AMD RX 5700-XT vs Vega-64
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 174,186 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
86,469 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 103% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 84% Acer(1025 1246) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 84%
Great: 103%
SPEED RANK: 50th / 688
87,717 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 116% Sapphire(1DA2 E409)
Worst Bench: 60% XFX(1682 5701)
Poor: 60%
Great: 116%
SPEED RANK: 48th / 688
| Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
94. |
94.7 % | +0% |
| Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
111 fps | +2% | 109 fps | |||
| Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
109 fps | 126 fps | Better reflection handling. +16% |
|||
| MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
92 fps | 109 fps | Faster multi rendering. +18% |
|||
| Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
131 fps | 132 fps | +1% |
| Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
122 fps | 139 fps | Better peak lighting effects. +14% |
|||
| Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
114 fps | 147 fps | Better peak reflection handling. +29% |
|||
| MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
95 fps | 122 fps | Faster peak multi rendering. +28% |
|||
| Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
143 fps | 158 fps | Faster peak NBody calculation. +10% |
| CSGO Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
223 Fps | 242 Fps | Slightly Better CSGO Fps. +9% |
|||
| Fortnite Avg.  Fps @ 1080p on Max
|
121 Fps | 167 Fps | Much Better Fortnite Fps. +37% |
|||
| PUBG Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
104 Fps | Better PUBG Fps. +11% |
94 Fps | |||
| GTAV Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
88 Fps | 117 Fps | Much Better GTAV Fps. +34% |
|||
| LoL Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
194 Fps | 225 Fps | Better LoL Fps. +16% |
|||
| Overwatch Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
127 Fps | 135 Fps | Slightly Better Overwatch Fps. +6% |
|||
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Avg.  Fps @ 1080p on Max
|
88 Fps | 115 Fps | Much Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps. +31% |
|||
| Minecraft Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max |
202 Fps | 215 Fps | Slightly Better Minecraft Fps. +7% |
Market Share
Based on 55,652,567 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.08 % | 0.52 % | Hugely higher market share. +550% |
|||
| Value Value For Money |
56.1 % | 68 % | Better value. +21% |
|||
| User Rating UBM User Rating |
67 % | 74 % | More popular. +10% |
|||
| Price Price (score) |
$400 | $330 | Cheaper. +17% |
| Age Newest |
62 Months | 39 Months | Much more recent. +37% |
|||
| Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
199 fps | 230 fps | Better peak texture detail. +16% |
|||
| Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
78. 3 fps |
98.5 fps | Faster peak complex splatting. +26% |
|||
| Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
179 fps | 179 fps | ||||
| Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
76.5 fps | 91.7 fps | Faster complex splatting. +20% |
ADVERTISEMENT
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs).
Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here) [Nov ’19 GPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock).
After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand.
[Jul ’19 GPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these GPUs
Top Builds that include these GPUs
- Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (675)
- Asus PRIME X470-PRO (474)
- Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (410)
- Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (398)
- MSI B450 Tomahawk (355)
- Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (309)
- MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (291)
- Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (924)
- MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) (863)
- Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (721)
- Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (451)
- MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) (411)
- MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) (376)
- Asus PRIME X570-P (329)
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.
com. - — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
-
Nvidia RTX 3070
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
-
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 3080
-
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
-
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
-
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 2060
-
AMD RX 6600-XT
-
AMD RX 5600-XT
-
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64: What is the difference?
56points
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
43points
Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
54 facts in comparison
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
Why is AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT better than Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64?
- 358MHz faster GPU clock speed?
1605MHzvs1247MHz - 22.
96 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
121.9 GPixel/svs98.94 GPixel/s - 70W lower TDP?
225Wvs295W - 805MHz faster memory clock speed?
1750MHzvs945MHz - 12110MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
14000MHzvs1890MHz - 359MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1905MHzvs1546MHz - Supports multi-display technology?
- 7nm smaller semiconductor size?
7nmvs14nm
Why is Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64 better than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT?
