List of atom processors: About: http://dbpedia.org/resource/list_of_intel_atom_microprocessors

17 ноября, 2022

List of comparisons between Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 and Intel Atom

List of comparisons between Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 and Intel Atom


List of comparisons of technical characteristics between the processor Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 and the processors group Intel Atom, with also the respective performance in the benchmarks. Click on one of the links to access the desired comparison.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Comparisons:


Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom Z530 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 1600 1600 512
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom Z3745 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1330 1860 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom Z3740 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1330 1860 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom Z3735G 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1330 1830 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom Z3735F 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1330 1830 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom Z3580 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 2330 2330 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom Z3560 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1830 1830 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom Z2560 2 2 2 2 3 2 4 1600 1600 1000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom x7-Z8750 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1600 2560 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom x7-Z8700 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1600 2400 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom x7-E3950 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1600 1600 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8550 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1440 2400 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8500 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1440 2240 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8350 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1440 1920 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8300 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1440 1840 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom x5-E8000 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1040 1040 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom x5-E3940 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1600 1800 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom N570 2 2 2 2 3 2 4 1660 1660 1000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom N455 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 1660 1660 512
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom N450 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 1660 1660 512
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom N2800 2 2 2 2 3 2 4 1860 1860 1000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom N270 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 1600 1600 512
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom N2600 2 2 2 2 3 2 4 1600 1600 1000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom E3845 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 1910 1910 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom E3815 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 1460 1460 512
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom D525 2 2 2 2 3 2 4 1800 1800 1000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom D510 2 2 2 2 3 2 4 1600 1660 1000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom D425 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 1800 1800 512
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom D2700 2 2 2 2 3 2 4 2130 2130 1000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom D2550 2 2 2 2 3 2 4 1860 1860 1000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom C3558 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 2200 2200 8000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom C2538 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 2400 2400 2000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom 330 2 2 2 2 3 2 4 1600 1600 1000
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Atom 230 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 1600 1600 512

Intel processor brand names-Xeon,Core,Pentium,Celeron—-Atom_weixin_30550271的博客-CSDN博客

This article is about the original line of Atom processors. For system on chips processors, see 
Atom (system on chip).

[hide]This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page.
This article’s factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. (December 2011)

Intel Atom is the brand name for a line of ultra-low-voltage IA-32 and Intel 64 (x86-64) CPUs (or microprocessors) fromIntel, originally designed in 45 nm CMOS with subsequent models, codenamed Cedar, using a 32 nm process.[2] Atom is mainly used in netbooks, nettops, embedded applications ranging from health care to advanced robotics, and mobile Internet devices (MIDs).

Atom processors are based on the Bonnell microarchitecture. [3][4] On 21 December 2009, Intel announced the Pine Trailplatform, including new Atom processor code-named Pineview (Atom N450), with total kit power consumption down 20%.[5] On 28 December 2011, Intel updated the Atom line with the Cedar processors.[2]

In December 2012, Intel launched the 64-bit Centerton family of Atom CPUs, designed specifically for use in servers.[6]Centerton adds features previously unavailable in Atom processors, such as Intel VT virtualization technology and support for ECC memory.[7] On 4 September 2013 Intel launched a 22 nm successor to Centerton, codenamed Avoton.[8]

 

Contents

 
 [hide] 

  • 1 History
  • 2 Instruction set architecture
    • 2.1 32-bit and 64-bit hardware support
    • 2.2 Intel 64 software support
  • 3 Availability
  • 4 Performance
  • 5 Bonnell microarchitecture
  • 6 Collaborations
  • 7 Competition
  • 8 Planned Atom versions
  • 9 See also
  • 10 Notes
  • 11 References
  • 12 External links

 

History[edit]

