AMD Ryzen 5 5700G iGPU Gaming Benchmarks — AMD Ryzen 7 5700G Review: Fastest Integrated Graphics Ever
Why you can trust Tom’s Hardware
Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G Integrated GPU Gaming Performance — The TLDR
Below you can see the geometric mean of our integrated graphics gaming tests across five titles at 1280×720 and 1080p, with each resolution split into its own chart to give us a decent overall view of the current landscape. These are cumulative metrics, so individual wins vary on a per-title basis. You’ll find the game-by-game test results further below, and then some dedicated tests that compare the Ryzen 7 5700G directly to discrete GPUs.
Here are the Ryzen 7 5700G configurations for the entries in the charts below:
- Ryzen 7 5700G: 2x 8GB DDR4-3200 (dual channel) memory @ 16-16-16-36, ASRock Taichi X570, PBO disabled, Default power limits
- Ryzen 7 5700G PBO + DDR4-4000: 2x 8GB DDR4-3200 (dual channel) memory @ DDR4-4000 19-19-19-48, ASRock Taichi X570, PBO enabled, FCLK at 2000 MHz (1:1 coupled mode), RX Vega at 2400 MHz
- Ryzen 7 5700G HP Dual Channel: 2x 16GB DDR4-3200 (dual channel) memory @ 22-22-22-52, HP Pavilion TP01-2066, No configurable options
- Ryzen 7 5700G HP Single Channel: 1x 16GB DDR4-3200 (single channel) memory @ 22-22-22-52, HP Pavilion TP01-2066, No configurable options
Image 1 of 4
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700G at Amazon for $178.
61
Our 1280×720 and 1080p cumulative results speak volumes about HP’s decision to ship Ryzen 7 5700G-powered systems with a single stick of memory — the single-channel configuration delivers a devastating blow to performance. The dual-channel HP configuration is 74% faster at 1280×720 than the single-channel configuration, and 82% faster at 1080p. Bear in mind that the single-channel configuration is the only option available through Office Max, so plenty of uninformed customers are buying what are best described as crippled systems. Luckily we located a matching DIMM to test a dual-channel config with the same memory that’s spec’d for the system.
We dropped the chip into the ASRock Taichi to see the difference between the HP system and an enthusiast rig, but the differences were surprisingly small. The X570 system was only ~4% faster at 1280×720 and 1080p, albeit against what we would consider a properly-kitted HP system with dual memory DIMMs. So naturally, an enthusiast motherboard will be a much better solution for any type of overclocking or even basic tuning (the HP system doesn’t allow you to manipulate literally any setting), not to mention the far superior connectivity options and other enthusiast trimmings, like RGB bling.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
| Row 0 — Cell 0 | 1280×720 | 1920×1080 |
| Ryzen 7 5700G B550-E | 100% | 100% |
| Ryzen 7 4750G | 92.9% | 94.1% |
| Ryzen 5 3400G | 83.5% | 84.1% |
| Intel UHD Graphics 750 32 EU (11600K, 11700K) | 58.3% | ~48.9% |
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 24 EU (10600K) | 36.0% | 34.4% |
The table above gives us a succinct iGPU performance comparison of the five most relevant chips, with the Ryzen 7 5700G on the ASRock motherboard used as the baseline.
We see a pretty impressive ~10% performance improvement from the 3400G to the 4750G, but bear in mind we’re looking at the jump from a quad-core to an eight-core chip. The move from Renoir (4750G) to Cezzane isn’t quite as impressive at ~7%, but that’s still a solid gain given that we’re looking at fundamentally the same Radeon RX Vega engine paired with eight CPU cores.
The Intel chips give us about what we expect, which is roughly the same (or slightly less) performance than the crippled Ryzen 7 5700G with a single memory stick. Intel’s UHD Graphics 750 engine with the Xe architecture marked a decent step forward over the company’s UHD Graphics 630 engine, but Intel’s decision to port the Xe architecture back to the 14nm process resulted in fewer graphics cores — the highest-end desktop chips currently have 32 EUs, whereas the 10nm Tiger Lake chips stretch up to 96 EU.