- 2.91 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
12.66 TFLOPSvs9.75 TFLOPS - 91 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
395.8 GTexels/svs304.8 GTexels/s - 35.8GB/s more memory bandwidth?
483.8GB/svs448GB/s - 1792bit wider memory bus width?
2048bitvs256bit - 1536 more shading units?
4096vs2560 - 2200million more transistors?
12500 millionvs10300 million - 96 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
256vs160
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 16GB
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super
Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming
Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
MSI Radeon RX 5500 XT Gaming 4GB
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
MSI Radeon RX 5500 XT Gaming 8GB
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
AMD Radeon RX 590
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
Zotac GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Mini
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080
Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
AMD Radeon R9 380
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
1 User reviews
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
9.
0/10
1 User reviews
Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
0 User reviews
Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
8.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
9.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Fan noise
5.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
7.0/10
1 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
1605MHz
1247MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.GPU turbo
1905MHz
1546MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
3.pixel rate
121.
9 GPixel/s
98.94 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
4.floating-point performance
9.75 TFLOPS
12.66 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
5.texture rate
304.8 GTexels/s
395.8 GTexels/s
The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1750MHz
945MHz
The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.
7.shading units
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.
8.texture mapping units (TMUs)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
9.render output units (ROPs)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
1.effective memory speed
14000MHz
1890MHz
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
448GB/s
483.8GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
256bit
2048bit
A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle.
It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.
5.version of GDDR memory
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64)
Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.
6.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
✖Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
Features
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
2.OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
3.OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing.
Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
4.Supports multi-display technology
✔AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
✖Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.
5.load GPU temperature
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64)
A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
✖Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✔AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
✔Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
✖Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.
9.PassMark (G3D) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64)
This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.
Ports
1.has an HDMI output
✔AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
✔Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
2.HDMI ports
More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.
3.HDMI version
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.0
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4.DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best graphics cards?
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon RX Vega 64
- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon RX Vega 64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
120%
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Radeon RX 5700 XT |
20% higher gaming performance. |
| 70 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon RX Vega 64 . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Reasons to consider Radeon RX Vega 64 |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon RX 5700 XT
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (69 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | Radeon RX Vega 64 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Name | Navi 10 (Navi 10 XT) | vs | Vega 10 (Vega 10 XT) | |
| Fab Process | 7 nm | vs | 14 nm | |
| Die Size | 254 mm² | vs | 484 mm² | |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 12,500 million | |
| Shaders | 2560 | vs | 4096 | |
| Compute Units | 40 | vs | 64 | |
| Core clock | 1605 MHz | vs | 1250 MHz | |
| ROPs | 64 | vs | 64 | |
| TMUs | 256 | vs | 256 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | Radeon RX Vega 64 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | HBM2 | |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 2048 bit | |
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz 14000 MHz effective |
vs | 945 MHz 1890 MHz effective |
|
| Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 8192 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | Radeon RX Vega 64 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225 watts | vs | 295 watts | |
| Release Date | 7 Jul 2019 | vs | 8 Aug 2017 |
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
112.