Intel Atom is a direct successor of the Intel A100 and A110 low-power microprocessors (code-named Stealey), which were built on a 90 nm process, had 512 kB L2 cache and ran at 600 MHz/800 MHz with 3W TDP (Thermal Design Power). Prior to the Silverthorne announcement, outside sources had speculated that Atom would compete with AMD’s Geode system-on-a-chipprocessors, used by the One Laptop per Child (OLPC) project, and other cost and power sensitive applications for x86processors. However, Intel revealed on 15 October 2007 that it was developing another new mobile processor, codenamed Diamondville, for OLPC-type devices.[9]

«Atom» was the name under which Silverthorne would be sold, while the supporting chipset formerly code-named Menlow was called Centrino Atom.[10]

At Spring Intel Developer Forum (IDF) 2008 in Shanghai, Intel officially announced that Silverthorne and Diamondville are based on the same microarchitecture. Silverthorne would be called the Atom Z5xx series and Diamondville would be called the Atom N2xx series. The more expensive lower-power Silverthorne parts will be used in Intel mobile Internet devices (MIDs) whereas Diamondville will be used in low-cost desktop and notebooks. Several Mini-ITX motherboard samples have also been revealed.[11] Intel and Lenovo also jointly announced an Atom powered MID called the IdeaPad U8.[12]

In April 2008, a MID development kit was announced by Sophia Systems[13] and the first board called CoreExpress-ECO was revealed by a German company LiPPERT Embedded Computers, GmbH.[14] Intel offers Atom based motherboards.[15][16]

In December 2012, Intel released Atom for servers, the S1200 series. The primary difference between these processors and all prior versions, is that ECC memory support has been added, enabling use of the Atom in mission-critical server environments that demand redundancy and memory failure protection.

 

Intel Atom processor family[17]
MID / Ultra-mobile PC / Lifestyle PC
Logo Code-name Series Core On-die GPU GPU speed TDP HT Intel 64 Intel VT-x Release date

 
Silverthorne Atom Z5xx single (45 nm) No 200 MHz 0. 65~2 W No No No April 2008
2~2.4 W Yes No
Lincroft Atom Z6xx single (45 nm) Yes 400 MHz 1.3~3 W Yes No No May 2010
Classmate PC / Netbook / Nettop / Lifestyle PC
Logo Code-name Series Core On-die GPU GPU speed TDP HT Intel 64 Intel VT-x Release date

 
Diamondville Atom N2xx single (45 nm) No n/a 2.5 W Yes No No June 2008
Atom 2xx 4 W Yes
(if enabled)
Atom 3xx dual (45 nm) 8 W September 2008
Pineview Atom N4xx single (45 nm) Yes 200 MHz 6. 5 W Yes Yes
(if enabled)		 No January 2010
Atom D4xx 400 MHz 10 W
Atom N5xx dual (45 nm) 200 MHz 8.5 W
Atom D5xx 400 MHz 13 W
Cedarview Atom D2500 dual (32 nm) Yes 400 MHz 10 W No Yes
(if enabled)		 No November 2011
Atom D2700 640 MHz Yes
Atom N2600 400 MHz 3.5 W December 2011
Atom N2800 640 MHz 6.5 W
Server
Logo Code-name Series Core On-die GPU GPU speed TDP HT Intel 64 Intel VT-x Release date
Centerton Atom S1220 dual (32 nm) Unknown 1. 60 GHz 8.1 W Yes Yes Yes December 2012
Atom S1240 1.60 GHz 6.1 W
Atom S1260 2.00 GHz 8.6 W
List of Intel Atom microprocessors

Instruction set architecture[edit]

32-bit and 64-bit hardware support[edit]

All Atom processors implement the x86 (IA-32) instruction set; however, support for the Intel 64 instruction set was not added until the desktop Diamondvilleand desktop and mobile Pineview cores. The Atom N2xx and Z5xx series Atom models cannot run x86-64 code.[18] The Centerton server processors will support the Intel 64 instruction set.[7]

Intel 64 software support[edit]

