AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT: Specs, performance, and value
Performance
16,967
Performance / $
42.52
Memory
8 GB GDDR6
Dimensions
272 mm x 111 mm x 36 mm
Release Date
Q3 2019
Overview
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q3 2019 with a price of $399 (MSRP). The Navi 10 chip that powers the GPU uses the RDNA 1.0 architecture by AMD, and is built on the 7 nm process. Its the fastest desktop GPU in AMD’s RDNA 1.0 lineup.
The RX 5700 XT delivers the 61st best performance among the 546 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It is approximately 43.36% as fast as the GeForce RTX 4090, the fastest desktop GPU in our database. Its 16,967 performance rating and $399 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 42.52, giving it the 26th best value among desktop GPUs in our database.
The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 1,750 MHz memory clock and 256 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 448 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is a dual slot desktop graphics card, taking up 2 slots PCIe slots. It has dimensions of 272 mm x 111 mm x 36 mm. This desktop card has 1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a output ports.
This graphics card has a TDP of 225 W. AMD recommends using a power supply of at least 550 W with this card. A power supply lower than this can result in system crashes and potentially damaging your hardware.
General Info
General information about the Radeon RX 5700 XT like its performance, release date, launch price, and production status. Performance rating and performance per dollar are based on its chipset.
Performance Rating (Rank)* | 16,967 (61) |
Performance Per Dollar (Rank)* | 42.52 (26) |
Chipset | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
Manufacturer | AMD |
Architecture | RDNA 1.![]() |
Market Segment | Desktop |
Release Date | Q3 2019 |
Launch Price (MSRP) | $399 |
Relative Performance
Compare Radeon RX 5700 XT’s performance with similar desktop GPUs. Relative performance provides insight into how its benchmarks compare to its peers. This data is based on chipset performance.
Performance Rating | Relative Performance | |
---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 2080 | 18,811 | 111% |
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 18,510 | 109% |
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 18,251 | 108% |
Radeon RX 6650 XT | 17,766 | 105% |
GeForce RTX 3060 | 17,214 | 101% |
Radeon RX 5700 XT | 16,967 | 100% |
Radeon VII | 16,817 | 99% |
Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary | 16,614 | 98% |
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 16,597 | 98% |
Radeon RX 6600 XT | 16,450 | 97% |
Relative Value
Compare Radeon RX 5700 XT’s value with similar desktop GPUs. Relative value provides insight into which GPU gives the best bang for your buck. This data is based on chipset performance and MSRP.
Performance Per Dollar | Relative Value | |
---|---|---|
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 45.30 | 107% |
GeForce RTX 4070 | 45.18 | 106% |
GeForce RTX 3070 | 45.10 | 106% |
Radeon RX 6650 XT | 44.53 | 105% |
Radeon RX 6600 XT | 43.40 | 102% |
Radeon RX 5700 XT | 42.52 | 100% |
Radeon RX 5700 | 42.17 | 99% |
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 41.60 | 98% |
Radeon RX 6700 XT | 41.56 | 98% |
GeForce RTX 2060 | 40.38 | 95% |
Benchmarks
Performance and benchmark metrics for the Radeon RX 5700 XT. These are usually the best indicator for determing a GPUs performance. This data is based on its chipset.
G3D Mark | 16,967 |
G2D Mark | 945 |
3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 9,580 |
Technical Specs
Processor
General information about Radeon RX 5700 XT’s processor.
Codename | Navi 10 |
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 |
Process Size | 7 nm |
Transistors | 10,300 million |
Board Compatibility & Dimensions
Radeon RX 5700 XT’s dimensions, bus interface, power consumption, and output ports. These specs are useful for verifying that the Radeon RX 5700 XT fits within your case and is compatible with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
Slots | 2 slots |
Length | 272 mm |
Width | 111 mm |
Height | 36 mm |
Bus Interface | PCIe 4.![]() |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 W |
Suggested PSU | 550 W |
Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Memory
The memory size, bandwidth, and clock speeds for the Radeon RX 5700 XT. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are critical for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
Memory Size | 8 GB |
Memory Type | GDDR6 |
Memory Bandwidth | 448 Gb/s |
Memory Clock | 1,750 MHz |
Memory Interface | 256 bit |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Radeon RX 5700 XT’s cores, clock speed, and cache. These specs have an impact on how fast the Radeon RX 5700 XT can process graphics. Each type of core serves a specific computational purpose.
