Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1080-vs-radeon-rx-5700-xt%23memory-specs
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX
2060
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce RTX
3060
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
Page not found — Technical City
Page not found — Technical City
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1080-vs-radeon-rx-5700-xt%23benchmarks
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX
2060
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
Popular graphics cards
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce RTX
3060
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Core i5
1135G7
vs
Ryzen 5
5500U
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Ryzen 5
5600G
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Popular CPUs
Ryzen 5
5500U
EPYC
7h22
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3500U
Ryzen 3
5300U
What is better than the MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1080 TI
Base
frequency.
1605MHz
max 2457
Average: 938 MHz
1481MHz
max 2457
Average: 938MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
1750MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326.6 MHz
1376MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326.6 MHz
FLOPS
The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
9.38TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92. 5 TFLOPS
11.3TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92.5 TFLOPS
Turbo GPU
If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can switch to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
1905 MHz
max 2903
Average: 1375.8 MHz
1582MHz
max 2903
Average: 1375.8 MHz
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all
304.8 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
332 GTexels/s
max 756. 8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
Architecture name
NAVI / RDNA
Pascal
The name of the graphic processor
Navi 10
GP102
memory capacity
is the speed with which the device saves or reads information.
448GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.3 GB/s
484.4GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.3 GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all
14000MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984. 5 MHz
11008MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
RAM
8GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
11GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show all
6
Average: 4.5
5
Average: 4.5
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
256bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
352bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
225W
Average: 140.4 W
250W
Average: 140.4 W
Process technology
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
7 nm
Average: 47.5 nm
16 nm
Average: 47.5 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
10300 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
11800 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
PCIe version
Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all
four
Mean: 2. 8
3
Mean: 2.8
Width
270mm
max 421.7
Average: 242.6mm
266.7mm
max 421.7
Average: 242.6mm
Height
110mm
max 180
Average: 119.1mm
111.2mm
max 180
Average: 119.1mm
DirectX
Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics
12
max 12.2
Average: 11.1
12
max 12. 2
Average: 11.1
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
2
max 4.6
Average: 1.7
3
max 4.6
Average: 1.7
opengl version
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4
Shader model version
6. 5
max 6.6
Average: 5.5
6.4
max 6.6
Average: 5.5
Vulkan version
1.2
1.3
Has HDMI output
HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Show all
Yes
Yes
HDMI version
The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.
Show all
2
max 2.1
Average: 2
2
max 2.1
Average: 2
DisplayPort
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort
3
Average: 2
3
Average: 2
Number of HDMI sockets
The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
Show all
one
Average: 1. 1
one
Average: 1.1
HDMI
Yes
Yes
Passmark score
16495
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
17693
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score
138294
max 1
Average: 80042.3
139640
max 1
Average: 80042.3
3DMark Fire Strike Score
21686
max 38276
Average: 12463
19224
max 38276
Average: 12463
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
24914
max 49575
Average: 11859. 1
27013
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
3DMark 11 Performance GPU Score
34866
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
36919
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
3DMark Vantage Performance score
65107
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
3DMark Ice Storm GPU score
446992
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
386800
max 533357
Average: 372425. 7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 sw-03
98
max 202
Average: 64
67
max 202
Average: 64
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01
136
max 232
Average: 121.3
146
max 232
Average: 121.3
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Showcase
135
max 175
Average: 108.4
146
max 175
Average: 108. 4
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01
45
max 107
Average: 39
57
max 107
Average: 39
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04
99
max 180
Average: 132.8
172
max 180
Average: 132.8
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01
12
max 21
Average: 10.7
max 21
Average: 10.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01
73
max 153
Average: 52. 5
59
max 153
Average: 52.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 catia-04
163
max 189
Average: 91.5
103
max 189
Average: 91.5
SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Catia
156
max 189
Average: 88.6
103
max 189
Average: 88.6
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 3dsmax-05
183
max 316
Average: 189. 5
145
max 316
Average: 189.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — 3ds Max
167
max 269
Average: 169.8
143
max 269
Average: 169.8
Comparison of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Video card performance analysis by benchmarks: PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
versus
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Newer graphics card, release date difference 3 year(s) 1 month78 in core mode 908 Boost 2% more: 1499 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- 1020.9 times more texturing speed: 239.8 GTexel/s vs 234.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with less power consumption : 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Approximately 15% less power consumption: 130 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Maximum memory size is 2 times more: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Approximately 10% improvement in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 12622 vs 11483
- Approx. 0900
4 Aug 2020 vs 27 June 2017
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
- About 4% more core clock: 1290 MHz vs 1243 MHz )
- Performance in GFXBench 4. 0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 4% more: 17105 vs 16433
- Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) about 4% more: 17105 vs 16433
- About 50% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) benchmark: 5581 vs 3712
9087 about 50% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) benchmark: 5581 vs 3712
Core frequency | 1290 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Memory frequency | 10008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17105 vs 16433 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17105 vs 16433 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 5581 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 5581 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3353 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|||
PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|||
Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) |
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark — G2D Mark | 830 | 743 |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 12622 | 11483 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 53335 | 46870 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 | 17105 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 | 17105 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 5581 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 5581 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 6008 |
Performance comparison
AMD Radeon Pro 5700XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | RDNA 1. 0 | Pascal |
Codename | Navi 10 | GP104 |
Production date | 4 Aug 2020 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in the ranking | 104 | 105 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Boost Core Clock | 1499 MHz | 1468MHz |
Number of Compute | 40 | |
Core clock | 1243MHz | 1290 MHz |
Process | 7nm | 16nm |
Maximum temperature | 479. 7GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.675TFLOPS | |
Number of shaders | 2560 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 95.94 GPixel/s | |
Texturing speed | 239.8 GTexel/s | 234.9 GTexel/s |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
Number of transistors | 10300 million | 7,200 million |
Floating point performance | 7. 516 gflops | |
Video connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended power supply | 350 Watt | |
Additional power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Notebook size | large | |
DirectX | 12.
|