AMD Announces A10-7850K Kaveri APU Specifications and Architectural Details
AMD has officially popped the lid and announced various key details of their next generation Kaveri APU. The A-Series Kaveri APUs from AMD would be branded as the A10/A8/A6/A4-7000 series and would replace the current A10/A8/A6/A4-6000 series ‘Richland’ APUs.
AMD Announces Kaveri APU Specifications and Architectural Details
AMD showed various slides of their upcoming Kaveri generation of APUs confirming our previous reports such as the Kaveri APU featuring a GCN core architecture, the brand new 28nm Steamroller core architecture and HSA enhancements which would make development an ease on the new platform. The Kaveri APU would stick to the FM2+ socket for desktop PCs and would arrive on the desktop platform first with initial availability beginning from 14th of January 2014. We have already seen several FM2+ socketed products from manufacturer’s which can be seen in the following links: MSI, ASUS, ASRock, Gigabyte, BioStar
Coming to the architecture details, the AMD Kaveri APU features a full blown Steamroller core architecture with upto four multi-threaded x86 cores which are specifically designed to expand computation efficiency, improve the single core execution and feed the cores faster. We are looking at Quad Core APUs in the Kaveri generation which would be multi-threaded and upto 4 MB of L2 shared cache. Steamroller is AMD’s first big core in some time that would feature the 28nm core process and would essentially mean lower power consumption while pumping out a better IPC rate over Piledriver and Bulldozer.
On the graphics side, AMD would fuse their past flagship GCN core architecture inside the Kaveri APU. The Kaveri APU can hold upto eight GCN compute units with powerful parallel compute and next-gen gaming capabilities. In addition to these, GCN would have the ability to support DirectX 11.2 and OpenGL 4.3 so overall we are looking at richer gaming experiences that would be delivered with the Kaveri APU and technologies such as TrueAudio and AMD Mantle further boosting the visual experiences of gamers.
The last significant enhancement Kaveri would adopt is the HSA (Heterogeneous System Architecture) powered with the new HUMA enhancements which allow coherent memory access within the GPU and CPU. HUMA would make sure that both the CPU and GPU would have uniform access to an entire memory space which would be done through the memory controller. This would allow additional performance out of the APU incase the GPU gets bandwidth starved. This also suggests that faster memory speeds would result in better overall performance from the graphics card. Now with all the architectural talks done, let’s get on with the A10-7850K itself.
AMD A10-7850K — The Flagship Kaveri APU For FM2+ Platform
The AMD A10-7850K is presumably the flagship Kaveri APU for 2014 which would replace the Richland A10-6800K APU. The A10-7850K has four Steamroller cores and 512 GCN stream processors which bring its performance on a level equivalent to the Radeon HD 7750 in terms of graphics performance. The A10-7850K has a max compute of 856 GFLops which is impressive yet slightly lower than the 1 TFLops class APU AMD mentioned a few months back
The clock speed of the APU is maintained at 3. 7 GHz which is presumably the base clock while Turbo clock would push the speeds beyond 4 GHz barrier. The GPU which is positioned in the R7 series is clocked at 720 MHz while the APU itself has 4 MB of L2 cache. AMD A10-7850K will support both Mantle API, DirectX 11.2 and OpenGL 4.3 and the possibility of it ending up as a Dual GPU solution with the AMD Radeon R7 260X remains very high and if it happens, then it would mean a very price to performance minded platform for gamers and desktop users.
Model | AMD A10-7850K ‘Kaveri’ | AMD A10-6800K ‘Richland’ | AMD A10-5800K ‘Trinity’ |
Cores | 4/4 | 4/4 | 4/4 |
Turbo Core 3.0 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Turbo Clock | 4. 0 GHz + | 4.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
L2 Cache | 4 MB L2 | 4 MB L2 | 4 MB L2 |
Unlocked Design | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Graphics Core | GCN Radeon R7 Series | HD 8670D | HD 7660D |
GPU Cores | 512 Cores | 384 Cores | 384 Cores |
GPU Clock | 720 MHz + | 844 MHz | 800 MHz |
TDP | 95W | 100W | 100W |
Launch Date | 14th January 2014 | 4th June 2013 | 2nd October 2012 |
AMD A10-7850K Plays Battlefield 4 at 1080P Without Discrete GPU — Twice Fast Than 4770K
Hothardware saw a demonstration of the Kaveri APU with the same A10-7850K sample running Battlefield 4 at 1080P and medium details at a frame rate between 28-40 FPS. The Core i7-4770K on the other hand which is Intel’s top dog only managed 12-14 FPS which is a definite lead for the APU platform. Hopefully, performance would improve a bit more given the new drivers at launch along with enhancements in Mantle and DirectX 11.2 API.
