Intel Core i5-4570 vs Intel Core i7-3770. Which is the Best?
X
This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors. Please be advised that the operator of this site accepts advertising compensation from certain companies that appear on the site, and such compensation impacts the location and order in which the companies (and/or their products) are presented, and in some cases may also impact the scoring that is assigned to them. The scoring that appears on this site is determined by the site operator in its sole discretion, and should NOT be relied upon for accuracy purposes. In fact, Company/product listings on this page DO NOT imply endorsement by the site operator. Except as expressly set forth in our Terms of Use, all representations and warranties regarding the information presented on this page are disclaimed. The information which appears on this site is subject to change at any time.
More info
General Specifications
Brand
Intel
Intel
Model
Core i5-4570
Core i7-3770
Origin
Malaysia
China
About the Product
The processor clock speed is 3.2 GHz. The level 3 cache is 6 MB. Integrated graphics are provided by Intel HD Graphics 4600 core up to 1.15 GHz. There’s lithography 22nm, Code Name of CPU is Haswell.
The Intel Core i7-3770 3.40 GHz Processor is equipped with 4 cores and 8 threads and can be installed on an LGA1155 socket. It delivers an improved automatic performance, thanks to its Intel Turbo Boost 2.0 Technology.
Package Size
Height
4.5 in.
4.6 in.
Width
4.4 in.
4.3 in.
Depth
2.9 in.
3.2 in.
Weight
1.1 lbs.
0.85 lbs.
-
Height
-
Width
-
Depth
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3770
Details
Socket
FCLGA1150
FCLGA1155
Lithography
22 nm
22 nm
Type of Processors
Desktop
Desktop
Code Name
Haswell
Ivy Bridge
What customers say about «Details»
Intel Core i5-4570 Desktop Processor
- I’ve been investigating other CPUs for my LGA-1150 socket motherboard. i5 is the best.
- Intel Core i5-4570 is exactly what i wanted it is a great product awesome thanks.
- Liked the price point and the ease of install. Low power draw too.
- Thanks for the good processor. No problem with the sockets FCLGA1150.
- Big drawbacks: the z87 or 1150 sockets are not compatible with older software.
Intel Core i7-3770 CPU Processor
- Easy to install, set it in the socket correctly.
- Was kinda surprised at the socket installation. Easy.
- It’s fast. Surprisingly easy to install. Socket is great.
- It booted up very fast, installed Windows 8 Pro quickly. Easy install with this socket.
- Sad to see that the 1155 socket is on it’s way out.
Technical Specifications
CPU Cores
CPU Threads
Clock Speed
3.2 GHz
3. 4 GHz
Turbo Clock Speed
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Max TDP
84 W
77 W
Max Temperature
72.72 °C
67 °C
Data Width
64 bits
64 bits
Virtualization Technology
Yes
Yes
-
CPU Cores
-
CPU Threads
-
Max TDP
-
Data Width
-
Max Temperature
-
Virtualization Technology
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3770
What customers say about «Technical Specifications»
Intel Core i5-4570 Desktop Processor
- This is represents an economic choice, although not quite as powerful as the Intel Core i7.
- Even though this has low clock speed, it’ll reach 3.4 GHz or 3.6 GHz.
- It’s a superb mid-range CPU even with the lack of overclocking, and the stock cooler indeed works fine.
- Pair it with a good GPU and you should be able to run pretty much anything.
- Unfortunately, no Hyper-Threading or overclocking support.
Intel Core i7-3770 CPU Processor
- Faster than a speeding bullet, runs cool.
- Excellent speed and no problems with Photoshop, Flash, Lightroom, or gaming.
- I love the speed and performace.
- Screaming fast at stock clock speeds.
- Loved the easy install, love the speed, all around great product.
Cache And Memory Specifications
L1 Cache Size
128 kB
256 kB
L2 Cache Size
1024 kB
1024 kB
L3 Cache Size
6000 kB
8000 kB
Max Memory Size
32 GB
32 GB
Memory Types
DDR3
DDR3
Max Memory Channels
Max Memory Bandwidth
25. 6 GB/s
25.6 GB/s
-
L1 Cache Size
-
Max Memory Channels
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3770
What customers say about «Cache And Memory Specifications»
Intel Core i5-4570 Desktop Processor
- Good Max memory size. Everything is working fine.
- It`a good CPU, getting older now but still good nonetheless.
- I won’t be overclocking it’s plenty fast just like it is. L3 6 MB and it’s good.
Intel Core i7-3770 CPU Processor
- A lot of new games are making use of over 4 cores and extra L2-L3 cache memory now. Has good memory.