30 GP/s -
Radeon RX Vega 64
96.00 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
449.30 GT/s
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
384.00 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
448.00 GB/s
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
483.80 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
8980.00 GFLOPs
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
12288.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
78
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
60
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
146
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
115
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
82
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
66
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
132
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
108
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
162
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
101
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
61
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
48
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
153
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
121
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
133
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
115
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
104
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
100
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
101
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
82
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
117
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
114
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
109
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
88
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
158
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
126
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
176
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
142
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
75
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
61
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
44
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
36
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
112
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
100
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
68
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
60
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
146
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
134
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
117
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
90
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
148
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
137
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
127
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
103
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
68
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
58
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
59
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
48
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
109
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
89
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
59
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
49
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
100
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
84
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
121
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
81
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
38
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
32
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
108
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
86
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
106
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
84
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
90
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
74
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
76
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
61
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
102
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
89
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
76
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
62
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
129
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
91
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
120
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
94
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
59
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
49
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
36
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
28
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
80
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
72
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
54
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
48
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
93
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
92
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
78
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
61
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
108
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
100
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
85
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
79
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
49
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
43
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
33
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
29
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
61
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
52
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
33
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
28
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
58
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
50
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
68
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
51
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
18
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
16
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
59
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
47
FPS (higher is better)
Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
60
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
50
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
45
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
38
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
43
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
35
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
55
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
49
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
38
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
34
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
62
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
49
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
67
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
48
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
36
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
32
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
20
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
16
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
47
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
43
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
34
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
31
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
48
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
46
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
40
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
31
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
66
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
61
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
44
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
44
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
Radeon RX 5700 XT
30
-
Radeon RX Vega 64
25
FPS (higher is better)
| VS | ||
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
| VS | ||
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary |
| VS | ||
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
| VS | ||
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | GeForce RTX 2060 Super |
| VS | ||
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
| VS | ||
| GeForce RTX 2080 Super | TITAN V |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
What is better than the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 or Gigabyte Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC
Gigabyte Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC
GPU 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 ) is characterized by a high clock frequency.
1650MHz
max 2457
Average: 938 MHz
1247MHz
max 2457
Average: 938MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
1750MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326.6 MHz
945MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326.
6 MHz
FLOPS
The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
9.45TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92.5 TFLOPS
12.8TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92.5 TFLOPS
Turbo GPU
If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can switch to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
1905 MHz
max 2903
Average: 1375.8 MHz
1546 MHz
max 2903
Average: 1375.8 MHz
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all
304.8 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
395.8 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
Architecture name
NAVI / RDNA
GCN 5.0
The name of the graphic processor
NAVI 10
VEGA 10
memory capacity
is the speed with which the device saves or reads information.
448GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.3 GB/s
483.8GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.3 GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all
14000MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
1890MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
RAM
8GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
8GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show all
6
Average: 4.5
5
Average: 4.
5
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
256bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
2048bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
225W
Average: 140.4W
295W
Average: 140.
4W
Process technology
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
7 nm
Average: 47.5 nm
14 nm
Average: 47.5 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
10300 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
12500 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
PCIe version
Considerable speed of the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals is provided.
The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all
four
Mean: 2.8
3
Mean: 2.8
Width
279.85mm
max 421.7
Average: 242.6mm
279mm
max 421.7
Average: 242.6mm
Height
114.35mm
max 180
Average: 119.1mm
mm
max 180
Average: 119.1mm
DirectX
Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics
12
max 12.
2
Average: 11.1
12
max 12.2
Average: 11.1
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
2
max 4.6
Average: 1.7
2.1
max 4.6
Average: 1.7
opengl version
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4
4.6
max 4.
6
Average: 4
Shader model version
6.5
max 6.6
Average: 5.5
6.4
max 6.6
Average: 5.5
Vulkan version
1.2
1.2
Has HDMI output
HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Yes
Yes
HDMI version
The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.
Show all
2
max 2.1
Average: 2
max 2.
1
Average: 2
DisplayPort
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort
3
Average: 2
3
Average: 2
Number of HDMI sockets
The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
Show all
one
Average: 1.1
one
Average: 1.1
HDMI
Yes
Yes
Passmark score
16495
max 29325
Average: 7628.
6
14327
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score
138294
max 1
Average: 80042.3
124827
max 1
Average: 80042.3
3DMark Fire Strike Score
21686
max 38276
Average: 12463
18001
max 38276
Average: 12463
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
24914
max 49575
Average: 11859.
1
22051
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
3DMark 11 Performance GPU score
34866
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
30208
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
3DMark Vantage Performance Score
65107
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
54157
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
3DMark Ice Storm GPU score
446992
max 533357
Average: 372425.
