Radeon 4450: Radeon HD 4450 — Technical City

Radeon HD 4450 — Technical City

ATI
Radeon HD 4450

Buy

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16

Core clock speed 600 MHz

Max video memory 512 MB

Memory type DDR2

Memory clock speed 800 MHz

Maximum resolution

Summary

ATI started Radeon HD 4450 sales 18 November 2011. This is TeraScale architecture desktop card based on 55 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. 512 MB of DDR2 memory clocked at 0.8 GHz are supplied, and together with 64 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 6.4 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is single-slot card attached via PCIe 2.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 168 mm. No additional power connector is required, and power consumption is at 25 Watt.

We have no data on Radeon HD 4450 benchmark results.

General info

Of Radeon HD 4450’s architecture, market segment and release date.

Place in performance rating	not rated
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	RV710
Market segment	Desktop
Release date	18 November 2011 (10 years ago)
Current price	$30	of 49999 (A100 SXM4)

Technical specs

Radeon HD 4450’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon HD 4450’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	of 18432 (AD102)
Core clock speed	600 MHz	of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Number of transistors	242 million	of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	of 4 (h200 PCIe)
Thermal design power (TDP)	25 Watt	of 900 (Tesla S2050)
Texture fill rate	4. 800	of 939.8 (h200 SXM5)
Floating-point performance	96 gflops	of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Radeon HD 4450’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	168 mm
Width	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Radeon HD 4450: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width	64 Bit	of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti)
Memory bandwidth	6.4 GB/s	of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260)

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon HD 4450. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	+

API support

APIs supported by Radeon HD 4450, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	4.1
OpenGL	3.3	of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile)
OpenCL	1.1
Vulkan	N/A

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance of Radeon HD 4450. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

NVIDIA equivalent

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon HD 4450 from NVIDIA is GeForce 8600 GTS.

GeForce
8600 GTS

Compare

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

HD
Graphics

Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Radeon HD 4450 according to our statistics.

Core 2
Duo T6600

4.2%

Core 2
Duo E8400

4.2%

Core i3
370M

3.4%

Core i3
2120

2.5%

Core i3
350M

2.5%

Pentium Dual
Core T4500

2. 5%

Core i5
1035G1

2.5%

Core i3
330M

2.5%

Core i5
9400F

2.5%

Core i3
10100F

2.5%

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Radeon HD 4450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

GPU Compare | Graphics Card Comparison

The Radeon HD 4450 will run 45% of the top 10,000 PC games. It will also run 20% of these games at the recommended or best experience levels.

Manufacturer: AMD
Generation: 14 generations old
Category: Mainstream
Dedicated RAM: 512 MB
DirectX: 10.1
Rank: 19th percentile of AMD GPUs
Rank in Power: 432nd of AMD GPUs
Rank in Popularity: 325th of AMD GPUs

Can the Radeon HD 4450 run the Top PC games? You can see a GPU comparison by choosing another video card. How many games can your GPU run?

		Radeon HD 4450 Choose Another…	Radeon RX 6950 XT Choose Another…
Rank	Game	Min Rec	Min Rec
1	Grand Theft Auto V
2	Cyberpunk 2077
3	VALORANT
4	Elden Ring
5	Call of Duty: Warzone
6	Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
7	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
8	Red Dead Redemption 2
9	God of War
10	Fortnite
11	Minecraft
12	The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
13	Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
14	Genshin Impact
15	The Sims 4
16	Apex Legends
17	Forza Horizon 5
18	League of Legends
19	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
20	Horizon Zero Dawn
21	FIFA 22
22	FIFA 23
23	Far Cry 6
24	PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS
25	Battlefield 2042
26	WARZONE
27	Days Gone
28	1982
29	Dying Light 2 Stay Human
30	Phasmophobia
31	ARK: Survival Evolved
32	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare
33	Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
34	Forza Horizon 4
35	Battlefield 1
36	NotGTAV
37	Assassin’s Creed: Origins
38	Sea of Thieves
39	Hogwarts Legacy
40	Rust
41	Grand Theft Auto IV
42	Call of Duty: WW2
43	Battlefield 4
44	Call of Duty: Black Ops II
45	Battlefield 5
46	Cities: Skylines
47	Escape from Tarkov
48	Assassin’s Creed Unity
49	Assetto Corsa
50	Overwatch
51	Subnautica
52	Fallout 4
53	Assassin’s Creed IV Black Flag
54	Destiny 2
55	NBA 2K23
56	Devil May Cry 5
57	The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
58	Team Fortress 2
59	PUBG Lite
60	Stray
61	Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout
62	Far Cry 5
63	Far Cry 4
64	Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six: Siege
65	Fortnite: Battle Royale
66	The Forest
67	Roblox
68	Project Zomboid
69	Rocket League
70	Far Cry 3
71	eFootball PES 2021
72	Dota 2
73	GTA 5 Thor Mod
74	Dead by Daylight
75	DayZ
76	Assassin’s Creed
77	Ready or Not
78	Euro Truck Simulator 2
79	Dark Souls 3
80	Assassin’s Creed III
81	Forza Horizon 3
82	Death Stranding
83	SEKIRO: SHADOWS DIE TWICE
84	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
85	Detroit: Become Human
86	Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord
87	GTA 5 Premium Online Edition
88	Need for Speed Heat
89	War Thunder
90	Call of Duty: Black Ops III
91	Watch Dogs 2
92	Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
93	Warframe
94	Assassin’s Creed II
95	Battlefield 3
96	Age of Empires 4
97	Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
98	Assassin’s Creed Syndicate
99	Hades
100	Tekken 7

AMD

NVIDIA

Intel

Rank	GPU

ATI Radeon HD 4450 vs Intel HD Graphics 2000

Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4450 and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark.

ATI Radeon HD 4450

Buy on Amazon

Intel HD Graphics 2000

Buy on Amazon

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4450

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
13.3x more pipelines: 80 vs 6
9.4x better floating-point performance: 96 gflops vs 10.2 gflops

Launch date	18 November 2011 vs 5 January 2011
Pipelines	80 vs 6
Floating-point performance	96 gflops vs 10.2 gflops

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000

Around 42% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 600 MHz
177. 1x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 55 nm

Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate	850 MTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm vs 55 nm

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4450
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000

Name	ATI Radeon HD 4450	Intel HD Graphics 2000
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)		1039
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps)		1039
PassMark — G2D Mark		456
PassMark — G3D Mark		213

Compare specifications (specs)

	ATI Radeon HD 4450	Intel HD Graphics 2000
Architecture	TeraScale	Generation 6.0
Code name	RV710	Sandy Bridge GT1
Launch date	18 November 2011	5 January 2011
Place in performance rating	not rated	573
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Core clock speed	600 MHz	850 MHz
Floating-point performance	96 gflops	10. 2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	32 nm
Pipelines	80	6
Texture fill rate	4.8 GTexel / s	850 MTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt
Transistor count	242 million	189 million
Boost clock speed		1150 MHz
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
Interface	PCIe 2. 0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	168 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
DirectX	10.1	10.1
OpenGL	3.3	3.1
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz
Memory type	DDR2
Shared memory		1

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare ATI Radeon HD 4450 with others

ATI
Radeon HD 4450

vs

AMD
Radeon HD 6370D IGP

ATI
Radeon HD 4450

vs

AMD
FirePro V4900

ATI
Radeon HD 4450

vs

NVIDIA
Tegra 3

ATI Radeon HD 4450 Drivers Download for Windows 7, 8, 8.

1, 10, XP, Vista.

