AMD A10-9700 vs Intel Core i3-10105F Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD A10-9700 vs Intel Core i3-10105F
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A10-9700 on one side and the Intel Core i3-10105F on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,8GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD A10-9700 | Intel Core i3-10105F | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Excavator | Comet Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Bristol Ridge | Comet Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | A10-9000 | Core i3-10000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
AD9700AGABBOX, |
CM8070104291323, |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2017 | Q1 2021 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ | ||||||
| Transistors | 3. 100.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,5 GHz | 3,7 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,8 GHz | 4,4 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 2 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-2400 |
DDR4-2666 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 38,4 GB/s | 41,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 8 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 384 Cores (Kaveri) | None | ||||||
| GPU cores | 6 | — | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 384 | — | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 351 MHz | — | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1029 MHz | — | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 553 GFLOPS | — | ||||||
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1200 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 90°C | 100°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine |
— |
AES New Instructions, |
||||||
| Security |
— |
Software Guard Extensions, |
||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 90 | 189 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 301 | 905 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 172 | 465 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 578 | 2. 228 |
||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.633 | 2.596 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 3.585 | 8.992 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
2.355 | 5.427 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
5.789 | 17.914 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
513 | 1.157 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
1.559 | 4.526 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
59,82 GFLOPS | 317,1 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
89 pts / W | 276 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-10105F is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Intel Core i3-10105F was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-10105F |
189 905 |
| AMD A10-9700 |
90 301 |
In single core, the difference is 110%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 201%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-10105F |
465 2.228 |
| AMD A10-9700 |
172 578 |
In single core, the difference is 170%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 285%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-10105F |
2.596 8.992 |
| AMD A10-9700 |
1.633 3.585 |
In single core, the difference is 59%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 151%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-10105F |
5.  42717.914 |
| AMD A10-9700 |
2.355 5.789 |
In single core, the difference is 130%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 209%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-10105F |
5.414 18.391 |
| AMD A10-9700 |
2.304 5.880 |
In single core, the difference is 135%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 213%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing.
This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-10105F |
1.157 4.526 |
| AMD A10-9700 |
513 1.559 |
In single core, the difference is 126%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 190%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-10105F |
1.270 5.034 |
| AMD A10-9700 |
538 1.243 |
In single core, the difference is 136%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 305%.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i3-10105F |
1.142 4.502 |
| AMD A10-9700 |
560 1.673 |
In single core, the difference is 104%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 169%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems.
Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD A10-9700 Intel equivalentIntel Core i3-10105F AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i3-10105Intel Core i3-10105T
Intel Core i3-7340 vs AMD A10-7850K
Summary
-
Intel Core i3-7340
176%
-
AMD A10-7850K
100%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i3-7340
208%
-
AMD A10-7850K
100%
Relative performance
-
Intel Core i3-7340
144%
-
AMD A10-7850K
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Intel Core i3-7340 |
| Much higher single threaded performance (around 108% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 44% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
| 44 watts lower power draw. |
| This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
| Around 76% higher average synthetic performance. |
Reasons to consider AMD A10-7850K |
| None |
Gaming
HWBench recommends Intel Core i3-7340
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends Intel Core i3-7340
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
| Intel Core i3-7340 | AMD A10-7850K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4. 1 |
||||
| SSE4.2 | ||||
| AVX | ||||
| AVX2 | ||||
| EIST | ||||
| Intel 64 | ||||
| XD bit | ||||
| VT-x | ||||
| HTT | ||||
| AES-NI | ||||
| TSX | ||||
| CLMUL | ||||
| FMA3 | ||||
| 3DNow! | ||||
| SSE4A | ||||
| AMD64 | ||||
| CnQ | ||||
| NX bit | ||||
| AMD-V | ||||
Architecture
| Intel Core i3-7340 | AMD A10-7850K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Intel_Kabylake | vs | AMD Steamroller | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR3 | |
| Codename | Kaby Lake | vs | Kaveri | |
| Release Date | Jul 2017 | vs | Jan 2014 |
Cores
| Intel Core i3-7340 | AMD A10-7850K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | vs | 4 | |
| Threads | 4 | vs | 4 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 | vs | Radeon R7 |
Cache
| Intel Core i3-7340 | AMD A10-7850K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | vs | 128 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | vs | 1024 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 4096 KB (shared) | vs | 0 KB |
Physical
| Intel Core i3-7340 | AMD A10-7850K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | vs | AMD Socket FM2 | |
| Max Case Temp | 65°C | vs | 74°C | |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | vs | uPGA | |
| Die Size | unknown | vs | 246mm² | |
| Process | 14 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Performance
| Intel Core i3-7340 | AMD A10-7850K | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 4200 MHz | vs | 3700 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | none | vs | 4000 MHz | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | unknown | vs | 1. 475 V |
|
| TDP | 51 W | vs | 95 W |
-
Intel Core i3-7340
5040 points
-
AMD A10-7850K
2520 points
Points — higher is better
-
Intel Core i3-7340
12096 points
-
AMD A10-7850K
7925 points
Points — higher is better
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
AMD A10-7850K vs Intel Core i3-4130: What is the difference?