Shader Units / CUDA Cores | 2,560 |
Compute Units / SM Count | 40 |
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 160 |
Render Output Units (ROPs) | 64 |
Clock Speed (Base) | 1,605 MHz |
Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,905 MHz |
L2 Cache | 4 MB |
Pixel Fill Rate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
Texture Fill Rate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
FP32 Performance | 9.75 TFLOPS |
FP64 Performance | 609.6 GFLOPS |
API Support
API versions that the Radeon RX 5700 XT supports. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 |
Radeon RX 5700 XT Graphics Cards
Retail models based on the Radeon RX 5700 XT chipset.
Product | Dimensions | Clock | TDP |
---|---|---|---|
ASRock Challenger D RX 5700 XT OC | 281 mm x 137 mm x 42 mm | 1,650 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
ASRock Challenger Pro RX 5700 XT OC | 279 mm x 118 mm x 52 mm | 1,650 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
ASRock Phantom D RX 5700 XT OC | 287 mm x 127 mm x 53 mm | 1,690 MHz / 1,945 MHz | 225 W |
ASRock Phantom Elite RX 5700 XT | 287 mm x 127 mm x 53 mm | 1,650 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
ASRock RX 5700 XT | 272 mm x 111 mm x 36 mm | 1,605 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
ASRock RX 5700 XT TAICHI OC+ | 324 mm x 145 mm x 53 mm | 1,810 MHz / 2,025 MHz | 225 W |
ASUS ROG STRIX RX 5700 XT GAMING OC | 305 mm x 130 mm x 54 mm | 1,770 MHz / 2,010 MHz | 225 W |
ASUS RX 5700 XT | 272 mm x 111 mm x 36 mm | 1,605 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
ASUS TUF RX 5700 XT EVO GAMING OC | 283 mm x 129 mm x 54 mm | 1,650 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
ASUS TUF RX 5700 XT GAMING OC | 269 mm x 125 mm x 54 mm | 1,650 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
GIGABYTE AORUS RX 5700 XT | 290 mm x 123 mm x 58 mm | 1,770 MHz / 2,010 MHz | 225 W |
GIGABYTE RX 5700 XT | 272 mm x 111 mm x 36 mm | 1,605 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
GIGABYTE RX 5700 XT GAMING OC | 280 mm x 114 mm x 50 mm | 1,650 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
MSI RX 5700 XT | 272 mm x 111 mm x 36 mm | 1,605 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
MSI RX 5700 XT EVOKE | 254 mm x 129 mm x 51 mm | 1,630 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
MSI RX 5700 XT EVOKE OC | 254 mm x 129 mm x 51 mm | 1,690 MHz / 1,945 MHz | 225 W |
MSI RX 5700 XT GAMING | 297 mm x 140 mm x 58 mm | 1,630 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
MSI RX 5700 XT GAMING X | 297 mm x 140 mm x 58 mm | 1,730 MHz / 1,980 MHz | 225 W |
MSI RX 5700 XT MECH | 232 mm x 126 mm x 46 mm | 1,605 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
MSI RX 5700 XT MECH OC | 232 mm x 126 mm x 46 mm | 1,670 MHz / 1,925 MHz | 225 W |
PowerColor Liquid Devil RX 5700 XT OC | 240 mm x 162 mm x 42 mm | 1,900 MHz / 2,070 MHz | 225 W |
PowerColor RX 5700 XT | 272 mm x 111 mm x 36 mm | 1,605 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
PowerColor Red Devil RX 5700 XT Limited Edition | 300 mm x 132 mm x 53 mm | 1,770 MHz / 2,010 MHz | 225 W |
PowerColor Red Devil RX 5700 XT OC | 300 mm x 132 mm x 53 mm | 1,770 MHz / 2,010 MHz | 225 W |
PowerColor Red Dragon RX 5700 XT OC | 240 mm x 132 mm x 41 mm | 1,650 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
Sapphire GPRO X070 | 282 mm x 134 mm x 35 mm | 1,605 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 180 W |
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 5700 XT | 306 mm x 135 mm x 49 mm | 1,770 MHz / 2,010 MHz | 225 W |
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 5700 XT BE | 306 mm x 135 mm x 49 mm | 1,730 MHz / 1,980 MHz | 225 W |
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 5700 XT Special Edition | 306 mm x 135 mm x 49 mm | 1,840 MHz / 2,035 MHz | 225 W |