Intel states the Atom supports 64-bit operation only «with a processor, chipset, BIOS» that all support Intel 64. Those Atom systems not supporting all of these cannot enable Intel 64.[19] As a result, the ability of an Atom-based system to run 64-bit versions of operating systems such as Ubuntu or Debian GNU/Linux may vary from one motherboard to another. Online retailer mini-itx.com has tested Atom-based motherboards made by Intel and Jetway, and while they were able to install 64-bit versions of Linux on Intel-branded motherboards with D2700 (Pineview) processors, Intel 64 support was not enabled on a Jetway-branded motherboard with a D2550 (Pineview) processor.[20]

Even among Atom-based systems which have Intel 64 enabled, not all are able to run 64-bit versions of Microsoft Windows. For those Pineview processors which support 64-bit operation, Intel Download Center currently provides 64-bit Windows 7 and Windows Vista drivers for Intel GMA 3150 graphics, found in Pineviewprocessors.[21] However, no 64-bit Windows drivers are available for newer Atom Cedarview processors at this time. [22]

The lack of 64-bit Windows support for Cedarview processors appears to be due to a driver issue. A member of the Intel Enthusiast Team has stated in a series of posts on enthusiast site Tom’s Hardware that while the Atom D2700 (Pineview) was designed with Intel 64 support, due to a «limitation of the board» Intel had pulled their previously-available 64-bit drivers for Windows 7 and would not provide any further 64-bit support.[23] Some system manufacturers have similarly stated that their motherboards with Atom Cedarview processors lack 64-bit support due to a «lack of Intel® 64-bit VGA driver support».[24] Because all Cedarviewprocessors use the same Intel GMA 3600 or 3650 graphics as the D2700, this indicates that Atom Cedarview systems will remain unable to run 64-bit versions of Windows, even those which have Intel 64 enabled and are able to run 64-bit versions of Linux.

Availability[edit]

Atom processors became available to system manufacturers in 2008. Because they are soldered, like northbridges and southbridges, onto a mainboard, Atom processors are not available to home users or system builders as separate processors, although they may be obtained preinstalled on some ITX motherboards. The Diamondville and Pineview[25] Atom is used in the HP Mini Series, aigo MID Asus N10, Lenovo IdeaPad S10, Acer Aspire One & Packard Bell’s «dot» (ZG5), recentASUS Eee PC systems, Sony VAIO M-series, AMtek Elego, Dell Inspiron Mini Series, Gigabyte M912, LG X Series, Samsung NC10, Sylvania g Netbook Meso, Toshiba NB series (100, 200, 205, 255, 300, 500, 505), MSI Wind PC netbooks, RedFox Wizbook 1020i, Sony Vaio X Series, Zenith Z-Book, a range of Aleutia desktops, Magic W3 and the Archos

Performance[edit]

The performance of a single core Atom is about half that of a Pentium M of the same clock rate. For example, the Atom N270 (1.60 GHz) found in many netbookssuch as the Eee PC can deliver around 3300 MIPS and 2.1 GFLOPS in standard benchmarks,[26] compared to 7400 MIPS and 3. 9 GFLOPS for the similarly clocked (1.73 GHz) Pentium M 740.[27]

The Pineview platform has proven to be only slightly faster than the previous Diamondville platform. This is because the Pineview platform uses the same Bonnell execution core as Diamondville and is connected to the memory controller via the FSB, hence memory latency and performance in CPU-intensive applications are minimally improved.[28]

Bonnell microarchitecture[edit]

Main article: 
Bonnell (microarchitecture)

Intel Atom processors are based on the Bonnell microarchitecture,[3][4] which can execute up to two instructions per cycle. Like many other x86 microprocessors, it translates x86-instructions (CISC instructions) into simpler internal operations (sometimes referred to as micro-ops, i.e., effectively RISC style instructions) prior to execution. The majority of instructions produce one micro-op when translated, with around 4% of instructions used in typical programs producing multiple micro-ops. The number of instructions that produce more than one micro-op is significantly fewer than the P6 and NetBurst microarchitectures. In the Bonnell microarchitecture, internal micro-ops can contain both a memory load and a memory store in connection with an ALU operation, thus being more similar to the x86 level and more powerful than the micro-ops used in previous designs.[29] This enables relatively good performance with only two integer ALUs, and without any instruction reordering, speculative execution, or register renaming. The Bonnell microarchitecture therefore represents a partial revival of the principles used in earlier Intel designs such as P5 and the i486, with the sole purpose of enhancing the performance per watt ratio. However, Hyper-Threading is implemented in an easy (i.e., low power) way to employ the whole pipeline efficiently by avoiding the typical single thread dependencies.[29]