As such, the Core i7-11700K and Core i5-11600K pull up far short of what we would expect from a graphics engine that’s intended for meaningful gaming, showing they’re better suited for basic display functionality.
The Intel chips struggle at both 1280×720 and 1080p, netting roughly half the performance of a properly configured Ryzen 7 5700G system.
Intel has made strides here, sure, just look at the improvement over the UHD Graphics 630 engine in the 10600K. But it still lags AMD’s three-year-old Ryzen 5 3400G ‘Picasso’ chips. Alder Lake can’t come soon enough, but it remains to be seen if any of the desktop models will come with enough EUs to put up a decent fight against AMD’s potent APUs.
We also include tests systems equipped with the $182 Core i5-11400 and $122 Core i3-10100 paired with a GT 1030 as a point of reference. Given today’s scalper pricing, the GT 1030 can be had for around $180 at retail, and if you can find the CPUs at MSRP, the ~$360 Core i5-11400 system would compete with the Ryzen 7 5700G, while the ~$300 Core i3-10100 system would kind of compete with the Ryzen 5 5600G.
The Ryzen 5 5700G is the better buy here only if you don’t plan on upgrading to a better graphics card in the future and you aren’t willing to buy a used graphics card on the second-hand market (particularly a less expensive previous-gen model).
If you plan on upgrading the GPU later, the Core i5-11400 is the better solution. Also, you can buy a used previous-gen graphics card with more horsepower than the GT 1030 and come out further ahead on gaming performance, but pricing will vary.
Overall, the results are clear; if you’re looking for the best integrated graphics on the desktop, Cezanne is really the only game in town. As long as you adjust your expectations and fidelity/resolution settings accordingly, Cezanne is plenty serviceable for its target audience. We found 1280×720 gaming to be solid across numerous titles. While the number of titles you can play becomes extremely restricted at 1080p, you can get away with 1080p gaming with reduced fidelity settings in many titles, too. Overclocking yields huge benefits, too.
Far Cry 5 on AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Image 1 of 6
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
In terms of alternatives to the 5700G that you can actually buy, you’re looking at the Core i7-11700K and Core i5-11600K.
However, the Intel processors absolutely bombed in our Far Cry 5 tests, and try as we might, we couldn’t correct the issue.
Flipping to the last slides in the above album shows the problem in stunning clarity — with the exception of the crippled HP config with a single DIMM, the Ryzen 7 5700G setups deliver a nice smooth and predictable series of frame rate measurements. In contrast, the Core i5-11600K and i7-11700K are incredibly inconsistent, manifesting as stuttering, hitching, and generally unplayable performance. The game is completely unplayable on the 10600K with its previous-gen UHD Graphics 630, but as you can see in the final two slides, at least it is consistently terrible. That means this issue is confined to Intel’s UHD Graphics 750 engine.
Unfortunately, we’ve encountered this situation with a few titles that we’ve tested with Intel’s new Xe architecture on the Rocket Lake chips, but driver updates have ironed out some of the wrinkles. We think these are early teething problems with drivers and game code, but some of these problems appear to persist three months after the Rocket Lake launch.
We didn’t encounter any of these issues with Intel’s previous-gen UHD Graphics 630 engine or the Ryzen chips, and even the crippled HP single-channel setup beats the Intel chips.
On the bright side (at least for AMD), the Ryzen 7 5700G in a reasonable configuration is quite adept at 1280×720, though things did get a bit dicier at 1080p. Of course, you always have the option to lower your quality settings, and overclocking helps tremendously. As you can see, the Ryzen 7 5700G blows past the competition after a bit of extra tuning. Keep your eye on the overclocked Ryzen 5 5600G, though, it’s just as impressive given its price point.
Grand Theft Auto V on AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Image 1 of 4
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
Grand Theft Auto V is immortal, partly because you can play it on lower-powered hardware if you’re willing to trade off fidelity for performance.