For performance, AMD showed Kaveri up against the Intel 4770K running a low-end GeForce GT 630. There are three variants of this particular card — it’s not clear which AMD utilized — but the overall performance figures are rather stark. In the intro scene to BF4’s single-player campaign (1920×1080, Medium Details), the AMD Kaveri system (with no discrete GPU) consistently pushed frame rates in the 28-40 FPS range. The Intel system, in contrast, couldn’t manage 15 FPS. Performance on that system was solidly in the 12-14 FPS range — meaning AMD is pulling 2x the frame rate, if not more. HotHardware
AMD has also planned more details for CES 2014 so this covers up the announcements made at the Developer Summit. AMD Kaveri APU would intially launch for the desktop platform in January 2014 while arriving later for the Notebooks, Embedded and Server Products. Do stay updated for more information.
A10-7850K [in 21 benchmarks]
AMD
A10-7850K
Buy
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Summary
AMD started AMD A10-7850K sales 14 January 2014 at a recommended price of $173. This is Godaveri architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 28nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 4000 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is FM2+ processor with a TDP of 95 Watt and a maximum temperature of 74 °C. It supports DDR3-2133 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
3.34%
of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
A10
7850K
vs
EPYC
7h22
General info
A10-7850K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
Place in performance rating | 1537 | |
Value for money | 0.81 | |
Market segment | Desktop processor | |
Series | AMD A-Series (Desktop) | |
Architecture codename | Godaveri (2014−2018) | |
Release date | 14 January 2014 (8 years ago) | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $173 | of 305 (Core i7-870) |
Current price | $118 (0. 7x MSRP) | of 16317 (EPYC 7351) |
Value for money
To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | |
Threads | 4 | |
Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | of 4.7 (FX-9590) |
Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | of 5. 8 (Core i9-13900K) |
L1 cache | 256 KB | of 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401) |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | of 32768 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | of 5 (Apple M1) |
Die size | 246 mm2 | |
Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | of 110 (Atom x7-E3950) |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | of 105 (Core i7-5950HQ) |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | of 57000 (Apple M1 Max) |
64 bit support | + | |
Windows 11 compatibility | — | |
Unlocked multiplier | 1 |
Compatibility
Information on A10-7850K compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | of 8 (Opteron 842) |
Socket | FM2+ | |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 95 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by A10-7850K. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | SSE1-4A, AVX, FM4A, VT | |
AES-NI | 1 | |
FMA | FMA4 | |
AVX | + | |
FRTC | 1 | |
FreeSync | 1 | |
PowerTune | — | |
DualGraphics | 1 | |
TrueAudio | + | |
PowerNow | + | |
PowerGating | + | |
Out-of-band client management | + | |
VirusProtect | + | |
HSA | 1 |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
AMD-V | + | |
IOMMU 2.0 | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A10-7850K’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X) |
Max memory channels | 2 | of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221) |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of GPU integrated into A10-7850K.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
iGPU core count | 8 | |
Number of pipelines | 512 | |
Enduro | + | |
Switchable graphics | 1 | |
UVD | + | |
VCE | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-7850K’s integrated GPU.
DisplayPort | + | |
HDMI | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-7850K’s integrated GPU, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | |
Vulkan | 1 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.
PCIe version | 3.0 | of 5 (Core i9-12900K) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of A10-7850K. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A10-7850K
3.34
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
- WinRAR 4.0
- Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
- Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
- Geekbench 2
- 3DMark Fire Strike Physics
- Geekbench 4. 0 64-bit multi-core
- Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 69%
A10-7850K
3365
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A10-7850K
523
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A10-7850K
1598
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
A10-7850K
3216
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A10-7850K
10278
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A10-7850K
4748
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
A10-7850K
4
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A10-7850K
318
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A10-7850K
86
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
A10-7850K
1
TrueCrypt AES
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
A10-7850K
2
x264 encoding pass 2
x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A10-7850K
24
x264 encoding pass 1
x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A10-7850K
114
WinRAR 4.0
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using ‘Best’ setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
Benchmark coverage: 12%
A10-7850K
2140
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
A10-7850K
7094
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 6%
A10-7850K
2333
Geekbench 2
Benchmark coverage: 5%
A10-7850K
6502
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Benchmark coverage: 4%
A10-7850K
3900
Geekbench 4.
0 64-bit multi-core
Benchmark coverage: 3%
A10-7850K
6267
Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core
Benchmark coverage: 3%
A10-7850K
2621
Relative perfomance
Overall A10-7850K performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.
AMD Athlon X4 870K
100.6
Intel Core i5-2300
100.6
Intel Core i7-975
100
AMD A10-7850K
100
Intel Core i3-4370T
99.7
Intel Core i3-4150
99.4
AMD Phenom II X6 1065T
99.1
Intel equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to A10-7850K from Intel is Core i7-975, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.
Core i7
975
Compare
Here are some closest Intel rivals to A10-7850K:
Intel Core i3-4360T
100.9
Intel Core i5-2300
100.6
Intel Core i7-975
100
AMD A10-7850K
100
Intel Core i3-4370T
99.7
Intel Core i3-4150
99.4
Intel Core i7-965
99.1
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Core i3
4370T
Compare
Athlon X4
870K
Compare
Core i3
4150
Compare
FX
4150
Compare
Core i3
4130
Compare
A10
7860K
Compare
Recommended graphics cards
These graphics cards are most commonly used with A10-7850K according to our statistics.
