Amd a10 7850k release date: AMD A10-7850K Specs | TechPowerUp CPU Database

AMD Announces A10-7850K Kaveri APU Specifications and Architectural Details

AMD has officially popped the lid and announced various key details of their next generation Kaveri APU. The A-Series Kaveri APUs from AMD would be branded as the A10/A8/A6/A4-7000 series and would replace the current A10/A8/A6/A4-6000 series ‘Richland’ APUs.

AMD Announces Kaveri APU Specifications and Architectural Details

AMD showed various slides of their upcoming Kaveri generation of APUs confirming our previous reports such as the Kaveri APU featuring a GCN core architecture, the brand new 28nm Steamroller core architecture and HSA enhancements which would make development an ease on the new platform. The Kaveri APU would stick to the FM2+ socket for desktop PCs and would arrive on the desktop platform first with initial availability beginning from 14th of January 2014. We have already seen several FM2+ socketed products from manufacturer’s which can be seen in the following links:  MSI, ASUS, ASRock, Gigabyte, BioStar

Coming to the architecture details, the AMD Kaveri APU features a full blown Steamroller core architecture with upto four multi-threaded x86 cores which are specifically designed to expand computation efficiency, improve the single core execution and feed the cores faster. We are looking at Quad Core APUs in the Kaveri generation which would be multi-threaded and upto 4 MB of L2 shared cache. Steamroller is AMD’s first big core in some time that would feature the 28nm core process and would essentially mean lower power consumption while pumping out a better IPC rate over Piledriver and Bulldozer.

On the graphics side, AMD would fuse their past flagship GCN core architecture inside the Kaveri APU. The Kaveri APU can hold upto eight GCN compute units with powerful parallel compute and next-gen gaming capabilities. In addition to these, GCN would have the ability to support DirectX 11.2 and OpenGL 4.3 so overall we are looking at richer gaming experiences that would be delivered with the Kaveri APU and technologies such as TrueAudio and AMD Mantle further boosting the visual experiences of gamers.

The last significant enhancement Kaveri would adopt is the HSA (Heterogeneous System Architecture) powered with the new HUMA enhancements which allow coherent memory access within the GPU and CPU. HUMA would make sure that both the CPU and GPU would have uniform access to an entire memory space which would be done through the memory controller. This would allow additional performance out of the APU incase the GPU gets bandwidth starved. This also suggests that faster memory speeds would result in better overall performance from the graphics card. Now with all the architectural talks done, let’s get on with the A10-7850K itself.

AMD A10-7850K — The Flagship Kaveri APU For FM2+ Platform

The AMD A10-7850K is presumably the flagship Kaveri APU for 2014 which would replace the Richland A10-6800K APU. The A10-7850K has four Steamroller cores and 512 GCN stream processors which bring its performance on a level equivalent to the Radeon HD 7750 in terms of graphics performance. The A10-7850K has a max compute of 856 GFLops which is impressive yet slightly lower than the 1 TFLops class APU AMD mentioned a few months back

The clock speed of the APU is maintained at 3. 7 GHz which is presumably the base clock while Turbo clock would push the speeds beyond 4 GHz barrier. The GPU which is positioned in the R7 series is clocked at 720 MHz while the APU itself has 4 MB of L2 cache. AMD A10-7850K will support both Mantle API, DirectX 11.2 and OpenGL 4.3 and the possibility of it ending up as a Dual GPU solution with the AMD Radeon R7 260X remains very high and if it happens, then it would mean a very price to performance minded platform for gamers and desktop users.

