AMD A10-7850K vs AMD A8-5600K: What is the difference?
47points
AMD A10-7850K
47points
AMD A8-5600K
vs
66 facts in comparison
AMD A10-7850K
AMD A8-5600K
Why is AMD A10-7850K better than AMD A8-5600K?
- 267MHz higher ram speed?
2133MHzvs1866MHz - 4nm smaller semiconductor size?
28nmvs32nm - 5W lower TDP?
95Wvs100W - 27.46% higher PassMark result?
5676vs4453 - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3vs2 - 64KB bigger L1 cache?
256KBvs192KB - 13.59% higher PassMark result (single)?
1580vs1391 - 1 newer version of DirectX?
12vs11
Why is AMD A8-5600K better than AMD A10-7850K?
- 40MHz faster GPU clock speed?
760MHzvs720MHz
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
Apple M2
vs
Intel Core i9-12900K
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
vs
Intel Core i5-12500H
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Intel Core i5-1135G7
vs
Intel Core i5-1235U
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
vs
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
vs
Intel Core i7-12700H
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
vs
Intel Core i7-11800H
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD A10-7850K
1 User reviews
AMD A10-7850K
10. 0/10
1 User reviews
AMD A8-5600K
0 User reviews
AMD A8-5600K
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Energy efficiency
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
CPU speed
4 x 3.7GHz
4 x 3.6GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
3.9GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD A8-5600K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L3 cache
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
L2 core
1MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
L3 core
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Benchmarks
PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
720MHz
760MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
GPU turbo
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
GPU execution units
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with a greater number of execution units can deliver better graphics.
supported displays
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Using multiple displays you can create a larger workspace, making it easier to work across multiple apps.
DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
texture mapping units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
render output units (ROPs)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
2133MHz
1866MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
maximum memory amount
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
5.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Supports ECC memory
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖AMD A8-5600K
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Features
uses multithreading
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖AMD A8-5600K
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
Has AES
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD A8-5600K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD A8-5600K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD A8-5600K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
Has MMX
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD A8-5600K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖AMD A8-5600K
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD A8-5600K)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD A10-7800 vs AMD A8-7680 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
AMD A10-7800 vs AMD A8-7680
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A10-7800 on one side and the AMD A8-7680 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,9GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,8 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Processor | AMD A10-7800 | AMD A8-7680 | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Steamroller | Excavator | ||||||
Core name | Kaveri | Carrizo | ||||||
Family | A10-7000 | A8-7000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec |
AD7800YBJABOX, |
AD7680ACABCBX, |
||||||
Release date | Q3 2014 | Q1 2019 | ||||||
Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | ||||||
Transistors | 2. 410.000.000 | 1.178.000.000 | ||||||
Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,5 GHz | 3,4 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 3,9 GHz | 3,8 GHz | ||||||
Cache memory | 4 MB | 2 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB | ||||||
Memory types |
DDR3-2133 |
DDR3-1600 |
||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 34,1 GB/s | 13,91 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 8 | ||||||
TDP | 65 W | 45 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 550W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 512 Cores (Kaveri) | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 384 Cores (Kaveri) | ||||||
GPU cores | 8 | 6 | ||||||
GPU shading units | 512 | 384 | ||||||
GPU base clock | 720 MHz | 351 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 720 MHz | 720 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | 737,3 GFLOPS | 553 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | FM2+ | FM2+ | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket FM2+ Motherboard | — | ||||||
Crypto engine |
Advanced Encryption Standard instructions |
— |
||||||
Security |
Enhanced Virus Protection |
— |
||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 113 | 208 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 226 | 741 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 87 | 93 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 301 | 292 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 1. 437 | 1.628 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 3.145 | 3.560 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
2.277 | 2.410 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
5.894 | 5.875 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
486 | 504 | ||||||
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
1.475 | 1.499 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
52,8 GFLOPS | 55,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
91 pts / W | 131 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD A10-7800 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD A8-7680 is less. The AMD A8-7680 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD A8-7680 |
208 741 |
AMD A10-7800 |
113 226 |
In single core, the difference is 84%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 228%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
AMD A10-7800 |
87 301 |
AMD A8-7680 |
93 292 |
In single core, the difference is -6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
AMD A8-7680 |
1.628 3.560 |
AMD A10-7800 |
1.437 3.145 |
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 13%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
AMD A10-7800 |
2.277 5.894 |
AMD A8-7680 |
2.410 5.875 |
In single core, the difference is -6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 0%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
---|---|
AMD A8-7680 |
504 1.499 |
AMD A10-7800 |
486 1.475 |
In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD A10-7800 Intel equivalentAMD A8-7680 Intel equivalent
AMD A10-7850K vs AMD A8-5600K: What is the difference?