File Name	Size
10-10_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	61.57 MB
10-10_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	92.08 MB
10-10_xp32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	48.59 MB
10-10_xp64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	79.00 MB
10-11_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	77.62 MB
10-11_xp64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	63.49 MB
10-12_xp32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	51.05 MB
10-12_xp64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	83.39 MB
10-1_agp-hotfix_vista_win7_32_dd_ccc.exe	60.15 MB
10-1_agp-hotfix_vista_win7_64_dd_ccc. exe	75.43 MB
10-1_agp-hotfix_xp32_dd_ccc.exe	53.19 MB
10-1_agp-hotfix_xp64_dd_ccc.exe	64.56 MB
10-1_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_wdm_enu.exe	51.92 MB
10-1_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_wdm_enu.exe	70.06 MB
10-1_xp32_dd_ccc_wdm_enu.exe	44.50 MB
10-1_xp64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	63.79 MB
10-2_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_wdm_enu.exe	52.67 MB
10-2_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_wdm_enu.exe	71.34 MB
10-2_xp32_dd_ccc_wdm_enu.exe	45.17 MB
10-2_xp64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	64.92 MB
10-3_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_wdm_enu. exe	52.77 MB
10-3_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_wdm_enu.exe	71.58 MB
10-3_xp32_dd_ccc_wdm_enu.exe	45.39 MB
10-3_xp64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	65.24 MB
10-5_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_enu.exe	52.93 MB
10-5_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	72.28 MB
10-5_xp32_dd_ccc_enu.exe	45.45 MB
10-5_xp64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	65.97 MB
10-6_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_enu.exe	53.13 MB
10-6_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	72.60 MB
10-6_xp32_dd_ccc_enu.exe	45.55 MB
10-6_xp64_dd_ccc_enu. exe	66.08 MB
10-7_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_enu.exe	53.51 MB
10-7_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	73.25 MB
10-7_xp32_dd_ccc_enu.exe	45.90 MB
10-7_xp64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	66.53 MB
10-8_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_enu.exe	54.00 MB
10-8_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	74.15 MB
10-8_xp32_dd_ccc_enu.exe	46.32 MB
10-8_xp64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	67.25 MB
10-9_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_enu.exe	54.72 MB
10-9_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	74.88 MB
10-9_xp32_dd_ccc_enu. exe	41.97 MB
10-9_xp64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	62.20 MB
11-10_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	63.35 MB
11-10_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	95.65 MB
11-10_xp32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	53.02 MB
11-11_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	64.20 MB
11-11_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	98.55 MB
11-11_xp32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	53.85 MB
11-11_xp64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	84.65 MB
11-12_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	70.45 MB
11-12_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	109.61 MB
11-12_xp32_dd_ccc_ocl. exe	57.71 MB
11-12_xp64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	91.85 MB
11-1_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	58.66 MB
11-1_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	91.58 MB
11-1_xp32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	51.50 MB
11-1_xp64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	84.30 MB
11-2_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	59.37 MB
11-2_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	93.48 MB
11-2_xp32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	52.20 MB
11-2_xp64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	85.17 MB
11-3_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	56.99 MB
11-3_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_ocl. exe	85.58 MB
11-3_xp32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	48.62 MB
11-3_xp64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	70.78 MB
11-4_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	56.25 MB
11-4_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	85.29 MB
11-4_xp32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	48.72 MB
11-4_xp64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	77.25 MB
11-5_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	56.69 MB
11-5_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	85.10 MB
11-5_xp32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	49.10 MB
11-5_xp64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	77.87 MB
11-6_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_ocl. exe	57.41 MB
11-6_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	86.46 MB
11-6_xp32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	49.64 MB
11-6_xp64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	78.74 MB
11-7_agp-hotfix_vista_win7_32_dd_ccc.exe	82.77 MB
11-7_agp-hotfix_vista_win7_64_dd_ccc.exe	103.97 MB
11-7_agp-hotfix_xp32_dd_ccc.exe	76.38 MB
11-7_agp-hotfix_xp64_dd_ccc.exe	90.14 MB
11-7_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	59.19 MB
11-7_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	90.00 MB
11-7_xp32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	50.94 MB
11-7_xp64_dd_ccc_ocl. exe	79.82 MB
11-8_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	62.06 MB
11-8_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	91.93 MB
11-8_xp32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	51.38 MB
11-8_xp64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	81.59 MB
11-9_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	61.64 MB
11-9_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	92.31 MB
11-9_xp32_dd_ccc_ocl.exe	51.71 MB
12-1_vista_win7_32_dd_ccc.exe	107.62 MB
12-1_vista_win7_64_dd_ccc.exe	148.21 MB
12-1_xp32_dd_ccc.exe	110.51 MB
12-1_xp64_dd_ccc. exe	159.99 MB
12-2_vista_win7_32_dd_ccc.exe	116.58 MB
12-2_vista_win7_64_dd_ccc.exe	158.24 MB
12-2_xp32_dd_ccc.exe	101.22 MB
12-2_xp64_dd_ccc.exe	139.06 MB
12-3_vista_win7_32_dd_ccc.exe	118.25 MB
12-3_vista_win7_64_dd_ccc.exe	161.57 MB
12-3_xp32_dd_ccc.exe	101.32 MB
12-3_xp64_dd_ccc.exe	139.27 MB
12-4_vista_win7_32_dd_ccc.exe	110.32 MB
12-4_vista_win7_64_dd_ccc.exe	153.44 MB
12-4_xp32_dd_ccc.exe	101. 50 MB
12-4_xp64_dd_ccc.exe	139.40 MB
12-6-legacy_vista_win7_32_dd_ccc_whql.exe	112.88 MB
12-6-legacy_vista_win7_64_dd_ccc_whql.exe	156.20 MB
12-6-legacy_xp32_dd_ccc_whql.exe	101.37 MB
13-1-legacy_vista_win7_win8_64_dd_ccc.exe	146.56 MB
14-4-xp32-64-dd-ccc-pack1.exe	184.76 MB
9-11_agp-hotfix_vista_win7_32_dd_ccc.exe	57.29 MB
9-11_agp-hotfix_vista_win7_64_dd_ccc.exe	71.86 MB
9-11_agp-hotfix_xp32_dd_ccc.exe	50.66 MB
9-11_agp-hotfix_xp64_dd_ccc.exe	61.80 MB
9-11_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_wdm_enu. exe	49.29 MB
9-11_vista64_win7_64_dd_ccc_wdm_enu.exe	66.45 MB
9-11_xp32_dd_ccc_wdm_enu.exe	42.38 MB
9-11_xp64_dd_ccc_enu.exe	61.06 MB
9-9_beta_win7_32_dd_CC.exe	93.75 MB
9-9_beta_win7_64_dd_CC.exe	94.28 MB
AMD_10-11_vista32_win7_32_dd_ccc_enu.exe	56.37 MB
AMD_10-11_xp32_dd_ccc_enu.exe	42.91 MB
AMD_Chipset_V307650.zip	427.01 MB
Catalyst_10.12_CCC2_Preview_Vista_Dec7.exe	112.20 MB
Catalyst_10.12_CCC2_Preview_Win7_Dec7.exe	110.16 MB

4450 United States Dollars (USD) to Armenian Dram (AMD) today

The cost of 4450 United States Dollars in Armenian Dram today is դր1,780,978. 56 according to the “Open Exchange Rates”, compared to yesterday, the exchange rate remained unchanged. The exchange rate of the United States Dollar in relation to the Armenian Dram on the chart, the table of the dynamics of the cost as a percentage for the day, week, month and year.

Currency Converter

United States Dollar

USD USA

Armenian Dram

AMD Armenia

With the currency converter, you can convert 4,450 United States Dollars to Dram and find out how much four thousand four hundred fifty dollars is currently worth in Dram. Also, you can make a reverse calculation and find out the current value of 4450 Dram in United States Dollars.

4350 USD to AMD	4400 USD to AMD	4450 USD to AMD	4500 USD to AMD	4550 USD to AMD
դր1,740,956. 56	դր1,760,967.56	դր1,780,978.56	դր1,800,989.55	դր1,821,000.54

Graph of change in 4450 United States Dollars to Armenian Dram rate

Select the period for plotting the chart:

The United States Dollar to Dram exchange rate on the chart allows you to track changes over different periods and draw conclusions about possible forecasts of the exchange rate of one currency in relation to another.

Dynamics of the cost changes of 4450 Dollars (USD) in Dram (AMD)

Compare the cost of 4450 United States Dollars in Armenian Dram in the past with the current price at the moment.

Changes for the week (7 days)
Date	Day of the week	4450 USD to AMD	Changes	Changes %
September 12, 2022	Monday	4450 USD = 1,804,034.74 AMD	+7,773.04 AMD	+0.43%
September 13, 2022	Tuesday	4450 USD = 1,813,987.93 AMD	+9,953.19 AMD	+0.55%
September 14, 2022	Wednesday	4450 USD = 1,802,711.60 AMD	-11,276.34 AMD	-0.63%
September 15, 2022	Thursday	4450 USD = 1,800,519.36 AMD	-2,192.23 AMD	-0.12%
September 16, 2022	Friday	4450 USD = 1,796,363.38 AMD	-4,155.98 AMD	-0. 23%
September 17, 2022	Saturday	4450 USD = 1,780,978.56 AMD	-15,384.82 AMD	-0.86%
September 18, 2022 (today)	Sunday	4450 USD = 1,780,978.56 AMD	—	—
The cost of 4450 Dollars (USD) in Armenian Dram for a week (7 days) decreased by -դր23,056.19 (twenty-three thousand fifty-six dram nineteen luma).

Changes for the month (30 days)
Date	Day of the week	4450 USD to AMD	Changes	Changes %
August 19, 2022	Friday	4450 USD = 1,792,028.89 AMD	-4,259.08 AMD	-0.24%
September 18, 2022 (today)	Sunday	4450 USD = 1,780,978. 56 AMD	-11,050.34 AMD	-0.62%
The cost of 4450 Dollars (USD) in Armenian Dram for a month (30 days) decreased by -դր11,050.34 (eleven thousand fifty dram thirty-four luma).