Model AMD A10-7850K ‘Kaveri’ AMD A10-6800K ‘Richland’ AMD A10-5800K ‘Trinity’
Cores 4/4 4/4 4/4
Turbo Core 3.0 Yes Yes Yes
Base Clock 3.7 GHz 4.1 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo Clock 4. 0 GHz + 4.4 GHz 4.2 GHz
L2 Cache 4 MB L2 4 MB L2 4 MB L2
Unlocked Design Yes Yes Yes
Graphics Core GCN Radeon R7 Series HD 8670D HD 7660D
GPU Cores 512 Cores 384 Cores 384 Cores
GPU Clock 720 MHz + 844 MHz 800 MHz
TDP 95W 100W 100W
Launch Date 14th January 2014 4th June 2013 2nd October 2012

 

AMD A10-7850K Plays Battlefield 4 at 1080P Without Discrete GPU — Twice Fast Than 4770K

Hothardware saw a demonstration of the Kaveri APU with the same A10-7850K sample running Battlefield 4 at 1080P and medium details at a frame rate between 28-40 FPS. The Core i7-4770K on the other hand which is Intel’s top dog only managed 12-14 FPS which is a definite lead for the APU platform. Hopefully, performance would improve a bit more given the new drivers at launch along with enhancements in Mantle and DirectX 11.2 API.

For performance, AMD showed Kaveri up against the Intel 4770K running a low-end GeForce GT 630. There are three variants of this particular card — it’s not clear which AMD utilized — but the overall performance figures are rather stark. In the intro scene to BF4’s single-player campaign (1920×1080, Medium Details), the AMD Kaveri system (with no discrete GPU) consistently pushed frame rates in the 28-40 FPS range. The Intel system, in contrast, couldn’t manage 15 FPS. Performance on that system was solidly in the 12-14 FPS range — meaning AMD is pulling 2x the frame rate, if not more. HotHardware

AMD has also planned more details for CES 2014 so this covers up the announcements made at the Developer Summit. AMD Kaveri APU would intially launch for the desktop platform in January 2014 while arriving later for the Notebooks, Embedded and Server Products. Do stay updated for more information.

 

A10-7850K [in 21 benchmarks]


AMD
A10-7850K

Buy

  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution

Summary

AMD started AMD A10-7850K sales 14 January 2014 at a recommended price of $173. This is Godaveri architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 28nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 4000 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is FM2+ processor with a TDP of 95 Watt and a maximum temperature of 74 °C. It supports DDR3-2133 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at


3.34%

of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.


A10
7850K

vs


EPYC
7h22

General info


A10-7850K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance rating 1537
Value for money 0.81
Market segment Desktop processor
Series AMD A-Series (Desktop)
Architecture codename Godaveri (2014−2018)
Release date 14 January 2014 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP) $173 of 305 (Core i7-870)
Current price $118 (0. 7x MSRP) of 16317 (EPYC 7351)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs


Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores 4 (Quad-Core)
Threads 4
Base clock speed 3.7 GHz of 4.7 (FX-9590)
Boost clock speed 4 GHz of 5. 8 (Core i9-13900K)
L1 cache 256 KB of 1536 (EPYC Embedded 3401)
L2 cache 4096 KB of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550)
L3 cache 0 KB of 32768 (Ryzen Threadripper 1998)
Chip lithography 28 nm of 5 (Apple M1)
Die size 246 mm2
Maximum core temperature 72 °C of 110 (Atom x7-E3950)
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 74 °C of 105 (Core i7-5950HQ)
Number of transistors 1,178 million of 57000 (Apple M1 Max)
64 bit support +
Windows 11 compatibility
Unlocked multiplier 1

Compatibility


Information on A10-7850K compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 of 8 (Opteron 842)
Socket FM2+
Thermal design power (TDP) 95 Watt of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Technologies and extensions


Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by A10-7850K. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions SSE1-4A, AVX, FM4A, VT
AES-NI 1
FMA FMA4
AVX +
FRTC 1
FreeSync 1
PowerTune
DualGraphics 1
TrueAudio +
PowerNow +
PowerGating +
Out-of-band client management +
VirusProtect +
HSA 1

Virtualization technologies


Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

AMD-V +
IOMMU 2.0 +

Memory specs


Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A10-7850K’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory types DDR3-2133 of 5200 (Ryzen 5 7600X)
Max memory channels 2 of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221)

Graphics specifications


General parameters of GPU integrated into A10-7850K.

Integrated graphics card AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core count 8
Number of pipelines 512
Enduro +
Switchable graphics 1
UVD +
VCE +

Graphics interfaces


Available interfaces and connections of A10-7850K’s integrated GPU.

