring Bus

Frequencies

Base frequency

Boost frequency: 900 MHz

Memory frequency: Uses system

Memory

Memory capacity: Uses system

Memory type: Uses system

Memory bus: Uses system

Memory bandwidth: Uses system

Learn more about memory usage of the integrated video card, how to increase or decrease the amount and where to view it.

Render Configuration

Shader Units

Compute modules: 12

Texture blocks: 12

Screen blocks: 3

Rated output

Pixel fill rate: 2.700 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate: 10.80 GT/s

Performance FP16: 345.6 GFlops

Performance FP32: 172.8 GFlops

Performance FP64: 43.2 GFlops

Graphics

DirectX: 12 (12_1)

OpenGL: 4. 6

OpenCL: 3

Vulcan: 1.2

Shader model: 6.4

Video Card Design

Heat Sink Requirements: 15 W

Outlets: None

FPS in games

Grand Theft Auto V

(2015)

Better than Intel Iris Graphics 6100, but worse than AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo).

nine0005

1024×768 / Low / 30.9

1366×768 / Medium / 26.8

Rise of the Tomb Raider

(2016)

Better than AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), but worse than Intel HD Graphics 4200.

nine0005

1024×768 / Low / 11.1

1366×768 / Medium / 7

Dota 2 Reborn

(2015)

Better than Intel Iris Graphics 540, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 10.

nine0005

1280×720 / Low / 66.2

1366×768 / Medium / 41.8

Resident Evil 7

(2017)

Better than Intel HD Graphics (Haswell), but worse than Intel HD Graphics 610.

nine0005

1280×720 / Low / 18. 3

Titanfall 2

(2016)

Better than Intel HD Graphics 4400, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 615.

1280×720 / Low / 19.9
nine0722

1366×768 / Medium / 15.4

Farming Simulator 17

(2016)

Better than Intel HD Graphics 4600, but worse than AMD Radeon 520.

1280×720 / Low / 70.6

1366×768 / Medium / 41.3

Civilization VI

(2016)

Better than AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge), but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8650G.

1024×768 / Low / 24.5

1366×768 / Medium / 9.4

The Division

(2016)

Better than AMD Radeon HD 8650G, but worse than AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo).

1280×720 / Low / 13.4

1366×768 / Medium / 7.7

Rainbow Six Siege

(2015)

Better than AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), but worse than Intel HD Graphics 515.

nine0109 1024×768 / Low / 25

1366×768 / Medium / 15. 9

World of Warships

(2015)

Better than AMD Radeon HD 8650G, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 5500.

nine0109 1366×768 / Low / 48.7

1366×768 / Medium / 29.2

Dirt Rally

(2015)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 5600.

nine0109 1024×768 / Low / 110.4

1366×768 / Medium / 19.3

Battlefield 4

(2013)

Better than NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 520.

nine0109 1024×768 / Low / 33.4

1366×768 / Medium / 22.5

1366×768 / Tall / 15.9

BioShock Infinite

(2013)

Better than AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri), but worse than Intel UHD Graphics 615.

nine0005

1280×720 / Low / 39

1366×768 / Medium / 20.1

1366×768 / Tall / 17. 7

Anno 2205

(2015)

Better than Intel HD Graphics 4200, but worse than Intel HD Graphics 520.

nine0729

1024×768 / Low / 19.9

1366×768 / Medium / 11

Tomb Raider

(2013)

Better than NVIDIA NVS 5200M, but worse than AMD Radeon HD 8670M.

nine0717

1366×768 / Tall / 16. 2

1024×768 / Low / 52.7

1366×768 / Medium / 23.9

The Sims 4

(2014)

Better than AMD Radeon R9 M295X, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 920M.

nine0717

1366×768 / Medium / 32.2

1024×768 / Low / 173.7

Benchmark tests

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: 5664 Better than Intel HD Graphics 4600 but worse than Intel HD Graphics 5000.

3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score: 4721 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M, but worse than AMD Radeon R5 M430.
nine0005

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 621 Better than Intel HD Graphics 610 but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M.

3DMark Fire Strike Score: 570 Better than Intel HD Graphics 610 but worse than AMD Radeon HD 7610M.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU: 43274 Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, but worse than Intel HD Graphics (Haswell).

3DMark Vantage P: 3798 Better than ATI FirePro M5800, but worse than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730.

3DMark06: 7253 Better than ATI FirePro M5800, but worse than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730.

3DMark11 P: 985 Better than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M.

3DMark11 P GPU: 847 Better than AMD FirePro M2000 but worse than ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650.
nine0005

Cinebench R10 32Bit OpenGL: 7348 Better than AMD Radeon HD 7560D but worse than AMD Radeon RX VEGA 3.

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit: 27.98 Better than AMD Radeon R5 M330 but worse than AMD Radeon RX VEGA 3.

ComputeMark v2.1 Normal, Score: 500 Better than AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), but worse than AMD Radeon R7 M370.

GFX Bench: 121.9 Better than Intel UHD Graphics 620 but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 930MX.

GFXBench 3.0 1080p Manhattan Offscreen: 64.6 Better than NVIDIA GeForce 940M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 930MX.

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen OGL: 64.6 Better than NVIDIA GeForce 940M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce 930MX.

GFXBench 3.1 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen: 51.7 Better than NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 5.

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit Sala GPUs-only: 302 Better than AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), but worse than Intel HD Graphics 5000.

Unigine Heaven 3.0: 9.3 Better than AMD Radeon HD 7570M but worse than Intel HD Graphics 5500.

Comparison with other graphics cards

Map 1:
nine0005

Map 2:

Video reviews and tests

Intel HD Graphics 510: gameplay in 18 popular games

*Intel HD 510 in 30 GAMES (Pentium G4400, i5-6402 ) | 2021

Rendimiento De Intel Pentium G4400 Con HD Graphics 510 (Integrada)

30 Juegos Jugables para Intel HD Graphics 510

Intel HD Graphics 510 integrated in Pentium G4400 vs. World of Tanks

HOW TO START INTEL HD GRAPHICS 510 HACKINTOSH?!

FACTORY INTEL HD GRAPHICS 510 HACKINTOSH!

Top 10 | Juegos + 30 fps Pentium G4400 + Intel HD Graphics 510

Pentium G4400 + HD Graphics 510 = VALORANT

INTEL HD GRAPHICS 510 RODANDO GTA V

Intel HD Graphics 510 Intel Celeron G3900 Dota 2(19020x) How00 HD 2(19020x) How00 2(19020x) How00 2(19020x) Graphics 510 || Download Latest Intel HD Graphics Drivers || New Update 2022

If you find a bug or have something to add, write in the comments.