Sapphire PULSE RX 5700 XT | 254 mm x 135 mm x 47 mm | 1,670 MHz / 1,925 MHz | 225 W |
Sapphire PULSE RX 5700 XT BE | 254 mm x 135 mm x 47 mm | 1,670 MHz / 1,925 MHz | 225 W |
Sapphire RX 5700 XT | 272 mm x 111 mm x 36 mm | 1,605 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
XFX RX 5700 XT | 272 mm x 111 mm x 36 mm | 1,605 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
XFX RX 5700 XT Double Dissipation | 280 mm x 148 mm x 44 mm | 1,605 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
XFX RX 5700 XT RAW II | 278 mm x 140 mm x 58 mm | 1,605 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
XFX RX 5700 XT RAW II Ultra | 278 mm x 140 mm x 58 mm | 1,730 MHz / 1,980 MHz | 225 W |
XFX RX 5700 XT THICC II | 293 mm x 130 mm x 55 mm | 1,605 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
XFX RX 5700 XT THICC II Ultra | 293 mm x 130 mm x 55 mm | 1,730 MHz / 1,980 MHz | 225 W |
XFX RX 5700 XT THICC III Ultra | 315 mm x 131 mm x 57 mm | 1,810 MHz / 2,025 MHz | 225 W |
XFX RX 5700 XT Triple Dissipation | 326 mm x 148 mm x 44 mm | 1,605 MHz / 1,905 MHz | 225 W |
*Performance rating, performance per dollar, rankings, and benchmarks are approximate values based on the Radeon RX 5700 XT chipset.
AMD Radeon RX 5700/ 5700 XT revealed: full Navi specs and analysis
AMD has taken the wraps off its first brace of Radeon Navi products, revealing the RX 5700 and the more powerful RX 5700 XT. Both are based on a new processor known as Navi 10, using the new RDNA micro architecture — with the products designed to outgun Nvidia’s RTX 2060 and RTX 2070. The two cards cost $379 and $449 respectively, undercutting their Nvidia counterparts but lacking features including hardware accelerated ray tracing. Both launch on July 7th, alongside AMD’s new Ryzen 3000 line of CPUs.
Full specs for the products reveal that the RX 5700 XT uses a fully enabled Navi 10 chip, featuring a total of 40 compute units and 2560 shaders. Peak compute tops out at 9.75TF — significantly lower than the existing Radeon RX Vega 64. However, AMD has massively revamped its compute unit architecture, with a big improvement in performance. The end result is that despite a 24 CU deficit, AMD says that the 5700 XT has a 14 per cent performance lead over RX Vega 64 using 23 per cent less power.
The standard RX 5700 loses some of the finish of the XT’s shroud, but cuts elsewhere look surprisingly modest. The 40 CU total in the higher end model drops to 36 in the RX 5700, while typical gaming clocks are dropped by 130MHz. What’s interesting here is that both units deliver eight gigabytes of GDDR6 memory, with the same 14gbps modules delivering 448GB/s of memory bandwidth — so there’s no reduction in memory throughput here on the cheaper card.
Performance-wise, AMD says that the RX 5700 delivers an average 10 per cent lead over the RTX 2060, while the RX 5700 XT normalises at around a six per cent advantage over the RTX 2070. However, there are outlier titles including Forza Horizon 4 and Battlefield 5 where AMD reckons it delivers massive performance advantages of over 20 per cent at 1440p resolution.
The notion of Navi’s 9.75TF outperforming Vega’s 12.6TF may well be the reason why the next-gen consoles — both based on AMD’s latest GPU architecture — won’t be marketed based on teraflop numbers alone in the way that Xbox One X was. AMD has pushed IPC hard with Navi, with a new compute unit design with a 2x increase in instruction rate, twice the scalar units and schedulers. There’s reduced execution latency, improved cache efficiency and a new cache hierarchy. Today’s teraflop with Navi clearly delivers a lot more real-life gaming performance than last gen’s Vega.
Meet the reference version of the Radeon RX 5700 XT, based on the Navi 10 processor with its RDNA micro architecture.