Changes for the year (365 days)
Date	Day of the week	4450 USD to AMD	Changes	Changes %
September 18, 2021	Saturday	4450 USD = 2,193,097.28 AMD	—	—
September 18, 2022 (today)	Sunday	4450 USD = 1,780,978.56 AMD	-412,118.72 AMD	-23.14%
The cost of 4450 Dollars (USD) in Armenian Dram for a year (365 days) decreased by -դր412,118. 72 (four hundred twelve thousand one hundred eighteen dram seventy-two luma).

Cross rate of 4450 USD to other currencies

EUR

Euro

European Union

4,442.83 EUR

Exchange rate change for the week

+€46.68

+1.05%

BTC

Bitcoin

Cryptocurrency

0.22 BTC

Exchange rate change for the week

+0.02 BTC

+10.36%

DOGE

Dogecoin

Cryptocurrency

73,259.03 DOGE

Exchange rate change for the week

+3,465.69 DOGE

+4.73%

GBP

British Pound

United Kingdom

3,857.32 GBP

Exchange rate change for the week

+£48. 31

+1.25%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U — AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U is a 64-bit quad-core entry-level performance x86 mobile microprocessor introduced by AMD in mid-2020. Fabricated on TSMC’s 7-nanometer process and based on AMD’s Zen 2 microarchitecture, the PRO 4450U operates at a base frequency of 2.5 GHz with a TDP of 15 W and a boost frequency of up to 3.7 GHz. This APU supports up to 64 GiB of DDR4-3200 or up to 32 GiB of quad-channel LPDDR4x-4266 memory. The 4450U integrates Radeon Vega 5 graphics operating at up to 1.4 GHz.

This model supports a configurable TDP-down of 10 W and TDP-up of 25 W.

Compared to its mainstream counterparts, the PRO 4450U includes a set of enterprise-oriented features such as Memory Guard, image stability, software stability, and manageability support.

1 Cache
2 Memory controller
3 Expansions
4 Graphics
5 Features
6 Die

Main article: Zen 2 § Cache

[Edit/Modify Cache Info]

Cache Organization

Cache is a hardware component containing a relatively small and extremely fast memory designed to speed up the performance of a CPU by preparing ahead of time the data it needs to read from a relatively slower medium such as main memory.

The organization and amount of cache can have a large impact on the performance, power consumption, die size, and consequently cost of the IC.

Cache is specified by its size, number of sets, associativity, block size, sub-block size, and fetch and write-back policies.

Note: All units are in kibibytes and mebibytes.

L1$

256 KiB

0.25 MiB
262,144 B
2.441406e-4 GiB

L1I$

128 KiB

0.125 MiB
131,072 B
1.220703e-4 GiB

4×32 KiB

8-way set associative

L1D$

128 KiB

0.125 MiB
131,072 B
1.220703e-4 GiB

4×32 KiB

8-way set associative

write-back

L2$

2 MiB

2,048 KiB
2,097,152 B
0.00195 GiB

		4×512 KiB	8-way set associative	write-back

L3$

4 MiB

4,096 KiB
4,194,304 B
0. 00391 GiB

		1×4 MiB	16-way set associative	write-back

Memory controller[edit]

This SoC features two memory controllers, each supporting DDR4 or LPDDR4x. This chip supports up to 64 GiB of dual-channel DDR4 memory with data rates of up to 3200 MT/s (51.2 GB/s) or up to 32 GiB of quad-channel LPDDR4x with data rates of up to 4266 MT/s (68.27 GB/s).

[Edit/Modify Memory Info]

Integrated Memory Controller

Max Type	DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4266
Max Mem	64 GiB
Controllers	2
Channels	4
Max Bandwidth	68.27 GB/s 39.236 GiB/s 40,177.287 MiB/s 0.0383 TiB/s 0.0421 TB/s
Bandwidth	Single 17. 07 GB/s Double 34.13 GB/s Quad 68.27 GB/s

Expansions[edit]

This processor has 16 PCIe lanes, 1×8 designated for a discrete GPU, 1×4 additional lanes for storage (e.g., NVMe), and 1×4 additional lanes reserved for additional peripherals (e.g., WiFi or LTE).

[Edit/Modify Expansions Info]

Expansion Options

PCIe	Revision: 3.0
	Max Lanes: 16
	Configuration: 1×8+1×4+1×4, 2×4+1×4+1×4

Graphics[edit]

[Edit/Modify IGP Info]

Integrated Graphics Information

GPU	Radeon Vega 5
Designer	AMD
Execution Units	5	Max Displays	4
Unified Shaders	320
Burst Frequency	1,400 MHz 1. 4 GHz 1,400,000 KHz
Output	DP, HDMI

[Edit] Zen 2 with Radeon Vega Hardware Accelerated Video Capabilities
Codec	Encode	Decode
VP9 8bpc/10bpc		1080p240 4K 60 FPS
MPEG-2 (H.262) 8b	1080p240 4K 60 FPS	1080p480 4K 120 FPS
HEVC (H.265) 8bpc/10bpc	1080p240 4K 60 FPS	1080p240 4K 60 FPS

Features[edit]

[Edit/Modify Supported Features]

Supported x86 Extensions & Processor Features

MMX	MMX Extension
EMMX	Extended MMX Extension
SSE	Streaming SIMD Extensions
SSE2	Streaming SIMD Extensions 2
SSE3	Streaming SIMD Extensions 3
SSSE3	Supplemental SSE3
SSE4. 1	Streaming SIMD Extensions 4.1
SSE4.2	Streaming SIMD Extensions 4.2
SSE4a	Streaming SIMD Extensions 4a
AVX	Advanced Vector Extensions
AVX2	Advanced Vector Extensions 2
ABM	Advanced Bit Manipulation
BMI1	Bit Manipulation Instruction Set 1
BMI2	Bit Manipulation Instruction Set 2
FMA3	3-Operand Fused-Multiply-Add
AES	AES Encryption Instructions
RdRand	Hardware RNG
SHA	SHA Extensions
ADX	Multi-Precision Add-Carry
CLMUL	Carry-less Multiplication Extension
F16C	16-bit Floating Point Conversion

x86-16	16-bit x86
x86-32	32-bit x86
x86-64	64-bit x86
Real	Real Mode
Protected	Protected Mode
SMM	System Management Mode
FPU	Integrated x87 FPU
NX	No-eXecute
SMT	Simultaneous Multithreading
AMD-Vi	AMD-Vi (I/O MMU virtualization)
AMD-V	AMD Virtualization
TSME	Transparent SME
SenseMI	SenseMI Technology

Main article: Zen 2 § Die

Renoir microprocessors are fabricated on TSMC’s 7-nanometer process. This SoC integrates 9.8 billion transistors on a single 156 mm² monolithic die which includes both the Zen 2 CPU cores along with the Vega GPU and various other additional components.

7-nanometer process (N7)
9,800,000,000 transistors
156 mm² die size

Facts about «Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U — AMD»

RDF feed

Has subobject «Has subobject» is a predefined property representing a container construct and is provided by Semantic MediaWiki.	Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U — AMD#pcie +
base frequency	2,500 MHz (2.5 GHz, 2,500,000 kHz) +
clock multiplier	25 +
core count	4 +
core family	23 +
core model	96 +
core name	Renoir +
core stepping	A1 +
designer	AMD +
die area	156 mm² (0. 242 in², 1.56 cm², 156,000,000 µm²) +
family	Ryzen 3 +
first announced	May 7, 2020 +
first launched	May 7, 2020 +
full page name	amd/ryzen 3/pro 4450u +
has advanced vector extensions	true +
has advanced vector extensions 2	true +
has amd amd-v technology	true +
has amd amd-vi technology	true +
has amd sensemi technology	true +
has amd transparent secure memory encryption technology	true +
has ecc memory support	false +
has feature	Advanced Vector Extensions +, Advanced Vector Extensions 2 +, Advanced Encryption Standard Instruction Set Extension + and SenseMI Technology +
has locked clock multiplier	true +
has simultaneous multithreading	true +
has x86 advanced encryption standard instruction set extension	true +
instance of	microprocessor +
integrated gpu	Radeon Vega 5 +
integrated gpu designer	AMD +
integrated gpu execution units	5 +
integrated gpu max frequency	1,400 MHz (1. 4 GHz, 1,400,000 KHz) +
isa	x86-64 +
isa family	x86 +
l1$ size	0.25 MiB (256 KiB, 262,144 B, 2.441406e-4 GiB) +
l1d$ description	8-way set associative +
l1d$ size	0.125 MiB (128 KiB, 131,072 B, 1.220703e-4 GiB) +
l1i$ description	8-way set associative +
l1i$ size	0.125 MiB (128 KiB, 131,072 B, 1.220703e-4 GiB) +
l2$ description	8-way set associative +
l2$ size	2 MiB (2,048 KiB, 2,097,152 B, 0.00195 GiB) +
l3$ description	16-way set associative +
l3$ size	4 MiB (4,096 KiB, 4,194,304 B, 0.00391 GiB) +
ldate	May 7, 2020 +
manufacturer	TSMC +
market segment	Mobile +
max case temperature	378.15 K (105 °C, 221 °F, 680. 67 °R) +
max cpu count	1 +
max memory	65,536 MiB (67,108,864 KiB, 68,719,476,736 B, 64 GiB, 0.0625 TiB) +
max memory bandwidth	39.236 GiB/s (68.27 GB/s, 40,177.287 MiB/s, 0.0383 TiB/s, 0.0421 TB/s) +
max memory channels	4 +
microarchitecture	Zen 2 +
min case temperature	273.15 K (0 °C, 32 °F, 491.67 °R) +
model number	PRO 4450U +
name	Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U +
package	Socket FP6 +
part number	100-000000104 +
process	7 nm (0.007 μm, 7.0e-6 mm) +
series	4000 +
smp max ways	1 +
supported memory type	DDR4-3200 + and LPDDR4x-4266 +
tdp	15 W (15,000 mW, 0.0201 hp, 0.015 kW) +
tdp down	10 W (10,000 mW, 0. 0134 hp, 0.01 kW) +
tdp up	25 W (25,000 mW, 0.0335 hp, 0.025 kW) +
technology	CMOS +
thread count	8 +
transistor count	9,800,000,000 +
turbo frequency	3,700 MHz (3.7 GHz, 3,700,000 kHz) +
word size	64 bit (8 octets, 16 nibbles) +