Collaborations[edit]

In March 2009, Intel announced that it would be collaborating with TSMC for the production of the Atom processors. [30] The deal was put on hold due to lack of demand in 2010.

On 13 September 2011 Intel and Google held a joint announcement of a partnership to provide support in Google’s Android operating system for Intel processors (beginning with the Atom). This would allow Intel to supply chips for the growing smartphone and tablet market.[31]

Competition[edit]

Embedded processors based on the ARM version 7 instruction set architecture (such as Nvidia’s Tegra 3 series, TI’s 4 series and Freescale’s i.MX51 based on theCortex-A8 core, or the Qualcomm Snapdragon and Marvell Armada 500/600 based on custom ARMv7 implementations) offer similar performance to the low end Atom chipsets[dubious – discuss] but at roughly one quarter the power consumption, and (like most ARM systems) as a single integrated system on a chip, rather than a two chip solution like the current Atom line. Although the second-generation Atom codenamed «Pineview» should greatly increase its competitiveness in performance/watt, ARM plans to counter the threat with the multi-core capable Cortex-A9 core as used in Nvidia’s Tegra 2/3, TI’s OMAP 4 series, and Qualcomm’s next-generation Snapdragon series, among others.

The Nano and Nano Dual-Core series from VIA is slightly above the average thermal envelope of the Atom, but offers hardware AES support, random number generators, and out-of-order execution. Performance comparisons of the Intel Atom against the Via Nano indicate that a single core Intel Atom is outperformed by the Via Nano which is in turn outperformed by a dual core Intel Atom 330 in tests where the second core is used. The Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms the dual-core Nano.[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]

The Xcore86 (also known as the PMX 1000) is x586 based System on Chip (SoC) that offers a below average thermal envelope compared to the Atom.

Kenton Williston of EE Times said that while Atom will not displace ARM from its current markets, the ability to apply the PC architecture into smaller, cheaper and lower power form factors will open up new markets for Intel.[40]

Planned Atom versions[edit]

A 22 nm Atom chip, code name Silvermont, is planned for 2013 release.

Intel has also released plans for Atom chips with 14 nm architecture. This chip, codenamed Airmont, is expected to be released in 2014.

Each chip is expected to provide improved performance while consuming less electricity. The Airmont Atom is expected to consume only 15 watts or less.

processor specifications and tests in 5 benchmarks

Intel began selling the Atom D525 on June 21, 2010 for a suggested price of $63. This is a processor for laptops, it has 2 cores and 4 threads, the processor is made according to the 45 nm process technology.

The processor is made for the FCBGA559 socket, TDP 13 W, with a maximum operating temperature of 100 °C. Supported memory types DDR3, DDR2, in 1-channel mode and a maximum of up to 4 GB.

Specifications

General information

Release date
June 21, 2010
Launch price
$63
Market price
$320
Purpose
for laptops
Architecture
Pineview
Series
Intel Atom
Process
45 nm
Crystal size
66 mm²
Number of transistors
176 million
Processor capacity
64 bit

Frequencies and performance

Clock speed
1800 MHz
Maximum frequency
1830 MHz
Number of cores
2
Number of threads
4
Level 1 cache
64 KB
Level 2 cache
512 KB
Unlocked multiplier
+
Permissible core voltage
0. 8V-1.175V

Memory

Memory type
DDR3, DDR2
Memory channels
1
Memory bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
Maximum OD volume
4 GB

Integrated Graphics

Integrated Graphics
Intel GMA 3150

Compatible

Socket
FCBGA559
Heat dissipation
13W
Maximum core temperature
100 °C
Maximum number of processors in configuration
1
Windows 11 support
No

Technology and instructions

Safety technology
EDB
Instruction sets
SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3

Benchmarks

Interesting information:

Check micro online entry.