47 Ballla
AMD A10-7850K
47 BALLLA
AMD A8-5600K
VS
66 Facts compared to
AMD A10-7850K
9000 -5600K?
- 267MHz higher RAM speed?
2133MHz vs 1866MHz - Is 4nm semiconductor smaller?
28nm vs 32nm - 5W below TDP?
95W vs 100W - 27. 46% higher PassMark score?
5676 vs 4453 - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
3 vs 2 - 64KB more L1 cache?
256KB vs 192KB - 13.59% higher PassMark score (single)?
1580 vs 1391 - 1 newer version of DirectX?
12 vs 11
Why is AMD A8-5600K better than AMD A10-7850K?
- GPU frequency 40MHz higher?
760MHz vs 720MHz
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD A10-7850K
VS
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD A8-5600K
VS
Intel Core i5-3330 9000 AMD A8-5600K
VS
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD A10-7850K
VS
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD A8-5600K
VS
Intel Core I5-7400
AMD A10-7850K vs
AMD A10-7890K
AMD A8-5600K
VS
AMD FX-6300
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD A10-78603
A8-5600K
VS 9000 A8 -7600
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD A8-7600
AMD A8-5600K
VS
AMD RYZEN 5 1600X
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD ATHOLON X4 950
AMD A8-5600K 9000 VS 9000 AM Athlon X4 880K
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD ATHLON X4 880K
A8-5600K
VS
Intel Core
AMD A10-7850K
VS
000
VS AMD
VS AMD AMD AMD
A8-5600K
VS
AMD A10-5800K
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 1700x
Comparison A10-7850K
10. 0 /10
1 reviews of users
AMD A8-5600K
0 Reviews of users
A8-5600K
0.0 /10
0 Reviews of users 9Ol000 Performance
10.0 /10
1 Votes
Reviews still not
Reliability
10.0 /10
1 VOTES
9,0003
Reviews are not yet
Energy Efficiency
10.0 /10
1 Votes
Reviews are not
Central processor speed
4 x 3.7GHZ
4 X 3.6GHZ
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 cpu shows how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores. nine0003
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
3. 9GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD A8-5600K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications. nine0003
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning. nine0003
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
1MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used. nine0003
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
720MHz
760MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
Turbo GPU
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance. nine0003
GPU Executors
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
By using multiple displays, you can expand your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
DirectX 9 version0003
DirectX is being used in games with a newer version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
The newer the OpenGL version, the better graphics quality in games.
version of OpenCL
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
texture units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
TMUs take texture units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
imaging units ROPs
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics. nine0003
Memory
RAM speed
2133MHz
1866MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
5.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory debug code
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖AMD A8-5600K
Memory debug code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server. nine0003
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Functions
uses multithreading
Intel or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) delivers faster performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time. nine0003
Has AES
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD A8-5600K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD A8-5600K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements. nine0003
Has F16C
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD A8-5600K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening. nine0003
Has MMX
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔AMD A8-5600K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖AMD A8-5600K
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming. nine0003
interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A8-5600K)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price Comparison
Which CPUs are better?
AMD A6, A8 and A10 processors of the Kaveri family
An epic battle with power consumption
Not so long ago we tested the A4 and A6 processors based on the Richland core and came to the conclusion that the performance of such solutions is not great, but you can use them — even in games play (in low quality mode, of course — but you can!). And today, as promised, we will deal with higher-level APUs, but, unlike previous articles, the main focus will be on models based on the Kaveri core. The fact is that no others are already actually shipped, and commodity balances do not last forever. Yes, the “oldies” are still quite relevant and attractive in price, but soon they simply won’t be left, and you should prepare for this in advance 🙂 908
T-10387700
For comparison, we will take four older processors (including one very old) from three, again, families. There are two A8, since there are two platforms — we are still interested to look again at the competition of four “half-cores” with four cores 🙂 And A10 is the eldest for the canonical FM2 “without a plus”: after all, as already mentioned, with the current top we had comparison rulers, so the old one as a guideline is more interesting.