Radeon RX 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700 | |
---|---|---|
Compute Units | 40 | 36 |
Stream Processors | 2560 | 2304 |
Base/Game/Max Boost | 1605MHz/1755MHz/1905MHz | 1465MHz/1625MHz/1725MHz |
Memory | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
Memory Bandwidth | 256-bit/ 448GB/s | 256-bit/ 448GB/s |
ROPs/Texture Units | 64/160 | 64/144 |
TDP | 225W | 180W |
There are other fascinating elements to the Navi package — including the arrival of a new display controller that carries through delta colour compression right through to compatible monitors — including a new Asus display that’ll hit with a 43-inch HDR 1000 panel capable of 120Hz gaming at 4K resolution using a single cable. Interestingly, AMD is retaining HDMI 2.0 output, which suggests a 4K60 limit on that output.
Other features Navi delivers are more software-based. Anti-lag sees the driver attempting a deeper level of synchronisation between CPU and GPU in order to reduce ‘button to response’ latency. Impressive results are mooted here, with an average 14ms reduction in lag — which could be seriously good news for esports players. Curiously, the tech only works right now with DX9 and DX11 titles.
Also promising is the arrival of Contrast Adaptive Sharpening, developed by FXAA author Timoty Lottes. The idea is to concentrate sharpening on low contrast areas, heightening detail in an artefact-free manner, with no halo edge ringing. This can be combined with an optional upscale — the idea being to maximise visual results on, say, a 4K display while rendering at a lower native resolution (1800p was mentioned as a recommended resolution to try). AMD is positioning this as an alternative to Nvidia’s DLSS, with just a one to two per cent hit to performance — in contrast to Team Green’s more expensive solution.
I do think the notion of a direct comparison is a little off, as the two technologies are doing very different things and each will have their own plus and minus points. CAS has no temporal component, for example, it’s screen-space only. Meanwhile, DLSS has some clear artefacting issues, but temporal stability is excellent and it is adding additional detail to the scene as opposed to sharpening a native resolution image. I get the idea that CAS is aimed more towards addressing the in-surface softness introduced by the temporal anti-aliasing and temporal super-sampling used in most modern game engines, where I suspect it will perform beautifully. I’m not sure how effective an upscale on top of that can be, but the brains behind this tech are top class and we’ll be sure to check this out more closely when we can.
Yes, it’s a blower — and traditionally AMD reference cards have been let down by their thermals. AMD is promising better things for this one, but the bottom line is that when Navi launches, this will be the only version available for a while.
On a broader level, the arrival of hard facts and figures on Navi and RDNA are welcome. AMD cites a 2.3x increase in performance from silicon area vs the 14nm Vega 64, and the fact that a part with 40 compute units can comprehensively best a last-gen 64 CU part is possibly the biggest leap we’ve seen from AMD since Graphics Core Next launched way back in 2011. If GCN’s apparent 4096 shader/64 CU limitation is still in place, a prospective Navi 20 with maximum CUs should still deliver a potent punch. Also interesting is that we have a firm die size measurement for Navi 10 — 251mm2. That’s up from the 36 CU RX 480/580/590 based on Polaris 10, which came in at 232mm2. Transistor count has almost doubled between the two parts, despite Navi 10 only delivering four extra CUs.
There are next-gen console implications too. The processors in Sony and Microsoft boxes have typically been in the 320-360mm2 area, meaning that with eight Zen 2 cores on top of Navi 10, we’re already getting very close to a console’s typical silicon budget — and of course, it’s highly likely that four or more CUs may be disabled to increase production yields.
Overall, Navi is looking interesting — though perhaps the performance win against Nvidia is more useful rather than game-changing, especially at what I’d consider to be higher than expected price-points. And of course, the Navi cards lack hardware ray tracing acceleration and desirable features found in Nvidia’s Turing, such as variable rate shading. AMD says the market isn’t ready for RT yet, but DXR software is appearing and the bottom line is that it’ll run on Nvidia cards but not AMD. Meanwhile, both Microsoft and Sony are including RT as a feature in their next-gen consoles: clearly ray tracing is important, it is happening, open standards are there and the fact that MS has confirmed it has a hardware accelerated implementation in turn suggests strongly that the technology exists within AMD right now, even if it’s not quite ready for show time in current Navi parts.