7
384458
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 sw-03
98
max 202
Average: 64
79
max 202
Average: 64
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01
136
max 232
Average: 121.3
109
max 232
Average: 121.3
SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase 9 score0004
135
max 175
Average: 108.
4
109
max 175
Average: 108.4
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01
45
max 107
Average: 39
49
max 107
Average: 39
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04
99
max 180
Average: 132.8
82
max 180
Average: 132.8
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01
12
max 21
Average: 10.
7
12
max 21
Average: 10.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01
73
max 153
Average: 52.5
57
max 153
Average: 52.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 catia-04
163
max 189
Average: 91.5
154
max 189
Average: 91.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Catia
156
max 189
Average: 88.
6
155
max 189
Average: 88.6
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 3dsmax-05
183
max 316
Average: 189.5
142
max 316
Average: 189.5
SPECviewperf 12 — 3ds Max 9 test score0004
169
max 269
Average: 169.8
137
max 269
Average: 169.8
Radeon Pro 5700 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT — Th200
Contents
- Introduction
- Features
- Tests
- Games
- Key differences
- Conclusion
- Comments
Video card
Video card
Introduction
We compared two graphics cards: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs.
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.
The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 is a Radeon Pro Mac generation (Navi Series) integrated graphics card based on RDNA 1.0 architecture released Aug 4th, 2020.
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is a Navi generation (RX 5000) RDNA 1.0 architecture graphics card released on Jul 7th, 2019. It comes with 8GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1750MHz, has 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin pin power connector and consumes up to 165 watts.
Characteristics
Graphics Card
Name
AMD Radeon Pro 5700
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Exit date
AUG AUG, 20000
9000 JUL 7TH, 2019 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
005
12.
44 TFLOPS (2:1)
19.51 TFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance
6.221 TFLOPS
9.754 TFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance
388.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
609.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
CLOCK Speeds
Basic frequency
1243 MHZ
1605 MHZ
Maximum frequency
1350 MHZ
1905 MHz
005
Render Config
Shading Units
2304
2560
Texture Units
144
160
Raster Units
64
64
Compute Units
36
40
Graphics Features
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Opengl
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
2.1
VULKAN
1.2
1.2
Board Design
Heating
130W
225W
Power Conventors
None
1x 6-Pin + PIN + PIN + PIN + PIN + PIN + PIN
Igp
IGP
DUAL-SLOT Tests
Th200 RP
Th200 RP is a test created by Th200.
It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.
AMD Radeon Pro 5700
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
+41%
3DMark Graphics
3DMark is a benchmarking tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.
AMD Radeon Pro 5700
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Blender bmw27
Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.
AMD Radeon Pro 5700
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Game
1920×1080, Ultra
| Game | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 5700XT |
|---|---|---|
| Battlefield V |
+14% |
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | ||
| DOOM Eternal | ||
| Far Cry 5 | ||
| Hitman 3 | ||
| Metro Exodus | ||
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
| The Witcher 3 | ||
| Average | 0. 00 fps |
111.40 fps |
2560×1440, Ultra
| Game | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 5700XT |
|---|---|---|
| Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | ||
| Battlefield V |
+5% |
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | ||
| DOOM Eternal | ||
| Far Cry 5 | ||
| Hitman 3 | ||
| Metro Exodus | ||
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
| The Witcher 3 | ||
| Average | 0. 00 fps |
84.45 fps |
3840×2160, Ultra
| Game | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 5700XT |
|---|---|---|
| Assassin’s Creed Valhalla | ||
| Battlefield V | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 | ||
| DOOM Eternal | ||
| Far Cry 5 | ||
| Hitman 3 | ||
| Metro Exodus | ||
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | ||
| Average | 0. 00 fps |
47.62 fps |
Key differences
Why is AMD Radeon Pro 5700 better than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT?
Newer — 1 year later release
Uses 43% less power — 130W vs. 225W
Why is AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT better than AMD Radeon Pro 5700?