An important fact — without loud statements, the company actually «increased the value» of the graphics part of each family: the number of GPUs in modern A6 is the same as in the old A8, and in A8 there are as many as there were in A10. This is not to mention the architecture update — GCN instead of VLIW4. Most of the new A10s (with the exception of the 7700K, which belongs to the A10 family without any reason) are even higher. Considering that the bottleneck in older models is the memory system, it may turn out that such a GPU boost is simply superfluous. This, among other things, we will check. nine0003
Let’s also check how much Kaveri needs “enhanced power supply”, since all three models we have taken support Custom TDP. The fact that performance decreases when the heat pack is limited is a fact that has been repeatedly verified, but it is interesting how it compares with the old “gluttonous” models.
Test methodology
To evaluate performance, we used our performance measurement methodology using iXBT Notebook Benchmark v.1.0 and iXBT Game Benchmark v.1.0. We normalized all test results in the iXBT Notebook Benchmark v.1.0 against the results of Pentium G3250 with 8 GB of memory and Intel SSD 520,240 GB, while the method of calculating the integral result remained unchanged. Another program that we, like last time, added to the test suite is the Basemark CL 1.0.1.4 benchmark, created to measure the performance of OpenCL code. nine0003
iXBT Notebook Benchmark v.1.0
A6 contains only one module, so this is a completely different world in terms of multi-threaded programs than A8 and A10, which (not surprisingly) differ from each other only in clock frequencies. Curiously, even in the 45 W mode, the models we have taken are already faster than any processors for FM1, and in the “regular” mode they are easily able to compete with APUs for FM2 with a TDP of 100 W. Well, the A6 is twice as slow, and it doesn’t really matter if it’s new or old.
The difference between families remains, but between generations it decreases. But, in principle, as we can see, even 45 W is not such a terrible limitation: the performance remains at the level of the Pentium of the recent past. Not much of an achievement, as we’re comparing two- and four-threaded processors in applications that can use all the resources, but the «regular» Pentium models have a slightly larger thermal package. Well, if you don’t “clamp” it, then once again intra-company competition looks interesting — not every old model with a TDP of 100 W can overtake the new economical APUs of the A8 and A10 families in terms of performance. nine0003
Photoshop, as we have already written more than once, is not too susceptible to the number of computation threads. But not completely immune — after all, the A6 (both new and old) is about one and a half times slower than two-module models of all generations. But the lag behind the quad-core APUs for FM1 has been greatly reduced. And in general, the best model for this platform also lags behind the A8-7600 in 45 W mode, which is quite interesting for those who plan to assemble a computer in a compact case.
Audition needs more than two cores (and even semi-cores), to an even lesser extent than Photoshop, however, this does not allow A6 (better modifications) to keep up with processors of higher classes. On the other hand, the latter is far from the dual-core Pentium, and even Celeron based on modern architectures.
Well, where there is multi-threaded optimization, A8/A10 keep quite at the Pentium level, and A6 lag behind all those listed by a couple of times. Nothing new. So, we can only once again pay attention to the increase in the energy efficiency of modern APUs, which, even with a limited heat pack, are able to fight on equal terms with the old top models. nine0003
In WinRAR, all newfangled optimizations fail, so everything starts to be determined by the clock frequency, which is not high in Kaveri in all variants. On the other hand, the A10-7800 still looks good, but it is quite expensive, and the A8-7600 is already outperformed by its immediate predecessors. Or even not direct — 5600K is a two-year-old model. However, in fairness, if we took not it, but the 5500 with a TDP of 65 W, there would be no lag… but there would still be a win too 🙂
A processor with a lower TDP leads to increased «viscosity» of the system, although, other things being equal, this is not very noticeable. If only because the A10-7800 in 45W mode keeps at the level of the first generation FM2 with a TDP of 100W. And the main thing in this test is not the processor at all — we recall that «hard» laptops in this test are on average three times slower, regardless of the central processor. In general, it’s worth starting anyway with the purchase of a solid-state drive (even when assembling a budget system), and then paying attention to other components. nine0003
Why does the A10-7850K look pale compared to its predecessors? Why is the Steamroller microarchitecture used only in the APU, while the multi-module processors of the FX family remained on the older Piledriver? It seems to us that this diagram explains a lot. It’s very simple: Steamroller is not for maximum performance, it’s an example of good scaling «down». In fact, the third generation of APUs is intended primarily for laptops — AMD has done the same thing as Intel did earlier: the «desktop» market is no longer a locomotive, but something that turns out according to the residual principle. At the time of Llano, an attempt to limit the heat pack to the acceptable level in portable computers led to dramatic consequences: when the A8-3500M could not keep up with the budget desktop A6-3500 with fewer cores, and the Pentium G2130 lagged behind one and a half times. Because of which? Yes, just due to the need to meet 35 watts. Well, Kaveri in the 45 W mode at least calmly competes with the Pentium, and in general — doubling the heat pack allows you to increase performance by only 20%. Actually, do you need it? 😉