The AMD RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT are due for release next month and we’ll bring you detailed reviews as quickly as we can.
We attended AMD’s tech day for press and analysts in Los Angeles in order to bring you this coverage. AMD covered travel and accommodation costs.
Specifications and reviews of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT video card / Overclockers.ua 10



Go to the list of all graphics cards XTRadeon RX 6700 XTRadeon RX 6700Radeon RX 6650 XTRadeon RX 6600 6400Radeon RX 5700 XTRadeon RX 5700Radeon RX 5600 XTRadeon RX 5500 XTRadeon VIIRadeon RX Vega 64Radeon RX Vega 56Radeon RX 590Radeon RX 580 XTRRadeon RX 580Radeon RX 570Radeon RX 560Radeon RX 550Radeon RX 480Radeon RX 470Radeon RX 460Radeon R9Fury XRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 NanoRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 390Radeon R9 380XRadeon R9 380Radeon R7 370Radeon R7 360Radeon R9 295X2Radeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 280XRadeon R9 285 Radeon R9 280Radeon R9 270XRadeon R9 270Radeon R7 265Radeon R7 260XRadeon R7 260Radeon R7 250Radeon R7 240Radeon HD 7970Radeon HD 7950Radeon HD 7870 XTRadeon HD 7870Radeon HD 7850Radeon HD 7790Radeon HD 7770Radeon HD 7750Radeon HD 6990Radeon HD 6970Radeon HD 6950Radeon HD 6930Radeon HD 6870Radeon HD 6850Radeon HD 6790Radeon HD 6770Radeon HD 6750Radeon HD 6670 GDDR5Radeon HD 6670 GDDR3Radeon HD 6570 GDDR5Radeon HD 6570 GDDR3Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5Radeon HD 6450 GDDR3Radeon HD 5570 GDDR5Radeon HD 3750Rade on HD 3730Radeon HD 5970Radeon HD 5870Radeon HD 5850Radeon HD 5830Radeon HD 5770Radeon HD 5750Radeon HD 5670Radeon HD 5570Radeon HD 5550Radeon HD 5450Radeon HD 4890Radeon HD 4870 X2Radeon HD 4870Radeon HD 4860Radeon HD 4850 X2Radeon HD 4850Radeon HD 4830Radeon HD 4790Radeon HD 4770Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 4670Radeon HD 4650Radeon HD 4550Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 4290 (IGP 890GX) Radeon HD 4200 (IGP) Radeon HD 3870 X2 Radeon HD 3870 Radeon HD 3850 Radeon HD 3690 Radeon HD 3650 Radeon HD 3470 Radeon HD 3450 Radeon HD 3300 (IGP) Radeon HD 3200 (IGP) 0 (IGP)Radeon HD 2900 XT 1Gb GDDR4Radeon HD 2900 XTRadeon HD 2900 PRORadeon HD 2900 GTRadeon HD 2600 XT DUALRadeon HD 2600 XT GDDR4Radeon HD 2600 XTRadeon HD 2600 PRORadeon HD 2400 XTRadeon HD 2400 PRORadeon HD 2350Radeon X1950 CrossFire EditionRadeon X19 50 XTXRadeon X1950 XTRadeon X1950 PRO DUALRadeon X1950 PRORadeon X1950 GTRadeon X1900 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1900 XTXRadeon X1900 XTRadeon X1900 GT Rev2Radeon X1900 GTRadeon X1800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1800 XT PE 512MBRadeon X1800 XTRadeon X1800 XLRadeon X1800 GTORadeon X1650 XTR adeon X1650 GTRadeon X1650 XL DDR3Radeon X1650 XL DDR2Radeon X1650 PRO on RV530XTRadeon X1650 PRO on RV535XTRadeon X1650Radeon X1600 XTRadeon X1600 PRORadeon X1550 PRORadeon X1550Radeon X1550 LERadeon X1 Radeon X850 XT Platinum Edition X800 XT Platinum Edition Radeon X800 XTRadeon X800 CrossFire Edition on X800 SERadeon X700 XTRadeon X700 ProRadeon X700Radeon X600 XTRadeon X600 ProRadeon X550 XTRadeon X550Radeon X300 SE 128MB HM-256MBRadeon X300 SE 32MB HM-128MBRadeon X300Radeon X300 SERadeon 9800 XTRadeon 9800 PRO /DDR IIRadeon 9800 PRO /DDRRadeon 9800Radeon 9800 SE-256 bitRadeon 9800 SE-128 bitRadeon 9700 PRORadeon 9700Radeon 9600 XTRadeon 9600 PRORadeon 9600Radeon 9600 SERadeon 9 600 TXRadeon 9550 XTRadeon 9550Radeon 9550 SERadeon 9500 PRORadeon 9500 /128 MBRadeon 9500 /64 MBRadeon 9250Radeon 9200 PRORadeon 9200Radeon 9200 SERadeon 9000 PRORadeon 9000Radeon 9000 XTRadeon 8500 LE / 9100Radeon 8500Radeon 7500Radeon 7200 Radeon LE Radeon DDR OEM Radeon DDR Radeon SDR Radeon VE / 7000Rage 128 GL Rage 128 VR Rage 128 PRO AFRRage 128 PRORage 1283D Rage ProIntelArc A770 16GBArc A770 8GBArc A750Arc A380Arc A310NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4080GeForce