Dialing back quality to the lowest settings yields a more-than-playable 86.2 fps at 1080p for the Ryzen 7 5700G, at least with the proper setup. That means there’s plenty of headroom for higher quality settings, and that applies nearly doubly at the 1280×720 resolution; 140 fps leaves plenty of room for tweaking the fidelity settings.
Here we can see that the Ryzen 7 5700G in a proper dual-channel configuration provides twice the performance of the crippled 5700G configuration — that’s unacceptable. Pay attention to the memory loadout if you purchase an OEM system.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider on AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Image 1 of 4
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
The Intel chips encounter more problems in the Shadow of the Tomb Raider benchmark. The Core i7-11700K and i5-11600K offer nearly identical performance in most of our benchmarks, indicating a graphics bottleneck that the 11700K’s slightly higher CPU clock rate can’t improve.
Here we can see the Rocket Lake chips fail to reach the 30 fps threshold at 1280×720, and performance plummets to ~16 fps at 1080p. In other words, you can’t do any meaningful 1080p gaming with these chips in this title without resorting to extreme tactics to reduce quality.
The Ryzen 7 5700G churns out a respectable 62.1 fps at 1280×720 and 37.6 fps at 1080p. That’s 19% faster at 1080p and 16% faster at 1280×720 than the Ryzen 5 3400G. The deltas shrink to 7% and 4% faster, respectively, than the Ryzen 7 4750G, but that’s largely inconsequential: The 4750G is OEM-only, so if you don’t plan on buying a full system, you can only buy it at scalper pricing via outlets like eBay. As shown in our Ryzen 7 4750G review, that kills the value proposition.
Strange Brigade on AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Image 1 of 4
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
Our last foray into testing the UHD Graphics 750 engine in Strange Brigade happened at the Rocket Lake launch, and try as we might, we couldn’t get the cursor to appear on the screen.
However, newer drivers (or perhaps a game update?) have ironed out that issue.
Strange Brigade now works just fine on our test system, but the 5700G is roughly 70% faster at both resolutions, capping the Ryzen 5000G’s commanding performance through the entire breadth of our integrated graphics test suite.
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G Compared to Discrete GPUs
Image 1 of 18
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
Image 1 of 18
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
Here you can see a series of tests contributed by our GPU editor Jarred, comparing the 5700G’s iGPU to the most relevant discrete GPUs along with the Ryzen 7 4800U.
Jarred’s extended testing shows that the Ryzen 7 5700G is the fastest integrated graphics solution currently available and that it equates to slightly better than GT 1030 levels of performance.
At 720p, across a rather demanding test suite, all things considered, the Ryzen 7 5700G was 25% faster than the GT 1030 GDDR5, and 35% faster than Intel’s DG1 solution — which delivers similar performance to the Tiger Lake integrated Xe Graphics. The margin of victory shrinks to around 20% at 1080p medium, as the memory bandwidth requirements increase, and this is an area where overclocking and faster memory can help, but frankly we need DDR5 systems to really deal with the memory bottlenecks. For a deeper look at the low end of the graphics market, head to our recent Intel Xe DG1 Benchmarked: Battle of the Weakling GPUs article.
MORE: Best CPUs for Gaming
MORE: CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy
MORE: All CPUs Content
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G: Price Comparison
$359
$178.
61
View
Reduced Price
$194
View
$199
View
$229.99
View
$431.18
View
Show More Deals
powered by
Current page:
AMD Ryzen 5 5700G iGPU Gaming Benchmarks
Prev Page AMD Ryzen 5 5700G Power Consumption, Overclocking and Thermals
Next Page AMD Ryzen 5 5700G Discrete GPU Gaming Performance
Paul Alcorn is the Deputy Managing Editor for Tom’s Hardware US.
He writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage and enterprise hardware.