Video card Radeon HD 4450 — Technical City

ATI
Radeon HD 4450

PCIe 2.0 x16 interface
Core frequency 600 MHz
Video memory size 512 MB
Memory type DDR2
Memory frequency 800 MHz
Maximum resolution

Description

ATI started Radeon HD 4450 sales 18 November 2011. This is TeraScale architecture desktop card based on 55 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. It has 512 MB of DDR2 memory at 0.8 GHz, and coupled with a 64-bit interface, this creates a throughput of 6. 400 Gb / s.

In terms of compatibility, this is a single-slot PCIe 2.0 x16 card. The length of the reference version is 168 mm. An additional power cable is not required for connection, and the power consumption is 25 W.

We don’t have test results for the Radeon HD 4450.

General Information

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Radeon HD 4450, as well as when sales started and cost at the time. Price now 30 $ of 49999 (A100 SXM4)

characteristics

Radeon HD 4450’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak of Radeon HD 4450’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Information on Radeon HD 4450 compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply).

90 ti)

Interface

Memorial capacity 6.400 GB/s of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260)

video exit

21

Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon HD 4450. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

+

Video connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

HDMI

Support API

9000
APIs supported by Radeon HD 4450, including their versions.

Competitor from NVIDIA
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon HD 4450 from NVIDIA is GeForce 8600 GTS.

GeForce
8600 GTS

Compare
Other video cards
Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.

HD
Graphics

Compare
Recommended Processors
According to our statistics, these processors are most often used with the Radeon HD 4450.

Core 2
Duo T6600

4.2%

Core 2
Duo E8400

4. 2%

Core i3
370M

3.4%

Core i3
2120

2.5%

Core i3
350M

2.5%

Pentium Dual
Core T4500

2.5%

Core i5
1035G1

2.5%

Core i3
330M

2.5%

Core i5
9400F

2.5%

Core i3
10100F

2.5%
User rating
Here you can see the rating of the video card by users, as well as put your own rating.
Tips and comments
Here you can ask a question about the Radeon HD 4450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Video card ATI Radeon HD 4450
Home / Video cards / ATI Radeon HD 4450

Date of issue: November, 2011;

Video card memory size: 512 MB;

Video memory type: DDR2;

GPU frequency: 600 MHz.

Specifications ATI Radeon HD 4450
GPU

DirectX 10.1 (10_1)

Shader Model 4.1

processors

GPU manufacturer ATI

GPU name RV710

Platform Desktop

Clock frequency 600MHz

Two No

Reference card No

Performance

Number of shaders 80

TMU 8

Number of ROPs 4

Computer units 1

Pixel fill rate 2. 4GPixel/s

Texture Fill Rate 4.8 GTexel/s

Number of floating point operations (FLOPS) 96 GFLOPS

Memory

Memory clock 400MHz

Effective memory frequency 800MHz

Memory bus width 64bit

Video memory size 512MB

Memory type DDR2

Memory bandwidth 6.4 GB/s

Energy consumption

Energy consumption 25W

Compare video card Radeon HD 4450 with its peers

Memory bandwidth

The speed at which data can be read from or stored in the built-in memory

Radeon HD 4450 6.4 GB/s

GeForce GT 710 14. 4 GB/s

GeForce 8400GS 6.4 GB/s

Pixel fill rate

The number of pixels that the graphics card can display on the screen every second

Radeon HD 4450 2.4GPixel/s

GeForce GT 710 3.82GPixel/s

GeForce 8400GS 2.08 GPixel/s

Texture Fill Rate

Rate at which the graphics card renders textures

Radeon HD 4450 4.8 GTexel/s

GeForce GT 710 15.26 GTexel/s

GeForce 8400GS 4.16 GTexel/s

Floating Point Operations (FLOPS)

GPU Compute Speed

Radeon HD 4450 96 GFLOPS

GeForce GT 710 366.3GFLOPS

GeForce 8400GS 39.36 GFLOPS

Number of shader units

Shaders — GPU sub-components that work with 3D graphics

Radeon HD 4450 80

GeForce GT 710 192

GeForce 8400GS 16

Number of texture units (TMU)