RTX 4080 12GBGeForce RTX 4070 TiGeForce RTX 4070GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GBGeForce RTX 4060 TiGeForce RTX 4060GeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce RTX 3090GeForce RTX 30 80 TiGeForce RTX 3080 12GBGeForce RTX 3080GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6XGeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce RTX 3060 rev. 2GeForce RTX 3060GeForce RTX 3050GeForce RTX 2080 TiGeForce RTX 2080 SuperGeForce RTX 2080GeForce RTX 2070 SuperGeForce RTX 2070GeForce RTX 2060 SuperGeForce RTX 2060GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce GTX 1660 SuperGeForce GTX 1660GeForce GTX 1650 SuperGeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6GeForce GTX 1650 rev.3GeForce GTX 1650 rev.2GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 1630GeForce Titan X GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 980GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX TitanGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 780GeForce GTX 770GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 750GeForce GT 740 GeForce GT 730GeForce GTX 690GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 660 TiGeForce GTX 660GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostGeForce GTX 650 TiGeForce GTX 650GeForce GT 640 rev.2GeForce GT 640GeForce GT 630 rev.2GeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 580GeForce GTX 570GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GTX 560GeForce GTX 550 TiGeForce GT 520GeForce GTX 480G eForce GTX 470GeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 460 SEGeForce GTX 460 1024MBGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce GTS 450GeForce GT 440 GDDR5GeForce GT 440 GDDR3GeForce GT 430GeForce GT 420GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 280GeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 260 rev.
2GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTS 250GeForce GTS 240GeForce GT 240GeForce GT 230GeForce GT 220GeForce 210Geforce 205GeForce GTS 150GeForce GT 130GeForce GT 120GeForce G100GeForce 9800 GTX+ GeForce 9800 GTXGeForce 9800 GTSGeForce 9800 GTGeForce 9800 GX2GeForce 9600 GTGeForce 9600 GSO (G94)GeForce 9600 GSOGeForce 9500 GTGeForce 9500 GSGeForce 9400 GTGeForce 9400GeForce 9300GeForce 8800 ULTRAGeForce 8800 GTXGeForce 8800 GTS Rev2GeForce 8800 GTSGeForce 8800 GTGeForce 8800 GS 768MBGeForce 8800 GS 384MBGeForce 8600 GTSGeForce 8600 GTGeForce 8600 GSGeForce 8500 GT DDR3GeForce 8500 GT DDR2GeForce 8400 GSGeForce 8300GeForce 8200GeForce 8100GeForce 7950 GX2GeForce 7950 GTGeForce 7900 GTXGeForce 7900 GTOGeForce 7900 GTGeForce 7900 GSGeForce 7800 GTX 512MBGeForce 7800 GTXGeForce 7800 GTGeForce 7800 GS AGPGeForce 7800 GSGeForce 7600 GT Rev.2GeForce 7600 GTGeForce 7600 GS 256MBGeForce 7600 GS 7100 GS TC 128 (512)GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MBGeForce 6800 UltraGeForce 6800 GT 256MBGeForce 6800 GT 128MBGeForce 6800 GTOGeForce 6800 256MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 128MB PCI-EGeForce 68 00 LE PCI-EGeForce 6800 256MB AGPGeForce 6800 128MB AGPGeForce 6800 LE AGPGeForce 6800 GS AGPGeForce 6800 GS PCI-EGeForce 6800 XTGeForce 6600 GT PCI-EGeForce 6600 GT AGPGeForce 6600 DDR2GeForce 6600 PCI-EGeForce 6600 AGPGeForce 6600 LEGeForce 6200 NV43VGeForce 6200GeForce 6200 NV43AGeForce 6 500GeForce 6200TC 64(256)GeForce 6200TC 32(128)GeForce 6200TC 16(128)GeForce PCX5950GeForce PCX 5900GeForce PCX 5750GeForce PCX 5550GeForce PCX 5300GeForce PCX 4300GeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce FX 5900 UltraGeForce FX 5900GeForce FX 5900 ZTGeForce FX 5900 XTGeForce FX 5800 UltraGeForce FX 5800GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-3GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-2GeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5700 LEGeForce FX GeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.