Has a 41% higher performance
Has a 17% higher throughput — 448.0 GB/s vs 384.0 GB/s
Has a 42% higher pixel fill rate — 121.9 GPixel/s vs 86.40 GPixel/s
Has 57% higher texture fill rate — 304.8 GTexel/s vs 194.4 GTexel/s
Has more texture units +16
Has 256 more shading units
Has 4 more compute units
Conclusion
Which is better Radeon RX 5700 XT or Radeon Pro 5700?
The Radeon RX 5700 XT delivers 41% better performance, consumes up to 74% more energy and holds the same amount of memory. Based on our research, Radeon RX 5700 XT 3990X is more powerful than Radeon Pro 5700.
Is Radeon RX 5700 XT good today?
Radeon RX 5700 XT has 8 GB memory and shows an average of 84.45 FPS in 10 games at 1440p, making it an excellent choice for games in 2022.
This graphics card will give you a good experience in every game on reasonable graphics settings.
What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to Radeon RX 5700 XT?
The Radeon RX 6600 is AMD’s closest competitor to the Radeon RX 5700 XT. It is 1% more powerful, uses 34% less energy, and holds the same amount of memory.
What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to Radeon RX 5700 XT?
The GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the Radeon RX 5700 XT. It is 7% more powerful, uses 12% more energy, holds the same amount of memory, and has higher average FPS in games at 1080p, 1440p, 2160p.
How does Radeon Pro 5700 perform compared to Radeon RX 5700 XT and other graphics cards?
Relative performance
General performance
Desktop performance
Professional performance
how to tame a red dragon? GECID.
com. Page 1
::>Video cards
>2019
> PowerColor AXRX 5700 8GBD6-3DHR/OC
02-10-2019
Page 1
Page 2
One page
AMD’s latest Radeon RX 5700 series of graphics products currently includes two models: the Radeon RX 5700 and the Radeon RX 5700 XT. They belong to the middle price range and are designed to replace the Radeon RX Vega 56/64 on the market, which, although they turned out to be quite interesting, but the high cost and heat dissipation did not allow them to become widespread. In the last article, we reviewed the details of the 7nm RDNA (Radeon DNA) microarchitecture and got acquainted with the older video card, and now it’s time for the younger solution.
AMD video card technical specification summary table:
|
Model |
AMD Radeon RX 580 |
AMD Radeon RX 590 |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
AMD Radeon VII |
AMD Radeon RX 5700 |
AMD Radeon RX 5700XT |
|
GPU |
AMD Polaris 20XT |
AMD Polaris 30XT |
AMD Vega 10XL |
AMD Vega 10XT |
Vega 20XL |
AMD Navi 10XL |
AMD Navi 10XT |
|
Microarchitecture |
4th Generation AMD GCN |
4th Generation AMD GCN |
5th Generation AMD GCN |
5th Generation AMD GCN |
5th Generation AMD GCN |
AM RDNA |
AM RDNA |
|
Number of transistors, million |
5700 |
12500 |
12500 |
12500 |
13200 |
10300 |
10300 |
|
Crystal area, mm 2 |
232 |
232 |
486 |
486 |
331 |
251 |
251 |
|
Technical process, nm |
14 |
12 |
14 |
14 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
|
Number of computing units |
36 |
36 |
56 |
64 |
60 |
36 |
40 |
|
Number of stream processors (ALU) |
2304 |
2304 |
3584 |
4096 |
3840 |
2304 |
2560 |
|
Number of texture units (TMU) |
144 |
144 |
224 |
256 |
240 |
144 |
160 |
|
Number of raster blocks (ROP) |
32 |
32 |
64 |
64 |
64 |
64 |
64 |
|
GPU clock frequency, MHz |
1257 / 1340 |
1469 / 1545 |
1156 / 1471 |
1247 / 1546 |
1400 / 1750 |
1465 / 1625 / 1725 |
1605 / 1755 / 1905 |
|
Video memory type |
GDDR5 |
GDDR5 |
HBM2 |
HBM2 |
HBM2 |
GDDR6 |
GDDR6 |
|
Volume, GB |
4 / 8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
16 |
8 |
8 |
|
Effective memory frequency, MHz |
7000 / 8000 |
8000 |
1600 |
1890 |
1800 |
14000 |
14000 |
|
Memory bus width, bit |
256 |
256 |
2048 |
2048 |
4096 |
256 |
256 |
|
Bandwidth, GB/s |
224 / 256 |
256 |
410 |
484 |
1024 |
448 |
448 |
|
Single precision performance level, TFLOPS |
6. |
7.1 |
10.5 |
12.7 |
13.8 |
7.95 |
9.75 |
|
TDP value, W |
185 |
225 |
210 |
295 |
300 |
180 |
225 |
|
Recommended price at the start of sales, $ |
199 / 229 |
279 |
399 |
499 |
699 |
349 |
399 |
2 As you can see, both presented adapters are based on the Navi 10 GPU. In the maximum configuration, AMD Navi 10 XT contains 2560 stream processors (ALUs), 160 texture units (TMUs), 64 an asynchronous engine and a geometry processing processor with four primitive processing units.