Comparison with other processors

Processor 1:

Processor 2:

Video reviews and tests

Intel Atom D525. Drag or where? We test in toys.

Intel Atom D525. Drag or where? We test in toys.

3Q E-lio nettop — review and test of capabilities — what is a computer with such characteristics capable of?

Review Intel D525MW

Intel Atom D525 / 4Gb (DDR3) / Intel GMA / SSD 120Gb / Wi-Fi

Overclocking Atom D525 and ION2

Nettop 3Q Sign: Intel AtomION D525 / 2Gb / 512m Nvidia / WiFi.

Computer overview with Intel Atom D410. What can you do in 2022?

Atom D525 Vale a Pena? veja os testes no Windows 10

Intel Atom D525 / 2Gb / Intel GMA / HDD 250Gb / Wi-Fi

Atom D525 N10 I3150 3 250

Kit: Asus AT5IONT-I motherboard + Atom D525 + 4Gb (DDR3) processor.

Intel Atom D525 / Memory 4Gb (DDR3) / 512m Nvidia ION / SSD 180Gb / Wi-Fi

If you find a bug or have something to add, write in the comments. Have you had any experience with this processor? Is it worth buying one today?

Share with friends

Intel Atom Family Brief / Intel Blog / Sudo Null IT News

Architecture

The Intel Atom is an x86 CISC processor. Intel Atom can execute up to two instructions per cycle (due to the use of u- and v-pipelines).

Generations

  • Intel Bonnell (45 nm; 2011-2013)
  • Intel Saltwell (32 nm; 2012-2013)
  • Intel Silvermont (22 nm; since 2013)

    • Intel Cherry Trail (14 nm; since 2020)

Performance

It is widely believed that the performance of a single core Atom processor is about half that of an equivalent Pentium M. 2.1 GFLOPS in standard tests[2] versus 7400 MIPS and 3.9 GFLOPS in Pentium M 740 (1.73 GHz)[3].

Atom N330 dual-core system and Core Duo 2300 dual-core system (1.66 GHz) are reported to have similar performance.[4] Although, for example, the results of a more authoritative study say that the speed of the Atom 330 is comparable only to the Intel Celeron M 520. [5]

BunsenLabs

BunsenLabs is one of the smallest Linux distributions in the world. It is a continuation of CrunchBang, which eschewed the traditional desktop environment in favor of a repackaged version of the Openbox window manager.

BunsenLabs isn’t the only distribution to support the CrunchBang mode, but it seems to be the most active. Another option is CrunchBang+++. If you’re feeling adventurous, you can run the Arch Linux based release called ArchBang.

Application

There is an opinion that having two virtual cores, the CISC architecture is less suitable for the implementation of mobile device processors (where these processors find their main application) than RISC (for example, ARM processors based on the RISC architecture are widely used in modern mobile devices).[6]

At present, the Atom platform has a low enough power consumption for use in smartphones and tablets, and even lower in comparison with similar ARM processors competing in this segment of mobile electronics. And the lower popularity of SoCs on the Atom platform is not dictated by power consumption and price, but by the low adaptation of software to the x86 architecture.

Lubuntu

Lubuntu is easy and quick to install. Newer versions use the LXQt desktop environment, although the most recent Long Term Support version still supports LXDE.

Minimum system requirements. The Lubuntu website recommends 1 GB of RAM for resource intensive web applications such as YouTube, Facebook and Google Docs.