Conclusion — AMD Ryzen 7 5700G Review: Fastest Integrated Graphics Ever
Why you can trust Tom’s Hardware
Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
AMD’s Ryzen 7 5700G brings the vaunted Zen 3 architecture and big CPU performance gains to its APU lineup, and the integrated Radeon RX Vega graphics engine provides smooth 1080p gaming if you’re willing to accept lower fidelity settings and a limited selection of titles. The 5700G also delivers unbeatable iGPU performance for 1280×720 gaming, but it isn’t the best value.
Given the fluid state of the chip market right now, it’s hard to give solid buying advice — CPU and GPU pricing and availability are extremely volatile. Additionally, recent signs point to GPU supply and pricing slowly improving. That means you’ll need to check current pricing on the relevant products before pulling the trigger.
The charts below outline three areas of performance: The geometric mean of our suite of integrated graphics tests at both 1920×1080 (FHD) and 1280×720 resolutions, the geometric mean of performance with a discrete GPU, and performance in single- and multi-threaded workloads.
Image 1 of 6
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
If you’re looking to find the absolute fastest integrated graphics performance on the market, the Ryzen 7 5700G is the uncontested champ. As long as you adjust your expectations and fidelity/resolution settings accordingly, the Cezanne chip is plenty serviceable for its target audience. We found 1280×720 gaming to be solid across numerous titles, and while the number of titles you can play comfortably becomes restricted at 1080p, you can get away with 1080p gaming with reduced fidelity settings in many titles, too.
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700G at Amazon for $178.61
Ultimately the Ryzen 5 5600G is the real star of the show, though. Given that the $259 Ryzen 5 5600G’s iGPU performance lands within a ~5% percent of the $359 Ryzen 7 5700G, but for 30% less cash, it’s unquestionably the best value if you’re looking to use the integrated graphics for gaming.
The Ryzen 7 5700G serves up solid performance with a discrete GPU, but despite AMD’s positioning of the 5700G as a filler for the non-X models that it traditionally sprinkled throughout its product stack, it isn’t the best value if you’re looking to use it solely with a dedicated card. As such, the 5700G doesn’t live up to its billing as a non-X equivalent, especially because it doesn’t come close to matching its «X» counterparts, even after overclocking. You’ll be far better served with a Ryzen 5 5600X or Core i5-11400 if you’re looking to build a system specifically for dGPU gaming.
Given the current environment, though, the main attraction for the 5700G could be as a stop-gap solution for enthusiasts as they wait out the GPU shortage.
The 5700G certainly doesn’t make a convincing argument for that option, though that could fluctuate with discrete GPU pricing. The Ryzen 7 5700G is AMD’s most expensive APU yet, but the aged Vega graphics engine simply isn’t enough to outweigh buying an older second-hand GPU and pairing it with a chip like the Core i5-11400. You’ll get more gaming performance today with that combo, and more when you upgrade the GPU after the shortage recedes.
If your focus is strictly on the productivity side of matters, the $359 Ryzen 7 5700G’s performance in threaded applications slots in between the $399 Core i7-11700K and $262 Core i5-11600K. The 11700K is 15% faster in threaded applications and 6% faster in single-threaded work for about 12% more cash. You’ll also have to factor the 5700G’s bundled Wraith Stealth heatsink into the equation (the 11700K doesn’t ship with a cooler). Conversely, the Core i5-11600K has similar performance in single-threaded work and is 10% slower in threaded work for 27% less cash.
In other words, if you aren’t after the 5700G’s integrated graphics, there are more attractive Intel chips on either side of the pricing spectrum.
If you choose the 5700G over a ‘standard’ Ryzen 5000 chip, you’ll sacrifice half the L3 cache, 100 MHz of peak boost clock speed, and the PCIe 4.0 interface. While PCIe 4.0 doesn’t deliver any gains in gaming performance, that could change in the future with the Windows 11 Direct Storage feature that will utilize NVMe SSDs more fully. You’ll also lose out on the (up to) doubled storage throughput for day-to-day file transfers and productivity applications.