Radeon R7
Graphics
19%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
7.9%
GeForce GTX
1050
4.3%
Radeon R7
240
4.1%
GeForce GTX
750 Ti
3.8%
Radeon RX
550
2.8%
GeForce GT
1030
2.6%
GeForce GT
730
2. 2%
Radeon RX
570
2.1%
Radeon RX
560
1.9%
User rating
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about A10-7850K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Processor A10-7850K [in 21 benchmarks]
AMD
A10-7850K
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started AMD A10-7850K sales on January 14, 2014 at a suggested price of $173. This is a desktop processor based on the Godaveri architecture, primarily designed for office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads and is manufactured using 28nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 4000MHz, the multiplier is locked.
In terms of compatibility, this is an FM2+ socket processor with a TDP of 95W and a maximum temperature of 74°C. It supports DDR3-2133 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
3.34%
from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.
A10
7850K
vs
EPYC
7h22
General information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the A10-7850K, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
place in the performance rating | 1537 | |||||
Price-quality | 0. 81 | of 305 (Core i7-870) | ||||
Price now | 118 $ (0.7x) | of 16317 (Epyc 7351) |
Core | 4 | |||||
Threads | 4 | of 110 (Atom X7-E3950) | ||||
The maximum housing temperature (TCASE) | 74 ° C | 900 | 1. 178 million | out of 57000 (Apple M1 Max) | ||
Support 64 bits | + | |||||
Compatibility with Windows 11 | — | |||||
Free multiplier | 1 |
compatibility
Information on A10-7850K compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.
Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.
RAM support
Types, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by A10-7850K. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard. Ryzen 5 7600X0058
Integrated video specifications
0
General parameters of the integrated video card in A10-7850K.
Video | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | ||||||||||||||||
002 Interfaces and connections supported by the A10-7850K’s integrated graphics card.
A10-7850K supported peripherals and how to connect them.
Tests in the benchmarksThese are the results of the A10-7850K performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment. Overall performance in testsThis is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A10-7850K
PassmarkPassmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test. Benchmark coverage: 69%
A10-7850K GeekBench 5 Single-CoreGeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core. Benchmark coverage: 37%
A10-7850K GeekBench 5 Multi-CoreGeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores. Benchmark coverage: 37%
A10-7850K Cinebench 10 32-bit single-coreCinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D, Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model. Benchmark coverage: 20%
A10-7850K Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-coreCinebench Release 10 Multi Core — A variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16. Benchmark coverage: 19%
A10-7850K 3DMark06 CPU3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package. Benchmark coverage: 19%
A10-7850K Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-coreCinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads. Benchmark coverage: 17%
A10-7850K Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-coreCinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes referred to as Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all of the processor’s threads. Benchmark coverage: 14%
A10-7850K Cinebench 15 64-bit single-coreCinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights. Benchmark coverage: 14%
A10-7850K Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-coreCinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark developed by Maxon. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights. Benchmark coverage: 14%
A10-7850K TrueCrypt AESTrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 13%
A10-7850K x264 encoding pass 2x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark that results in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second. Benchmark coverage: 12%
A10-7850K x264 encoding pass 1The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the HD (720p) sample video. Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average. Benchmark coverage: 12%
A10-7850K WinRAR 4.0 WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 12%
A10-7850K Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-coreBenchmark coverage: 6%
A10-7850K Geekbench 3 32-bit single-coreBenchmark coverage: 6%
A10-7850K Geekbench 2Benchmark coverage: 5%
A10-7850K 3DMark Fire Strike PhysicsBenchmark coverage: 4%
A10-7850K Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-coreBenchmark coverage: 3%
A10-7850K Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-coreBenchmark coverage: 3%
A10-7850K Relative capacityOverall performance of the A10-7850K compared to its closest competitor in desktop processors.
AMD Athlon X4 870K
Intel Core i5-2300
Intel Core i7-975
AMD A10-7850K
Intel Core i3-4370T
Intel Core i3-4150
AMD Phenom II X6 1065T Competitor from IntelWe believe that the nearest equivalent to A10-7850K from Intel is Core i7-975, which is approximately equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating. Compare Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the A10-7850K:
Intel Core i3-4360T
Intel Core i5-2300
Intel Core i7-975
AMD A10-7850K
Intel Core i3-4370T
Intel Core i3-4150
Intel Core i7-965 Other processorsHere we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one. Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare Recommended video cardsAccording to our statistics, these video cards are most often used with A10-7850K: 19% 7. 9% 4.3% 4.1% 3.8% 2.8% 2.6% 2.2% 2.1% 1.9% User ratingHere you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating. Tips and commentsHere you can ask a question about the A10-7850K processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site. |