Texture units (TMUs) affect the texture fill rate of a graphics scene

Radeon HD 4450 8

GeForce GT 710 16

GeForce 8400GS 8

Video Reviews

9 Games on AMD HD5450 #1| GTA V, Payday 2, Resident Evil 5…

A $10 Radeon HD 5450 Vs Gaming

49 BALLLA </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 53 BALLLA </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> Winner when comparing </p> <p> VS </p> <p> 64 AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U </p> <p> AMD 9000U </p> <p> AMD 9000u 9000u 9000u </p> <p> AMD Why is AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U better than AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U? </h3> <ul> <em/> </ul> <h3> Why is AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U better than AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U? </h3> <ul> <li> 38% higher CPU speed? <br /> <em> 6 x 2.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> 3GHz </em> vs <em> 4 x 2.5GHz </em> </li> <li> 4 more CPU threads? <br /> <em> 12 </em> vs <em> 8 </em> </li> <li> 1MB more L2 cache? <br /> <em> 3MB </em> vs <em> 2MB </em> </li> <li> 1.53x higher PassMark score? <br /> <em> 15482 </em> vs <em> 10139 </em> </li> <li> 0.5GHz higher turbo clock speed? <br /> <em> 4.2GHz </em> vs <em> 3.7GHz </em> </li> <li> 10W below TDP? <br /> <em> 15W </em> vs <em> 25W </em> </li> <li> 12MB more L3 cache? <br /> <em> 16MB </em> vs <em> 4MB </em> </li> <li> 128KB more L1 cache? <br /> <em> 384KB </em> vs <em> 256KB </em> </li> </ul> <h4> Which comparisons are the most popular? </h4> <p> AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U </p> <p> vs </p> <p> Intel Core i5-10210U </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> vs </p> <p> Intel Core i5-1135G7 </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U </p> <p> VS </p> <p> Intel Core i3-1005g1 </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> VS </p> <p> Intel Core i5-10210u </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U </p> <p> VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000u 9000) 1135g7 </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> VS </p> <p> Intel Core i5-1145g7 </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450u </p> <p> VS </p> <p> Intel Core Core 9000 9000 Vs 9000 VS VS 50005000 VS 50005000 VS -1065G7 </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450u </p> <p> VS </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 3 5300U </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> VS </p> <p> Intel i7-1165g7 AMD Ryzen 3 Pro </p> <p> VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS </p> <p> AMD RYZEN 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> VS </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 5 5600u </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U </p> <p> VS </p> <p> Intel Core i7-7820HQ </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 5 Proen </p> <p> VS 9000 AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450u </p> <p> VS </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 5 5500U </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> VS </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U </p> </p> <p> 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 nttel 9000 nttel 9000 ntt </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650u </p> <p> VS </p> <p> Intel Core i7-8550U </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U </p> <p> VS </p> <p> Intel Core i5-8250u </p> <p> AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 565 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 AMD Ry </p> <h3> Price Match </h3> <h3> User Reviews </h3> <h3> Performance </h3> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 1.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> CPU Speed </p> <p> 4 x 2.5GHz </p> <p> 6 x 2.3GHz </p> <p> ). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 2nd processor thread </p> <p> More threads result in better performance and better multitasking. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 3.speed turbo clock </p> <p> 3.7GHz </p> <p> 4.2GHz </p> <p> When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 4. Unlocked </p> <p> ✖AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U </p> <p> ✖AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 5.L2 cache </p> <p> More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 6.L3 cache </p> <p> More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 7.L1 cache </p> <p> More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 8.core L2 </p> <p> 0.5MB/core </p> <p> 0.5MB/core </p> <p> More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 9.core L3 </p> <p> 1MB/core </p> <p> 2.67MB/core </p> <p> More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core. </p> <h3> Memory </h3> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 1.RAM speed </p> <p> 4266MHz </p> <p> 4266MHz </p> <p> Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 2.max memory bandwidth </p> <p> 68.27GB/s </p> <p> 68.3GB/s </p> <p> This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 3.DDR version </p> <p> DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 4 memory channels </p> <p> More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 5.max memory </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U) </p> <p> Maximum amount of memory (RAM). </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 6.bus baud rate </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U) </p> <p> The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 7. Supports memory troubleshooting code </p> <p> ✖AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U </p> <p> ✖AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> Memory troubleshooting code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 8.eMMC version </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U) </p> <p> Newer version of eMMC — Built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 9.bus frequency </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U) </p> <p> The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device </p> <h3> Geotagging </h3> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 1. PassMark result </p> <p> This test measures processor performance using multi-threading. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 2. PassMark result (single) </p> <p> This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 3.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> Geekbench 5 result (multi-core) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U) </p> <p> Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022) </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U) </p> <p> Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 5.Cinebench R20 result (single core) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U) </p> <p> Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 6.Geekbench 5 result (single core) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U) </p> <p> Unknown.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U) </p> <p> Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022) </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 7. Blender test result (bmw27) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U) </p> <p> The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 8. Blender result (classroom) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U) </p> <p> The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 9.performance per watt </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U) </p> <p> Unknown.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U) </p> <p> This means the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used. </p> <h3> Features </h3> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 1.uses multi-threading </p> <p> ✔AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U </p> <p> ✔AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 2. Has AES </p> <p> ✔AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U </p> <p> ✔AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 3. Has AVX </p> <p> ✔AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U </p> <p> ✔AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 4.Version SSE </p> <p> SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> Each new version contains new instructions and improvements. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 5. Has F16C </p> <p> ✔AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U </p> <p> ✔AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 6 bits transmitted at the same time </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U) </p> <p> NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 7. Has MMX </p> <p> ✔AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U </p> <p> ✔AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume. </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 8. TrustZone enabled </p> <p> ✖AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U </p> <p> ✖AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U </p> <p> Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through digital rights management ( DRM).<img loading='lazy' src='' /> </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> 9.interface width </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 4450U) </p> <p> Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 5650U) </p> <p> The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better </p> <h3> Price comparison </h3> <p> Cancel </p> <h4> Which CPUs are better? </h4> <h2> Amd radeon hd 5450 512mb • Web cheat sheet for internet entrepreneurs! </h2> <p> Contents </p> <ul> <li> 1 Buy in the store: </li> <li> 2 Order with delivery: </li> <li> 3 Characteristics </li> <li> 4 Reviews </li> <li> 5 Custom comparison and test results <ul> <li> <li> 5.0.1 Advertising </li> <li> 5.0.2 Advertising </li> </ul> <li> 9000 5.1 Recommended reading </li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> (OEM) D-Sub+DVI+DP’> ✔512 MB ✔PCI Express 2.1 16x ✔DDR3 ✔DisplayPort, DVI-I, 15-pin D-Sub connector ✔RADEON HD 5450 ✔64 bit <br /> SKU: #95753 Compare Back Forward </p> <table> <tr> Pick up a replacement </tr> </table> <h3> Buy from store: </h3> <h3> Order with delivery: </h3> <p> Not expected to be available for sale, as a rule, this condition of the goods means that it is discontinued.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> </p> <ul> <li> Features </li> <li> Video </li> <li> Options and consumables </li> <li> Photo examples </li> <li> Reviews (no) </li> <li> Leave feedback </li> <li> Tests </li> <li> Information </li> </ul> <h3> Features </h3> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> Active promotions </td> <td> ✔ Discount when buying GIGABYTE motherboard, GIGABYTE graphics card and Intel </td> <p> processor<br /> </tr> <tr> <td> Key features </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Manufacturer </td> <td> Sapphire </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Model </td> <td> HD 5450 512MB DDR3 PCIE DP Find similar graphics card </td> </tr> <tr> <td> API support </td> <td> DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.x </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Equipment type </td> <td> Video card </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Length </td> <td> 170 mm </td> </tr> <tr> <td> OS support </td> <td> Windows XP x64, Windows XP, Windows MCE 2005, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Video </td> </tr> <tr> <td> RAMDAC </td> <td> 400 MHz, 10 bits per channel. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Maximum screen resolution </td> <td> 2560 x 1600 when connecting a DVI monitor, 2048 x 1536 (when an analog monitor is connected), 1920×1200 when connected via HDMI.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Max. number of connected monitors </td> <td> 3 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Video card configuration </td> </tr> <tr> <td> GPU </td> <td> RADEON HD 5450 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> GPU frequency </td> <td> 650 MHz (measured at NIKS) </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Number of Shader Processors </td> <td> 80 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Video memory </td> <td> 512 MB </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Video memory type </td> <td> DDR3 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Video memory bus width </td> <td> 64 bits </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Video memory frequency </td> <td> 900 MHz (measured at NIKS) </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Number of pixel pipelines </td> <td> 8, 4 texture fetch units </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Configuration </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Process </td> <td> 40 nm </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Interface, connectors and outputs </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Interface </td> <td> PCI Express 2.1 16x (compatible with PCI Express 1.x) </td> </tr> <tr> <td> HDCP 9 support0038</p> <td> Yes (1080p) </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Ports </td> <td> DisplayPort, DVI-I, 15-pin D-Sub connector </td> <p> ports<br /> </tr> <tr> <td> Other features </td> </tr> <tr> <td> General purpose GPU support </td> <td> AMD APP, OpenCL 1.