Atom Processors

The Intel® Atom™ processor nomenclature is a three-digit number sequence with a one-letter prefix. Netbook processors are prefixed with N, while the Z prefix indicates that the processor is for MID devices. — 1,2-2 512 32 — Z3xx (Silvermont) Z300 22 4 Intel Gen 7 — 2, 1-2. 4 1024-2048 32-64 — Z4xx (AIRMONT) 9036 9030

9030 9903 9030 — 32-64

45 1 GMA 3150 9030 DMI 2.5gt/s 1.66 … 1.80 9030

512 64 10 N4XX (Pine TRANIL -M) N450, N455, N470, N475 45 1 GMA 3150 DMI 2.5GT/S

9030 1.33 … 1.83 512 9030.5.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90AL 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90.5 90ALS

D5xx (Pine Trail-D ) D510, D525 45 2 GMA 3150 DMI 2.5GT/S 1.66 … 1.80 1024 13 N5XX (PINE TRAILIL-M) 905, N. 45 2 GMA 3150 9030 DMI 2.5gt/s 1.5 … 1.66 1024 64

9030

9030, 9020, E. E640, E640T, E660, E660T, E680, E680T 45 1 GMA 600 DMI 2.5gt/s 0.6 … 1.6 512 3.3 … 4.5 D2XXX (CEDARVIEW-D) 9030 9036 9036 9036 9036 9036 9036 9036 9036 9036 9036 9036

D2500, D2550, D2700 32 2 GMA 3600/3650 DMI 2.5GT/S 1.87 … 2.13 1024

64

903 903 903 903 903 903 903 903 903 903 90ALE 903 903 903 903 903 903 903 903 90ALLEDED Cedarview-M) N2600, N2800 32 2-4 GMA 3600/3650 DMI 2.5GT/S 1.60 … 1,87 1024 64

9030 … 6.5 (ValleyView) 9036 9030

22 1-4 Intel Gen7 DMI 2.5gt/S 1.20 … 2.40 64

9030 3.5 … 6.5

9030

ELIVE 9000 9000 9000 get a unique experience at Intel Atom? Look at Elive, a very small Linux distribution with its own custom desktop environment.

Elive is not intended for beginners and is not intended for enterprise use. Who is it for? Let the development team tell you:

Elive is not made for newbies. Elive is not made for experienced people. Elive is not made for enterprises or personal user. Elive is art. It is simply for the people who appreciate it and want to use it. Feel free to try Elive, because only you decide what you want in this world!

It’s not yet clear who the Elive is for, but we do know if it’s for older machines or machines with low horsepower. The minimum requirements for the Elive processor are 500 MHz, 198 MB of RAM and 700 MB of disk space.

Notes

  1. Intel to unveil OLPC chips in Shanghai next April. InfoWorld (October 15, 2007). Retrieved August 31, 2009. Archived from the original on March 11, 2012.
  2. ZOTAC IONITX-A-U Atom N330 WiFi N Motherboard Kit «the dual-core Atom 330 is equivalent to Intel’s Core Duo processor».
  3. Economy Test: Core 2 Duo vs Atom 330 Dual Core | THG. RU
  4. Return of the Son of Pentium in 2008? Intel’s new ultramobile processors. ??? (December 12, 2007). Retrieved August 31, 2009. Archived from the original on March 11, 2012.

Performance

Users who switched to a Samsung Ativ Smart PC after the Surface RT and the Samsung Ativ Tab equated their experience with gains. Most impressive is the compatibility of the Clover Trail platform with Windows applications: image processing in Photoshop, writing notes in a Word text editor. Of course, applications of this type run much faster on ultrabooks, but these are not tablets, which do not even have fans to cool powerful processors.

At the same time, it is worth mentioning that the computing power and graphics performance of the Clover Trail platform are not so high as to put the ultrabook aside. According to the company, on a single charge, the tablet can work for 10 hours. In practice, the operating time is slightly less. The Samsung Ativ Smart PC lasted 9 hours while watching YouTube videos, browsing the Internet and playing audio. Battery life drops dramatically if you start decoding video, processing images, and running resource-intensive games. In this case, the tablet can work for about 5 hours, which is quite acceptable for a 30 Wh battery.

