Sapphire AMD/ATI R7 265 2 GB DDR5 Graphics Card
Specifications
In The Box
| Sales Package |
|
General
| Brand |
|
| Graphics Engine |
|
| GPU Clock |
|
| Bus Standard |
|
| Cooling and Heatsink |
|
| Model ID |
|
| Power Supply Required |
|
| Part Number |
|
Memory
| Memory |
|
Technologies Supported
| Graphics Technologies Supported |
|
Connectivity
| DVI and HDMI Interface |
|
Warranty
| Warranty Summary |
|
| Covered in Warranty |
|
| Not Covered in Warranty |
|
| Service Type |
|
Ratings & Reviews
15 Ratings &
5 Reviews
-
5★
-
4★
-
3★
-
2★
-
1★
-
11
-
3
-
1
5
Excellent Value at 12. 5k!
This card is basically a rebranded AMD HD7850 with a pinch of steroids. It represents fantastic value at this price. I can max out every game (Crysis 3, Tomb Raider, Batman AO, BF4) at 900p with 2-4xAA thrown in. Except Crysis 3(which comes at around 40fps), all other games easily run at 60fps. Without AA, one could get the same frame rates at even 1080p!
The card is also quiet and Sapphire is the top AMD vendor!
If you are looking to spend this much, go for the R9 265X! Its better than a 65…
READ MORE
Manpreet Singh
Apr, 2014
Permalink
Report Abuse
5
R7 265
Good Card. its one of the best graphic card which delivers good FPS. good value for money . it is aclear winner againt GTX760Ti ….. It’s capable of running FULL HD games and consumes very less power. Good that AMD has relalised this. ANd yes, you can overclock this card.
READ MORE
Imran Patel
Certified Buyer, Mumbai
Jan, 2015
Permalink
Report Abuse
5
Classy product
Note that gtx750ti…gtx660…. Radeon hd7770…hd7850…..are of same class…..near about every game runs. R7 265 has lesser power consumption than the hd series and faster than the gtx….so in one word value for money….great product totally satisfied
READ MORE
Samarendra Bhattacharyya
Certified Buyer, Hooghly
Oct, 2016
Permalink
Report Abuse
3
good but not up to the mark
this card is good but not the best option if u want get real value for money than go for r 9270x its just cost 2k more but there is noticeable differenced in performance at least 10 to 15 fps in all latest games at medium to ultra settings
READ MORE
vikrant
Certified Buyer, Jalandhar
Sep, 2014
Permalink
Report Abuse
5
Nice Graphic Card In This Budget
Handles the games like CODAW,CRYSIS3&2, BATLEFIELD3&4 at ultra settings at 55-60 FPS.
good graphic card at all.
READ MORE
CHETAN HEGDE
Certified Buyer, Dharwar
May, 2015
Permalink
Report Abuse
+
All 5 reviews
Have doubts regarding this product?
Safe and Secure Payments.Easy returns.100% Authentic products.
AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB Graphics Card Launched
JeGX
AMD has announced a new mid-range graphics card: the Radeon R7 265. This graphics card priced at USD $149 is based on a Pitcairn GPU and packs 1024 stream processors clocked at 925MHz. The R7 265 is the most powerful member of the R7 family. This new card fills the gap between the R7 260X and the R9 270X. The R7 265 is refresh with higher clock speeds of the prev-gen Radeon HD 7850.
Radeon R7 265 specifications:
- GPU: Pitcairn @ 925MHz
- Shader processors: 1024
- Texture units: 64
- ROP units: 32
- Compute performance: 1.