In the case of the Radeon RX 5700 GPU, the number of execution units is 10% less.
Naturally, the clock speeds also vary. And in addition to the already familiar base and dynamic frequency, AMD has added a gaming frequency. It corresponds to the minimum auto overclocking in the most demanding games.
The configuration of the Navi 10 XL chip is very similar to the Polaris 20/30. But the RDNA microarchitecture has received a large number of qualitative changes compared to GCN, which are designed to increase the efficiency of using the resources of SIMD blocks. For example, the new CUs are designed to execute two instructions in one clock cycle, while the predecessors require four. We also see a doubled number of ROPs: 64 instead of 32. This makes the new product related to Vega and increases the efficiency of 3D rendering.
And thanks to the advanced 7nm process technology, the performance per watt of Navi 10 is 1.5 times better than Vega 10, not to mention the smaller die and higher frequencies.
The TDP of the Radeon RX 5700 is 5W lower than the Radeon RX 580. The Radeon RX 5700 XT reaches 225W, the same as the Radeon RX 590. For comparison: direct competitors GeForce RTX 2060 / 2060 Super and GeForce RTX 2070 / 2070 Super «eat» 160/175 and 175/215 W, respectively.
As with the Radeon RX 5700 XT, the Radeon RX 5700 is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The bandwidth is 448 GB / s with a 256-bit bus and an effective frequency of 14000 MHz. This puts it between the Radeon RX Vega 56 and the Radeon RX Vega 64 with expensive HBM2 memory.
Enough theory — let’s move on to a practical acquaintance with the new product using the non-reference video card PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 5700 8GB OC (AXRX 5700 8GBD6-3DHR / OC) as an example.
Specification
|
Model |
PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 5700 8GB OC (AXRX 5700 8GBD6-3DHR/OC) |
|
GPU |
AMD Navi 10 XL |
|
Microarchitecture |
AMD RDNA |
|
Technical process, nm |
7 |
|
Number of stream processors |
2304 |
|
Number of texture units |
144 |
|
Number of raster blocks |
64 |
|
Base / game / dynamic GPU frequency, MHz |
1565 / 1720 / 1750 (OC Mode) 1490 / 1650 / 1725 (Silent Mode) |
|
Effective memory frequency, MHz |
14000 |
|
Memory size, GB |
8 |
|
Memory type |
GDDR6 |
|
Memory bus width, bit |
256 |
|
Memory bandwidth, GB/s |
448 |
|
Image output interfaces |
1 x HDMI 2. 3 x DisplayPort |
|
Minimum power supply, W |
650 |
|
Additional PCIe power connectors |
1 x 8-pin 1 x 6-pin |
|
Dimensions from the official website (own measurements), mm |
240 x 132 x 41 (258 x 130 x 40.5) |
|
Drivers |
Latest drivers can be downloaded from the PowerColor website or the manufacturer’s website GPU |
|
Manufacturer website |
PowerColor |
0 Packaging and Contents
The PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 5700 8GB OC will be easily recognizable by its colorful cardboard box on store shelves. It is made in black and red colors. On the front, the image of the series logo in the form of a red dragon flaunts, the model name is mentioned, the presence of 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, support for the PCIe 4.