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> 0, DirectCompute 11 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Cooling </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Video card cooling </td> <td> Passive cooling (heatsink on processor) </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Cooling system design </td> <td> Single-slot cooling system </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Compatible </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Power connector </td> <td> No </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Low profile board </td> <td> No </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Logistics </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Package dimensions (measured in NYX) </td> <td> 18.5 x 13.5 x 2.7 cm </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Gross weight (measured in NYX) </td> <td> 0.207 kg </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h3> Reviews </h3> <p> we may not have exploited this product, but only felt it from all sides, and after you buy it, try it in work, your feedback can make this world a better place, if your feedback is really useful, then we will publish it and give it you the opportunity to make the next purchase with us on the 2nd column. </p> <h3> Performance Comparison and Test Results </h3> <p> To give you an idea of the performance of the selected product (not yet in our test lab, but we are working on it), the chart shows the test results for 10 products that are similar in price to the selected product.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> Percentages indicate an approach to the maximum of the recorded results. </p> <p> Only items currently in stock are used for comparison. </p> <p> Today we present to your attention a review of the youngest video card among Radeons of the fifth series. This accelerator, based on the Cedar graphics processor, closes the series of ATI premieres as part of the launch of a new generation of video cards (not counting the other Radeon HD 5830 announced later). The release of the entry-level video card was planned even before the premiere of the HD 5870 and took place right on schedule — in the first quarter of this year. </p> <p> The video card complies with both key features of the «5000th» family — the processor is manufactured in compliance with the 40-nm process technology and supports the DirectX11 API. However, you should not delude yourself — despite the use of advanced technologies, the accelerator that opens the lineup cannot be too powerful by definition. Among the people, such video cards are often disparagingly referred to as «gags», indicating an extremely low level of performance, insufficient even for «light» games.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> Often, such accelerators are delivered directly to the OEM market and find shelter in ready-made system units of the “advanced office” or “family computer” level. And yet, and it’s impossible not to write about it, dishonest sellers simply adore such cards, offering inexperienced users “gaming” configurations with completely inappropriate filling. Just imagine how good it sounds: “A powerful home computer with the latest ATI graphics card equipped with 512 MB of video memory and supporting DirectX11” ? </p> <h5> advertisement </h5> <p> Those interested can study the architecture of the new video processor in detail on the ATI presentation slide, which we present below: </p> <p> The graphics core has 80 stream processors, 4 rasterization units and 4 texture units. Thus, the new 40-nm Cedar graphics processor, in terms of the number and type of functional blocks, completely repeats the 55-nm RV710 used on the Radeon HD 4350 and Radeon HD 4550 video cards. The table shows the characteristics of these video cards for comparison with the new product: </p> <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3"> <tr bgcolor="#F0F0F0"> <td> <b> video card name </b> </td> <td> <b> Radeon HD 4350 </b> </td> <td> <b> Radeon HD 4450 </b> </td> <td> <b> Radeon HD 5450 </b> </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <td> Process technology, nm </td> <td> 55 </td> <td> 55 </td> <td> 40 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#F0F0F0"> <td> Core area, mm 2 </td> <td> 73 </td> <td> 73 </td> <td> 53 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <td> Number of transistors, mln pieces </td> <td> 242 </td> <td> 242 </td> <td> 292 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#F0F0F0"> <td> Number of stream processors </td> <td> 80 </td> <td> 80 </td> <td> 80 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <td> Number of texture units </td> <td> 8 </td> <td> 8 </td> <td> 8 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#F0F0F0"> <td> Number of ROPs </td> <td> 4 </td> <td> 4 </td> <td> 4 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <td> Core clock, MHz </td> <td> 600 </td> <td> 600 </td> <td> 650 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#F0F0F0"> <td> Effective video memory frequency, MHz </td> <td> 800/1000 </td> <td> 1600 </td> <td> 800/1600 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <td> Video memory type </td> <td> DDR2 </td> <td> GDDR3 </td> <td> DDR2 / GDDR3 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#F0F0F0"> <td> Video memory bus width, bit </td> <td> 64 </td> <td> 64 </td> <td> 64 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <td> Memory bandwidth, GB/s </td> <td> 6.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> 4 / 8 </td> <td> 12.8 </td> <td> 6.4 / 12.8 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#F0F0F0"> <td> Video memory size, MB </td> <td> 256 / 512 </td> <td> 256 / 512 </td> <td> 512 / 1024 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <td> TDP, W </td> <td> 22 </td> <td> 25 </td> <td> 19 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#F0F0F0"> <td> DirectX </td> <td> 10.1 </td> <td> 10.1 </td> <td> 11 </td> </tr> </table> <h5> advertisement </h5> <p> It should be noted that «pure» power cannot be considered a priority characteristic of video cards of this class. This is also indicated by the content of ATI’s presentation dedicated to bringing the HD 5450 to the market. Very little attention is paid to the performance of the novelty here, but marketers are doing their best to focus on DirectX11 support and ATI Eyefinity technology. Regarding the first, let me immediately express my skepticism — what kind of use of DX11 can we talk about with such a meager processing power of the video card? According to this parameter, the HD 5450 is more than five times inferior to the already low-power HD 5670, or, for example, approximately fifty (!) Times to the current «world leader» in 3D graphics — Radeon HD 5970.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> So we can’t count on using DirectX11 to improve the picture, we just don’t have enough hardware resources on the HD 5450 to get decent graphics. </p> <p> But another use of the new API — improving performance in «fresh» games (as a result of optimization) compared to the DirectX10 API, may be in demand. But even here everything is limited by the low power of the HD 5450. Looking ahead, let’s explain: for example, in the game «Stalker: Call of Pripyat» the inclusion of Dx11 (without tessellation and other «improvements») leads to an increase in performance compared to the Dx10-Dx10.1 modes — but we still cannot use this “bonus”, the framerate remains too low even at the minimum settings. In order to play Stalker, you need to switch the renderer to DX9 modeonly then will it be possible to obtain an acceptable number of frames per second. Similar situations can be repeated in other games where the new product will not have enough power. </p> <p> Another innovation is support for ATI Eyefinity technology, which allows connecting several monitors to one video card, on the contrary, the HD 5450 is the strongest trump card.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> desktop space. Essentially, buying a younger Radeon now looks like the easiest and most affordable way to put together a three-monitor setup. </p> <p> Also worth mentioning is the ability of the «younger» Radeon to provide hardware acceleration and all sorts of additional picture improvements when playing high-definition video (VC-1 and H.264 formats). Considering the presence of an HDMI connector (revision 1.3a) and the ability of the board to also provide 7.1-channel audio output (192 kHz / 24-bit with support for various standards, up to DTS-HD audio and Dolby True HD), the video card looks like an excellent candidate for using as part of the multimedia center. </p> <p> AMD/ATI was the first manufacturing giant to give users the opportunity to evaluate the next generation of graphics accelerators with support for the new Microsoft DirectX 11 API. by NVIDIA, but in both cases so far we have been talking about users who need powerful solutions primarily focused on 3D games. Thus, users who want to upgrade their work PC or home theater by installing a video card with support for the new API have been out of work until now.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> And in February 2010, AMD/ATI introduced the least productive and most affordable solution of the HD5000 series — ATI Radeon HD 5450. </p> </p> <p> When comparing the characteristics of the most affordable new-generation video card with other solutions from ATI, it is clear that it is not far behind its predecessors and is far behind GPUs for mainstream accelerators in the Radeon HD 5000 line. </p> <p> Chip area, sq. mm. </p> <p> Number of transistors, bln. </p> <p> Core clock, MHz </p> <p> Memory clock (effective QDR), MHz </p> <p> Texture units, pcs. </p> <p> Shader processors, pcs. </p> <p> Video memory bus width, bit </p> <p> Memory, MB </p> <p> Now let’s look at the architecture of the Radeon HD 5450 video core: </p> </p> <p> Since the Radeon HD 5450 is the most affordable video accelerator in the series and is designed to work in low-cost systems, this is reflected in its architecture. The video core contains two SIMD engines, each of which has four texture units and eight stream processors.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> Each stream processor includes five ALUs, which are called stream cores. As a result, each SIMD engine contains 40 stream cores and 4 texture units. In total, two engines give us 80 streaming cores and eight texture units. Nearby we can see four blocks of raster operations ROP. The memory controller, unfortunately, is 64-bit. Thus, it is obvious that the Radeon HD 5450 GPU is as simple as possible. </p> <p> Well, it’s time to get acquainted directly with the review of the Radeon HD 5450, in our case, using the example of the ASUS EAH5450/DI/1GD3(LP) video adapter. </p> </p> <p> ASUS EAH 5450/Di/1GD3 (LP): </p> <p> (AMD) ATI Radeon HD 5450 </p> <p> 80 unified stream </p> <p> DirectX 11 (SHADER MODEL 5.0) <br /> Opengl 3.1 </p> <p> MST </p> <p> Memory size (type), MB </p> <p> Memory frequency (effective), MHz </p> <p> Memory bus, bit </p> <p> PCI Express X16 2.1 </p> <p> Up to 2560×1600 Dual-link DVI or 1920×1200 Single-link DVI <br /> Up to 2048×1536 VGA (via DVI-to-VGA adapter) <br /> Up to 1920×1080 HDMI 9103×1 Up to 26060 DisplayPort </p> <p> 1x DVI-I <br /> 1x HDMI <br /> 1x VGA </p> <p> HDCP support and HD video decoding </p> <p> Latest drivers can be downloaded from the support site </p> <p> DI/1GD3(LP) describes the capabilities of any «reference» solution based on the Radeon HD 5450 with 1024 MB of memory on board.