89TFLOPS - Memory: 2GB GDDR5 @ 5.6GHz (GDDR5-effective), 256-bit
- TDP: 150W
- Power connector: one 6-pin
- 3D APIs: OpenGL 4.3, Direct3D 11.2 and Mantle
- Computing APIs: OpenCL 1.2, DirectCompute
Links:
- AMD Radeon™ R7 Series Graphics
- Sapphire Radeon R7 265 2 GB review
- AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB Review – Pitcairn takes another pass
- AMD Announces Radeon R7 265 Video Card and Cuts R7 260X Prices
- AMD lance la Radeon R7 265, une HD 7850 Overclockée
Graphics Cards
AMD, gpu, graphics card, launch, pitcairn, radeon r7 260, specifications, videocard
SEARCH
Quick Links
Latest Graphics Drivers
- NVIDIA GeForce 528.49 (VK_1.3.224)
- NVIDIA Vulkan Dev 528.50 (VK_1.3.240)
- AMD Radeon 23.2.2 (VK_1.3.237)
- Intel Arc/IGP 31.
0.101.4125 (VK_1.3.237) - Intel IGP 31.0.101.3790 (VK_1.3.228)
Geeks3D’s Tools
- FurMark 1.33.0
- GPU Caps Viewer 1.58.0
- GPU Shark 0.29.0
- GeeXLab 0.49.3
- ASUS FurMark ROG Edition 0.8.16
- MSI Kombustor 4.1.20
- YAFFplayer 0.5.16
- GL-Z 0.5.0
- MadView3D 0.4.2
- h5shG3n 0.5.2
⦿ Never miss a news
⦿ WebGL Caps Viewer
[ WebGL Caps Viewer ]
⦿ Sticky Articles
- Vulkan API Programming Resources
- How to Install NVIDIA Graphics Drivers on Linux Mint 17
- Electronics: blinking LED with Raspberry Pi GPIO and GeeXLab
- AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce FP32/FP64 GFLOPS Table
- Graphics card VRM explained
- Graphics memory speeds demystified
- Graphics card TDP database
Categories
CategoriesSelect CategoryCatchall (6) Guest Posts (4)Demoscene (80)General Tech (215)GPU Computing (143) NVIDIA PhysX (57)Hardware (615) ASUS Tinker Board (3) Graphics Cards (472) Overclocking (21) Raspberry Pi (35) Unboxing (9) VGA Coolers (18)Howto (22)Programming (395) Gamedev (132) Assets (1) Lua (3) Python (20) Shader Library (33)Reviews (62)Softwares (1,225) Benchmarks (78) Drivers (461) AMD Graphics Driver (157) Intel Graphics Driver (76) NVIDIA Graphics Driver (226) Geeks3D (548) EVGA OC Scanner (22) FluidMark (17) FurMark (100) GeeXLab (161) GL-Z (5) GPU Caps Viewer (87) GPU-Shark (64) GpuTest (15) h5shG3n (3) MadShaders (5) MadView3D (4) MSI Kombustor (36) ShaderToyMark (6) TessMark (17) vkz (6) YAFFplayer (6) GPU Tools (64) Linux (55) tech demo (51) Utilities (15)Tests (169)
Archives
Archives
Select Month March 2023 (1) February 2023 (8) January 2023 (5) December 2022 (7) November 2022 (7) October 2022 (6) September 2022 (8) August 2022 (7) July 2022 (3) June 2022 (5) May 2022 (9) April 2022 (3) March 2022 (4) February 2022 (2) January 2022 (3) December 2021 (4) November 2021 (11) October 2021 (7) September 2021 (3) August 2021 (6) July 2021 (2) June 2021 (3) May 2021 (2) April 2021 (9) March 2021 (7) February 2021 (6) January 2021 (7) December 2020 (11) November 2020 (7) October 2020 (7) September 2020 (9) August 2020 (9) July 2020 (2) June 2020 (6) May 2020 (4) April 2020 (4) March 2020 (7) February 2020 (6) January 2020 (12) December 2019 (3) November 2019 (10) October 2019 (5) September 2019 (7) August 2019 (5) July 2019 (3) June 2019 (5) May 2019 (6) April 2019 (5) March 2019 (7) February 2019 (4) January 2019 (6) December 2018 (6) November 2018 (11) October 2018 (11) September 2018 (3) August 2018 (6) June 2018 (7) May 2018 (4) April 2018 (4) March 2018 (11) February 2018 (3) January 2018 (14) December 2017 (12) November 2017 (5) October 2017 (10) September 2017 (5) August 2017 (7) July 2017 (6) June 2017 (1) May 2017 (11) April 2017 (11) March 2017 (8) February 2017 (8) December 2016 (8) November 2016 (12) October 2016 (5) September 2016 (7) August 2016 (18) July 2016 (2) June 2016 (7) May 2016 (12) April 2016 (6) March 2016 (20) February 