47 Ballla
AMD A10-7850K
39 BALLLA
Intel Core i3-4130
Winter when comparing
VS
66 facts compared to
AMD A10-7850K
9000 Is A10-7850K better than Intel Core i3-4130?
- 2.18x higher CPU speed?
4 x 3.7GHz vs 2 x 3.4GHz - 533MHz higher RAM speed?
2133MHz vs 1600MHz - GPU frequency 370MHz more?
720MHz vs 350MHz - 3.
5MB more L2 cache?
4MB vs 0.5MB - 14.32% higher PassMark score?
5676 vs 4965 - Has an unlocked multiplier?
- 128KB more L1 cache?
256KB vs 128KB - 0.75MB/core more L2 cache per core?
1MB/core vs 0.25MB/core
Why is Intel Core i3-4130 better than AMD A10-7850K?
- Smaller 6nm semiconductors?
22nm vs 28nm - 41W below TDP?
54W vs 95W - 27.72% higher PassMark score (single)?
2018 vs 1580 - Uses multithreading?
- Supports memory debug code?
- 12 more GPU execution units?
20 vs 8
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD A10-7850K
VS
Intel Core i5-7400
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Core i5-3470
9000 IKETEL CORE CORE CORE INTEL CORE
Intel Core i3-4130
vs
Intel Pentium G3220
AMD A10-7850K
VS
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Celeron N3060
AMD A10-78903 A10-78903 A10-7890s 9000.
000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 i3-4130
VS
Intel Celeron N4020
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD A10-7860K
Intel Core i3-4130
9000KD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD AMD
vs
AMD A8-7600
Intel Core i3-4130
VS
Intel Core i3-7100
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD Athlon X4 9000
VS 9000 VS 9000 Intel Celeron J4105
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD Athlon X4 880K
Intel Core i3-4130
VS
AMD RYZEN 3 3250U
AMD AMD A10-
Intel Core i3-4130
VS
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD A10-7850K
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 1700x
Intel Core i3-4130
VS
Intel Core i3-6100
Substation
General rating
AMD A10-7850K
1 Reviews of users
AMD A10-7850K
10.0 /10
1 Reviews Users
Intel Core i3-3-3-3-4130
003
Intel Core i3-4130
7.
0 /10
1 reviews of users
Functions
Quality
10.0 /10
1 Votes
96 8.0 /10 9000
Games
10.0 /10
1 Votes
6.0247 /10
1 Votes
10.0 /10
1 VOTES
9000 9000
246 8.0
/10
1 Votes
Reliability
10.0 /10
1 VOTES
7.0247 /10
1 VOTES
Energy
9000 9000 9000 9000 1 VOTES 7.0 /10
1 votes
Performance
CPU speed
4 x 3.7GHz
2 x 3.4GHz
). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
(Intel Core i3-4130)
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Has unlocked multiplier
✔AMD A10-7850K
✖Intel Core i3-4130
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be overclocked more easily, allowing you to get better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
More L3 scratchpad results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
1MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2023)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender result (classroom)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
720MHz
350MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
Turbo GPU
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
1150MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU Execution Units
A Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
By using multiple displays, you can expand your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
DirectX version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
DirectX is being used in games with a newer version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
The newer the OpenGL version, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
textured units (TMUs)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric location of the 3D scene.
