Amd a9 9425 vs intel i3 5005u: AMD A9-9425 vs Intel Core i3-5005U: What is the difference?

7 февраля, 2021

AMD A9-9425 vs Intel Core i3-5005U Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

AMD A9-9425 vs Intel Core i3-5005U

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD A9-9425 on one side and the Intel Core i3-5005U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the notebook sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,7GHz. The second is used on the notebook segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor

AMD A9-9425

Intel Core i3-5005U
Market (main)

Notebook

Notebook
ISA


x86-64 (64 bit)

x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Excavator

Broadwell
Core name

Stoney Ridge

Broadwell-U
Family

A9-9000

Core i3-5000
Part number(s), S-Spec

AM9425AYN23AC

FH8065801884006,

SR244, SR27G
Release date

Q1 2016

Q1 2015
Lithography

28 nm

14 nm
Transistors

1. 200.000.000

1.300.000.000
Cores

2

2
Threads

2

4
Base frequency

3,1 GHz

2,0 GHz
Turbo frequency

3,7 GHz

—
Cache memory

1 MB

3 MB
Max memory capacity

8 GB

16 GB
Memory types

DDR4-2133

DDR3L 1333/1600,

LPDDR 1333 /1600
Max # of memory channels

1

2
Max PCIe lanes

8

12
TDP

15 W

15 W
GPU integrated graphics

AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics (Stoney)

Intel HD Graphics 5500
GPU cores

3

—
GPU execution units

—

24
GPU shading units

192

192
GPU base clock

200 MHz

300 MHz
GPU boost clock

800 MHz

850 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

325,2 GFLOPS

364,8 GFLOPS
Socket

BGA

BGA1168
Maximum temperature

90°C

105°C
CPU-Z single thread

196

167
CPU-Z multi thread

351

583
Cinebench R15 single thread

120

82
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

360

205
PassMark single thread

1. 342

1.147
PassMark CPU Mark

1.538

2.029
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 single core

3.628

2.238
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

7.137

4.184
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core

419

477
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core

666

1.038
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

88,06 GFLOPS

59,4 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

476 pts / W

279 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of AMD A9-9425 is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD A9-9425 was designed earlier.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i3-5005U

167

583
AMD A9-9425

196

351

In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 66%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD A9-9425

120

360
Intel Core i3-5005U

82

205

In single core, the difference is 46%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 76%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i3-5005U

1.147

2.029
AMD A9-9425

1.342

1.538

In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 32%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
AMD A9-9425

3.628

7.137
Intel Core i3-5005U

2.238

4.184

In single core, the difference is 62%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 71%.

On Linux:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
AMD A9-9425

3.740

6.747
Intel Core i3-5005U

2. 116

3.237

In single core, the difference is 77%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 108%.

On Android:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
AMD A9-9425

3.201

6.145
Intel Core i3-5005U

2.425

4.536

In single core, the difference is 32%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 35%.

On Mac OS X:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X
AMD A9-9425

4.681

9.717
Intel Core i3-5005U

2.522

4.706

In single core, the difference is 86%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 106%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i3-5005U

477

1.038
AMD A9-9425

419

666

In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 56%.

On Linux:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Core i3-5005U

542

1.140
AMD A9-9425

396

482

In single core, the difference is 37%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 137%.

On Android:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Core i3-5005U

522

1.174
AMD A9-9425

521

862

In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 36%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:

AMD A9-9425 Intel equivalentIntel Core i3-5005U AMD equivalent

See also:

AMD A9-9420AMD A9-9420e

Intel Core i3-5005U vs AMD A9-9425 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

Intel Core i3-5005U vs AMD A9-9425

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i3-5005U on one side and the AMD A9-9425 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the notebook sector, It has 2 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,0GHz. The second is used on the notebook segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 2 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Processor

Intel Core i3-5005U

AMD A9-9425
Market (main)

Notebook

Notebook
ISA

x86-64 (64 bit)


x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture

Broadwell

Excavator
Core name

Broadwell-U

Stoney Ridge
Family

Core i3-5000

A9-9000
Part number(s), S-Spec

FH8065801884006,

SR244, SR27G

AM9425AYN23AC
Release date

Q1 2015

Q1 2016
Lithography

14 nm

28 nm
Transistors

1. 300.000.000

1.200.000.000
Cores

2

2
Threads

4

2
Base frequency

2,0 GHz

3,1 GHz
Turbo frequency

—

3,7 GHz
Cache memory

3 MB

1 MB
Max memory capacity

16 GB

8 GB
Memory types

DDR3L 1333/1600,

LPDDR 1333 /1600

DDR4-2133
Max # of memory channels

2

1
Max PCIe lanes

12

8
TDP

15 W

15 W
GPU integrated graphics

Intel HD Graphics 5500

AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics (Stoney)
GPU cores

—

3
GPU execution units

24

—
GPU shading units

192

192
GPU base clock

300 MHz

200 MHz
GPU boost clock

850 MHz

800 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point

364,8 GFLOPS

325,2 GFLOPS
Socket

BGA1168

BGA
Maximum temperature

105°C

90°C
CPU-Z single thread

167

196
CPU-Z multi thread

583

351
Cinebench R15 single thread

82

120
Cinebench R15 multi-thread

205

360
PassMark single thread

1. 147

1.342
PassMark CPU Mark

2.029

1.538
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 single core

2.238

3.628
(Windows)
Geekbench 4 multi-core

4.184

7.137
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 single core

477

419
(Windows)
Geekbench 5 multi-core

1.038

666
(SGEMM)
GFLOPS performance

59,4 GFLOPS

88,06 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance)
Performance / watt ratio

279 pts / W

476 pts / W
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD A9-9425 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD A9-9425 was started more recently.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.





CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i3-5005U

167

583
AMD A9-9425

196

351

In single core, the difference is -15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 66%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.





Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
AMD A9-9425

120

360
Intel Core i3-5005U

82

205

In single core, the difference is 46%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 76%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.





PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i3-5005U

1.147

2.029
AMD A9-9425

1.342

1.538

In single core, the difference is -15%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 32%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
AMD A9-9425

3.628

7.137
Intel Core i3-5005U

2.238

4.184

In single core, the difference is 62%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 71%.

On Linux:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
AMD A9-9425

3.740

6.747
Intel Core i3-5005U

2. 116

3.237

In single core, the difference is 77%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 108%.

On Android:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
AMD A9-9425

3.201

6.145
Intel Core i3-5005U

2.425

4.536

In single core, the difference is 32%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 35%.

On Mac OS X:





Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X
AMD A9-9425

4.681

9.717
Intel Core i3-5005U

2.522

4.706

In single core, the difference is 86%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 106%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Windows:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows
Intel Core i3-5005U

477

1.038
AMD A9-9425

419

666

In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 56%.

On Linux:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux
Intel Core i3-5005U

542

1.140
AMD A9-9425

396

482

In single core, the difference is 37%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 137%.

On Android:





Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Android
Intel Core i3-5005U

522

1.174
AMD A9-9425

521

862

In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 36%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.