2016 (12) January 2016 (8) December 2015 (8) November 2015 (11) October 2015 (10) September 2015 (4) August 2015 (9) July 2015 (4) June 2015 (21) May 2015 (9) April 2015 (5) March 2015 (12) February 2015 (6) January 2015 (7) December 2014 (12) November 2014 (15) October 2014 (9) September 2014 (18) August 2014 (16) July 2014 (4) June 2014 (12) May 2014 (20) April 2014 (16) March 2014 (15) February 2014 (17) January 2014 (15) December 2013 (8) November 2013 (25) October 2013 (25) September 2013 (17) August 2013 (3) July 2013 (25) June 2013 (19) May 2013 (25) April 2013 (11) March 2013 (34) February 2013 (15) January 2013 (17) December 2012 (11) November 2012 (14) October 2012 (13) September 2012 (12) August 2012 (22) July 2012 (14) June 2012 (21) May 2012 (20) April 2012 (29) March 2012 (36) February 2012 (5) January 2012 (34) December 2011 (34) November 2011 (29) October 2011 (22) September 2011 (23) August 2011 (35) July 2011 (11) June 2011 (36) May 2011 (30) April 2011 (26) March 2011 (65) February 2011 (36) January 2011 (54) December 2010 (32) November 2010 (23) October 2010 (35) September 2010 (25) August 2010 (38) July 2010 (20) June 2010 (31) May 2010 (37) April 2010 (33) March 2010 (40) February 2010 (22) January 2010 (14) December 2009 (15) November 2009 (20) October 2009 (28) September 2009 (14) August 2009 (12) July 2009 (9) June 2009 (13) May 2009 (2) April 2009 (8) March 2009 (1) February 2009 (8) January 2009 (4) December 2008 (3) November 2008 (13) October 2008 (5) September 2008 (2) August 2008 (5) May 2008 (1)
Cookies
Reset
Powered by WP-Forge & WordPress
Radeon R7 M265 [in 6 benchmarks]
Radeon R7 M265
- PCIe 3.
0 x8 interface - Core frequency 825
- Video memory size 4096 MB
- Memory type DDR3
- Memory frequency 1000
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started Radeon R7 M265 sales 7 January 2014. This is GCN architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. It has 4 GB of DDR3 memory at 1000 GHz, and coupled with a 128-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 32 GB / s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a PCIe 3.0 x8 card.
It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of
1.36%
from the leader, which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce RTX
4090
Compare
General information
- 0
- 50
- 100
Features
Radeon R7 M265’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed.
They indirectly speak of Radeon R7 M265’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Compatibility and dimensions
Information on Radeon R7 M265 compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For laptop video cards, this is the estimated size of the laptop, the bus and the connection connector, if the video card is connected through the connector, and not soldered on the motherboard.
| Video Connectors | No outputs |
Technology solutions and APIs supported by Radeon R7 M265 are listed here. You will need this information if your graphics card is required to support specific technologies.
| AppAcceleration | — | |
| Enduro | — | |
| FreeSync | 1 | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | 1 | |
| TrueAudio | — 0054 + | |
| Switched graphics | 1 |
Support API
APIs supported by Radeon R7 M265, including their versions.
| DirectX | Directx® 11 | |
| Sheder Model | 6.3 | 9005 | 4.4 | of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 (Mobile)) |
| Mantle | + | 9005 |
He gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation, running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11, and 12 (the latter being done at 4K resolution whenever possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute. 