Based on feedback from most users, the Samsung Ativ Smart PC tablet and Intel Clover Trail platform will not deliver the performance levels found on most Ultrabooks based on the Ivy Bridge family of Intel Core processors. At the same time, the Intel Clover Trail platform suggests that the processor giant has not yet lost the race and cannot be written off from the mobile processor market, which is currently dominated by such first-tier companies as Qualcomm, Samsung and Nvidia. If you need a tablet that can completely replace a laptop, then the Microsoft Surface Pro is the perfect choice. True, not everyone is ready to shell out from their wallet 9$00 for a tablet. That’s when the Clover Trail platform comes into play.

Most do not recommend buying the Samsung Ativ Smart PC 500T, as the device looks cheap and looks like other plastic solutions from the South Korean giant. Microsoft CFO Tami Reller said that all first-tier manufacturers are preparing tablets based on the Clover Trail platform this year. It remains to be hoped that soon there will be plenty to choose from.

The Samsung Ativ Smart PC 500T is $600, $100 more than the Surface RT. It is hoped that soon the range of tablets based on the Clover Trail platform will expand, and their cost will be at the level of Surface RT. For just $100 more, users get access to hundreds of familiar apps, improved performance, and long battery life. It’s hard to understand how the Surface RT tablet still exists.

Undoubtedly, the market for ARM processors does not stand still and more energy-efficient and productive models will appear in the future, but Windows RT will not be able to offer users support for their favorite Windows applications and will always be one step below Windows 8. Most of the companies worth noting are Adobe and Google also share this idea and are in no hurry to port their applications to Windows RT. A few days ago, the head of Nvidia called Windows RT a total disappointment, and Microsoft itself is trying to somehow increase the meager sales of Surface RT with the help of retail stores Staples, Best Buy and Walmart.

AMD A4 1200

This processor is not of particular interest for overclocking, since its nominal frequency of 1 GHz will remain so. The Atom N450 has the potential for this. However, this is where the advantages of the 450 over the A4 end.

It’s worth starting with the fact that there are two cores in the A4 1200. Each is capable of working in dual-stream mode. The size of the L2 cache memory is higher and is 1 MB. The maximum power consumption is 4 W, while the 450 has 5.5. The memory controller is of the DDR3 type, which means that this model is more technologically advanced and is capable of operating at a frequency of 1066 MHz. Also, the production process for 1200 is 1.5 times less. In this comparison, AMD A4 1200 is a clear favorite, which is confirmed by tests for popular computing.

Similarity Intel Atom and Intel Celeron

  • The processors are in the same price category.
  • Both platforms have the same amount of cache memory.
  • The technological process of the platforms is the same and equal to 14HM.
  • Maximum TDP — the indicator showing heat dissipation is identical, equal to 6 watts.
  • The performance of Atom and Celeron processors with four cores is almost the same.
  • Tests that measure the performance of all cores and threads and in game and application mode showed similar results between platforms.
  • The speed of work in complex applications is identical.

Purchase

At the time of purchase, this fee was also present on Aliexpress, but the price tag was completely different. Approximately 5,200 rubles ($74) for a fee and 2,800 rubles ($40) for EMS delivery to Russia. On Taobao, the price tag was 420 yuan and 12 yuan shipping within China. The seller was essentially the same, a la the official Qotom store. Therefore, thinking about 7 seconds, I decided to order there through the wonderful intermediary Yoybuy. The order was placed, paid for… and… nothing… The seller turned out to be from the category of those who accumulate orders, and then send them out en masse. But I really wanted to pay, and so I patiently waited. After almost 3 weeks, the shipment finally took place, after 3 days it was already in the Yoybuy warehouse, repackaged and sent by airmail, because the parcel weighed only 150 grams and the delivery was only $4.07. A couple of weeks later I received a light and neat box in the mail and went home to study the contents. Digression: google the manufacturer
With a shallow google, the official website of the manufacturer pops up. Which does not have this board. Generally! But we are not born with a bastard and hieroglyphs do not scare us, so we find a completely official site, where everything is already present. From this page, we can easily find out that this board belongs to the 工控主板 无风扇 class, the Pico ITX form factor.