- I bought this with my first custom built PC. Good memory.
- Extremely fast. Lots of cache.
- It fast and a quad with HT, lots of cache.
- Has a smaller cache. It does lack hyperthreading.
Graphics Specifications
DirectX* Support
11.2/12
11.1
Graphics Output
eDP/DP/HDMI/VGA
Graphics Video Max Memory
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
1150 MHz
1150 MHz
Graphics Base Frequency
350 MHz
650 MHz
Processor Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Intel HD Graphics 4000
-
Graphics Base Frequency
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i7-3770
Supported Technologies
Execute Disable Bit / Virus Protection
Yes
Yes
Turbo Boost / Turbo Core
Yes
Yes
Enhanced SpeedStep / PowerNow!
Yes
Yes
Hyper-Threading / HyperTransport
-
Execute Disable Bit / Virus Protection
-
Enhanced SpeedStep / PowerNow!
-
Hyper-Threading / HyperTransport
Warranty / Certifications
Manufacturer Warranty
3 year(s)
3 year(s)
Certifications
CE, FCC
CE, FCC
Other Information
Manufacturer
Price History
✔ Intel Core i5-4570 Desktop Processor
✔ Intel Core i7-3770 CPU Processor
Popular Comparisons
Other reviews
Best CPUs
Best Gaming CPUs
Best Computer Cases
Best M. 2 Solid-State Drives
Best CPU Liquid Coolers
Best Thermal Paste
Best Arduino Starter Kits
Best DDR4 RAM Kits to Upgrade Your PC
Best Raspberry Pi Starter Kits
Best USB Sound Cards
Best Tempered Glass PC Cases
Best NVMe SSD
Intel Core i7-3770K vs Intel Core i5-4570 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
Intel Core i7-3770K vs Intel Core i5-4570
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-3770K on one side and the Intel Core i5-4570 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,9GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Processor | Intel Core i7-3770K | Intel Core i5-4570 | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Ivy Bridge | Haswell | ||||||
Core name | Ivy Bridge | Haswell-DT | ||||||
Family | Core i7-3000 | Core i5-4000 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec |
BX80637I73770K, |
BX80646I54570, |
||||||
Release date | Q2 2012 | Q2 2013 | ||||||
Lithography | 22 nm | 22 nm | ||||||
Transistors | 1. 400.000.000 | 1.400.000.000 | ||||||
Cores | 4 | 4 | ||||||
Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
Base frequency | 3,5 GHz | 3,2 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 3,9 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
High performance cores |
4 Cores 8 Threads @ 3,5 / 3,9 GHz |
— |
||||||
Bus speed | 5 GT/s | 5 GT/s | ||||||
Cache memory | 8 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
Memory types |
DDR3 1333/1600 |
DDR3-1333/1600, |
||||||
Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 25,6 GB/s | 25,6 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
TDP | 77 W | 84 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ||||||
GPU execution units | 16 | 20 | ||||||
GPU shading units | 128 | 160 | ||||||
GPU base clock | 650 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 1150 MHz | 1150 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | 268,8 GFLOPS | 352 GFLOPS | ||||||
Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1150 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1155 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 105°C | 72. 7°C | ||||||
Drystone MIPS | 106.913 DMIPS | — | ||||||
Crypto engine |
AES New Instructions, |
— |
||||||
Security |
Execute Disable Bit, |
— |
||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 352 | 386 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 1.842 | 1.477 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 137 | 136 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 672 | 532 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 single thread | 717 | 771 | ||||||
Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 3. 281 | 3.045 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 2.070 | 2.016 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 6.427 | 5.144 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.228 | 3.910 | ||||||
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
14.385 | 11.286 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
153,48 GFLOPS | 218,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
187 pts / W | 134 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i7-3770K is greater, that the PDT of Intel Core i7-3770K is lower. The Intel Core i5-4570 was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770K |
352 1.842 |
Intel Core i5-4570 |
386 1.477 |
In single core, the difference is -9%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 25%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770K |
137 672 |
Intel Core i5-4570 |
136 532 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 26%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770K |
717 3.281 |
Intel Core i5-4570 |
771 3.045 |
In single core, the difference is -7%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 8%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770K |
2.070 6.427 |
Intel Core i5-4570 |
2.016 5. 144 |
In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 25%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770K |
4.228 14.385 |
Intel Core i5-4570 |
3.910 11.286 |
In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 27%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770K |
4.569 15.678 |
Intel Core i5-4570 |
4.195 11.813 |
In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 33%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770K |
4.040 13.835 |
Intel Core i5-4570 |
4.036 11.491 |
In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 20%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.