All tests make extensive use of volumetric lighting and tessellation and, despite being run at 1280×720, are relatively heavy. Support for 3DMark 11 ended in January 2020 and is now being replaced by Time Spy. 
It features two separate tests showing a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature that appears to be made of lava. Using resolution 1920×1080, Fire Strike shows quite realistic graphics and is quite demanding on hardware. | Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 68 Mh/s |
Is the Radeon R7 M265 good for gaming?
FPS in popular games on the Radeon R7 M265, as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests.
Average FPS
Here are the average FPS values for a large selection of popular games at various resolutions:
| Full HD | 14 |
Popular Games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3-4 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1-2 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10-11 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3-4 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2-3 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 2-3 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4-5 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5-6 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1-2 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10-11 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3-4 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2-3 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 2-3 | |
| Metro Exodus | 2-3 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4-5 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5-6 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9 |
| Assassin’s Creed Odyssey | 1-2 | |
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3-4 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2-3 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2-3 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4-5 | |
| Hitman 3 | 1-2 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 7-8 | |
| Metro Exodus | 2-3 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1-2 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4-5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3-4 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 2-3 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1-2 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2-3 | |
| Hitman 3 | 1-2 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 6-7 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2-3 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 3-4 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 6-7 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1-2 |
Relative capacity
Radeon R7 M265 overall performance compared to its closest competitors in notebook graphics cards.
Intel HD Graphics 5000
102.21
AMD Radeon HD 6570M
101.47
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5830
100.74
AMD Radeon R7 M265
100
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730
99.26
Intel HD Graphics 515
99.26
Intel HD Graphics 510
99.26
Competitor from NVIDIA
The closest competitor of Radeon R7 M265 from NVIDIA is GeForce GT 630M, which is on average 2% faster and higher by 6 positions in our rating.
GeForce GT
630M
Compare
Here are some of NVIDIA’s closest competitors to the Radeon R7 M265:
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
105.88
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
105.
88
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
102.21
AMD Radeon R7 M265
100
NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
97.06
NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
97.06
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
94.85
Other video cards
Here we recommend a few video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Radeon R5
M335
Compare
GeForce GT
630M
Compare
HD
Graphics 4400
Compare
Radeon R5
M255
Compare
Radeon HD
6680G2
Compare
Radeon HD
8670M
Compare
Recommended Processors
According to our statistics, these processors are most often used with the Radeon R7 M265.
Core i5
4200U
23.6%
Core i7
4500U
11.3%
A10
7300
9.4%
Core i7
4700MQ
8.4%
Core i7
5500U
5.4%
Core i7
4510U
3.9%
Core i5
4200M
3.1%
Core i5
4210U
3%
Core i3
4010U
3%
FX
7500
2.
6%
User rating
Here you can see the rating of the video card by users, as well as put your own rating.
Tips and comments
Here you can ask a question about the Radeon R7 M265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 comparison
AMD Radeon R7 265
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
VS
AMD Radeon R7 265
Rating: 8 points
12 points
Top specifications and features
- GPU base clock
- RAM
- Memory Bandwidth
- Effective memory speed
- GPU memory frequency
GPU base clock
AMD Radeon R7 265: 900 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750: 1020 MHz
RAM
AMD Radeon R7 265: 2 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750: 1 GB
Memory bandwidth
AMD Radeon R7 265: 179.
2 GB/s
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750: 80.19 GB/s
Effective memory speed
AMD Radeon R7 265: 5600 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750: 5000 MHz
GPU Memory Clock
AMD Radeon R7 265: 1400 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750: 1253 MHz
Description
The AMD Radeon R7 265 graphics card is based on the GCN 1.0 architecture. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 based on Maxwell architecture. The first has 2800 million transistors. The second is 1870 million. The AMD Radeon R7 265 has a transistor size of 28 nm, versus 28.
The base clock speed for the first video card is 900 MHz versus 1020 MHz for the second.
Let’s move on to memory. AMD Radeon R7 265 has 2 GB. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 has 2 GB installed. The bandwidth of the first video card is 179.2 Gb / s versus 80.19 Gb / s of the second.