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> </p> </p> <p> The ASUS Radeon HD 5450 comes in a small carton. The appearance of the package, the winged horseman in its design is the same for the entire series of Radeon HD 5000 graphics accelerators from ASUS. The only difference here is the use of the ATI Radeon HD 5450 graphics processor, which underlies our test subject and other logos that emphasize proprietary technologies and video accelerator capabilities. Separately, the use of a fan with an extended service life in the cooling system of this solution, the presence of 1 GB of GDDR3 memory and an HDMI connector are noted. </p> </p> <p> The back of the package describes features typical for the entire fifth series of ATI graphics accelerators, and this solution in particular, such as support for Microsoft DirectX 11, the implementation of ATI Eyefinity technology, and also focuses on some proprietary ASUS technologies and provides system requirements. The latter confirms that this video card will be able to work in almost any system.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> </p> </p> <p> ASUS EAH5450/DI/1GD3(LP) package includes: </p> <ul> <li> CD with drivers and utilities; </li> <li> Instruction CD in many languages; </li> <li> Brief instructions for installing a video card. </li> <li> Half plug for installing a graphics card in small cases. </li> </ul> <p> Poor bundle is standard for solutions of this level. </p> <p> Externally, the ASUS EAH5450/DI/1GD3(LP) video card has a slightly redesigned design compared to the «reference» from ATI. Also, this video card differs from the standard in its original cooling system, in the design of which, along with an aluminum radiator, a fan is used, in the center of which there is a company logo. </p> </p> <p> In terms of dimensions, the ASUS EAH5450/DI/1GD3(LP) graphics accelerator corresponds to its «reference» analogue on the Radeon HD 5450, however, the accelerator version from ASUS has a slight advantage over the reference solution, since the use of a fan in the cooling system made it possible to make a heatsink more than two times thinner than on the standard.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> This, coupled with the fact that the board has a low profile, will allow you to install ASUS EAH5450/DI/1GD3(LP) in the most compact cases. </p> </p> <p> Due to the specific purpose of this video accelerator, it does not have connectors for CrossFire bridges, although the technology itself must be supported by software. As we can see, half of the video memory chips are located on the back side of the textolite. </p> <p> Low power consumption ASUS EAH5450/DI/1GD3(LP) ensures the operation of this video card without additional power supply and, obviously, it is not necessary to say that the installed cooler will be enough to cool the video card. </p> </p> <p> Video accelerator interface panel occupies one slot. The panel contains the most requested outputs: one universal DVI output, HDMI multimedia output and analog VGA output. In addition, the design features of the board allow you to dismantle a standard single-slot plug and install a two-slot half plug (included in the kit) instead of it for using ASUS EAH5450/DI/1GD3(LP) in small-sized cases.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> </p> </p> <p> The front side of the printed circuit board does not differ in layout density: in addition to the GPU itself, there are half of the video memory chips and components of the power stabilization unit. The memory chips were left without a heatsink, which is natural for a video card of this level. </p> </p> <p> The 40nm AMD RV810 chip has the smallest footprint (53mm2) of the entire Radeon HD 5000 family, resulting in the lowest performance and power consumption. The frequency of the GPU corresponds to the recommended value of 650 MHz. The most affordable member of the Radeon HD 5000 family has 80 unified shader processors, 8 texture units, and the number of ROPs is 4. ns, which allows them to operate at an effective frequency up to 1600 MHz. Since the resulting frequency of the memory chips on the video card is exactly the same, there are not so many hopes for its noticeable overclocking. </p> </p> <p> When there is no load, the chip operation frequency drops to 157 MHz, and the video memory slows down to 740 MHz (1480 MHz effective frequency).<img loading='lazy' src='' /> This provides an even greater reduction in energy consumption and, accordingly, the temperature and noise of the cooling system. </p> </p> <p> Obviously, the simplest power system will suffice for the Radeon HD 5450. Two simple single-phase converters are used to power the graphics processor and video memory chips. </p> </p> <p> The ASUS EAH5450/DI/1GD3(LP) cooling system differs from that recommended by ATI. In addition to the aluminum heatsink with plastic latches, it includes a compact fan mounted in the center of the heatsink. As already noted, this approach to the organization of the cooling system made it possible to significantly reduce the size of the heatsink and the thickness of the accelerator in comparison with the reference solution from ATI, which makes it possible to install the ASUS video adapter in the smallest cases. However, some users will probably find the ASUS EAH5450/DI/1GD3(LP) solution less successful, as the graphics card design has moving parts, which can affect durability and usability.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> </p> </p> <p> The aluminum heatsink contacts the video chip through a medium-quality thermal interface. Contact of the heatsink with memory chips is not implemented. </p> </p> <p> To evaluate the efficiency of the ASUS EAH 5450/DI/1GD3(LP) cooling system, we used the FurMark utility, and detailed monitoring was carried out using MSI Afterburner 1.5. The video card worked at standard frequencies, and the turbine speed was controlled automatically. At maximum load, the video core itself heats up to 50 ° C, which is quite good for video cards of this class. Considering that at the same time the fan speed was about 50% of the maximum, this gives a clear margin for quiet operation and even raises the idea of a slight overclocking. In general, even at maximum performance, this cooling system is very quiet and clearly does not stand out against the background of case fans. </p> <p> When testing, we used the Stand for testing Video cards No. 2 </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> Processor </td> <td> Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 (LGA775, 2.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> 83GHz, L2 12MB) @3.8GHz </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Motherboards </td> <td> ZOTAC NForce 790i-Supreme (LGA775, nForce 790i Ultra SLI, DDR3, ATX)GIGABYTE GA-EP45T-DS3R (LGA775, Intel P45, DDR3, ATX) </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Coolers </td> <td> Noctua NH-U12P (LGA775, 54.33 CFM, 12.6-19.8 dB) Thermalright SI-128 (LGA775) + VIZO Starlet UVLED120 (62.7 CFM, 31.1 dB) </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Additional cooling </td> <td> VIZO Propeller PCL-201 (+1 slot, 16.0-28.3 CFM, 20 dB) </td> </tr> <tr> <td> RAM </td> <td> 2x DDR3-1333 1024MB Kingston PC3-10600 (KVR1333D3N9/1G) </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Hard drives </td> <td> Hitachi Deskstar HDS721616PLA380 (160 GB, 16 MB, SATA-300) </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Power supplies </td> <td> Seasonic M12D-850 (850W, 120mm, 20dB) Seasonic SS-650JT (650W, 120mm, 39.1dB) </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Housing </td> <td> Spire SwordFin SP9007B (Full Tower) + Coolink SWiF 1202 (120x120x25, 53 CFM, 24 dB) </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Monitor </td> <td> Samsung SyncMaster 757MB (DynaFlat, 2048×1536@60Hz, MPR II, TCO’99) </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> <b> Select what you want to compare Radeon HD5450 1GB DDR3 ASUS </b> </p> </p> <p> <p><p> 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 </p> <p><p> 9000 </p> <p> 9000 </p> <p> 9000 </p> <p>0005 </p> </p> </p> <p> The performance of the Radeon HD 5450 graphics processor is clearly not enough to comfortably play modern games at graphics settings close to the maximum.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> But at the minimum, and, in some cases, medium settings, you can play, although here, often, the frame rate will leave much to be desired. Thus, the Radeon HD 5450 graphics processor is the least efficient discrete solution in the Radeon HD 5000 family. However, given that this video accelerator is primarily aimed at creating HTPC systems, low performance in games in this case is not a minus. It is also worth noting the manufacturability of the video adapter as a representative of a new generation: support for all new technologies, the key of which is DirectX 11. </p> <p> Overclocking ASUS Radeon HD 5450 </p> <p> To overclock ASUS EAH5450/DI/1GD3(LP), we used the AMD GPU Clock Tool. </p> </p> <p> The video card, when cooled by its standard turbine, was able to operate stably at frequencies: 810 MHz for the graphics core (+23%) and 1010 MHz (+26%) for the video memory, which ensured its operation at an effective frequency of 2020 MHz. This is an excellent result for a video card of this level.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> </p> <h2> Features AMD Athlon Dual Core 4450e , price, test, competitors </h2> </p> <h3> Family </h3> <ul> <li> Athlon Dual Core 4450B </li> <li> Athlon Dual Core 4850e </li> </ul> <h3> Benchmarks AMD Athlon Dual Core 4450e </h3> <h4> Speed in games </h4> <p> Performance in games, in games and similar applications. </p> <p> The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores. </p> <p> The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important. </p> <h4> Speed in office use </h4> <p> Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications. </p> <p> The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest. </p> <p> Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance. </p> <h4> Speed in heavy applications </h4> <p> Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> </p> <p> The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly. </p> <p> At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor. </p> <p> Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor. </p> <h3> Speed of numerical operations </h3> <table> <thead> <tr> <td> <h4> Simple household tasks </h4> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td> Minimum </td> <td> Average </td> <td> Maximum </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 40 </td> <td> Memory: 61 </td> <td> 80 9003<br /> </tr> <tr> <td> <p> Memory </p> <p> 64.6 </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 20 </td> <td> 1 core: 36 </td> <td> 41 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p> 1 core </p> <p> 17.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> 8 </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 33 </td> <td> 2 cores: 67 </td> <td> 81 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p> 2 cores </p> <p> 16.5 </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td/> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> <thead> <tr> <td> <h4> Demanding games and tasks </h4> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td> Minimum </td> <td> Average </td> <td> Maximum </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 42 </td> <td> 4 cores: 70 </td> <td> 81 9003<br /> </tr> <tr> <td> <p> 4 cores </p> <p> 8.8 </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 47 </td> <td> 8 cores: 71 </td> <td> 81 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p> 8 cores </p> <p> 4.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> 6 </p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> <thead> <tr> <td> <h4> Extreme </h4> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td> Minimum </td> <td> Average </td> <td> Maximum </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 45 </td> <td> All cores: 72 </td> <td> 81 9003<br /> </tr> <tr> <td> <p> All cores </p> <p> 1.3 </p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario. </p> <p> We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> </p> <p> Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance. </p> <p> When choosing a processor to work with, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads. </p> <p> Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems. </p> <h3> Benchmarks </h3> <p> Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version. </p> <h4> Passmark </h4> <p data-readability-styled="true"> Intel Core2 Duo E4500 </p> <p> 745 </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e </p> <p> 735 </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> Intel Core2 Duo T8100 9000 9000 9000 734 </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> AMDLLLOA0005 </p> <p> 730 </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> Intel Celeron 887 </p> <p> 727 </p> <p> AMD Athlon Dual Core 4450e </p> <p> 721 </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> Intel Pentium T4200 </p> <p> 714 </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> Intel Core2 Duo P7350 </p> <p> 711 </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> Intel Core2 Duo T5850 </p> <p> 705 </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ </p> <p> 704 </p> <p data-readability-styled="true"> Intel Core2 Duo T5870 </p> <p> 704 </p> <h3> Game Tests </h3> <p> FPS measured by us in popular games on AMD Athlon Dual Core 4450e and meets system requirements.