Amd radeon rx 5700 xt vs gtx 1080: RX 5700 XT vs GTX 1080 Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-8700K vs i7-6700K)

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1080-vs-radeon-rx-5700-xt%23memory-specs

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce RTX
2060

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce RTX
4090



Radeon RX
Vega 7



GeForce RTX
3060



Radeon RX
580



GeForce GTX
1650

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
1135G7

vs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Core i5
10400F

vs


Core i3
12100F

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



EPYC
7h22



Core i3
1115G4



Core i5
1135G7



Ryzen 5
3500U



Ryzen 3
5300U










Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1080-vs-radeon-rx-5700-xt%23benchmarks

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce RTX
2060

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce RTX
4090



Radeon RX
Vega 7



GeForce RTX
3060



Radeon RX
580



GeForce GTX
1650

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
1135G7

vs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Core i5
10400F

vs


Core i3
12100F

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



EPYC
7h22



Core i3
1115G4



Core i5
1135G7



Ryzen 5
3500U



Ryzen 3
5300U










What is better than the MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1080 TI

Base

frequency.

1605MHz

max 2457

Average: 938 MHz

1481MHz

max 2457

Average: 938MHz

GPU memory frequency

This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth

1750MHz

max 16000

Average: 1326.6 MHz

1376MHz

max 16000

Average: 1326.6 MHz

FLOPS

The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.

9.38TFLOPS

max 1142.32

Average: 92. 5 TFLOPS

11.3TFLOPS

max 1142.32

Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

Turbo GPU

If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can switch to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all

1905 MHz

max 2903

Average: 1375.8 MHz

1582MHz

max 2903

Average: 1375.8 MHz

Texture size

A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all

304.8 GTexels/s

max 756.8

Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

332 GTexels/s

max 756. 8

Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

Architecture name

NAVI / RDNA

Pascal

The name of the graphic processor

Navi 10

GP102

memory capacity

is the speed with which the device saves or reads information.

448GB/s

max 2656

Average: 198.3 GB/s

484.4GB/s

max 2656

Average: 198.3 GB/s

Effective memory speed

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all

14000MHz

max 19500

Average: 6984. 5 MHz

11008MHz

max 19500

Average: 6984.5 MHz

RAM

8GB

max 128

Average: 4.6 GB

11GB

max 128

Average: 4.6 GB

GDDR Memory Versions

Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show all

6

Average: 4.5

5

Average: 4.5

Memory bus width

A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all

256bit

max 8192

Average: 290.1bit

352bit

max 8192

Average: 290.1bit

Heat dissipation (TDP)

Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all

225W

Average: 140.4 W

250W

Average: 140.4 W

Process technology

The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

7 nm

Average: 47.5 nm

16 nm

Average: 47.5 nm

Number of transistors

The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates

10300 million

max 80000

Average: 5043 million

11800 million

max 80000

Average: 5043 million

PCIe version

Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all

four

Mean: 2. 8

3

Mean: 2.8

Width

270mm

max 421.7

Average: 242.6mm

266.7mm

max 421.7

Average: 242.6mm

Height

110mm

max 180

Average: 119.1mm

111.2mm

max 180

Average: 119.1mm

DirectX

Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics

12

max 12.2

Average: 11.1

12

max 12. 2

Average: 11.1

OpenCL version

Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all

2

max 4.6

Average: 1.7

3

max 4.6

Average: 1.7

opengl version

Later versions provide better game graphics

4.6

max 4.6

Average: 4

4.6

max 4.6

Average: 4

Shader model version

6. 5

max 6.6

Average: 5.5

6.4

max 6.6

Average: 5.5

Vulkan version

1.2

1.3

Has HDMI output

HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Show all

Yes

Yes

HDMI version

The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.
Show all

2

max 2.1

Average: 2

2

max 2.1

Average: 2

DisplayPort

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort

3

Average: 2

3

Average: 2

Number of HDMI sockets

The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
Show all

one

Average: 1. 1

one

Average: 1.1

HDMI

Yes

Yes

Passmark score

16495

max 29325

Average: 7628.6

17693

max 29325

Average: 7628.6

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score

138294

max 1

Average: 80042.3

139640

max 1

Average: 80042.3

3DMark Fire Strike Score

21686

max 38276

Average: 12463

19224

max 38276

Average: 12463

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score

24914

max 49575

Average: 11859. 1

27013

max 49575

Average: 11859.1

3DMark 11 Performance GPU Score

34866

max 57937

Average: 18799.9

36919

max 57937

Average: 18799.9

3DMark Vantage Performance score

65107

max 97887

Average: 37830.6

max 97887

Average: 37830.6

3DMark Ice Storm GPU score

446992

max 533357

Average: 372425.7

386800

max 533357

Average: 372425. 7

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 sw-03

98

max 202

Average: 64

67

max 202

Average: 64

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01

136

max 232

Average: 121.3

146

max 232

Average: 121.3

SPECviewperf 12 test score — Showcase

135

max 175

Average: 108.4

146

max 175

Average: 108. 4

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01

45

max 107

Average: 39

57

max 107

Average: 39

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04

99

max 180

Average: 132.8

172

max 180

Average: 132.8

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01

12

max 21

Average: 10.7

max 21

Average: 10.7

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01

73

max 153

Average: 52. 5

59

max 153

Average: 52.5

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 catia-04

163

max 189

Average: 91.5

103

max 189

Average: 91.5

SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Catia

156

max 189

Average: 88.6

103

max 189

Average: 88.6

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 3dsmax-05

183

max 316

Average: 189. 5

145

max 316

Average: 189.5

SPECviewperf 12 test score — 3ds Max

167

max 269

Average: 169.8

143

max 269

Average: 169.8

Comparison of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Video card performance analysis by benchmarks: PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

  • Newer graphics card, release date difference 3 year(s) 1 month78 in core mode 908 Boost 2% more: 1499 MHz vs 1468 MHz
  • 1020.9 times more texturing speed: 239.8 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with less power consumption : 7 nm vs 16 nm
  • Approximately 15% less power consumption: 130 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • Maximum memory size is 2 times more: 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Approximately 10% improvement in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 12622 vs 11483
  • Approx. 0900 4 Aug 2020 vs 27 June 2017 Boost Core Clock 1499 MHz vs 1468 MHz Texturing speed 239.8 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel/s Process 7nm vs 16nm Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt vs 150 Watt Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB PassMark — G2D Mark 830 vs 743 PassMark — G3D Mark 12622 vs 11483 Geekbench — OpenCL 53335 vs 46870

    Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

    • About 4% more core clock: 1290 MHz vs 1243 MHz )
    • Performance in GFXBench 4. 0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 4% more: 17105 vs 16433
    • Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) about 4% more: 17105 vs 16433
    • 9087 about 50% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 5581 vs 3712

    • About 50% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 5581 vs 3712
    Core frequency 1290 MHz vs 1243 MHz
    Memory frequency 10008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 17105 vs 16433
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 17105 vs 16433
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 5581 vs 3712
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) 5581 vs 3712
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3360 vs 3353
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3360 vs 3353

    Benchmark comparison

    GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
    GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

    PassMark — G2D Mark
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    PassMark — G3D Mark
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    Geekbench — OpenCL
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    Name AMD Radeon Pro 5700XT NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
    PassMark — G2D Mark 830 743
    PassMark — G3D Mark 12622 11483
    Geekbench — OpenCL 53335 46870
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16433 17105
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16433 17105
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3712 5581
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3712 5581
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3360
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3360
    3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 6008

    Performance comparison

    conveyors

    AMD Radeon Pro 5700XT NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
    Architecture RDNA 1. 0 Pascal
    Codename Navi 10 GP104
    Production date 4 Aug 2020 27 June 2017
    Place in the ranking 104 105
    Type Laptop Laptop
    Boost Core Clock 1499 MHz 1468MHz
    Number of Compute 40
    Core clock 1243MHz 1290 MHz
    Process 7nm 16nm
    Maximum temperature 479. 7GFLOPS (1:16)
    Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1)
    Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7.675TFLOPS
    Number of shaders 2560 2560
    Pixel fill rate 95.94 GPixel/s
    Texturing speed 239.8 GTexel/s 234.9 GTexel/s
    Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 150 Watt
    Number of transistors 10300 million 7,200 million
    Floating point performance 7. 516 gflops
    Video connectors No outputs No outputs
    G-SYNC support
    Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Recommended power supply 350 Watt
    Additional power connectors None None
    Width IGP
    Notebook size large
    DirectX 12.

    2024 © All rights reserved