0 interface, and some features of the RDNA microarchitecture. The back part contains bright inserts, well illustrating the main advantages of the novelty. There you can also find a list of manufacturer’s recommendations for the power supply: a minimum of 650 W and two additional power connectors (6- and 8-pin).
Judging by the official website of the manufacturer, the package should include a manual and a disk with drivers, but our sample arrived without them.
Appearance
PowerColor AXRX 5700 8GBD6-3DHR/OC belongs to original solutions with modified PCB and cooling system. The novelty looks simple and nice: matte black colors and rectangular shapes, without any backlight. The plastic shroud and fan have beautiful dragon-shaped inserts and silver halos around the fans.
The reverse side of the video adapter is covered with a solid metal plate that protects the printed circuit board and takes part in heat dissipation. It also features a large Red Dragon logo.
We were not allowed to disassemble the new product, but judging by the image on the official website, an 8-phase (the reference Radeon RX 5700 has 7 phases) GPU power subsystem controlled by a digital controller is used.
In addition to the PCI Express x16 slot, the video card is powered through a pair of additional PCIe connectors (6- and 8-pin). Together with a PCI Express 4.0 x16 slot, they can supply up to 300 W of energy in total (75 + 75 + 150). This is more than enough for overclocking experiments, given that the power consumption of the video card is 180 watts. Thanks to the good location, the cooler does not make it difficult to disconnect the PCIe cable.
For image output, a reference set of interfaces is used:
- 1 x HDMI;
- 3 x DisplayPort.
The GPU-Z utility reported that the PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 5700 8GB OC is based on the 7nm AMD Navi 10 XL GPU. By default, the OC profile is used, in which the frequencies are much higher than the reference ones: 1565 / 1720 / 1750 versus 1465 / 1625 / 1725 MHz.
In turn, 8 GB of GDDR6 memory operates at an effective frequency of 14000 MHz and a bandwidth of 448 GB / s with a 256-bit bus, which is fully consistent with the recommended values.
The video card received two BIOS chips and a convenient toggle switch for switching between them. One chip contains the OC profile, the second contains the Silent profile. When activated, the GPU frequencies are reduced to 1490 / 1650 / 1725 MHz, although GPU-Z reads the indicators incorrectly again.
Cooling system
By modern standards, the video card turned out to be quite compact. It occupies two expansion slots and is 240 mm long. A two-fan cooler is used as a cooler.
The structure of the passive part consists of two blocks of aluminum fins pierced by five 6 mm copper heat pipes. The technology of direct contact of heat pipes with the GPU has been implemented. Power elements and memory chips also did not remain without cooling.
They give off heat to the main CO radiator.
The active part is represented by two 96 mm fans mounted on a plastic housing. They are designed with a double ball bearing, which guarantees a long service life.
With automatic fan speed control, in maximum load mode with an activated OC profile, the graphics core heated up to 76 ° C at a critical indicator of 110 ° C, and the cooler worked at a speed of 1070 rpm (30% of its maximum power). The noise was below average and did not stand out against the background of other components of the system. The frequency of the graphics core was 1589 MHz.
Under similar conditions, but with the Silent profile active, the GPU temperature was at 70°C, and the cooler ran at 1207 rpm (34% of its maximum power). The frequency of HP was 1549MHz. Noise again did not exceed the average level.
In the maximum fan speed mode (2913 rpm), the temperature of the GPU dropped to 54°C. The noise exceeded the average level and became uncomfortable for everyday use.