As for more mundane things, it is obvious that one module is not enough for many modern programs. Moreover, just in this configuration, there is no special gain from the new architecture: A6-6420K and A6-7400K come to the finish line head to head when using the same heat pack. The addition of the second module changes the situation radically — the performance increases one and a half times, which is very good. And, as expected, there is no difference between the A8 and A10 in these tests — their processor component is almost the same. So it’s more interesting to look at the tests of the graphics core. nine0003
OpenCL
What distinguishes any APU of the Kaveri family from its predecessors is the performance when executing OpenCL code: even the A6-7400K in 45 W mode easily outperforms both the old A10 and Intel processors with GPU HD Graphics 4600. As a result, we it only remains to drag out the old song: if all this extended not only to synthetic benchmarks, but also to mass-purpose programs … Indeed: the new architecture of the graphic part would allow even younger models to easily catch up and overtake even expensive Core i7, clearly demonstrating the advantages AMD’s approach to making processors. But the reality so far looks much more boring and familiar. nine0003
Games
As expected from the performance characteristics, the gaming performance of the new A6s is about the same as the old A8s, and the latest generation A8s are able to compete with the A10s. That’s what’s unpleasant — and with the new A10 too, since the limiting factor is the memory bandwidth, and it is already maximum in the Kaveri-based A8. In general, we are convinced that the A8 of the 7000 series is already enough to play this game in high resolution, and there is no point in paying for the A10 — it will not be faster. nine0003
In this game, even the old A6 «pull out» FullHD, but only older models. At the same time, one module is already not enough, so the A8-7600 turns out to be the best option from the tested ones: more expensive models are not faster, and cheaper ones are much slower.
It is noteworthy that despite the single-threaded «tank» engine, the A6 noticeably loses here to any dual-module processors. Other than that, there is no alternative to the older Richland high-frequency ones (which we have long seen), although this is not so important — since the A8-7600 in FullHD even with a limited heat pack produces more than 50 frames per second. nine0003
A rather easy game for modern processors well demonstrates different requirements for them depending on the mode — if in HD the A10-6800K is out of competition, then in Full HD it is already behind the A8-7600 by 65 W, and from the A10-7800 — even in the most economical mode.
A6 «does not pull» this game in any mode, since one module is not enough for it even in terms of the processor part, but A8 and higher is enough for at least HD. Moreover, in economy mode, but “and above” is not required.
The situation is similar to the previous case, but here the requirements for the processor are even higher, and for the graphics — perhaps lower, so on modern A8 and any A10 you can already try to use the full resolution of modern monitors.
Total
So, as it was mentioned above, the limitation of the heat pack reduces the performance of the processor part in an acceptable way, and practically does not affect games at all. In general, if we assume that energy efficiency was at the forefront when creating Kaveri, then this goal is more than achieved. And given that these APUs are primarily focused on the market of computers without discrete graphics (laptops, mini-PCs, inexpensive and compact multimedia system units), this situation generally causes a feeling of deep satisfaction 🙂 As for achieving high performance, this is not all smoothly, since even two modules at full load are comparable only to Pentium, and at partial load they lag behind it. An attempt to increase the operating frequencies mainly leads to an increase in power consumption, not compensated by an increase in performance (it is, but obviously insufficient), and the limitations of the memory system make it pointless to increase the number of GPUs above a certain level, and the price of older models turns out to be too high to be achievable (taking into account the listed bottlenecks) by their performance. In a word, the best Kaveri models are A8, where “everything is already there”, but still “nothing interferes”, and the final price is at the level of that of Pentium with significantly better graphics. A10 is faster, but not as much as more expensive, so if any purchase is justified, then rather the K-series from the previous family (in cases where a 100 W heat pack does not interfere and / or overclocking is supposed). And the A6 is not so cheap as to justify the radically lower performance of just one module, which is already starting to get in the way even in some games.