1) SEGeForce 4 Ti 4200-8xGeForce 4 Ti 4600GeForce 4 Ti 4400GeForce 4 Ti 4200GeForce 4 MX 4000GeForce 4 MX 440-8x / 480GeForce 4 MX Force 3GeForce 2 Ti VXGeForce 2 TitaniumGeForce 2 UltraGeForce 2 PROGeForce 2 GTSGeForce 2 MX 400GeForce 2 MX 200GeForce 2 MXGeForce 256 DDRGeForce 256Riva TNT 2 UltraRiva TNT 2 PRORiva TNT 2Riva TNT 2 M64Riva TNT 2 Vanta LTRiva TNT 2 VantaRiva TNTRiva 128 ZXRiva 128
You can simultaneously select
up to 10 video cards by holding Ctrl
Reviews of video cards AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT:
-
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming X video card review and testing. Even faster!
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming X
-
Review and testing Radeon RX 5700 XT and Radeon RX 5700 by MSI
MSI Radeon RX 5700XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT graphics card [at 19benchmarks]
Description
AMD started Radeon RX 5700 XT sales on July 7, 2019 at a suggested price of $399. This is a Navi / RDNA architecture desktop card based on 7 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory at 14 GHz, and coupled with a 256-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 448.0 GB / s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a two-slot PCIe 4.0 x16 card. The length of the reference version is 272 mm. The connection requires one 6-pin cable and one 8-pin cable, and the power consumption is 225W.
It provides good performance in tests and games at the level of
43.24%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 130
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Radeon RX 5700 XT, as well as when sales started and cost at the time.
Rank in performance | 55 | |
Rank in popularity | 90 149 49 | |
Value for money | 43.18 | |
Architecture | Navi / RDNA (2019-2020) | |
GPU | Navi 10 | |
Type | Desktop | Release date | July 7, 2019 (4 years ago) |
Release price | $399 | |
Price now 68889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher the better.
Features
Radeon RX 5700 XT’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak of Radeon RX 5700 XT’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Number of stream processors | 2560 | of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
Core clock | 1605MHz 901 50 | out of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
Boost frequency | 1905 MHz | of 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX) |
Number of transistors | 10 .300 million | out of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (mobile)) |
Process | 7nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
225 W | out of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) | |
Texturing speed | 304.![]() |
out of 969.9 (h200 SXM5 96 GB) |
Compatibility and dimensions
Information on Radeon RX 5700 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply).
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 901 49 272 mm | |
Thickness | 2 slots | |
Additional connectors power supply | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
RAM
Parameters of the memory installed on Radeon RX 5700 XT — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Maximum memory | 9014 9 8 GB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory clock | 14000MHz | out of 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 Gb/s | of 3276 (Aldebaran) |
Video outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon RX 5700 XT. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Video connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
HDMI | + |
Technology
Technology solutions and APIs supported by Radeon RX 5700 XT are listed here. You will need this information if your graphics card is required to support specific technologies.
VR Ready0012 | + |
API support
APIs supported for Radeon RX 5700 XT, including their revisions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | OpenCL | 2.0 |
Benchmark tests
These are the results of Radeon RX 5700 XT rendering performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest video card at the moment.