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> Please note that the official requirements of developers in games do not always match the data of real tests. Also, the result is strongly influenced by the overclocking of the system and the graphic settings in the game. We test at high settings in FullHD resolution to get numbers close to real gameplay. </li> <li> GeForce 6150SE NFORCE 430 </li> <li> GEFORCE 210 </li> <li> GeForce 8500 GT </li> </ul> <h4> RAM </h4> <ul> <li> No data </li> </ul> <h4> SSD </h4> <p> A400 1202 9000 9000 9000 9000-M 80000-M 80000-M 80000 9000-M most often chosen when building a computer based on the Athlon Dual Core 4450e. Also with these components, the best results in tests and stable operation are achieved. </p> <p> The most popular config: motherboard for AMD Athlon Dual Core 4450e — HP D5468AT-ABA ALONPAV, video card — HD 7730, SSD — A400 120GB. </p> <h3> Characteristics </h3> <p> The data is not yet filled in, so the tables may lack information or omit existing functions. </p> <h4> Basic </h4> <table> <tr> <td> Manufacturer </td> <td> AMD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability.<img loading='lazy' src='' /> </td> <td> 09-2016 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Cores The number of physical cores. </td> <td> 2 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. </td> <td> 2 </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. </td> <td> Missing </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. </td> <td> 2.3 GHz </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode.<img loading='lazy' src='' /></p> </div> <div class="entry-footer"> <div class="entry-meta taxonomies"> </div> </div> </div> </div> </article> <nav class="navigation post-navigation" aria-label="Записи"> <h2 class="screen-reader-text">Навигация по записям</h2> <div class="nav-links"><div class="nav-previous"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/intel-pentium-gold-5405u-vs-i3-7020u-intel-core-i3-7020u-vs-pentium-5405u.html" rel="prev"><span class="nav-subtitle">Previous:</span> <span class="nav-title">Intel pentium gold 5405u vs i3 7020u: Intel Core i3-7020U vs Pentium 5405U</span></a></div><div class="nav-next"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/760-vs-660-ti-nvidia-gtx-660-ti-vs-760.html" rel="next"><span class="nav-subtitle">Next:</span> <span class="nav-title">760 vs 660 ti: Nvidia GTX 660-Ti vs 760</span></a></div></div> </nav> </main> </div> <div class="col-lg-4"> <aside id="secondary" class="widget-area"> <section id="search-2" class="widget widget_search"><form role="search" method="get" class="search-form" action="https://cbmssymposium.org/"> <label> <span class="screen-reader-text">Найти:</span> <input type="search" class="search-field" placeholder="Поиск…" value="" name="s" /> </label> <input type="submit" class="search-submit" value="Поиск" /> </form></section> <section id="recent-posts-2" class="widget widget_recent_entries"> <h2 class="widget-title">Свежие записи</h2> <ul> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/intel-pentium-dual-core-6000-please-click-the-green-button-to-continue.html">Intel pentium dual core 6000: Please click the green button to continue.</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/rivatuner-osd-not-display-in-league-of-legends-reddit-dive-into-anything-3.html">Rivatuner osd not display in league of legends: Reddit — Dive into anything</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/980-ti-wattage-nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti-specs-2.html">980 ti wattage: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Specs</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/a6-5200m-amd-a-series-a6-5200-notebook-processor-4.html">A6-5200M: AMD A-Series A6-5200 Notebook Processor</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/g502-lightspeed-review-logitech-g502-lightspeed-review-rtings-com-4.html">G502 lightspeed review: Logitech G502 LIGHTSPEED Review — RTINGS.com</a> </li> </ul> </section><section id="recent-comments-2" class="widget widget_recent_comments"><h2 class="widget-title">Свежие комментарии</h2><ul id="recentcomments"></ul></section><section id="archives-2" class="widget widget_archive"><h2 class="widget-title">Архивы</h2> <ul> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/10'>Октябрь 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/09'>Сентябрь 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/08'>Август 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/07'>Июль 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/06'>Июнь 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/05'>Май 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/04'>Апрель 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/03'>Март 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/02'>Февраль 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/01'>Январь 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/12'>Декабрь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/11'>Ноябрь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/10'>Октябрь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/09'>Сентябрь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/08'>Август 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/07'>Июль 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/06'>Июнь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/05'>Май 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/04'>Апрель 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/03'>Март 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/02'>Февраль 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/01'>Январь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/12'>Декабрь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/11'>Ноябрь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/10'>Октябрь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/09'>Сентябрь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/08'>Август 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/07'>Июль 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/06'>Июнь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/05'>Май 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/04'>Апрель 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/03'>Март 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/02'>Февраль 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/01'>Январь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/12'>Декабрь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/11'>Ноябрь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/10'>Октябрь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/09'>Сентябрь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/08'>Август 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/07'>Июль 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/06'>Июнь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/05'>Май 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/04'>Апрель 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/03'>Март 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/02'>Февраль 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/01'>Январь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2019/12'>Декабрь 2019</a></li> </ul> </section><section id="categories-2" class="widget widget_categories"><h2 class="widget-title">Рубрики</h2> <ul> <li class="cat-item cat-item-5"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/amd">Amd</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-7"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/benchmark">Benchmark</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-8"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/cpu">Cpu</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-4"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/gpu">Gpu</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-3"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/miscellaneous">Miscellaneous</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-11"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/monitor">Monitor</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-12"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/playstation">Playstation</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-6"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/radeon">Radeon</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-9"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/windows">Windows</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-10"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/xbox">Xbox</a> </li> </ul> </section><section id="meta-2" class="widget widget_meta"><h2 class="widget-title">Мета</h2> <ul> <li><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-login.php">Войти</a></li> <li><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/feed">Лента записей</a></li> <li><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/comments/feed">Лента комментариев</a></li> <li><a href="https://ru.wordpress.org/">WordPress.org</a></li> </ul> </section></aside> </div> </div> </div> </section> <footer id="colophon" class="site-footer"> <div class="col-lg-12"> <div class="site-info"> 2024 © All rights reserved </div> </div> </footer> </div> <style type="text/css"> .pgntn-page-pagination { text-align: left !important; } .pgntn-page-pagination-block { width: 60% !important; padding: 0 0 0 0; } .pgntn-page-pagination a { color: #1e14ca !important; background-color: #ffffff !important; text-decoration: none !important; border: 1px solid #cccccc !important; } .pgntn-page-pagination a:hover { color: #000 !important; } .pgntn-page-pagination-intro, .pgntn-page-pagination .current { background-color: #efefef !important; color: #000 !important; border: 1px solid #cccccc !important; } .archive #nav-above, .archive #nav-below, .search #nav-above, .search #nav-below, .blog #nav-below, .blog #nav-above, .navigation.paging-navigation, .navigation.pagination, .pagination.paging-pagination, .pagination.pagination, .pagination.loop-pagination, .bicubic-nav-link, #page-nav, .camp-paging, #reposter_nav-pages, .unity-post-pagination, .wordpost_content .nav_post_link,.page-link, .page-links,#comments .navigation, #comment-nav-above, #comment-nav-below, #nav-single, .navigation.comment-navigation, comment-pagination { display: none !important; } .single-gallery .pagination.gllrpr_pagination { display: block !important; } </style> <link rel='stylesheet' id='pgntn_stylesheet-css' href='https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-content/plugins/pagination/css/nav-style.css?ver=6.4.2' media='all' /> <script src="https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-content/themes/lolipop/assets/js/bootstrap.min.js?ver=1.0.3" id="bootstrap-js-js"></script> <script src="https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-content/themes/lolipop/assets/js/popper.min.js?ver=1.0.3" id="popper-js-js"></script> <script src="https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-content/themes/lolipop/assets/js/navigation.js?ver=1.0.3" id="lolipop-navigation-js-js"></script> <style>iframe,object{width:100%;height:480px}img{max-width:100%}</style><script type="text/javascript">jQuery(document).ready(function($){$('.mylink').replaceWith(function(){return'<a href="'+$(this).attr('data-url')+'" title="'+$(this).attr('title')+'">'+$(this).html()+'</a>'})});new Image().src="//counter.yadro.ru/hit?r"+escape(document.referrer)+((typeof(screen)=="undefined")?"":";s"+screen.width+"*"+screen.height+"*"+(screen.colorDepth?screen.colorDepth:screen.pixelDepth))+";u"+escape(document.URL)+";h"+escape(document.title.substring(0,150))+";"+Math.random();</script> </body> </html> <script src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/7d0fa10a/cloudflare-static/rocket-loader.min.js" data-cf-settings="9c6894140a7a9482929e11ec-|49" defer></script>