Overall, if you already have a discrete GPU for your build, we think most enthusiasts will be better served with other alternatives, be they from the Ryzen 5000 product stack or Intel’s lineup. Pricing is fluid, though, so be sure to check our list of Best CPUs for the latest advice.
That leaves the Ryzen 7 5700G as an attractive chip for the normal APU target audience — if the price isn’t a deciding factor, it will be the hands-down champ for gaming on integrated graphics, like in small form factor systems, and HTPC rigs.
However, if you’re dead set on purchasing an APU for iGPU gaming specifically, the Ryzen 5 5600G is a far better value.
The 5700G could slot in as a much-needed temporary solution for enthusiasts that can’t find a used graphics card at reasonable pricing, but that will depend upon many factors, including the current pricing of GPUs on the second-hand market. We’ll also have to temper our expectations — in the recent past, AMD has had considerable difficulty assuring a supply of its standard chips that generate higher margins. However, we have seen a steady supply of Cezanne chips since the launch, which is encouraging. Now all we need is for AMD to bring the lower-end Ryzen 3 5300G to retail for the extreme budget crowd.
MORE: Best CPUs for Gaming
MORE: CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy
MORE: All CPUs Content
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G: Price Comparison
$359
$178.
61
View
Reduced Price
$194
View
$199
View
$229.99
View
$431.18
View
Show More Deals
powered by
- 6
Current page:
Conclusion
Prev Page AMD Ryzen 5 5700G Application Benchmarks
Paul Alcorn is the Deputy Managing Editor for Tom’s Hardware US.
He writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage and enterprise hardware.
0026 vs 8 x 3.4GHz
95°C vs 90°C
10700M vs 4150M
Why is AMD Ryzen 7 5700X better than AMD Ryzen 7 5700G?
- 11.66% higher PassMark score?
26497 vs 23730 - 16MB more L3 cache?
32MB vs 16MB - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
4 vs 3 - 14.29% higher Geekbench 5 multi-core result?
10381 vs 9083 - 13.65% higher single core Geekbench 5 result?
1748 vs 1538 - 2MB/core more L3 cache per core?
4MB/core vs 2MB/core
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD RYZEN 7 5700G
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 7 5700x
VS
Intel Core i5-12400f
AMD Ryzen 7 5700g
9000 VS
AMD Ryzen 56002 AMD RYZEN 5700x
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 7600x
AMD Ryzen 7 5700g
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800x
AMD Ryzen 7 5700x
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600
AMD Ryzen 57000 AMD Ryzen 57000 AMD RYZEN0002 VS
Intel Core i7-11700k
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 3700x
AMD Ryzen 7 5700g
VS
9000 9000 3,0003
570002 5,0002 AMD Ryt
Intel Core i5-12400
AMD RYZEN 7 5700G
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
VS
Intel Core i7-11700 9000 9004 Readers
comparison0021
General rating
AMD Ryzen 7 5700g
7 Reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 7 5700g
/10
7 Reviews of users
AMD RYZEN 7 5700X
4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000
9.
3 /10
4 Reviews of users
Functions
Price and quality ratio
/10
7 Votes
9.5 9 /10
4 Votes
Games
9.3 /10
7 Votes
/10
4 Votes
performance
9.7 /10 9000.000 7 VOTES 9000 9000 9000 9000 /10
4 Votes
Reliability
9.9 /10
7 VOTES
8.3 /10
4 VOTES
003
7 Votes
10.0 /10
4 Votes
Productivity
Central processor speed
8 x 3.8GHZ
8 x 3.4GHZ
The central processor speed shows how many processing cycles per second can perform the processor, the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
turbo clock speed
4.6GHz
4.6GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
Unlocked
✔AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.
L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
L3 core
2MB/core
4MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Geotagging
PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multithreading.
PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700X)
Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700X)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700G)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700X)
This means the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Integrated graphics
GPU clock speed
300MHz
∅
Not applicable
Graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
turbo GPU
2000MHz
∅
N/A
When the GPU is running below its limits, it may jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
GPU Execution Units
∅
N/A
A graphics processing unit (GPU) with more execution units can provide better graphics.
monitor support
∅
N/A
By using multiple displays, you can increase your workspace, making it easier to work across multiple applications.