Overall benchmark performance
This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
RX 5700 XT
43.24
Passmark
This is a very common benchmark included in the Passmark PerformanceTest package. He gives the card a thorough evaluation, running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11, and 12 (the latter being done at 4K resolution whenever possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
RX 5700 XT
16904
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark. It loads the graphics card with two scenes, one of which is a girl running away from some kind of military base located in a sea cave, and the other is a space fleet attacking defenseless planet. Support for 3DMark Vantage was discontinued in April 2017 and it is now recommended to use the Time Spy benchmark instead.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
RX 5700 XT
83961
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is Futuremark’s legacy DirectX 11 benchmark. He used four tests based on two scenes: one is several submarines exploring a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All tests make extensive use of volumetric lighting and tessellation and, despite being run at 1280×720, are relatively heavy. Support for 3DMark 11 ended in January 2020 and is now being replaced by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
RX 5700 XT
35823
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Benchmark coverage: 13%
RX 5700 XT
22800
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests showing a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature that appears to be made of lava. Using resolution 1920×1080, Fire Strike shows quite realistic graphics and is quite demanding on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
RX 5700 XT
26189
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is a legacy DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark used to test home PCs and low-end laptops. It displays several scenes of some strange teleportation device launching spaceships into the unknown at a fixed resolution of 1280×720. As with the Ice Storm benchmark, it was deprecated in January 2020 and 3DMark Night Raid is now recommended instead.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
RX 5700 XT
146093
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of the 3DMark package. Ice Storm has been used to measure the performance of entry-level laptops and Windows-based tablets. It uses DirectX 11 feature level 9 to render a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet at 1280×720 resolution. Support for Ice Storm ended in January 2020, now the developers recommend using Night Raid instead.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
RX 5700 XT
499658
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 maya-04
Benchmark coverage: 3%
RX 5700 XT
115
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 sw-03
Benchmark coverage: 3%
RX 5700 XT
110
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 snx-02
Benchmark coverage: 3%
RX 5700 XT
43
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 medical-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
RX 5700 XT
47
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 catia-04
Benchmark coverage: 3%
RX 5700 XT
174
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 creo-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
RX 5700 XT
81
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 showcase-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
RX 5700 XT
141
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 energy-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
RX 5700 XT
13
SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase
Benchmark coverage: 2%
RX 5700 XT
138
SPECviewperf 12 — Catia
Benchmark coverage: 2%
RX 5700 XT
159
SPECviewperf 12 — specvp12 3dsmax-05
Benchmark coverage: 1%
RX 5700 XT
200
SPECviewperf 12 — 3ds Max
This part of the SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates 3DS Max by running eleven tests in various use cases, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.
Benchmark coverage: 1%
RX 5700 XT
174
Radeon RX 5700 XT gaming
FPS in popular games on the Radeon RX 5700 XT, as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests.
Average FPS
Here are the average FPS values for a large selection of popular games at various resolutions:
Full HD 009 | ||
1440p | 83 | |
4K | 53 |
Popular games
Relative performance
Overall performance of Radeon RX 5700 XT compared to its closest competitors in desktop graphics cards.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
101.6
NVIDIA TITAN V
101.32
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
100. 51
AMD Radeon RX 5700XT
100
AMD Radeon VII
99.33
AMD Radeon RX 5700XT 50th Anniversary
98.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
98.15
Competitor from NVIDIA
The closest competitor of Radeon RX 5700 XT from NVIDIA is TITAN V CEO Edition, which is 1% faster on average and higher by 1 position in our rating.
TITAN V CEO Edition
Compare
Here are some of NVIDIA’s closest competitors to the Radeon RX 5700 XT:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
101.6
NVIDIA TITAN V
101.32
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
100.51
AMD Radeon RX 5700XT
100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
98.15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
95. 7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
93.83
Other video cards
Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Radeon VII
Compare
GeForce RTX 3060
Compare
GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Compare
Radeon RX 6600 XT 9 0137
Compare
Radeon RX 6650 XT
Compare
GeForce RTX 2070
Compare
Recommended Processors
Based on our statistics, these processors are most commonly used with the Radeon RX 5700 XT.
Ryzen 5
3600
12.4%
Ryzen 7
3700X
5.3%
Ryzen 5
5600X
3.8%
Ryzen 5
5500
3.