FLOPS for AMD Radeon R7 265 is 1.9. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 1.
1.
Moves to benchmark tests. In the Passmark benchmark, the AMD Radeon R7 265 scored No data points. But the second card is 3340 points. In 3DMark, the first model scored No data points. Second 3891 points.
For interfaces. The first video card is connected using No data. The second is PCIe 3.0 x16. The AMD Radeon R7 265 graphics card has Directx version 12. OpenGL version 4.6. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 graphics card has Directx version 12. OpenGL version 4.6.
Why NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 is better than AMD Radeon R7 265
- RAM 2 GB vs 1 GB, 100% more
- Memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 80.19GB/s, up 123%
- Effective memory speed 5600 MHz vs. 5000 MHz, 12% higher
- GPU memory frequency 1400 MHz vs. 1253 MHz, 12% more
- FLOPS 1.9 TFLOPS vs 1.1 TFLOPS, 73% more
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750: highlights0005
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
900MHz
max 2459
Average: 1124.9 MHz
1020MHz
max 2459
Average: 1124.9 MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
1400MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
1253MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
FLOPS
The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
1.9TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
1.
1TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
RAM
2GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
1GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
Turbo GPU
If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can switch to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
925MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
1085MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all
57.6 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
32.6 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
Architecture name
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Graphic processor name
Pitcairn
GM107
Personal capacity is the speed with which the device saves or reads information.
179.2GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
80.19GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory.
The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all
5600MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
5000MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
RAM
2GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
1GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show all
5
Mean: 4.9
5
Mean: 4. 9
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
256bit
max 8192
Average: 283.9bit
128bit
max 8192
Average: 283.9bit
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
150W
Average value: 160 W
55W
Average value: 160 W
Process technology
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
28 nm
Average: 34.7 nm
28 nm
Average: 34.7 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
2800 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
1870 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
PCIe version
Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all
3
Average: 3
3
Average: 3
Width
210mm
max 421. 7
Average: 192.1mm
145mm
max 421.7
Average: 192.1mm
DirectX
Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics
12
max 12.2
Mean: 11.4
12
max 12.2
Mean: 11.4
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
1.2
max 4.6
Average: 2.2
3
max 4. 6
Average: 2.2
opengl version
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4.2
4.6
max 4.6
Average: 4.2
Shader model version
5.1
max 6.6
Average: 5.9
5.1
max 6.6
Average: 5.9
Vulkan version
1.2
1.3
Has HDMI output
HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini-HDMI ports. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Yes
Yes
DisplayPort
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort
1
Average: 2.2
Average: 2.2
DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI
2
Mean: 1.4
2
Mean: 1.4
Number of HDMI sockets
The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
Show all
1
Average: 1.1
Average: 1.1
HDMI
Yes
Yes
FAQ
How does the AMD Radeon R7 265 perform in benchmarks?
Passmark AMD Radeon R7 265 scored No data points. The second video card in Passmark scored 3340 points.
What is the FLOPS of video cards?
FLOPS AMD Radeon R7 265 is 1.9 TFLOPS. But the second video card FLOPS is 1.1 TFLOPS.
What is the energy consumption?
AMD Radeon R7 265 150 Watt. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 55 Watt.
How fast are AMD Radeon R7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750?
AMD Radeon R7 265 runs at 900 MHz. In this case, the maximum frequency reaches 925 MHz. The clock base frequency of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 reaches 1020 MHz. In turbo mode it reaches 1085 MHz.
What kind of memory do graphics cards have?
AMD Radeon R7 265 supports GDDR5. Installed 2 GB of RAM. Bandwidth reaches 179.2 GB/s. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 works with GDDR5. The second one has 1 GB of RAM. Its throughput is 179.2 GB/s.
How many HDMI connectors do they have?
AMD Radeon R7 265 has 1 HDMI output. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 is equipped with No HDMI outputs.
What power connectors are used?
AMD Radeon R7 265 uses No data.