More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
imaging units ROPs
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
2133MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
25.6GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖AMD A10-7850K
✔Intel Core i3-4130
Memory troubleshooting code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Functions
uses multithreading
✖AMD A10-7850K
✔Intel Core i3-4130
AMD) achieves higher performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔Intel Core i3-4130
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔Intel Core i3-4130
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔Intel Core i3-4130
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
Has MMX
✔AMD A10-7850K
✔Intel Core i3-4130
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD A10-7850K
✖Intel Core i3-4130
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.
interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD A10-7850K)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-4130)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Which CPUs are better?
AMD A10-5750M vs Intel Core i3-390M
Intel Core i3-390M
AMD A10-5750M
VS
Intel Core i3-390M
Rating: 4 points
Winner
AMD A10-5750M
Rating: 4 points
Tests
Technologies
Production
Specification of memory
Interfaces and communications
Main characteristics of
Top specifications and features
- PassMark CPU score
- PassMark CPU score
- Heat dissipation (TDP)
- Technological process
- Number of transistors
PassMark CPU score
Intel Core i3-390M: 1190
AMD A10-5750M: 2274
Cinebench21.
5 score (single) UBER
Intel Core i3-390M: 2
AMD A10-5750M: 2
Thermal Dissipation (TDP)
Intel Core i3-390M: 35 W
AMD A10-5750M: 35 W
Process technology
Intel Core i3-390M: 32 nm
AMD A10-5750M: 32 nm
Number of transistors
Intel Core i3-390M: 382 million
AMD A10-5750M: 1178 million
Description
Intel Core i3-390M processor runs at 2.66 Hz, second AMD A10-5750M runs at 2.5 Hz. The Intel Core i3-390M is capable of overclocking up to No data Hz, and the second up to 3.5 Hz. The maximum power consumption of the first processor is 35W, while the AMD A10-5750M has 35W.
Regarding the architecture, the Intel Core i3-390M is based on 32nm technology. AMD A10-5750M on 32 nm architecture.
Regarding processor memory. Intel Core i3-390M can support DDR3.
The maximum supported volume is 8 MB. It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is 17.1. The second processor AMD A10-5750M is capable of supporting DDR No data. Throughput is No data. And the maximum amount of supported RAM is No data MB.
Graphics. The Intel Core i3-390M has an Intel HD Graphics graphics core. The frequency of which is — 500 MHz. AMD A10-5750M received the AMD Radeon HD 8650G video core. Here the frequency is 533 MHz.
How processors perform in benchmarks. In the PassMark benchmark, the Intel Core i3-390M scored 1190. And the AMD A10-5750M scored 2274.
Why AMD A10-5750M is better than Intel Core i3-390M
- CPU base clock speed 2.66 GHz vs 2.5 GHz, 6% higher
Comparison Intel Core i3-390M and AMD A10-5750M: Main points
Intel Core i3-390M
AMD A10-5750M 9066 PASSMARK CPUS CPUS CPUS CPUS CPUS write speed and seek time when testing SSD performance.
Show all
1190
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
2274
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
3DMark06 score
2656
max 18628
Average: 3892.6
3403
max 18628
Average: 3892.6
Cinebench R11.5 /64bit test score (Multi-Core)
2.0856
max 45.3622
Average: 5.3
2.1413
The more threads, the higher the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
Show all
4
max 256
Average: 10.7
4
max 256
Average: 10.7
L1 cache size
A large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all
128KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
192KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
L2 cache size
L2 cache with large scratchpad memory to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all
0.512MB
max 512
Average: 4.
5 MB
4MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
L3 cache size
A large amount of L3 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all
3MB
max 768
Average: 16.3 MB
MB
max 768
Average: 16.3 MB
Number of cores
2
max 72
Mean: 5.8
4
max 72
Mean: 5.8
Processor base clock speed
2.66GHz
max 4.