DisplayPort +
HDMI +

Graphics API support


APIs supported by A10-7850K’s integrated GPU, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX DirectX® 12
Vulkan 1

Peripherals


Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.

PCIe version 3.0 of 5 (Core i9-12900K)

Benchmark performance


Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of A10-7850K. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.


A10-7850K
3.34

  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 Single-Core
  • GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
  • 3DMark06 CPU
  • Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
  • Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
  • Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
  • TrueCrypt AES
  • x264 encoding pass 2
  • x264 encoding pass 1
  • WinRAR 4.0
  • Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
  • Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
  • Geekbench 2
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Physics
  • Geekbench 4. 0 64-bit multi-core
  • Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core
Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 69%


A10-7850K
3365

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%


A10-7850K
523

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%


A10-7850K
1598

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%


A10-7850K
3216

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%


A10-7850K
10278

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%


A10-7850K
4748

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%


A10-7850K
4

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%


A10-7850K
318

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%


A10-7850K
86

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%


A10-7850K
1

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%


A10-7850K
2

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%


A10-7850K
24

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 12%


A10-7850K
114

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using ‘Best’ setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%


A10-7850K
2140

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%


A10-7850K
7094

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%


A10-7850K
2333

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%


A10-7850K
6502

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%


A10-7850K
3900

Geekbench 4.

0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 3%


A10-7850K
6267

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 3%


A10-7850K
2621


Relative perfomance


Overall A10-7850K performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.



AMD Athlon X4 870K
100.6


Intel Core i5-2300
100.6


Intel Core i7-975
100


AMD A10-7850K
100


Intel Core i3-4370T
99.7


Intel Core i3-4150
99.4


AMD Phenom II X6 1065T
99.1

Intel equivalent


We believe that the nearest equivalent to A10-7850K from Intel is Core i7-975, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.


Core i7
975


Compare


Here are some closest Intel rivals to A10-7850K:


Intel Core i3-4360T
100.9


Intel Core i5-2300
100.6


Intel Core i7-975
100


AMD A10-7850K
100


Intel Core i3-4370T
99.7


Intel Core i3-4150
99.4


Intel Core i7-965
99.1

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.


Core i3
4370T


Compare


Athlon X4
870K


Compare


Core i3
4150


Compare


FX
4150


Compare


Core i3
4130


Compare


A10
7860K


Compare

Recommended graphics cards

These graphics cards are most commonly used with A10-7850K according to our statistics.


Radeon R7
Graphics

19%


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

7.9%


GeForce GTX
1050

4.3%


Radeon R7
240

4.1%


GeForce GTX
750 Ti

3.8%


Radeon RX
550

2.8%


GeForce GT
1030

2.6%


GeForce GT
730

2. 2%


Radeon RX
570

2.1%


Radeon RX
560

1.9%

User rating


Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


Questions and comments


Here you can ask a question about A10-7850K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.


Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Processor A10-7850K [in 21 benchmarks]

AMD
A10-7850K

  • Interface
  • Core frequency
  • Video memory size
  • Memory type
  • Memory frequency
  • Maximum resolution

Description

AMD started AMD A10-7850K sales on January 14, 2014 at a suggested price of $173. This is a desktop processor based on the Godaveri architecture, primarily designed for office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads and is manufactured using 28nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 4000MHz, the multiplier is locked.

In terms of compatibility, this is an FM2+ socket processor with a TDP of 95W and a maximum temperature of 74°C. It supports DDR3-2133 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

3.34%

from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.


A10
7850K

vs


EPYC
7h22

General information

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the A10-7850K, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.

9.09

9014L

To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Features

A10-7850K quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock status. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment, you need to consider the results of the tests.

place in the performance rating 1537
Price-quality 0. 81 of 305 (Core i7-870)
Price now 118 $ (0.7x) of 16317 (Epyc 7351)
Core 4
Threads 4 of 110 (Atom X7-E3950)
The maximum housing temperature (TCASE) 74 ° C 900 1. 178 million out of 57000 (Apple M1 Max)
Support 64 bits +
Compatibility with Windows 11
Free multiplier 1

compatibility

Information on A10-7850K compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.

Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.

1 PowerTune DualGraphics 1 TrueAudio + PowerNow + 0068

IOMMU 2. 0 +

RAM support

Types, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by A10-7850K. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard. Ryzen 5 7600X0058

Number of memory channels 2 out of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221)

Integrated video specifications

0
General parameters of the integrated video card in A10-7850K.

IGPU

Video AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
002
Interfaces and connections supported by the A10-7850K’s integrated graphics card.

9014L
APIs supported by A10-7850K integrated graphics card, including their versions.

DisplayPort +
HDMI +

DirectX DirectX® 12
Vulkan 1

A10-7850K supported peripherals and how to connect them.

CHILDER PCI Express 3.0 of 5 (Core i9-12900K)

Tests in the benchmarks

These are the results of the A10-7850K performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.


Overall performance in tests

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7850K
3.34

  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 Single-Core
  • GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
  • 3DMark06 CPU
  • Cinebench 11. 5 64-bit multi-core
  • Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
  • Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
  • Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
  • TrueCrypt AES
  • x264 encoding pass 2
  • x264 encoding pass 1
  • WinRAR 4.0
  • Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
  • Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
  • Geekbench 2
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Physics
  • Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core
  • Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core
Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

Benchmark coverage: 69%

A10-7850K
3365

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

A10-7850K
523

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

A10-7850K
1598

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D, Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10-7850K
3216

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core — A variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-7850K
10278

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10-7850K
4748

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A10-7850K
4

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes referred to as Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all of the processor’s threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-7850K
318

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-7850K
86

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark developed by Maxon. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A10-7850K
1

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a deprecated program that was widely used to encrypt disk partitions on the fly. It contains several built-in benchmarks, one of which is TrueCrypt AES. It measures the speed of data encryption using the AES algorithm. The result of the test is the encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A10-7850K
2

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark that results in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A10-7850K
24

x264 encoding pass 1

The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the HD (720p) sample video. Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A10-7850K
114

WinRAR 4.

0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of the popular archiver. It contains an internal speed test using maximum compression by the RAR algorithm on large amounts of randomly generated data. Results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A10-7850K
2140

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

A10-7850K
7094

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

A10-7850K
2333

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

A10-7850K
6502

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

A10-7850K
3900

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 3%

A10-7850K
6267

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 3%

A10-7850K
2621


Relative capacity

Overall performance of the A10-7850K compared to its closest competitor in desktop processors.


AMD Athlon X4 870K
100.6

Intel Core i5-2300
100.6

Intel Core i7-975
100

AMD A10-7850K
100

Intel Core i3-4370T
99.7

Intel Core i3-4150
99.4

AMD Phenom II X6 1065T
99.1

Competitor from Intel

We believe that the nearest equivalent to A10-7850K from Intel is Core i7-975, which is approximately equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.


Core i7
975

Compare

Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the A10-7850K:

Intel Core i3-4360T
100.9

Intel Core i5-2300
100. 6

Intel Core i7-975
100

AMD A10-7850K
100

Intel Core i3-4370T
99.7

Intel Core i3-4150
99.4

Intel Core i7-965
99.1

Other processors

Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.


Core i3
4370T

Compare


Core i3
4150

Compare


Athlon X4
870K

Compare


FX
4150

Compare


Core i3
4130

Compare


A10
7860K

Compare

Recommended video cards

According to our statistics, these video cards are most often used with A10-7850K:


Radeon R7
Graphics

19%


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

7. 9%


GeForce GTX
1050

4.3%


Radeon R7
240

4.1%


GeForce GTX
750 Ti

3.8%


Radeon RX
550

2.8%


GeForce GT
1030

2.6%


GeForce GT
730

2.2%


Radeon RX
570

2.1%


Radeon RX
560

1.9%

User rating

Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.


Tips and comments

Here you can ask a question about the A10-7850K processor, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.

2024 © All rights reserved