DirectX version
∅
N/A
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
OpenGL version
∅
N/A
The newer the OpenGL version, the better the graphics in games.
OpenCL version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700X)
Some applications use OpenCL to use the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
texture units (TMUs)
∅
N/A
TMUs take texture units and map them to the geometric location of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
ROPs
∅
N/A
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
RAM speed
3200MHz
3200MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
maximum memory bandwidth
47.68GB/s
47.68GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
(AMD Ryzen 7 5700X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Supports memory debug code
✖AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
✖AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory debug code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700X)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Features
uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
logical cores, also known as threads.
Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
version of SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700X)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
✖AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.
interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 5700X)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price Comparison
Which CPUs are better?
This page is currently only available in English.
Ryzen 7 5800X3D and new junior Ryzen CPUs are official (Update 2)
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D processor has been rumored for a long time, and the same goes for the new low-end Ryzen models. Today, AMD officially confirmed this information by announcing the Ryzen spring update.
Junior Zen 3 models have been announced. It seems that AMD does not want to completely give this niche to Intel’s competitor. Previously, the «youngest» Zen 3 processor was the Ryzen 5 5600X designed by Vermeer. Of course, the Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 5 5600G are cheaper, but they rely on the Cezanne design with Zen 2 cores and integrated graphics that not everyone wants.
The new entry-level Ryzen 3 4100 follows in the footsteps of the Ryzen 3 3100 and offers the same four Zen 2 cores. GHz before). Above is the Ryzen 5 4500 with six cores. There is no direct predecessor in the Ryzen 3000 line, at least not in name.
AMD opted for the Matisse design with Zen 2 cores here as well. The Ryzen 7 4600G processor aims to close the gap between the Ryzen 3 4300G and 4700G. AMD is still building on the Renoir design with Zen 2 cores and integrated Vega graphics. 65
If you want Zen 3 cores and the Ryzen 5000 generation, AMD has released three new models.
The Ryzen 5 5500 offers six cores at 3.6 or 4.2 GHz (base/boost). The L3 cache is 16 MB. The Ryzen 5 5600 already has a full 32 MB of cache, in Boost mode the frequency reaches 4.4 GHz. Between the Ryzen 5 5600X and the Ryzen 7 5800X, AMD placed the Ryzen 7 5700X, but unlike the Ryzen 7 5800X, the TDP is capped at 65W.
So far only prices in US dollars are known. The new processors will go on sale on April 4, but this only applies to lower Ryzen models. Now let’s move on to the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, which is coming out later.
Ryzen 7 5800X3D technical specifications are already known. Now AMD has named the price and date of the start of sales. The first processors with 3D V-Cache will be available April 20 for $449.
AMD also announced official support for Ryzen 5000 processors on 300-series motherboards.
Update:
Unlike all Ryzen 5000 desktop processors, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D does not have an «Unlocked for Overclocking» item in the datasheet.
This topic was raised several times, but there was no clarity with it. We specifically asked AMD about the possibility of overclocking.
No information at this time, Ryzen 7 5800X3D details will be known in the near future. Since motherboard manufacturers have already added support for a processor with a BIOS containing AGESA 1.2.0.6b, the lack of overclocking support should be listed there.
Update 2:
In an interview with HotHardware, Robert Hallock talked about overclocking the Ryzen 7 5800X3D. The CPU voltage and frequency cannot be changed manually. But the frequency of Infinity Fabric and memory can be changed.
Hallock indicated that the CPU voltage could not be set above 1.35 V. So adding SRAM leads not only to production difficulties, but also to limitations on functions. In the case of EPYC Milan-X processors, for which the 3D V-Cache cache was developed, overclocking restrictions do not play a role.
If in the future Zen 4 processors will also be equipped with a 3D V-Cache, then there is still no clarity with the overclocking capabilities.