7
Average: 2.5 GHz
2.5GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
Max. number of PCI Express lanes
16
0.667GHz
max 1.55
Average: 1.1 GHz
GHz
max 1.55
Average: 1.1 GHz
Max. number of processors in the configuration
1
Mean: 1.3
1
Mean: 1.3
DDR version
3
Mean: 3.5
Mean: 3.
5
Max. memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
17.1GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
Memory frequency
RAM can be faster to improve system performance.
Show all
1066MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.2 MHz
MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.2 MHz
Max. number of memory channels
2
max 16
Mean: 2.
9
max 16
Mean: 2.9
Max. memory size
Largest RAM memory.
8GB
max 6000
Average: 404.4 GB
GB
max 6000
Average: 404.4 GB
System bus frequency
Data between computer components and other devices is transferred via the bus.
Show all
2.5 GT/s
max 1600
Average: 156.1 GT/s
GT/s
max 1600
Average: 156.1 GT/s
ECC memory support
Memory debugging code is used when it is necessary to avoid data corruption in scientific computing or server startup.
It finds possible errors and repairs data corruption.
N/A
N/A
Intel Flexible Display Interface (Intel FDI)
Yes
N/A
sse version
Allows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as volume control). Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
Show all
4.2
max 4.2
Average: 4.1
4.2
max 4.2
Average: 4.1
Socket
BGA1288. PGA988
FS1r2
Thermal Monitoring
is
No data
FLEX Memory Access
There
36
max 46
Average: 39.5
max 46
Average: 39.
5
TXT
N/A
N/A
EDB
there is
no data
VT-D
No
No data
VT-X
is
No data
EPT
Clear Video
Yes
n.a.0003
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
32 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
32 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
382 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.3 million
1178 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.
3 million
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
35W
Average: 67.6 W
35W
Average: 67.6 W
PCI Express Edition
2
Mean: 2.9
Mean: 2.9
condition 9000
rPGA 37.5mmx 37.5mm. BGA 34mmx28mm
n/a
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
500MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.
8 MHz
533MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
Supports 64-bit system
A 64-bit system can support more than 4 GB of RAM as opposed to a 32-bit system. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Show all
Yes
Yes
Maximum processor temperature
If the maximum temperature at which the processor operates is exceeded, a reset may occur.
Show all
105°C
max 110
Average value: 96 °C
°C
max 110
Average value: 96 °C
Monitor support
Multiple monitors can be connected to the device, making it easier to work by increasing the working space.
Show all
2
Mean: 2.9
Mean: 2.9
Codename
Arrandale
Richland
Destination
Mobile
Laptop
FAQ
Can Intel Core i3-390M and AMD A10-5750M work in 4K mode?
Intel Core i3-390M — Not available. AMD A10-5750M — No data available.
How many PCIe lanes
Intel Core i3-390M — 16. AMD A10-5750M — No data.
How much RAM do they support?
Intel Core i3-390M supports 8 GB. AMD A10-5750M supports N/AGB.
How fast are processors?
Intel Core i3-390M operates at 2.66 GHz.5 GHz.
How many cores does the processor have?
Intel Core i3-390M has 2 cores. AMD A10-5750M has 4 cores.
Do the processors support ECC memory?
Intel Core i3-390M — no. AMD A10-5750M — No data available.
Does the Intel Core i3-390M have integrated graphics?
Intel Core i3-390M — Intel HD Graphics. AMD A10-5750M — AMD Radeon HD 8650G
What RAM does the
support? Intel Core i3-390M supports DDR3. AMD A10-5750M supports DDR No data available.
What is the socket of the processors?
BGA1288 is used to install the Intel Core i3-390M. PGA988. FS1r2 is used to install AMD A10-5750M.
What architecture is used?
The Intel Core i3-390M is based on the Arrandale architecture. AMD A10-5750M is based on the Richland architecture.
Is the Intel Core i3-390M multiplier unlocked?
Intel Core i3-390M — Not available. AMD A10-5750M — No data available.
How do processors perform in benchmarks?
According to PassMark, the Intel Core i3-390M scored 1190 points. AMD A10-5750M scored 2274 points.
What is the maximum frequency of the processors?
Maximum frequency for Intel Core i3-390M reaches No data Hz.